UniCredit S.p.A.
UniCredit S.p.A. UNCFF Peers
See (UNCFF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNCFF | $71.56 | +1.76% | 112.1B | 10.24 | $7.03 | +6.35% |
| CAIXY | $3.08 | +5.22% | 193B | 9.38 | $0.32 | +5.52% |
| CIHKY | $33.70 | +2.40% | 163.9B | 8.64 | $3.92 | +3.51% |
| CIHHF | $6.50 | +0.00% | 157.8B | 8.33 | $0.78 | +4.29% |
| UNCRY | $35.88 | +1.64% | 112.9B | 10.30 | $3.52 | +5.07% |
| DBSDF | $38.46 | +0.00% | 108.8B | 12.61 | $3.05 | +4.46% |
| IITSF | $6.09 | +6.47% | 108.3B | 10.50 | $0.58 | +6.17% |
| DBSDY | $153.67 | +3.64% | 107.9B | 12.45 | $12.19 | +3.63% |
| BNPQY | $46.50 | +2.22% | 107.3B | 8.60 | $5.52 | +5.52% |
| BNPQF | $93.10 | +3.44% | 106.9B | 8.57 | $11.04 | +5.70% |
Stock Comparison
UNCFF vs CAIXY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, CAIXY has a market cap of 193B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while CAIXY trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas CAIXY's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CAIXY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to CAIXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs CIHKY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, CIHKY has a market cap of 163.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while CIHKY trades at $33.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas CIHKY's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CIHKY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to CIHKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs CIHHF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, CIHHF has a market cap of 157.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while CIHHF trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas CIHHF's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CIHHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to CIHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs UNCRY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, UNCRY has a market cap of 112.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while UNCRY trades at $35.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas UNCRY's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UNCRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to UNCRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs DBSDF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, DBSDF has a market cap of 108.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while DBSDF trades at $38.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas DBSDF's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DBSDF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to DBSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs IITSF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, IITSF has a market cap of 108.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while IITSF trades at $6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas IITSF's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IITSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to IITSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs DBSDY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, DBSDY has a market cap of 107.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while DBSDY trades at $153.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas DBSDY's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DBSDY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to DBSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs BNPQY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, BNPQY has a market cap of 107.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while BNPQY trades at $46.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas BNPQY's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BNPQY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to BNPQY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs BNPQF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, BNPQF has a market cap of 106.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while BNPQF trades at $93.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas BNPQF's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BNPQF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to BNPQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs SBKFF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, SBKFF has a market cap of 87.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while SBKFF trades at $101.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas SBKFF's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SBKFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to SBKFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs KBCSY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, KBCSY has a market cap of 85.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while KBCSY trades at $53.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas KBCSY's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KBCSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to KBCSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs MZHOF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, MZHOF has a market cap of 76B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while MZHOF trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas MZHOF's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MZHOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to MZHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs BREJY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, BREJY has a market cap of 75.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while BREJY trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas BREJY's P/E ratio is 44.20. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BREJY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to BREJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs EBKDY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, EBKDY has a market cap of 70.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while EBKDY trades at $46.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas EBKDY's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EBKDY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to EBKDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs AKSJF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, AKSJF has a market cap of 66.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while AKSJF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas AKSJF's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AKSJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to AKSJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs PBCRY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, PBCRY has a market cap of 64.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while PBCRY trades at $13.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas PBCRY's P/E ratio is 18.63. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PBCRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to PBCRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs LLDTF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, LLDTF has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while LLDTF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas LLDTF's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LLDTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to LLDTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs LLOBF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, LLOBF has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while LLOBF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas LLOBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LLOBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to LLOBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs PBCRF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, PBCRF has a market cap of 62.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while PBCRF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas PBCRF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PBCRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to PBCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs CHBJF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, CHBJF has a market cap of 62.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while CHBJF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas CHBJF's P/E ratio is 6.06. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHBJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to CHBJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs CHCJY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, CHCJY has a market cap of 62B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while CHCJY trades at $21.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas CHCJY's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHCJY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to CHCJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs CIXPF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, CIXPF has a market cap of 60.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while CIXPF trades at $8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas CIXPF's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CIXPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to CIXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs OVCHY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, OVCHY has a market cap of 60.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while OVCHY trades at $26.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas OVCHY's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OVCHY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to OVCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs PSBKF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, PSBKF has a market cap of 59.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while PSBKF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas PSBKF's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PSBKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to PSBKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs OVCHF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, OVCHF has a market cap of 58.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while OVCHF trades at $13.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas OVCHF's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OVCHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to OVCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs CRARY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, CRARY has a market cap of 58.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while CRARY trades at $9.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas CRARY's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRARY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to CRARY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs CRARF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, CRARF has a market cap of 57.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while CRARF trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas CRARF's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRARF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to CRARF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs NBNKF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, NBNKF has a market cap of 51.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while NBNKF trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas NBNKF's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NBNKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to NBNKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs NRDBY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, NRDBY has a market cap of 51.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while NRDBY trades at $14.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas NRDBY's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NRDBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to NRDBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs UOVEF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, UOVEF has a market cap of 50.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while UOVEF trades at $30.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas UOVEF's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UOVEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to UOVEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs UOVEY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, UOVEY has a market cap of 48.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while UOVEY trades at $58.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas UOVEY's P/E ratio is 10.66. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UOVEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to UOVEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs BHKLY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, BHKLY has a market cap of 48.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while BHKLY trades at $91.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas BHKLY's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BHKLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to BHKLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs BNKHF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, BNKHF has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while BNKHF trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas BNKHF's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BNKHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to BNKHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs SCGLY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, SCGLY has a market cap of 47.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while SCGLY trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas SCGLY's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SCGLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to SCGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs STNDF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, STNDF has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while STNDF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas STNDF's P/E ratio is 34.09. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STNDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to STNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs SCGLF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, SCGLF has a market cap of 42.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while SCGLF trades at $60.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas SCGLF's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SCGLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to SCGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs CWESF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, CWESF has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while CWESF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas CWESF's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CWESF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to CWESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs CRZBY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, CRZBY has a market cap of 39.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while CRZBY trades at $35.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas CRZBY's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRZBY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to CRZBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs KBCSF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, KBCSF has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while KBCSF trades at $105.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas KBCSF's P/E ratio is 10.16. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KBCSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to KBCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs DNBBF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, DNBBF has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while DNBBF trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas DNBBF's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DNBBF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to DNBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs DNBBY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, DNBBY has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while DNBBY trades at $25.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas DNBBY's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DNBBY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to DNBBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs JPSTF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, JPSTF has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while JPSTF trades at $10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas JPSTF's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JPSTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to JPSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs CEBCF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, CEBCF has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while CEBCF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas CEBCF's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CEBCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to CEBCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs CRZBF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, CRZBF has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while CRZBF trades at $34.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas CRZBF's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRZBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to CRZBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs BKRKF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, BKRKF has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while BKRKF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas BKRKF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BKRKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to BKRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs SVKEF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, SVKEF has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while SVKEF trades at $17.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas SVKEF's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SVKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to SVKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs BKRKY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, BKRKY has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while BKRKY trades at $11.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas BKRKY's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BKRKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to BKRKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs EBKOF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, EBKOF has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while EBKOF trades at $93.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas EBKOF's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EBKOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to EBKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs DNKEY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, DNKEY has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while DNKEY trades at $20.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas DNKEY's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DNKEY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to DNKEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs JPPTY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, JPPTY has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while JPPTY trades at $9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas JPPTY's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JPPTY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to JPPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs SWDBY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, SWDBY has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while SWDBY trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas SWDBY's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SWDBY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to SWDBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs SWDBF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, SWDBF has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while SWDBF trades at $27.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas SWDBF's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SWDBF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to SWDBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs CMAKY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, CMAKY has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while CMAKY trades at $6.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas CMAKY's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CMAKY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to CMAKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs PSZKF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, PSZKF has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while PSZKF trades at $23.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas PSZKF's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PSZKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to PSZKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs MLYNF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, MLYNF has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while MLYNF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas MLYNF's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MLYNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to MLYNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs HSNGY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, HSNGY has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while HSNGY trades at $15.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas HSNGY's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HSNGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to HSNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs HSNGF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, HSNGF has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while HSNGF trades at $15.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas HSNGF's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HSNGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to HSNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs BLMIF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, BLMIF has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while BLMIF trades at $19.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas BLMIF's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BLMIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to BLMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs FCNCB Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, FCNCB has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while FCNCB trades at $1,778.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas FCNCB's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FCNCB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to FCNCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs DNSKF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, DNSKF has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while DNSKF trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas DNSKF's P/E ratio is 8.06. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DNSKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to DNSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs JPHLF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, JPHLF has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while JPHLF trades at $9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas JPHLF's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JPHLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to JPHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs JPPHY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, JPPHY has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while JPPHY trades at $9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas JPPHY's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JPPHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to JPPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs PPERY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, PPERY has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while PPERY trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas PPERY's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PPERY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to PPERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs PSZKY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, PSZKY has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while PSZKY trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas PSZKY's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PSZKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to PSZKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs MLYBY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, MLYBY has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while MLYBY trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas MLYBY's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MLYBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to MLYBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs PPERF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, PPERF has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while PPERF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas PPERF's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PPERF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to PPERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs BKHYY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, BKHYY has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while BKHYY trades at $95.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas BKHYY's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BKHYY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to BKHYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs GBOOF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, GBOOF has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while GBOOF trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas GBOOF's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GBOOF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to GBOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs GBOOY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, GBOOY has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while GBOOY trades at $45.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas GBOOY's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GBOOY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to GBOOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs BKHPF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, BKHPF has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while BKHPF trades at $18.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas BKHPF's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BKHPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to BKHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs SBGOF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, SBGOF has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while SBGOF trades at $14.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas SBGOF's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SBGOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to SBGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs CKHGY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, CKHGY has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while CKHGY trades at $97.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas CKHGY's P/E ratio is 29.81. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CKHGY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to CKHGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs SGBLY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, SGBLY has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while SGBLY trades at $13.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas SGBLY's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SGBLY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to SGBLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs CGMBF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, CGMBF has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while CGMBF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas CGMBF's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CGMBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to CGMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs RSNHF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, RSNHF has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while RSNHF trades at $9.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas RSNHF's P/E ratio is 15.04. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RSNHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to RSNHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs BDORY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, BDORY has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while BDORY trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas BDORY's P/E ratio is 5.38. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BDORY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to BDORY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs CMTDF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, CMTDF has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while CMTDF trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas CMTDF's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CMTDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to CMTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs SUTNY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, SUTNY has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while SUTNY trades at $5.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas SUTNY's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SUTNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to SUTNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs CKHGF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, CKHGF has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while CKHGF trades at $166.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas CKHGF's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CKHGF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to CKHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs BNCZF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, BNCZF has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while BNCZF trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas BNCZF's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BNCZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to BNCZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs PBLOF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, PBLOF has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while PBLOF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas PBLOF's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PBLOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to PBLOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs MDIBY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, MDIBY has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while MDIBY trades at $21.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas MDIBY's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MDIBY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to MDIBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs ISNPY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, ISNPY has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while ISNPY trades at $35.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas ISNPY's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ISNPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to ISNPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs BDOUF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, BDOUF has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while BDOUF trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas BDOUF's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BDOUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to BDOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs CIMDF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, CIMDF has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while CIMDF trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas CIMDF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CIMDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to CIMDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs AIBGY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, AIBGY has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while AIBGY trades at $15.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas AIBGY's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AIBGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to AIBGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs AIBRF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, AIBRF has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while AIBRF trades at $7.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas AIBRF's P/E ratio is 7.02. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AIBRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to AIBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs GPFOF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, GPFOF has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while GPFOF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas GPFOF's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GPFOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to GPFOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs GPFOY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, GPFOY has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while GPFOY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas GPFOY's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GPFOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to GPFOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs MDIBF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, MDIBF has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while MDIBF trades at $18.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas MDIBF's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MDIBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to MDIBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs TKGBY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, TKGBY has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while TKGBY trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas TKGBY's P/E ratio is 6.29. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TKGBY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to TKGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs SKCBY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, SKCBY has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while SKCBY trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas SKCBY's P/E ratio is 54.31. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SKCBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to SKCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs BKPKF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, BKPKF has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while BKPKF trades at $48.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas BKPKF's P/E ratio is 7.08. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BKPKF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to BKPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs BPXXY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, BPXXY has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while BPXXY trades at $19.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas BPXXY's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BPXXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to BPXXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs BKRIY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, BKRIY has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while BKRIY trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas BKRIY's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BKRIY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to BKRIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs EGFEF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, EGFEF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while EGFEF trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas EGFEF's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EGFEF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to EGFEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs BKRIF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, BKRIF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while BKRIF trades at $14.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas BKRIF's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BKRIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to BKRIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs OTPBF Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, OTPBF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while OTPBF trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas OTPBF's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OTPBF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is more volatile compared to OTPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.
UNCFF vs EGFEY Comparison
UNCFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNCFF stands at 112.1B. In comparison, EGFEY has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNCFF is priced at $71.56, while EGFEY trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNCFF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas EGFEY's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, UNCFF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EGFEY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UNCFF is less volatile compared to EGFEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNCFF.