Domtar Corporation

UFS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UFS.TO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, WFG.TO has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UFS.TO is priced at CA$71.48, while WFG.TO trades at CA$104.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UFS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 129.03, whereas WFG.TO's P/E ratio is -2624.25. In terms of profitability, UFS.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WFG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS.TO is less volatile compared to WFG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.TO.

UFS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UFS.TO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SJ.TO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UFS.TO is priced at CA$71.48, while SJ.TO trades at CA$78.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UFS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 129.03, whereas SJ.TO's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, UFS.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SJ.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS.TO is less volatile compared to SJ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.TO.

UFS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UFS.TO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, RFP.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UFS.TO is priced at CA$71.48, while RFP.TO trades at CA$29.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UFS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 129.03, whereas RFP.TO's P/E ratio is 20.74. In terms of profitability, UFS.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RFP.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS.TO is less volatile compared to RFP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.TO.

UFS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UFS.TO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CFP.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UFS.TO is priced at CA$71.48, while CFP.TO trades at CA$14.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UFS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 129.03, whereas CFP.TO's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, UFS.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CFP.TO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS.TO is less volatile compared to CFP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.TO.

UFS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UFS.TO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, IFP.TO has a market cap of 678.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UFS.TO is priced at CA$71.48, while IFP.TO trades at CA$13.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UFS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 129.03, whereas IFP.TO's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, UFS.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IFP.TO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS.TO is less volatile compared to IFP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.TO.

UFS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UFS.TO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ADN.TO has a market cap of 319.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UFS.TO is priced at CA$71.48, while ADN.TO trades at CA$17.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UFS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 129.03, whereas ADN.TO's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, UFS.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ADN.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS.TO is more volatile compared to ADN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.TO.

UFS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UFS.TO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, WEF.TO has a market cap of 125.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UFS.TO is priced at CA$71.48, while WEF.TO trades at CA$0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UFS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 129.03, whereas WEF.TO's P/E ratio is -9.87. In terms of profitability, UFS.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WEF.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS.TO is less volatile compared to WEF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.TO.

UFS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UFS.TO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, GDL.TO has a market cap of 103.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UFS.TO is priced at CA$71.48, while GDL.TO trades at CA$12.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UFS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 129.03, whereas GDL.TO's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, UFS.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GDL.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS.TO is more volatile compared to GDL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.TO.

UFS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UFS.TO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, GFP.TO has a market cap of 78M. Regarding current trading prices, UFS.TO is priced at CA$71.48, while GFP.TO trades at CA$3.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UFS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 129.03, whereas GFP.TO's P/E ratio is -2.95. In terms of profitability, UFS.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GFP.TO's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS.TO is less volatile compared to GFP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.TO.

UFS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UFS.TO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CFX.TO has a market cap of 47M. Regarding current trading prices, UFS.TO is priced at CA$71.48, while CFX.TO trades at CA$0.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UFS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 129.03, whereas CFX.TO's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, UFS.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CFX.TO's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS.TO is less volatile compared to CFX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.TO.

UFS.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UFS.TO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CFF.TO has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UFS.TO is priced at CA$71.48, while CFF.TO trades at CA$0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UFS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 129.03, whereas CFF.TO's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, UFS.TO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CFF.TO's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS.TO is more volatile compared to CFF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.TO.