Ubisoft Entertainment SA
Ubisoft Entertainment SA UBSFY Peers
See (UBSFY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UBSFY | $2.11 | +0.96% | 1.38B | -23.44 | -$0.09 | N/A |
| NTDOF | $80.38 | +1.84% | 93.58B | 49.31 | $1.63 | +1.31% |
| NTDOY | $20.07 | +2.19% | 93.47B | 48.95 | $0.41 | +0.29% |
| NETTF | $22.64 | -7.61% | 71.96B | 17.82 | $1.27 | +2.28% |
| KONMY | $69.87 | +8.29% | 18.94B | 37.56 | $1.86 | +0.18% |
| NEXOY | $17.81 | -0.34% | 14.45B | 17.46 | $1.02 | +0.00% |
| NEXOF | $17.40 | +10.83% | 14.12B | 17.06 | $1.02 | +0.01% |
| CCOEY | $14.13 | +4.63% | 11.82B | 36.23 | $0.39 | +0.41% |
| CCOEF | $27.18 | +7.21% | 11.37B | 34.40 | $0.79 | +1.00% |
| BLBLF | $18.10 | N/A | 7.47B | -40.22 | -$0.45 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
UBSFY vs NTDOF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, NTDOF has a market cap of 93.58B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while NTDOF trades at $80.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas NTDOF's P/E ratio is 49.31. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NTDOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is more volatile compared to NTDOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs NTDOY Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, NTDOY has a market cap of 93.47B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while NTDOY trades at $20.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas NTDOY's P/E ratio is 48.95. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NTDOY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is more volatile compared to NTDOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs NETTF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, NETTF has a market cap of 71.96B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while NETTF trades at $22.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas NETTF's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NETTF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to NETTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs KONMY Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, KONMY has a market cap of 18.94B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while KONMY trades at $69.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas KONMY's P/E ratio is 37.56. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KONMY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is more volatile compared to KONMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs NEXOY Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, NEXOY has a market cap of 14.45B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while NEXOY trades at $17.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas NEXOY's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NEXOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to NEXOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs NEXOF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, NEXOF has a market cap of 14.12B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while NEXOF trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas NEXOF's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NEXOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to NEXOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs CCOEY Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, CCOEY has a market cap of 11.82B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while CCOEY trades at $14.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas CCOEY's P/E ratio is 36.23. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CCOEY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is more volatile compared to CCOEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs CCOEF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, CCOEF has a market cap of 11.37B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while CCOEF trades at $27.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas CCOEF's P/E ratio is 34.40. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CCOEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to CCOEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs BLBLF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, BLBLF has a market cap of 7.47B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while BLBLF trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas BLBLF's P/E ratio is -40.22. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BLBLF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is more volatile compared to BLBLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs SQNXF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, SQNXF has a market cap of 7.17B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while SQNXF trades at $59.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas SQNXF's P/E ratio is 43.28. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SQNXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is more volatile compared to SQNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs SQNNY Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, SQNNY has a market cap of 7.13B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while SQNNY trades at $29.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas SQNNY's P/E ratio is 43.01. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SQNNY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is more volatile compared to SQNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs KSFTF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, KSFTF has a market cap of 6.34B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while KSFTF trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas KSFTF's P/E ratio is 30.33. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KSFTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is more volatile compared to KSFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs OTGLY Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, OTGLY has a market cap of 6.02B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while OTGLY trades at $15.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas OTGLY's P/E ratio is 51.76. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to OTGLY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to OTGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs OTGLF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, OTGLF has a market cap of 5.95B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while OTGLF trades at $59.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas OTGLF's P/E ratio is 51.33. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to OTGLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to OTGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs SGAMY Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, SGAMY has a market cap of 4.50B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while SGAMY trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas SGAMY's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SGAMY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to SGAMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs SGAMF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, SGAMF has a market cap of 4.49B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while SGAMF trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas SGAMF's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SGAMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to SGAMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs BCDMF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, BCDMF has a market cap of 4.36B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while BCDMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas BCDMF's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BCDMF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is more volatile compared to BCDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs KYYWF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, KYYWF has a market cap of 2.65B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while KYYWF trades at $31.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas KYYWF's P/E ratio is -101.77. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KYYWF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is more volatile compared to KYYWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs DNACF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, DNACF has a market cap of 2.55B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while DNACF trades at $22.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas DNACF's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DNACF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to DNACF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs THQQF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, THQQF has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while THQQF trades at $11.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas THQQF's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to THQQF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to THQQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs PRXXF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, PRXXF has a market cap of 2.16B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while PRXXF trades at $20.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas PRXXF's P/E ratio is 36.46. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PRXXF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to PRXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs MIXIF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, MIXIF has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while MIXIF trades at $24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas MIXIF's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MIXIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to MIXIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs KYYWY Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, KYYWY has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while KYYWY trades at $16.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas KYYWY's P/E ratio is -53.74. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KYYWY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to KYYWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs UBSFF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, UBSFF has a market cap of 1.44B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while UBSFF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas UBSFF's P/E ratio is -23.40. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to UBSFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to UBSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs XDNCF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, XDNCF has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while XDNCF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas XDNCF's P/E ratio is 270.00. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to XDNCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to XDNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs GREZF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, GREZF has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while GREZF trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas GREZF's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GREZF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is more volatile compared to GREZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs GUNGF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, GUNGF has a market cap of 939.50M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while GUNGF trades at $17.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas GUNGF's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GUNGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to GUNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs RVTTY Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, RVTTY has a market cap of 778.80M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while RVTTY trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas RVTTY's P/E ratio is 25.76. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RVTTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is more volatile compared to RVTTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs IGGGF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, IGGGF has a market cap of 545.50M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while IGGGF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas IGGGF's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IGGGF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is more volatile compared to IGGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs BOYAF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, BOYAF has a market cap of 535.18M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while BOYAF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas BOYAF's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BOYAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is more volatile compared to BOYAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs TSVNF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, TSVNF has a market cap of 489.59M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while TSVNF trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas TSVNF's P/E ratio is -113.33. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TSVNF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to TSVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs STLFF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, STLFF has a market cap of 353.75M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while STLFF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas STLFF's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to STLFF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to STLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs BLITF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, BLITF has a market cap of 333.67M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while BLITF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas BLITF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BLITF's ROE of -75.92%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to BLITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs SCFR Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, SCFR has a market cap of 320.45M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while SCFR trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas SCFR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SCFR's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to SCFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs RMDEF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, RMDEF has a market cap of 275.41M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while RMDEF trades at $20.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas RMDEF's P/E ratio is -225.22. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RMDEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is more volatile compared to RMDEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs AKAFF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, AKAFF has a market cap of 197.84M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while AKAFF trades at $13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas AKAFF's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AKAFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to AKAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs FRRDF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, FRRDF has a market cap of 135.16M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while FRRDF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas FRRDF's P/E ratio is 6.86. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FRRDF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to FRRDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs ENADF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, ENADF has a market cap of 106.32M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while ENADF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas ENADF's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ENADF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to ENADF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs FGRTF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, FGRTF has a market cap of 99.34M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while FGRTF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas FGRTF's P/E ratio is -5.39. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FGRTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to FGRTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs GENTF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, GENTF has a market cap of 80.95M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while GENTF trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas GENTF's P/E ratio is 6.62. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GENTF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to GENTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs PONGF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, PONGF has a market cap of 77.81M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while PONGF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas PONGF's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PONGF's ROE of -4.28%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to PONGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs IDGAF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, IDGAF has a market cap of 55.72M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while IDGAF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas IDGAF's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IDGAF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to IDGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs POPRF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, POPRF has a market cap of 36.65M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while POPRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas POPRF's P/E ratio is -12.99. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to POPRF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to POPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs EAGRF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, EAGRF has a market cap of 26.17M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while EAGRF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas EAGRF's P/E ratio is -32.10. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EAGRF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is more volatile compared to EAGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs GAMGF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, GAMGF has a market cap of 22.03M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while GAMGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas GAMGF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GAMGF's ROE of -6.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to GAMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs VSQTF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, VSQTF has a market cap of 15.03M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while VSQTF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas VSQTF's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VSQTF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to VSQTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs ZUKI Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, ZUKI has a market cap of 13.14M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while ZUKI trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas ZUKI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ZUKI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is more volatile compared to ZUKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs SMPBF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, SMPBF has a market cap of 10.76M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while SMPBF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas SMPBF's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SMPBF's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is more volatile compared to SMPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs SRVTF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, SRVTF has a market cap of 9.33M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while SRVTF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas SRVTF's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SRVTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is more volatile compared to SRVTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs SCTGF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, SCTGF has a market cap of 8.60M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while SCTGF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas SCTGF's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SCTGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is more volatile compared to SCTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs WIGAF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, WIGAF has a market cap of 5.98M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while WIGAF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas WIGAF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WIGAF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is more volatile compared to WIGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs ENDRF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, ENDRF has a market cap of 4.43M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while ENDRF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas ENDRF's P/E ratio is 0.79. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ENDRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is more volatile compared to ENDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs NVNT Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, NVNT has a market cap of 4.05M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while NVNT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas NVNT's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NVNT's ROE of +62.78%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is more volatile compared to NVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs YDRMF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, YDRMF has a market cap of 3.87M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while YDRMF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas YDRMF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to YDRMF's ROE of +2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is more volatile compared to YDRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs GGAMF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, GGAMF has a market cap of 1.92M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while GGAMF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas GGAMF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GGAMF's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to GGAMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs PRYNF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, PRYNF has a market cap of 1.22M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while PRYNF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas PRYNF's P/E ratio is -5.24. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PRYNF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is more volatile compared to PRYNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs TAPM Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, TAPM has a market cap of 954786.00. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while TAPM trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas TAPM's P/E ratio is -5.63. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TAPM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is more volatile compared to TAPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs ATIG Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, ATIG has a market cap of 889430.00. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while ATIG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas ATIG's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ATIG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is more volatile compared to ATIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs SWMIF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, SWMIF has a market cap of 742244.00. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while SWMIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas SWMIF's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SWMIF's ROE of +752.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is more volatile compared to SWMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs EPYFF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, EPYFF has a market cap of 708199.00. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while EPYFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas EPYFF's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EPYFF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to EPYFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs KSMRF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, KSMRF has a market cap of 672927.00. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while KSMRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas KSMRF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KSMRF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is more volatile compared to KSMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs IMGX Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, IMGX has a market cap of 642041.00. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while IMGX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas IMGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IMGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is more volatile compared to IMGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs FRZT Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, FRZT has a market cap of 570426.00. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while FRZT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas FRZT's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FRZT's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to FRZT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs GMETF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, GMETF has a market cap of 565762.00. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while GMETF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas GMETF's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GMETF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is more volatile compared to GMETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs APETF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, APETF has a market cap of 539897.00. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while APETF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas APETF's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to APETF's ROE of -26.75%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to APETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs WGRFF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, WGRFF has a market cap of 444087.00. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while WGRFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas WGRFF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WGRFF's ROE of +2.47%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is more volatile compared to WGRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs IENT Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, IENT has a market cap of 405670.00. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while IENT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas IENT's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IENT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to IENT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs TIIDF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, TIIDF has a market cap of 131075.00. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while TIIDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas TIIDF's P/E ratio is -3.62. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TIIDF's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is more volatile compared to TIIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs COUV Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, COUV has a market cap of 62507.00. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while COUV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas COUV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to COUV's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is more volatile compared to COUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs CLIS Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, CLIS has a market cap of 34329.00. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while CLIS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas CLIS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CLIS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to CLIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs NTEK Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, NTEK has a market cap of 17865.00. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while NTEK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas NTEK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NTEK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to NTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs STIE Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, STIE has a market cap of 16988.00. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while STIE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas STIE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to STIE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to STIE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs LIVC Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, LIVC has a market cap of 16291.00. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while LIVC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas LIVC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LIVC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is more volatile compared to LIVC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs PLGC Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, PLGC has a market cap of 13944.00. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while PLGC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas PLGC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PLGC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to PLGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs WINRW Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, WINRW has a market cap of 9484.00. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while WINRW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas WINRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WINRW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is more volatile compared to WINRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs GMGT Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, GMGT has a market cap of 9140.00. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while GMGT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas GMGT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GMGT's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to GMGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs ADTR Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, ADTR has a market cap of 4416.00. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while ADTR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas ADTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ADTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to ADTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs FASDF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, FASDF has a market cap of 4200.00. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while FASDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas FASDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FASDF's ROE of +16.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to FASDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs VRVR Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, VRVR has a market cap of 4126.00. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while VRVR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas VRVR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VRVR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is more volatile compared to VRVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs SPYR Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, SPYR has a market cap of 3507.00. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while SPYR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas SPYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SPYR's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to SPYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs AXNVF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, AXNVF has a market cap of 2559.00. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while AXNVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas AXNVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AXNVF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to AXNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs WINR Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, WINR has a market cap of 2371.00. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while WINR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas WINR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WINR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is more volatile compared to WINR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs HTSF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, HTSF has a market cap of 1800.00. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while HTSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas HTSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HTSF's ROE of -816.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is more volatile compared to HTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs TERA Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, TERA has a market cap of 1348.00. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while TERA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas TERA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TERA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to TERA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs BLKCF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, BLKCF has a market cap of 1224.00. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while BLKCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas BLKCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BLKCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to BLKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs SPLY Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, SPLY has a market cap of 1187.00. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while SPLY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas SPLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SPLY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to SPLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs IPUB Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, IPUB has a market cap of 1040.00. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while IPUB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas IPUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IPUB's ROE of +14.89%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is more volatile compared to IPUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs RIVX Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, RIVX has a market cap of 620.00. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while RIVX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas RIVX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RIVX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to RIVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.
UBSFY vs YVRLF Comparison
UBSFY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFY stands at 1.38B. In comparison, YVRLF has a market cap of 483.00. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFY is priced at $2.11, while YVRLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -23.44, whereas YVRLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBSFY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to YVRLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFY is less volatile compared to YVRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFY.