Ultra Brands Ltd.

ULTA.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA.CN stands at 277319.00. In comparison, DC-A.TO has a market cap of 182.54M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA.CN is priced at $0.02, while DC-A.TO trades at $2.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas DC-A.TO's P/E ratio is 3.30. In terms of profitability, ULTA.CN's ROE is +0.62%, compared to DC-A.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA.CN is less volatile compared to DC-A.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.CN.

ULTA.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA.CN stands at 277319.00. In comparison, OPTI.CN has a market cap of 21.70M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA.CN is priced at $0.02, while OPTI.CN trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas OPTI.CN's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, ULTA.CN's ROE is +0.62%, compared to OPTI.CN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA.CN is less volatile compared to OPTI.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.CN.

ULTA.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA.CN stands at 277319.00. In comparison, AFI.CN has a market cap of 2.59M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA.CN is priced at $0.02, while AFI.CN trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas AFI.CN's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, ULTA.CN's ROE is +0.62%, compared to AFI.CN's ROE of -15.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA.CN and AFI.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ULTA.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA.CN stands at 277319.00. In comparison, GLG.TO has a market cap of 1.92M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA.CN is priced at $0.02, while GLG.TO trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas GLG.TO's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ULTA.CN's ROE is +0.62%, compared to GLG.TO's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA.CN is less volatile compared to GLG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.CN.