Umicore SA
Umicore SA UMICF Peers
See (UMICF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMICF | $15.62 | +5.19% | 3.8B | -2.19 | -$7.13 | +3.59% |
| KTWIY | $82.09 | +10.83% | 4.6B | 32.92 | $2.47 | N/A |
| KTWIF | $39.71 | -0.01% | 4.4B | 31.85 | $1.24 | +1.58% |
| UMICY | $4.18 | +9.71% | 3.9B | -2.29 | -$1.78 | +3.59% |
| MMNNF | $16.50 | +16.53% | 3B | 30.56 | $0.54 | +0.50% |
| CCVTF | $1.17 | +0.00% | 2.1B | 7.31 | $0.16 | +0.46% |
| ORGJF | $53.03 | +0.00% | 1.9B | 13.41 | $3.16 | +2.33% |
| HIZOF | $6.72 | +0.00% | 1.1B | 7.24 | $0.91 | +0.02% |
| TKUMF | $9.18 | +0.00% | 701.5M | 12.41 | $0.74 | +2.16% |
| MTWTF | $12.31 | -0.04% | 671.2M | 17.09 | $0.90 | +1.10% |
Stock Comparison
UMICF vs KTWIY Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, KTWIY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while KTWIY trades at $82.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas KTWIY's P/E ratio is 32.92. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to KTWIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to KTWIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs KTWIF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, KTWIF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while KTWIF trades at $39.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas KTWIF's P/E ratio is 31.85. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to KTWIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to KTWIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs UMICY Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, UMICY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while UMICY trades at $4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas UMICY's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to UMICY's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to UMICY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs MMNNF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MMNNF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while MMNNF trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas MMNNF's P/E ratio is 30.56. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to MMNNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to MMNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs CCVTF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CCVTF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while CCVTF trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas CCVTF's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to CCVTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to CCVTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs ORGJF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ORGJF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while ORGJF trades at $53.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas ORGJF's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to ORGJF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to ORGJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs HIZOF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, HIZOF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while HIZOF trades at $6.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas HIZOF's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to HIZOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to HIZOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs TKUMF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, TKUMF has a market cap of 701.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while TKUMF trades at $9.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas TKUMF's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to TKUMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to TKUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs MTWTF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MTWTF has a market cap of 671.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while MTWTF trades at $12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas MTWTF's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to MTWTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to MTWTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs GRPRF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GRPRF has a market cap of 364.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while GRPRF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas GRPRF's P/E ratio is 37.50. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to GRPRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to GRPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs PVARF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PVARF has a market cap of 305.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while PVARF trades at $10.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas PVARF's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to PVARF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to PVARF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs ACTHF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ACTHF has a market cap of 148.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while ACTHF trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas ACTHF's P/E ratio is -6.34. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to ACTHF's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to ACTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs SREMF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SREMF has a market cap of 72.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while SREMF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas SREMF's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to SREMF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to SREMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs MEEC Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MEEC has a market cap of 72.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while MEEC trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas MEEC's P/E ratio is -75.00. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to MEEC's ROE of -36.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to MEEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs SSHPF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SSHPF has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while SSHPF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas SSHPF's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to SSHPF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to SSHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs EMFGF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, EMFGF has a market cap of 43.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while EMFGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas EMFGF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to EMFGF's ROE of +385.57%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to EMFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs BIRMF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BIRMF has a market cap of 26.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while BIRMF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas BIRMF's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to BIRMF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to BIRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs YEWTF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, YEWTF has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while YEWTF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas YEWTF's P/E ratio is -7.60. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to YEWTF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to YEWTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs AKCCF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AKCCF has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while AKCCF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas AKCCF's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to AKCCF's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to AKCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs TMGEF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, TMGEF has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while TMGEF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas TMGEF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to TMGEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to TMGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs ENPRF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ENPRF has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while ENPRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas ENPRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to ENPRF's ROE of -3.71%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to ENPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs EESH Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, EESH has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while EESH trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas EESH's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to EESH's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to EESH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs INTWF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, INTWF has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while INTWF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas INTWF's P/E ratio is -3.62. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to INTWF's ROE of -3.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to INTWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs DNDDF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DNDDF has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while DNDDF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas DNDDF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to DNDDF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to DNDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs BNET Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BNET has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while BNET trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas BNET's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to BNET's ROE of +1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to BNET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs GRNWF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GRNWF has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while GRNWF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas GRNWF's P/E ratio is -6.76. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to GRNWF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to GRNWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs QUTIF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, QUTIF has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while QUTIF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas QUTIF's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to QUTIF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to QUTIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs AETLF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AETLF has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while AETLF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas AETLF's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to AETLF's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to AETLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs COSLF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, COSLF has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while COSLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas COSLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to COSLF's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to COSLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs RAKR Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, RAKR has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while RAKR trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas RAKR's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to RAKR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to RAKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs DCTIF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DCTIF has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while DCTIF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas DCTIF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to DCTIF's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to DCTIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs GOGR Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GOGR has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while GOGR trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas GOGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to GOGR's ROE of +1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to GOGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs QWTR Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, QWTR has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while QWTR trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas QWTR's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to QWTR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to QWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs DRFS Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DRFS has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while DRFS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas DRFS's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to DRFS's ROE of -4.50%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to DRFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs SCAXF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SCAXF has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while SCAXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas SCAXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to SCAXF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to SCAXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs KNOS Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, KNOS has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while KNOS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas KNOS's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to KNOS's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to KNOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs DOCKF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DOCKF has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while DOCKF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas DOCKF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to DOCKF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to DOCKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs MGON Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MGON has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while MGON trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas MGON's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to MGON's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to MGON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs OWUV Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, OWUV has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while OWUV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas OWUV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to OWUV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to OWUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs EAWD Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, EAWD has a market cap of 614.8K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while EAWD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas EAWD's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to EAWD's ROE of +3.