Unum Group 6.250% JR NT58
Unum Group 6.250% JR NT58 UNMA Peers
See (UNMA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNMA | $24.57 | +0.60% | 13.98B | 5.10 | $4.82 | +6.36% |
| BRK-A | $770,840.00 | +1.55% | 1.11T | 13.70 | $56,265.16 | N/A |
| BRK-B | $514.18 | +1.35% | 1.11T | 13.71 | $37.50 | N/A |
| AIG-PA | $62.68 | +6.02% | 112.45B | 5.48 | $11.44 | +1.90% |
| AEH | $25.67 | N/A | 52.47B | 19.37 | $1.33 | N/A |
| AED | $25.52 | N/A | 52.17B | 19.26 | $1.33 | N/A |
| AEB | $25.01 | -0.08% | 51.13B | 18.88 | $1.33 | N/A |
| AIG | $84.33 | +1.32% | 48.60B | 20.57 | $4.10 | +1.90% |
| HIG | $131.12 | +1.45% | 37.25B | 13.07 | $10.03 | +1.51% |
| HIG-PG | $25.00 | +0.40% | 36.87B | 3.42 | $7.30 | +1.51% |
Stock Comparison
UNMA vs BRK-A Comparison
UNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNMA stands at 13.98B. In comparison, BRK-A has a market cap of 1.11T. Regarding current trading prices, UNMA is priced at $24.57, while BRK-A trades at $770,840.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNMA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.10, whereas BRK-A's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, UNMA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRK-A's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UNMA is less volatile compared to BRK-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNMA.
UNMA vs BRK-B Comparison
UNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNMA stands at 13.98B. In comparison, BRK-B has a market cap of 1.11T. Regarding current trading prices, UNMA is priced at $24.57, while BRK-B trades at $514.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNMA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.10, whereas BRK-B's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, UNMA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRK-B's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UNMA is less volatile compared to BRK-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNMA.
UNMA vs AIG-PA Comparison
UNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNMA stands at 13.98B. In comparison, AIG-PA has a market cap of 112.45B. Regarding current trading prices, UNMA is priced at $24.57, while AIG-PA trades at $62.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNMA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.10, whereas AIG-PA's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, UNMA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AIG-PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UNMA is less volatile compared to AIG-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNMA.
UNMA vs AEH Comparison
UNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNMA stands at 13.98B. In comparison, AEH has a market cap of 52.47B. Regarding current trading prices, UNMA is priced at $24.57, while AEH trades at $25.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNMA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.10, whereas AEH's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, UNMA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AEH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UNMA is more volatile compared to AEH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNMA.
UNMA vs AED Comparison
UNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNMA stands at 13.98B. In comparison, AED has a market cap of 52.17B. Regarding current trading prices, UNMA is priced at $24.57, while AED trades at $25.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNMA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.10, whereas AED's P/E ratio is 19.26. In terms of profitability, UNMA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AED's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UNMA is more volatile compared to AED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNMA.
UNMA vs AEB Comparison
UNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNMA stands at 13.98B. In comparison, AEB has a market cap of 51.13B. Regarding current trading prices, UNMA is priced at $24.57, while AEB trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNMA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.10, whereas AEB's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, UNMA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AEB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UNMA is more volatile compared to AEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNMA.
UNMA vs AIG Comparison
UNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNMA stands at 13.98B. In comparison, AIG has a market cap of 48.60B. Regarding current trading prices, UNMA is priced at $24.57, while AIG trades at $84.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNMA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.10, whereas AIG's P/E ratio is 20.57. In terms of profitability, UNMA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AIG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UNMA is less volatile compared to AIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNMA.
UNMA vs HIG Comparison
UNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNMA stands at 13.98B. In comparison, HIG has a market cap of 37.25B. Regarding current trading prices, UNMA is priced at $24.57, while HIG trades at $131.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNMA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.10, whereas HIG's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, UNMA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HIG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UNMA is less volatile compared to HIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNMA.
UNMA vs HIG-PG Comparison
UNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNMA stands at 13.98B. In comparison, HIG-PG has a market cap of 36.87B. Regarding current trading prices, UNMA is priced at $24.57, while HIG-PG trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNMA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.10, whereas HIG-PG's P/E ratio is 3.42. In terms of profitability, UNMA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HIG-PG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UNMA is more volatile compared to HIG-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNMA.
UNMA vs ACGL Comparison
UNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNMA stands at 13.98B. In comparison, ACGL has a market cap of 35.45B. Regarding current trading prices, UNMA is priced at $24.57, while ACGL trades at $94.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNMA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.10, whereas ACGL's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, UNMA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ACGL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UNMA is less volatile compared to ACGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNMA.
UNMA vs ACGLO Comparison
UNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNMA stands at 13.98B. In comparison, ACGLO has a market cap of 34.19B. Regarding current trading prices, UNMA is priced at $24.57, while ACGLO trades at $20.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNMA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.10, whereas ACGLO's P/E ratio is 4.38. In terms of profitability, UNMA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ACGLO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UNMA is more volatile compared to ACGLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNMA.
UNMA vs SLF Comparison
UNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNMA stands at 13.98B. In comparison, SLF has a market cap of 32.36B. Regarding current trading prices, UNMA is priced at $24.57, while SLF trades at $56.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNMA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.10, whereas SLF's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, UNMA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UNMA is less volatile compared to SLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNMA.
UNMA vs ATH Comparison
UNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNMA stands at 13.98B. In comparison, ATH has a market cap of 19.79B. Regarding current trading prices, UNMA is priced at $24.57, while ATH trades at $83.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNMA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.10, whereas ATH's P/E ratio is 4.42. In terms of profitability, UNMA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ATH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UNMA is less volatile compared to ATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNMA.
UNMA vs PFG Comparison
UNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNMA stands at 13.98B. In comparison, PFG has a market cap of 18.28B. Regarding current trading prices, UNMA is priced at $24.57, while PFG trades at $81.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNMA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.10, whereas PFG's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, UNMA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PFG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UNMA is more volatile compared to PFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNMA.
UNMA vs EQH Comparison
UNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNMA stands at 13.98B. In comparison, EQH has a market cap of 16.29B. Regarding current trading prices, UNMA is priced at $24.57, while EQH trades at $53.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNMA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.10, whereas EQH's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, UNMA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EQH's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, UNMA is less volatile compared to EQH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNMA.
UNMA vs ACGLP Comparison
UNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNMA stands at 13.98B. In comparison, ACGLP has a market cap of 15.17B. Regarding current trading prices, UNMA is priced at $24.57, while ACGLP trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNMA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.10, whereas ACGLP's P/E ratio is 5.03. In terms of profitability, UNMA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ACGLP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UNMA is more volatile compared to ACGLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNMA.
UNMA vs BNT Comparison
UNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNMA stands at 13.98B. In comparison, BNT has a market cap of 14.47B. Regarding current trading prices, UNMA is priced at $24.57, while BNT trades at $59.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNMA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.10, whereas BNT's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, UNMA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BNT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNMA is more volatile compared to BNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNMA.
UNMA vs AEG Comparison
UNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNMA stands at 13.98B. In comparison, AEG has a market cap of 10.96B. Regarding current trading prices, UNMA is priced at $24.57, while AEG trades at $6.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNMA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.10, whereas AEG's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, UNMA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AEG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UNMA is less volatile compared to AEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNMA.
UNMA vs AIZN Comparison
UNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNMA stands at 13.98B. In comparison, AIZN has a market cap of 10.37B. Regarding current trading prices, UNMA is priced at $24.57, while AIZN trades at $20.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNMA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.10, whereas AIZN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNMA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AIZN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UNMA is less volatile compared to AIZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNMA.
UNMA vs ORI Comparison
UNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNMA stands at 13.98B. In comparison, ORI has a market cap of 9.50B. Regarding current trading prices, UNMA is priced at $24.57, while ORI trades at $38.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNMA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.10, whereas ORI's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, UNMA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ORI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNMA is less volatile compared to ORI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNMA.
UNMA vs ACGLN Comparison
UNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNMA stands at 13.98B. In comparison, ACGLN has a market cap of 6.35B. Regarding current trading prices, UNMA is priced at $24.57, while ACGLN trades at $16.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNMA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.10, whereas ACGLN's P/E ratio is 3.61. In terms of profitability, UNMA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ACGLN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UNMA is less volatile compared to ACGLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNMA.
UNMA vs EQH-PA Comparison
UNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNMA stands at 13.98B. In comparison, EQH-PA has a market cap of 6.09B. Regarding current trading prices, UNMA is priced at $24.57, while EQH-PA trades at $20.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNMA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.10, whereas EQH-PA's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, UNMA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EQH-PA's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, UNMA is less volatile compared to EQH-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNMA.
UNMA vs ATH-PE Comparison
UNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNMA stands at 13.98B. In comparison, ATH-PE has a market cap of 5.22B. Regarding current trading prices, UNMA is priced at $24.57, while ATH-PE trades at $25.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNMA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.10, whereas ATH-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNMA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ATH-PE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UNMA is more volatile compared to ATH-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNMA.
UNMA vs ATH-PC Comparison
UNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNMA stands at 13.98B. In comparison, ATH-PC has a market cap of 5.13B. Regarding current trading prices, UNMA is priced at $24.57, while ATH-PC trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNMA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.10, whereas ATH-PC's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, UNMA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ATH-PC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UNMA is more volatile compared to ATH-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNMA.
UNMA vs EQH-PC Comparison
UNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNMA stands at 13.98B. In comparison, EQH-PC has a market cap of 5.00B. Regarding current trading prices, UNMA is priced at $24.57, while EQH-PC trades at $16.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNMA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.10, whereas EQH-PC's P/E ratio is 4.33. In terms of profitability, UNMA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EQH-PC's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, UNMA is more volatile compared to EQH-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNMA.
UNMA vs ESGRP Comparison
UNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNMA stands at 13.98B. In comparison, ESGRP has a market cap of 4.99B. Regarding current trading prices, UNMA is priced at $24.57, while ESGRP trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNMA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.10, whereas ESGRP's P/E ratio is -14.17. In terms of profitability, UNMA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ESGRP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNMA is less volatile compared to ESGRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNMA.
UNMA vs ESGR Comparison
UNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNMA stands at 13.98B. In comparison, ESGR has a market cap of 4.99B. Regarding current trading prices, UNMA is priced at $24.57, while ESGR trades at $334.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNMA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.10, whereas ESGR's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, UNMA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ESGR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNMA is more volatile compared to ESGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNMA.
UNMA vs ESGRO Comparison
UNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNMA stands at 13.98B. In comparison, ESGRO has a market cap of 4.98B. Regarding current trading prices, UNMA is priced at $24.57, while ESGRO trades at $20.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNMA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.10, whereas ESGRO's P/E ratio is -13.69. In terms of profitability, UNMA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ESGRO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNMA is less volatile compared to ESGRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNMA.
UNMA vs ATH-PA Comparison
UNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNMA stands at 13.98B. In comparison, ATH-PA has a market cap of 4.85B. Regarding current trading prices, UNMA is priced at $24.57, while ATH-PA trades at $23.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNMA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.10, whereas ATH-PA's P/E ratio is 2.99. In terms of profitability, UNMA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ATH-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UNMA is less volatile compared to ATH-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNMA.
UNMA vs GSHD Comparison
UNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNMA stands at 13.98B. In comparison, GSHD has a market cap of 4.27B. Regarding current trading prices, UNMA is priced at $24.57, while GSHD trades at $113.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNMA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.10, whereas GSHD's P/E ratio is 94.86. In terms of profitability, UNMA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GSHD's ROE of +2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UNMA is less volatile compared to GSHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNMA.
