Umicore SA
Umicore SA UMICF Peers
See (UMICF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMICF | $11.05 | +7.80% | 2.7B | -1.58 | -$6.99 | +5.77% |
| COSLF | $0.01 | +122900.00% | 5.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| KTWIF | $39.44 | +16.34% | 4.4B | 31.55 | $1.25 | +1.58% |
| KTWIY | $73.93 | -3.33% | 4.2B | 29.45 | $2.51 | N/A |
| MMNNF | $19.60 | +0.56% | 3.6B | 35.64 | $0.55 | +0.37% |
| UMICY | $2.68 | +0.76% | 2.6B | -1.53 | -$1.75 | +6.22% |
| CCVTF | $1.17 | +24.96% | 2.1B | 7.31 | $0.16 | +3.30% |
| ORGJF | $42.37 | -20.10% | 1.9B | 13.41 | $3.16 | +2.33% |
| HIZOF | $6.59 | -0.90% | 1.1B | 7.24 | $0.91 | +0.02% |
| TKUMF | $9.18 | N/A | 701.5M | 12.41 | $0.74 | +2.16% |
Stock Comparison
UMICF vs COSLF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, COSLF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while COSLF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas COSLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to COSLF's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to COSLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs KTWIF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, KTWIF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while KTWIF trades at $39.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas KTWIF's P/E ratio is 31.55. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to KTWIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF and KTWIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMICF vs KTWIY Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, KTWIY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while KTWIY trades at $73.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas KTWIY's P/E ratio is 29.45. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to KTWIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to KTWIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs MMNNF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MMNNF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while MMNNF trades at $19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas MMNNF's P/E ratio is 35.64. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to MMNNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF and MMNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMICF vs UMICY Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, UMICY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while UMICY trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas UMICY's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to UMICY's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to UMICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs CCVTF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CCVTF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while CCVTF trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas CCVTF's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to CCVTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF and CCVTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMICF vs ORGJF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ORGJF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while ORGJF trades at $42.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas ORGJF's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to ORGJF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF and ORGJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMICF vs HIZOF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, HIZOF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while HIZOF trades at $6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas HIZOF's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to HIZOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to HIZOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs TKUMF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TKUMF has a market cap of 701.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while TKUMF trades at $9.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas TKUMF's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to TKUMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF and TKUMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMICF vs MTWTF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MTWTF has a market cap of 671.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while MTWTF trades at $15.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas MTWTF's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to MTWTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to MTWTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs PVARF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PVARF has a market cap of 423.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while PVARF trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas PVARF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to PVARF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to PVARF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs GRPRF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GRPRF has a market cap of 330.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while GRPRF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas GRPRF's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to GRPRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to GRPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs AKCCF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, AKCCF has a market cap of 170.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while AKCCF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas AKCCF's P/E ratio is -9.42. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to AKCCF's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to AKCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs ACTHF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ACTHF has a market cap of 148.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while ACTHF trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas ACTHF's P/E ratio is -6.34. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to ACTHF's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF and ACTHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMICF vs MEEC Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MEEC has a market cap of 72.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while MEEC trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas MEEC's P/E ratio is -75.00. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to MEEC's ROE of -36.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to MEEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs SSHPF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SSHPF has a market cap of 69.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while SSHPF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas SSHPF's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to SSHPF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF and SSHPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMICF vs EMFGF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, EMFGF has a market cap of 35.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while EMFGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas EMFGF's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to EMFGF's ROE of +385.57%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF and EMFGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMICF vs SCAXF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SCAXF has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while SCAXF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas SCAXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to SCAXF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to SCAXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs YEWTF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, YEWTF has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while YEWTF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas YEWTF's P/E ratio is -7.60. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to YEWTF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to YEWTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs PGTK Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PGTK has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while PGTK trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas PGTK's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to PGTK's ROE of -2.79%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF and PGTK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMICF vs SREMF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SREMF has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while SREMF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas SREMF's P/E ratio is -5.47. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to SREMF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF and SREMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMICF vs BIRMF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BIRMF has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while BIRMF trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas BIRMF's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to BIRMF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to BIRMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs TMGEF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TMGEF has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while TMGEF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas TMGEF's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to TMGEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF and TMGEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMICF vs INTWF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, INTWF has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while INTWF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas INTWF's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to INTWF's ROE of -3.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF and INTWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMICF vs DNDDF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DNDDF has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while DNDDF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas DNDDF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to DNDDF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to DNDDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs BNET Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BNET has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while BNET trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas BNET's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to BNET's ROE of +1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to BNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs QUTIF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, QUTIF has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while QUTIF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas QUTIF's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to QUTIF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF and QUTIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMICF vs GRNWF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GRNWF has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while GRNWF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas GRNWF's P/E ratio is -6.44. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to GRNWF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to GRNWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs TGTMF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TGTMF has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while TGTMF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas TGTMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to TGTMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to TGTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs ENPRF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ENPRF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while ENPRF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas ENPRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to ENPRF's ROE of -3.71%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF and ENPRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMICF vs QWTR Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, QWTR has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while QWTR trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas QWTR's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to QWTR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to QWTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs AETLF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, AETLF has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while AETLF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas AETLF's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to AETLF's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF and AETLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMICF vs DCTIF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DCTIF has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while DCTIF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas DCTIF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to DCTIF's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF and DCTIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMICF vs DRFS Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DRFS has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while DRFS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas DRFS's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to DRFS's ROE of -4.50%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF and DRFS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMICF vs ROBXF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ROBXF has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while ROBXF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas ROBXF's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to ROBXF's ROE of +12.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to ROBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs KNOS Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, KNOS has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while KNOS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas KNOS's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to KNOS's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to KNOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs DOCKF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DOCKF has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while DOCKF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas DOCKF's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to DOCKF's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF and DOCKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMICF vs GOGR Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GOGR has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while GOGR trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas GOGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to GOGR's ROE of +1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF and GOGR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMICF vs MGON Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MGON has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while MGON trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas MGON's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to MGON's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF and MGON have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMICF vs OWUV Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, OWUV has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while OWUV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas OWUV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to OWUV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF and OWUV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMICF vs ATGVF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ATGVF has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while ATGVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas ATGVF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to ATGVF's ROE of -9.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF and ATGVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMICF vs EAWD Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, EAWD has a market cap of 901.7K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while EAWD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas EAWD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to EAWD's ROE of +3.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to EAWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs LQWC Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, LQWC has a market cap of 587.9K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while LQWC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas LQWC's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to LQWC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to LQWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs ATMFF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ATMFF has a market cap of 528K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while ATMFF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas ATMFF's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to ATMFF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to ATMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs RAKR Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, RAKR has a market cap of 476.6K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while RAKR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas RAKR's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to RAKR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to RAKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs SFBE Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SFBE has a market cap of 427.1K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while SFBE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas SFBE's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to SFBE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF and SFBE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMICF vs GWTR Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GWTR has a market cap of 320.6K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while GWTR trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas GWTR's P/E ratio is 0.28. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to GWTR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF and GWTR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMICF vs EESH Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, EESH has a market cap of 277K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while EESH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas EESH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to EESH's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to EESH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs TNKE Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TNKE has a market cap of 265.9K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while TNKE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas TNKE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to TNKE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF and TNKE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMICF vs PURA Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PURA has a market cap of 114.1K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while PURA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas PURA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to PURA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF and PURA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMICF vs MSBN Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MSBN has a market cap of 106.3K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while MSBN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas MSBN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to MSBN's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to MSBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs WTII Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, WTII has a market cap of 84.7K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while WTII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas WTII's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to WTII's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to WTII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs PCTL Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PCTL has a market cap of 80.6K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while PCTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas PCTL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to PCTL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF and PCTL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMICF vs GLEC Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GLEC has a market cap of 50K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while GLEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas GLEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to GLEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF and GLEC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMICF vs SINX Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SINX has a market cap of 47.4K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while SINX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas SINX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to SINX's ROE of +2.98%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to SINX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs MPML Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MPML has a market cap of 36.1K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while MPML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas MPML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to MPML's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to MPML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs AKMYF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, AKMYF has a market cap of 35.3K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while AKMYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas AKMYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to AKMYF's ROE of +9.34%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to AKMYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs XLPI Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, XLPI has a market cap of 31.4K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while XLPI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas XLPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to XLPI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF and XLPI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMICF vs CGYV Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CGYV has a market cap of 31.1K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while CGYV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas CGYV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to CGYV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to CGYV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs ETII Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ETII has a market cap of 26.2K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while ETII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas ETII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to ETII's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF and ETII have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMICF vs WTNW Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, WTNW has a market cap of 24.3K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while WTNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas WTNW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to WTNW's ROE of +2.69%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF and WTNW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMICF vs GCHK Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GCHK has a market cap of 16.1K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while GCHK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas GCHK's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to GCHK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF and GCHK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMICF vs SYEV Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SYEV has a market cap of 16K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while SYEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas SYEV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to SYEV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF and SYEV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMICF vs ESFS Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ESFS has a market cap of 15K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while ESFS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas ESFS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to ESFS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to ESFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs UVFT Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, UVFT has a market cap of 13.4K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while UVFT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas UVFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to UVFT's ROE of +1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF and UVFT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMICF vs SMVS Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SMVS has a market cap of 8.5K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while SMVS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas SMVS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to SMVS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF and SMVS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMICF vs GRCO Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GRCO has a market cap of 8.3K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while GRCO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas GRCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to GRCO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF and GRCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMICF vs HTHL Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, HTHL has a market cap of 6.9K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while HTHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas HTHL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to HTHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to HTHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs GMEV Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GMEV has a market cap of 5.4K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while GMEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas GMEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to GMEV's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF and GMEV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMICF vs EMHI Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, EMHI has a market cap of 4K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while EMHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas EMHI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to EMHI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF and EMHI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMICF vs RENO Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, RENO has a market cap of 3.5K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while RENO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas RENO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to RENO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF and RENO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMICF vs EAUI Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, EAUI has a market cap of 2.9K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while EAUI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas EAUI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to EAUI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF and EAUI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
UMICF vs FQCC Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FQCC has a market cap of 4. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $11.05, while FQCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas FQCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to FQCC's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to FQCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.