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to EAWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs ATMFF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ATMFF has a market cap of 528K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while ATMFF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas ATMFF's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to ATMFF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to ATMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs TGTMF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, TGTMF has a market cap of 467.1K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while TGTMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas TGTMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to TGTMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to TGTMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs LQWC Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, LQWC has a market cap of 434.1K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while LQWC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas LQWC's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to LQWC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to LQWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs SFBE Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SFBE has a market cap of 427.1K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while SFBE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas SFBE's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to SFBE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to SFBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs ATGVF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ATGVF has a market cap of 404.7K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while ATGVF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas ATGVF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to ATGVF's ROE of -9.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to ATGVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs GMEV Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GMEV has a market cap of 270.5K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while GMEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas GMEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to GMEV's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to GMEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs TNKE Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, TNKE has a market cap of 265.9K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while TNKE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas TNKE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to TNKE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to TNKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs GWTR Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GWTR has a market cap of 251.9K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while GWTR trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas GWTR's P/E ratio is 0.20. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to GWTR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to GWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs PCTL Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PCTL has a market cap of 80.6K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while PCTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas PCTL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to PCTL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to PCTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs WTII Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, WTII has a market cap of 77K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while WTII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas WTII's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to WTII's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to WTII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs ESFS Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ESFS has a market cap of 75.1K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while ESFS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas ESFS's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to ESFS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to ESFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs MSBN Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MSBN has a market cap of 53.2K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while MSBN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas MSBN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to MSBN's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to MSBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs GLEC Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GLEC has a market cap of 50K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while GLEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas GLEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to GLEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to GLEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs AKMYF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AKMYF has a market cap of 35.3K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while AKMYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas AKMYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to AKMYF's ROE of +9.34%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is less volatile compared to AKMYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs XLPI Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, XLPI has a market cap of 31.4K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while XLPI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas XLPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to XLPI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to XLPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs ETII Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ETII has a market cap of 26.2K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while ETII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas ETII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to ETII's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to ETII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs PGTK Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PGTK has a market cap of 26.2K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while PGTK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas PGTK's P/E ratio is 3.77. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to PGTK's ROE of -2.79%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to PGTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs WTNW Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, WTNW has a market cap of 24.3K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while WTNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas WTNW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to WTNW's ROE of +2.69%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to WTNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs SINX Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SINX has a market cap of 19K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while SINX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas SINX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to SINX's ROE of +2.98%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to SINX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs GCHK Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GCHK has a market cap of 16.1K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while GCHK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas GCHK's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to GCHK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to GCHK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs UVFT Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, UVFT has a market cap of 13.4K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while UVFT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas UVFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to UVFT's ROE of +1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to UVFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs PURA Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PURA has a market cap of 11.4K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while PURA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas PURA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to PURA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to PURA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs SMVS Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SMVS has a market cap of 8.5K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while SMVS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas SMVS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to SMVS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to SMVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs GRCO Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GRCO has a market cap of 8.3K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while GRCO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas GRCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to GRCO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to GRCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs CGYV Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CGYV has a market cap of 6.2K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while CGYV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas CGYV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to CGYV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to CGYV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs ROBXF Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ROBXF has a market cap of 5.6K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while ROBXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas ROBXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to ROBXF's ROE of +12.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to ROBXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs SYEV Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SYEV has a market cap of 5.3K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while SYEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas SYEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to SYEV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to SYEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs EMHI Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, EMHI has a market cap of 4K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while EMHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas EMHI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to EMHI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to EMHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs RENO Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, RENO has a market cap of 3.5K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while RENO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas RENO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to RENO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to RENO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs EAUI Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, EAUI has a market cap of 2.9K. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while EAUI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas EAUI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to EAUI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to EAUI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs HTHL Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, HTHL has a market cap of 229. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while HTHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas HTHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to HTHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to HTHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs MPML Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MPML has a market cap of 10. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while MPML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas MPML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to MPML's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to MPML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.
UMICF vs FQCC Comparison
UMICF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMICF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, FQCC has a market cap of 4. Regarding current trading prices, UMICF is priced at $15.62, while FQCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMICF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.19, whereas FQCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMICF's ROE is -0.66%, compared to FQCC's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMICF is more volatile compared to FQCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMICF.