Umicore SA

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, VLTO has a market cap of 23.64B. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while VLTO trades at $95.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas VLTO's P/E ratio is 27.25. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to VLTO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to VLTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, AQUA has a market cap of 6.10B. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while AQUA trades at $49.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas AQUA's P/E ratio is 77.94. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to AQUA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to AQUA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, ZWS has a market cap of 5.76B. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while ZWS trades at $34.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas ZWS's P/E ratio is 35.69. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to ZWS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to ZWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, FSS has a market cap of 5.33B. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while FSS trades at $87.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas FSS's P/E ratio is 24.97. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to FSS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to FSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, KTWIY has a market cap of 3.82B. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while KTWIY trades at $67.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas KTWIY's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to KTWIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to KTWIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, KTWIF has a market cap of 3.81B. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while KTWIF trades at $33.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas KTWIF's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to KTWIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to KTWIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, MMNNF has a market cap of 3.56B. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while MMNNF trades at $19.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas MMNNF's P/E ratio is 35.44. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to MMNNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to MMNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, ATMU has a market cap of 2.94B. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while ATMU trades at $35.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas ATMU's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to ATMU's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to ATMU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, ORGJF has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while ORGJF trades at $53.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas ORGJF's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to ORGJF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to ORGJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, UMICY has a market cap of 2.16B. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while UMICY trades at $2.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas UMICY's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to UMICY's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to UMICY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, CCVTF has a market cap of 1.68B. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while CCVTF trades at $0.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas CCVTF's P/E ratio is 5.85. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to CCVTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to CCVTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, PCTTU has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while PCTTU trades at $8.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas PCTTU's P/E ratio is -12.92. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to PCTTU's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to PCTTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, PCT has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while PCT trades at $6.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas PCT's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to PCT's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to PCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, HIZOF has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while HIZOF trades at $6.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas HIZOF's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to HIZOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to HIZOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, CECO has a market cap of 896.86M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while CECO trades at $25.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas CECO's P/E ratio is 19.56. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to CECO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to CECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, ERII has a market cap of 814.77M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while ERII trades at $14.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas ERII's P/E ratio is 37.20. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to ERII's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to ERII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, TKUMF has a market cap of 723.53M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while TKUMF trades at $9.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas TKUMF's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to TKUMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to TKUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, MTWTF has a market cap of 537.41M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while MTWTF trades at $12.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas MTWTF's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to MTWTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to MTWTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, PVARF has a market cap of 423.21M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while PVARF trades at $9.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas PVARF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to PVARF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to PVARF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, CECE has a market cap of 400.99M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while CECE trades at $11.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas CECE's P/E ratio is 58.25. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to CECE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to CECE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, GRPRF has a market cap of 307.79M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while GRPRF trades at $0.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas GRPRF's P/E ratio is 31.65. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to GRPRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to GRPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, PCTTW has a market cap of 245.79M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while PCTTW trades at $1.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas PCTTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to PCTTW's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to PCTTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, ARQ has a market cap of 179.41M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while ARQ trades at $4.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas ARQ's P/E ratio is -30.36. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to ARQ's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to ARQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, AKCCF has a market cap of 158.07M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while AKCCF trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas AKCCF's P/E ratio is -8.72. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to AKCCF's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to AKCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, ACTHF has a market cap of 148.38M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while ACTHF trades at $5.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas ACTHF's P/E ratio is -6.34. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to ACTHF's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to ACTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, ADES has a market cap of 111.72M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while ADES trades at $3.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas ADES's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to ADES's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to ADES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, MEEC has a market cap of 72.11M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while MEEC trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas MEEC's P/E ratio is -75.00. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to MEEC's ROE of +16.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to MEEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, EMFGF has a market cap of 42.81M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while EMFGF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas EMFGF's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to EMFGF's ROE of +385.57%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to EMFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, SCWO has a market cap of 42.29M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while SCWO trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas SCWO's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to SCWO's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to SCWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, SSHPF has a market cap of 40.66M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while SSHPF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas SSHPF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to SSHPF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to SSHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, SREMF has a market cap of 33.75M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while SREMF trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas SREMF's P/E ratio is -7.48. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to SREMF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to SREMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, CLIR has a market cap of 30.93M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while CLIR trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas CLIR's P/E ratio is -5.36. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to CLIR's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to CLIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, BHTG has a market cap of 29.46M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while BHTG trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas BHTG's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to BHTG's ROE of -7.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to BHTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, FTEK has a market cap of 29.05M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while FTEK trades at $0.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas FTEK's P/E ratio is -15.74. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to FTEK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to FTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, SCAXF has a market cap of 25.26M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while SCAXF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas SCAXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to SCAXF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to SCAXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, YEWTF has a market cap of 25.13M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while YEWTF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas YEWTF's P/E ratio is -7.60. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to YEWTF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to YEWTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, PGTK has a market cap of 23.56M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while PGTK trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas PGTK's P/E ratio is 3.46. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to PGTK's ROE of -2.79%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to PGTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, BIRMF has a market cap of 20.98M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while BIRMF trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas BIRMF's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to BIRMF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to BIRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, TOMZ has a market cap of 16.21M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while TOMZ trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas TOMZ's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to TOMZ's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to TOMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, TMGEF has a market cap of 13.78M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while TMGEF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas TMGEF's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to TMGEF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to TMGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, LIQT has a market cap of 13.26M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while LIQT trades at $1.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas LIQT's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to LIQT's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to LIQT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, ZONE has a market cap of 11.51M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while ZONE trades at $1.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas ZONE's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to ZONE's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to ZONE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, GRNWF has a market cap of 10.51M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while GRNWF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas GRNWF's P/E ratio is -6.70. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to GRNWF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to GRNWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, INTWF has a market cap of 10.38M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while INTWF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas INTWF's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to INTWF's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to INTWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, CLWT has a market cap of 8.10M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while CLWT trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas CLWT's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to CLWT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to CLWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, QUTIF has a market cap of 6.88M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while QUTIF trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas QUTIF's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to QUTIF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to QUTIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, BNET has a market cap of 6.79M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while BNET trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas BNET's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to BNET's ROE of +3.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to BNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, DNDDF has a market cap of 6.46M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while DNDDF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas DNDDF's P/E ratio is -5.03. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to DNDDF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to DNDDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, QWTR has a market cap of 5.94M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while QWTR trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas QWTR's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to QWTR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to QWTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, DEVS has a market cap of 5.81M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while DEVS trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas DEVS's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to DEVS's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to DEVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, AETLF has a market cap of 5.17M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while AETLF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas AETLF's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to AETLF's ROE of -3.37%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to AETLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, COSLF has a market cap of 4.83M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while COSLF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas COSLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to COSLF's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to COSLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, DRFS has a market cap of 3.93M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while DRFS trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas DRFS's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to DRFS's ROE of -3.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to DRFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, GOGR has a market cap of 3.00M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while GOGR trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas GOGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to GOGR's ROE of +1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to GOGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, KNOS has a market cap of 2.64M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while KNOS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas KNOS's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to KNOS's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to KNOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, DCTIF has a market cap of 2.50M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while DCTIF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas DCTIF's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to DCTIF's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to DCTIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, ENPRF has a market cap of 2.29M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while ENPRF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas ENPRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to ENPRF's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to ENPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, RAINW has a market cap of 1.96M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while RAINW trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas RAINW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to RAINW's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to RAINW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, MKUL has a market cap of 1.87M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while MKUL trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas MKUL's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to MKUL's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to MKUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, MGON has a market cap of 1.78M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while MGON trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas MGON's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to MGON's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to MGON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, DOCKF has a market cap of 1.43M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while DOCKF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas DOCKF's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to DOCKF's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to DOCKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, OWUV has a market cap of 1.32M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while OWUV trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas OWUV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to OWUV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to OWUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, EAWD has a market cap of 901679.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while EAWD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas EAWD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to EAWD's ROE of +3.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to EAWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, RAKR has a market cap of 628764.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while RAKR trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas RAKR's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to RAKR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to RAKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, ATMFF has a market cap of 527959.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while ATMFF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas ATMFF's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to ATMFF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to ATMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, ATGVF has a market cap of 472330.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while ATGVF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas ATGVF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to ATGVF's ROE of -9.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to ATGVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, LQWC has a market cap of 467284.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while LQWC trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas LQWC's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to LQWC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to LQWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, TGTMF has a market cap of 463000.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while TGTMF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas TGTMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to TGTMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to TGTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, SFBE has a market cap of 427149.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while SFBE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas SFBE's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to SFBE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to SFBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, GWTR has a market cap of 332021.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while GWTR trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas GWTR's P/E ratio is 0.26. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to GWTR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to GWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, GMEV has a market cap of 270544.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while GMEV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas GMEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to GMEV's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to GMEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, TNKE has a market cap of 265934.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while TNKE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas TNKE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to TNKE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to TNKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, EESH has a market cap of 110797.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while EESH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas EESH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to EESH's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to EESH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, XLPI has a market cap of 86265.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while XLPI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas XLPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to XLPI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to XLPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, PCTL has a market cap of 80560.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while PCTL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas PCTL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to PCTL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to PCTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, WTII has a market cap of 77017.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while WTII trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas WTII's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to WTII's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to WTII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, ESFS has a market cap of 75086.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while ESFS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas ESFS's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to ESFS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to ESFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, SPECW has a market cap of 71552.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while SPECW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas SPECW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to SPECW's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to SPECW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, MSBN has a market cap of 53168.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while MSBN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas MSBN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to MSBN's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to MSBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, GLEC has a market cap of 49990.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while GLEC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas GLEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to GLEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to GLEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, AKMYF has a market cap of 35252.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while AKMYF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas AKMYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to AKMYF's ROE of +9.34%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to AKMYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, ETII has a market cap of 26205.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while ETII trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas ETII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to ETII's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to ETII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, WTNW has a market cap of 24267.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while WTNW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas WTNW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to WTNW's ROE of +2.69%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to WTNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, SPEC has a market cap of 20402.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while SPEC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas SPEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to SPEC's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to SPEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, SINX has a market cap of 18953.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while SINX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas SINX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to SINX's ROE of +2.98%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to SINX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, GCHK has a market cap of 16136.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while GCHK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas GCHK's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to GCHK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to GCHK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, SYEV has a market cap of 15984.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while SYEV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas SYEV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to SYEV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to SYEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, UVFT has a market cap of 13416.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while UVFT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas UVFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to UVFT's ROE of +1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to UVFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, PURA has a market cap of 11414.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while PURA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas PURA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to PURA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to PURA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, SMVS has a market cap of 8523.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while SMVS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas SMVS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to SMVS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to SMVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, GRCO has a market cap of 8291.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while GRCO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas GRCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to GRCO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to GRCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, CGYV has a market cap of 6210.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while CGYV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas CGYV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to CGYV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to CGYV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, ROBXF has a market cap of 5605.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while ROBXF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas ROBXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to ROBXF's ROE of +12.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to ROBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, EMHI has a market cap of 4017.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while EMHI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas EMHI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to EMHI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to EMHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, RENO has a market cap of 3520.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while RENO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas RENO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to RENO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to RENO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, EAUI has a market cap of 2858.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while EAUI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas EAUI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to EAUI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to EAUI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, MPML has a market cap of 1001.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while MPML trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas MPML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to MPML's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to MPML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, HTHL has a market cap of 229.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while HTHL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas HTHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to HTHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to HTHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, FQCC has a market cap of 4.00. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while FQCC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas FQCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to FQCC's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to FQCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, AERC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while AERC trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas AERC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to AERC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to AERC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.

UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.34B. In comparison, NEWA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $9.72, while NEWA trades at $4.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas NEWA's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to NEWA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to NEWA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.