UniCredit S.p.A.
UniCredit S.p.A. UNCFF Peers
See (UNCFF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNCFF | $70.32 | +3.87% | 109.5B | 10.00 | $7.03 | +3.87% |
| CAIXY | $2.93 | +2.09% | 187.8B | 9.13 | $0.32 | +5.67% |
| CIHKY | $32.91 | +0.58% | 162.2B | 8.38 | $3.92 | +3.58% |
| CIHHF | $6.50 | +0.00% | 157.8B | 8.33 | $0.78 | +4.29% |
| DBSDF | $38.46 | +0.00% | 108.8B | 12.49 | $3.08 | +4.46% |
| UNCRY | $35.30 | +4.59% | 108.3B | 9.88 | $3.52 | +2.50% |
| DBSDY | $148.27 | +0.92% | 105.4B | 12.05 | $12.31 | +3.71% |
| IITSF | $5.92 | +0.00% | 105.2B | 10.03 | $0.59 | +6.27% |
| BNPQY | $45.49 | +0.44% | 102.5B | 8.21 | $5.52 | +5.80% |
| BNPQF | $90.00 | -3.39% | 101.7B | 8.14 | $11.05 | +5.99% |
Stock Comparison
UNCFF vs CAIXY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, CAIXY has a market cap of 187.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while CAIXY trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas CAIXY's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CAIXY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to CAIXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs CIHKY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, CIHKY has a market cap of 162.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while CIHKY trades at $32.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas CIHKY's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CIHKY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to CIHKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs CIHHF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, CIHHF has a market cap of 157.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while CIHHF trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas CIHHF's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CIHHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to CIHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs DBSDF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, DBSDF has a market cap of 108.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while DBSDF trades at $38.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas DBSDF's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DBSDF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to DBSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs UNCRY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, UNCRY has a market cap of 108.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while UNCRY trades at $35.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas UNCRY's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UNCRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to UNCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs DBSDY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, DBSDY has a market cap of 105.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while DBSDY trades at $148.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas DBSDY's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DBSDY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to DBSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs IITSF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, IITSF has a market cap of 105.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while IITSF trades at $5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas IITSF's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IITSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to IITSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs BNPQY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, BNPQY has a market cap of 102.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while BNPQY trades at $45.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas BNPQY's P/E ratio is 8.21. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BNPQY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to BNPQY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs BNPQF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, BNPQF has a market cap of 101.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while BNPQF trades at $90.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas BNPQF's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BNPQF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to BNPQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs SBKFF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, SBKFF has a market cap of 87.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while SBKFF trades at $98.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas SBKFF's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SBKFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to SBKFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs KBCSY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, KBCSY has a market cap of 83.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while KBCSY trades at $51.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas KBCSY's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KBCSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to KBCSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs BREJY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, BREJY has a market cap of 75.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while BREJY trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas BREJY's P/E ratio is 44.20. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BREJY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to BREJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs MZHOF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, MZHOF has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while MZHOF trades at $27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas MZHOF's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MZHOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to MZHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs EBKDY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, EBKDY has a market cap of 68.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while EBKDY trades at $44.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas EBKDY's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EBKDY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to EBKDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs AKSJF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, AKSJF has a market cap of 66.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while AKSJF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas AKSJF's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AKSJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to AKSJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs PBCRY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, PBCRY has a market cap of 63.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while PBCRY trades at $12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas PBCRY's P/E ratio is 18.31. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PBCRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to PBCRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs PBCRF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, PBCRF has a market cap of 62.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while PBCRF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas PBCRF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PBCRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to PBCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs CHCJY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, CHCJY has a market cap of 62.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while CHCJY trades at $21.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas CHCJY's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHCJY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to CHCJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs CHBJF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, CHBJF has a market cap of 62.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while CHBJF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas CHBJF's P/E ratio is 6.06. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHBJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to CHBJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs LLDTF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, LLDTF has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while LLDTF trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas LLDTF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LLDTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to LLDTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs LLOBF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, LLOBF has a market cap of 61.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while LLOBF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas LLOBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LLOBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to LLOBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs CIXPF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, CIXPF has a market cap of 60.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while CIXPF trades at $8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas CIXPF's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CIXPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to CIXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs PSBKF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, PSBKF has a market cap of 60.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while PSBKF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas PSBKF's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PSBKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to PSBKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs OVCHY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, OVCHY has a market cap of 60.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while OVCHY trades at $26.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas OVCHY's P/E ratio is 10.45. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OVCHY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to OVCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs OVCHF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, OVCHF has a market cap of 58.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while OVCHF trades at $13.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas OVCHF's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OVCHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to OVCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs CRARY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, CRARY has a market cap of 56.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while CRARY trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas CRARY's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRARY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to CRARY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs CRARF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, CRARF has a market cap of 56B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while CRARF trades at $18.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas CRARF's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRARF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to CRARF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs NBNKF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, NBNKF has a market cap of 51.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while NBNKF trades at $15.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas NBNKF's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NBNKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to NBNKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs UOVEF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, UOVEF has a market cap of 50.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while UOVEF trades at $30.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas UOVEF's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UOVEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to UOVEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs NRDBY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, NRDBY has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while NRDBY trades at $14.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas NRDBY's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NRDBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to NRDBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs BHKLY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, BHKLY has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while BHKLY trades at $91.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas BHKLY's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BHKLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to BHKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs UOVEY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, UOVEY has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while UOVEY trades at $58.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas UOVEY's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UOVEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to UOVEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs BNKHF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, BNKHF has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while BNKHF trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas BNKHF's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BNKHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to BNKHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs STNDF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, STNDF has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while STNDF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas STNDF's P/E ratio is 34.09. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STNDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to STNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs SCGLY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, SCGLY has a market cap of 45.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while SCGLY trades at $11.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas SCGLY's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SCGLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to SCGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs CWESF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, CWESF has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while CWESF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas CWESF's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CWESF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to CWESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs SCGLF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, SCGLF has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while SCGLF trades at $57.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas SCGLF's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SCGLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to SCGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs DNBBF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, DNBBF has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while DNBBF trades at $26.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas DNBBF's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DNBBF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to DNBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs KBCSF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, KBCSF has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while KBCSF trades at $99.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas KBCSF's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KBCSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to KBCSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs CRZBF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, CRZBF has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while CRZBF trades at $32.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas CRZBF's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRZBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to CRZBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs CRZBY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, CRZBY has a market cap of 38.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while CRZBY trades at $34.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas CRZBY's P/E ratio is 13.32. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRZBY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to CRZBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs JPSTF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, JPSTF has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while JPSTF trades at $10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas JPSTF's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JPSTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to JPSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs DNBBY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, DNBBY has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while DNBBY trades at $25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas DNBBY's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DNBBY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to DNBBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs CEBCF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, CEBCF has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while CEBCF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas CEBCF's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CEBCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to CEBCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs BKRKF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, BKRKF has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while BKRKF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas BKRKF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BKRKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to BKRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs SVKEF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, SVKEF has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while SVKEF trades at $17.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas SVKEF's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SVKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to SVKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs BKRKY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, BKRKY has a market cap of 35.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while BKRKY trades at $11.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas BKRKY's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BKRKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to BKRKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs EBKOF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, EBKOF has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while EBKOF trades at $88.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas EBKOF's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EBKOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to EBKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs JPPTY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, JPPTY has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while JPPTY trades at $9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas JPPTY's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JPPTY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to JPPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs CMAKY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, CMAKY has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while CMAKY trades at $6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas CMAKY's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CMAKY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to CMAKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs DNKEY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, DNKEY has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while DNKEY trades at $20.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas DNKEY's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DNKEY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to DNKEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs SWDBF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, SWDBF has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while SWDBF trades at $27.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas SWDBF's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SWDBF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to SWDBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs PSZKY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, PSZKY has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while PSZKY trades at $21.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas PSZKY's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PSZKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to PSZKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs SWDBY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, SWDBY has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while SWDBY trades at $26.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas SWDBY's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SWDBY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to SWDBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs PSZKF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, PSZKF has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while PSZKF trades at $23.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas PSZKF's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PSZKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to PSZKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs MLYNF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, MLYNF has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while MLYNF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas MLYNF's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MLYNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to MLYNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs HSNGY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, HSNGY has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while HSNGY trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas HSNGY's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HSNGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to HSNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs HSNGF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, HSNGF has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while HSNGF trades at $15.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas HSNGF's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HSNGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to HSNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs BLMIF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, BLMIF has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while BLMIF trades at $19.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas BLMIF's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BLMIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to BLMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs FCNCB Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, FCNCB has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while FCNCB trades at $1,794.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas FCNCB's P/E ratio is 10.27. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FCNCB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to FCNCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs DNSKF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, DNSKF has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while DNSKF trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas DNSKF's P/E ratio is 8.06. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DNSKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to DNSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs JPHLF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, JPHLF has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while JPHLF trades at $9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas JPHLF's P/E ratio is 11.37. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JPHLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to JPHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs JPPHY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, JPPHY has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while JPPHY trades at $9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas JPPHY's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JPPHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to JPPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs PPERY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, PPERY has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while PPERY trades at $11.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas PPERY's P/E ratio is 7.66. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PPERY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to PPERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs PPERF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, PPERF has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while PPERF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas PPERF's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PPERF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to PPERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs MLYBY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, MLYBY has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while MLYBY trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas MLYBY's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MLYBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to MLYBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs BKHYY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, BKHYY has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while BKHYY trades at $96.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas BKHYY's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BKHYY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to BKHYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs GBOOF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, GBOOF has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while GBOOF trades at $8.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas GBOOF's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GBOOF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to GBOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs BKHPF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, BKHPF has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while BKHPF trades at $18.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas BKHPF's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BKHPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to BKHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs GBOOY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, GBOOY has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while GBOOY trades at $42.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas GBOOY's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GBOOY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to GBOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs CKHGY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, CKHGY has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while CKHGY trades at $97.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas CKHGY's P/E ratio is 29.45. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CKHGY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to CKHGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs CGMBF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, CGMBF has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while CGMBF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas CGMBF's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CGMBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to CGMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs SGBLY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, SGBLY has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while SGBLY trades at $13.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas SGBLY's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SGBLY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to SGBLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs RSNHF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, RSNHF has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while RSNHF trades at $8.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas RSNHF's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RSNHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to RSNHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs BDORY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, BDORY has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while BDORY trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas BDORY's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BDORY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to BDORY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs CMTDF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, CMTDF has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while CMTDF trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas CMTDF's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CMTDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to CMTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs CKHGF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, CKHGF has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while CKHGF trades at $166.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas CKHGF's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CKHGF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to CKHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs SUTNY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, SUTNY has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while SUTNY trades at $5.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas SUTNY's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SUTNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to SUTNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs BNCZF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, BNCZF has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while BNCZF trades at $12.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas BNCZF's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BNCZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to BNCZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs PBLOF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, PBLOF has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while PBLOF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas PBLOF's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PBLOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to PBLOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs SBGOF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, SBGOF has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while SBGOF trades at $11.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas SBGOF's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SBGOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to SBGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs BDOUF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, BDOUF has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while BDOUF trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas BDOUF's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BDOUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to BDOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs MDIBY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, MDIBY has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while MDIBY trades at $21.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas MDIBY's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MDIBY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to MDIBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs ISNPY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, ISNPY has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while ISNPY trades at $34.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas ISNPY's P/E ratio is 9.93. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ISNPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to ISNPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs CIMDF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, CIMDF has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while CIMDF trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas CIMDF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CIMDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to CIMDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs AIBRF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, AIBRF has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while AIBRF trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas AIBRF's P/E ratio is 7.16. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AIBRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to AIBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs GPFOF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, GPFOF has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while GPFOF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas GPFOF's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GPFOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to GPFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs AIBGY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, AIBGY has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while AIBGY trades at $15.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas AIBGY's P/E ratio is 7.07. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AIBGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to AIBGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs GPFOY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, GPFOY has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while GPFOY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas GPFOY's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GPFOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to GPFOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs MDIBF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, MDIBF has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while MDIBF trades at $18.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas MDIBF's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MDIBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to MDIBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs TKGBY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, TKGBY has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while TKGBY trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas TKGBY's P/E ratio is 6.29. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TKGBY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to TKGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs SKCBY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, SKCBY has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while SKCBY trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas SKCBY's P/E ratio is 54.31. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SKCBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to SKCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs BPXXY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, BPXXY has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while BPXXY trades at $19.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas BPXXY's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BPXXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to BPXXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs BKRIY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, BKRIY has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while BKRIY trades at $13.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas BKRIY's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BKRIY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to BKRIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs EGFEF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, EGFEF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while EGFEF trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas EGFEF's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EGFEF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to EGFEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs OTPBF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, OTPBF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while OTPBF trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas OTPBF's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OTPBF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to OTPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs BKPKF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, BKPKF has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while BKPKF trades at $48.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas BKPKF's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BKPKF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to BKPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs EGFEY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, EGFEY has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while EGFEY trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas EGFEY's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EGFEY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to EGFEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs BKRIF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 109.5B. In comparison, BKRIF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $70.32, while BKRIF trades at $13.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas BKRIF's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BKRIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to BKRIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.