UNMA vs YB Comparison
UNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNMA stands at 13.98B. In comparison, YB has a market cap of 4.05B. Regarding current trading prices, UNMA is priced at $24.57, while YB trades at $14.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNMA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.10, whereas YB's P/E ratio is 68.05. In terms of profitability, UNMA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to YB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UNMA is less volatile compared to YB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNMA.
UNMA vs ATH-PB Comparison
UNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNMA stands at 13.98B. In comparison, ATH-PB has a market cap of 3.99B. Regarding current trading prices, UNMA is priced at $24.57, while ATH-PB trades at $19.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNMA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.10, whereas ATH-PB's P/E ratio is 2.46. In terms of profitability, UNMA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ATH-PB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UNMA is less volatile compared to ATH-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNMA.
UNMA vs CNO-PA Comparison
UNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNMA stands at 13.98B. In comparison, CNO-PA has a market cap of 3.84B. Regarding current trading prices, UNMA is priced at $24.57, while CNO-PA trades at $18.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNMA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.10, whereas CNO-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNMA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CNO-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNMA is more volatile compared to CNO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNMA.
UNMA vs ATH-PD Comparison
UNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNMA stands at 13.98B. In comparison, ATH-PD has a market cap of 3.42B. Regarding current trading prices, UNMA is priced at $24.57, while ATH-PD trades at $16.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNMA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.10, whereas ATH-PD's P/E ratio is 2.11. In terms of profitability, UNMA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ATH-PD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UNMA is more volatile compared to ATH-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNMA.
UNMA vs FIHL Comparison
UNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNMA stands at 13.98B. In comparison, FIHL has a market cap of 1.96B. Regarding current trading prices, UNMA is priced at $24.57, while FIHL trades at $17.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNMA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.10, whereas FIHL's P/E ratio is -195.22. In terms of profitability, UNMA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FIHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UNMA is less volatile compared to FIHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNMA.
UNMA vs RZC Comparison
UNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNMA stands at 13.98B. In comparison, RZC has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, UNMA is priced at $24.57, while RZC trades at $25.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNMA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.10, whereas RZC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNMA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RZC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UNMA is more volatile compared to RZC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNMA.
UNMA vs IGIC Comparison
UNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNMA stands at 13.98B. In comparison, IGIC has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, UNMA is priced at $24.57, while IGIC trades at $24.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNMA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.10, whereas IGIC's P/E ratio is 8.73. In terms of profitability, UNMA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IGIC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UNMA is less volatile compared to IGIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNMA.
UNMA vs ARGD Comparison
UNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNMA stands at 13.98B. In comparison, ARGD has a market cap of 704.86M. Regarding current trading prices, UNMA is priced at $24.57, while ARGD trades at $20.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNMA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.10, whereas ARGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNMA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ARGD's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UNMA is less volatile compared to ARGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNMA.
UNMA vs WDH Comparison
UNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNMA stands at 13.98B. In comparison, WDH has a market cap of 55.70M. Regarding current trading prices, UNMA is priced at $24.57, while WDH trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNMA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.10, whereas WDH's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, UNMA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WDH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNMA is less volatile compared to WDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNMA.
UNMA vs FGF Comparison
UNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNMA stands at 13.98B. In comparison, FGF has a market cap of 20.99M. Regarding current trading prices, UNMA is priced at $24.57, while FGF trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNMA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.10, whereas FGF's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, UNMA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FGF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UNMA is more volatile compared to FGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNMA.
UNMA vs FGFPP Comparison
UNMA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNMA stands at 13.98B. In comparison, FGFPP has a market cap of 20.74M. Regarding current trading prices, UNMA is priced at $24.57, while FGFPP trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNMA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.10, whereas FGFPP's P/E ratio is -6.43. In terms of profitability, UNMA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FGFPP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UNMA is more volatile compared to FGFPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNMA.