Ubisoft Entertainment SA
Ubisoft Entertainment SA (UBSFF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (UBSFF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UBSFF | $4.77 | -4.60% | 642.7M | -7.45 | -$0.64 | N/A |
| NETTF | $23.39 | +0.00% | 74.1B | 15.39 | $1.52 | +2.53% |
| NTDOF | $55.48 | -1.46% | 64.6B | 27.06 | $2.05 | +1.51% |
| NTDOY | $13.78 | -1.64% | 64.1B | 27.00 | $0.51 | +1.00% |
| NEXOF | $25.50 | +0.00% | 20.1B | 31.88 | $0.80 | +1.16% |
| KONMY | $61.12 | +0.98% | 16.6B | 29.82 | $2.05 | +0.91% |
| NEXOY | $20.06 | -2.62% | 15.9B | 26.79 | $0.75 | +1.12% |
| BLBLF | $25.58 | +14.30% | 10.7B | 98.38 | $0.26 | N/A |
| CCOEF | $21.00 | +4.74% | 8.8B | 22.34 | $0.94 | +1.48% |
| CCOEY | $10.03 | -1.18% | 8.4B | 21.36 | $0.47 | +1.39% |
Stock Comparison
UBSFF vs NETTF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, NETTF has a market cap of 74.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while NETTF trades at $23.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas NETTF's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NETTF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to NETTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check NETTF's competition here
UBSFF vs NTDOF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, NTDOF has a market cap of 64.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while NTDOF trades at $55.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas NTDOF's P/E ratio is 27.06. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NTDOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to NTDOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check NTDOF's competition here
UBSFF vs NTDOY Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, NTDOY has a market cap of 64.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while NTDOY trades at $13.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas NTDOY's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NTDOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to NTDOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check NTDOY's competition here
UBSFF vs NEXOF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, NEXOF has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while NEXOF trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas NEXOF's P/E ratio is 31.88. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NEXOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to NEXOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check NEXOF's competition here
UBSFF vs KONMY Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, KONMY has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while KONMY trades at $61.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas KONMY's P/E ratio is 29.82. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KONMY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to KONMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check KONMY's competition here
UBSFF vs NEXOY Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, NEXOY has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while NEXOY trades at $20.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas NEXOY's P/E ratio is 26.79. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NEXOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to NEXOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check NEXOY's competition here
UBSFF vs BLBLF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, BLBLF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while BLBLF trades at $25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas BLBLF's P/E ratio is 98.38. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BLBLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to BLBLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check BLBLF's competition here
UBSFF vs CCOEF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, CCOEF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while CCOEF trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas CCOEF's P/E ratio is 22.34. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CCOEF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to CCOEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check CCOEF's competition here
UBSFF vs CCOEY Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, CCOEY has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while CCOEY trades at $10.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas CCOEY's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CCOEY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to CCOEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check CCOEY's competition here
UBSFF vs OTGLF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, OTGLF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while OTGLF trades at $69.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas OTGLF's P/E ratio is 43.59. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OTGLF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to OTGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check OTGLF's competition here
UBSFF vs OTGLY Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, OTGLY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while OTGLY trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas OTGLY's P/E ratio is 42.26. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OTGLY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to OTGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check OTGLY's competition here
UBSFF vs SQNNY Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, SQNNY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while SQNNY trades at $8.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas SQNNY's P/E ratio is 39.21. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SQNNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to SQNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check SQNNY's competition here
UBSFF vs SQNXF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, SQNXF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while SQNXF trades at $16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas SQNXF's P/E ratio is 41.00. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SQNXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to SQNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check SQNXF's competition here
UBSFF vs KSFTF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, KSFTF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while KSFTF trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas KSFTF's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KSFTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to KSFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check KSFTF's competition here
UBSFF vs SGAMF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, SGAMF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while SGAMF trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas SGAMF's P/E ratio is 33.46. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SGAMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to SGAMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check SGAMF's competition here
UBSFF vs SGAMY Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, SGAMY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while SGAMY trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas SGAMY's P/E ratio is 31.55. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SGAMY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to SGAMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check SGAMY's competition here
UBSFF vs KYYWF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, KYYWF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while KYYWF trades at $31.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas KYYWF's P/E ratio is -101.77. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KYYWF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to KYYWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check KYYWF's competition here
UBSFF vs DNACF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, DNACF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while DNACF trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas DNACF's P/E ratio is 6.52. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DNACF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to DNACF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check DNACF's competition here
UBSFF vs MIXIF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, MIXIF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while MIXIF trades at $26.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas MIXIF's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MIXIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to MIXIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check MIXIF's competition here
UBSFF vs KYYWY Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, KYYWY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while KYYWY trades at $16.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas KYYWY's P/E ratio is -53.74. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KYYWY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to KYYWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check KYYWY's competition here
UBSFF vs PRXXF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, PRXXF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while PRXXF trades at $13.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas PRXXF's P/E ratio is 104.54. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PRXXF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to PRXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check PRXXF's competition here
UBSFF vs XDNCF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, XDNCF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while XDNCF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas XDNCF's P/E ratio is 270.00. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to XDNCF's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to XDNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check XDNCF's competition here
UBSFF vs THQQF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, THQQF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while THQQF trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas THQQF's P/E ratio is 2.63. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to THQQF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to THQQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check THQQF's competition here
UBSFF vs GUNGF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, GUNGF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while GUNGF trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas GUNGF's P/E ratio is 35.25. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GUNGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to GUNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check GUNGF's competition here
UBSFF vs RVTTY Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, RVTTY has a market cap of 778.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while RVTTY trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas RVTTY's P/E ratio is 25.76. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RVTTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to RVTTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check RVTTY's competition here
UBSFF vs UBSFY Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, UBSFY has a market cap of 625.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while UBSFY trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas UBSFY's P/E ratio is -7.15. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to UBSFY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to UBSFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check UBSFY's competition here
UBSFF vs GREZF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, GREZF has a market cap of 542.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while GREZF trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas GREZF's P/E ratio is 79.00. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GREZF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to GREZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check GREZF's competition here
UBSFF vs IGGGF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, IGGGF has a market cap of 488.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while IGGGF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas IGGGF's P/E ratio is 7.17. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IGGGF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to IGGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check IGGGF's competition here
UBSFF vs BOYAF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, BOYAF has a market cap of 329.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while BOYAF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas BOYAF's P/E ratio is 2.81. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BOYAF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to BOYAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check BOYAF's competition here
UBSFF vs SCFR Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, SCFR has a market cap of 292.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while SCFR trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas SCFR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SCFR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to SCFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check SCFR's competition here
UBSFF vs FRRDF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, FRRDF has a market cap of 264.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while FRRDF trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas FRRDF's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FRRDF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to FRRDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check FRRDF's competition here
UBSFF vs STLFF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, STLFF has a market cap of 254.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while STLFF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas STLFF's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to STLFF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to STLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check STLFF's competition here
UBSFF vs RMDEF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, RMDEF has a market cap of 227.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while RMDEF trades at $16.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas RMDEF's P/E ratio is -14.70. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RMDEF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to RMDEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check RMDEF's competition here
UBSFF vs AKAFF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, AKAFF has a market cap of 197.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while AKAFF trades at $13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas AKAFF's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AKAFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to AKAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check AKAFF's competition here
UBSFF vs ENADF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, ENADF has a market cap of 125.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while ENADF trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas ENADF's P/E ratio is -6.45. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ENADF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to ENADF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check ENADF's competition here
UBSFF vs GBNW Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, GBNW has a market cap of 100.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while GBNW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas GBNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GBNW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to GBNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check GBNW's competition here
UBSFF vs GENTF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, GENTF has a market cap of 79.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while GENTF trades at $9.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas GENTF's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GENTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to GENTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check GENTF's competition here
UBSFF vs PONGF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, PONGF has a market cap of 60.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while PONGF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas PONGF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PONGF's ROE of -7.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to PONGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check PONGF's competition here
UBSFF vs VSQTF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, VSQTF has a market cap of 45.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while VSQTF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas VSQTF's P/E ratio is 43.54. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VSQTF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to VSQTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check VSQTF's competition here
UBSFF vs POPRF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, POPRF has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while POPRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas POPRF's P/E ratio is -12.99. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to POPRF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to POPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check POPRF's competition here
UBSFF vs FGRTF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, FGRTF has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while FGRTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas FGRTF's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FGRTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to FGRTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check FGRTF's competition here
UBSFF vs GAMGF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, GAMGF has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while GAMGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas GAMGF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GAMGF's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to GAMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check GAMGF's competition here
UBSFF vs IDGAF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, IDGAF has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while IDGAF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas IDGAF's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IDGAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to IDGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check IDGAF's competition here
UBSFF vs EAGRF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, EAGRF has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while EAGRF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas EAGRF's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EAGRF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to EAGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check EAGRF's competition here
UBSFF vs SMPBF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, SMPBF has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while SMPBF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas SMPBF's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SMPBF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to SMPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check SMPBF's competition here
UBSFF vs SCTGF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, SCTGF has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while SCTGF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas SCTGF's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SCTGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to SCTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check SCTGF's competition here
UBSFF vs ZUKI Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, ZUKI has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while ZUKI trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas ZUKI's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ZUKI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to ZUKI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check ZUKI's competition here
UBSFF vs WIGAF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, WIGAF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while WIGAF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas WIGAF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WIGAF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to WIGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check WIGAF's competition here
UBSFF vs NVNT Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, NVNT has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while NVNT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas NVNT's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NVNT's ROE of +5.89%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to NVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check NVNT's competition here
UBSFF vs YDRMF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, YDRMF has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while YDRMF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas YDRMF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to YDRMF's ROE of +2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to YDRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check YDRMF's competition here
UBSFF vs APETF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, APETF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while APETF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas APETF's P/E ratio is -9.10. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to APETF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to APETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check APETF's competition here
UBSFF vs GGAMF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, GGAMF has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while GGAMF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas GGAMF's P/E ratio is -5.62. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GGAMF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to GGAMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check GGAMF's competition here
UBSFF vs SRVTF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, SRVTF has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while SRVTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas SRVTF's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SRVTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to SRVTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check SRVTF's competition here
UBSFF vs PRYNF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, PRYNF has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while PRYNF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas PRYNF's P/E ratio is -4.90. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PRYNF's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to PRYNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check PRYNF's competition here
UBSFF vs SWMIF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, SWMIF has a market cap of 742.2K. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while SWMIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas SWMIF's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SWMIF's ROE of +752.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to SWMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check SWMIF's competition here
UBSFF vs BCDMF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, BCDMF has a market cap of 730.7K. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while BCDMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas BCDMF's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BCDMF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to BCDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check BCDMF's competition here
UBSFF vs IMGX Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, IMGX has a market cap of 642K. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while IMGX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas IMGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IMGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to IMGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check IMGX's competition here
UBSFF vs FRZT Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, FRZT has a market cap of 623K. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while FRZT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas FRZT's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FRZT's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to FRZT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check FRZT's competition here
UBSFF vs ATIG Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, ATIG has a market cap of 593K. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while ATIG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas ATIG's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ATIG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to ATIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check ATIG's competition here
UBSFF vs GMETF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, GMETF has a market cap of 570.2K. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while GMETF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas GMETF's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GMETF's ROE of -1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to GMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check GMETF's competition here
UBSFF vs TAPM Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, TAPM has a market cap of 408.8K. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while TAPM trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas TAPM's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TAPM's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to TAPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check TAPM's competition here
UBSFF vs IENT Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, IENT has a market cap of 405.7K. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while IENT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas IENT's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IENT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to IENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check IENT's competition here
UBSFF vs KSMRF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, KSMRF has a market cap of 235.1K. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while KSMRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas KSMRF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KSMRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to KSMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check KSMRF's competition here
UBSFF vs EPYFF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, EPYFF has a market cap of 234.9K. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while EPYFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas EPYFF's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EPYFF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to EPYFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check EPYFF's competition here
UBSFF vs WGRFF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, WGRFF has a market cap of 229.9K. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while WGRFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas WGRFF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WGRFF's ROE of +2.47%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to WGRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check WGRFF's competition here
UBSFF vs TIIDF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, TIIDF has a market cap of 131.1K. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while TIIDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas TIIDF's P/E ratio is -3.62. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TIIDF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to TIIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check TIIDF's competition here
UBSFF vs PLGC Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, PLGC has a market cap of 104.6K. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while PLGC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas PLGC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PLGC's ROE of +19.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to PLGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check PLGC's competition here
UBSFF vs SPYR Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, SPYR has a market cap of 70.1K. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while SPYR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas SPYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SPYR's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to SPYR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check SPYR's competition here
UBSFF vs COUV Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, COUV has a market cap of 62.5K. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while COUV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas COUV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to COUV's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to COUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check COUV's competition here
UBSFF vs CLIS Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, CLIS has a market cap of 34.3K. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while CLIS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas CLIS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CLIS's ROE of -2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to CLIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check CLIS's competition here
UBSFF vs STIE Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, STIE has a market cap of 34K. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while STIE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas STIE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to STIE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to STIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check STIE's competition here
UBSFF vs GMGT Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, GMGT has a market cap of 27.4K. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while GMGT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas GMGT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GMGT's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to GMGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check GMGT's competition here
UBSFF vs BLITF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, BLITF has a market cap of 22.2K. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while BLITF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas BLITF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BLITF's ROE of -75.92%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to BLITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check BLITF's competition here
UBSFF vs NTEK Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, NTEK has a market cap of 17.9K. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while NTEK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas NTEK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NTEK's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to NTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check NTEK's competition here
UBSFF vs LIVC Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, LIVC has a market cap of 16.3K. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while LIVC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas LIVC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LIVC's ROE of +15.64%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to LIVC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check LIVC's competition here
UBSFF vs WINRW Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, WINRW has a market cap of 9.5K. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while WINRW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas WINRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WINRW's ROE of -53.95%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to WINRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check WINRW's competition here
UBSFF vs ADTR Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, ADTR has a market cap of 8.8K. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while ADTR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas ADTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ADTR's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to ADTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check ADTR's competition here
UBSFF vs ENDRF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, ENDRF has a market cap of 7.7K. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while ENDRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas ENDRF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ENDRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to ENDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check ENDRF's competition here
UBSFF vs AXNVF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, AXNVF has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while AXNVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas AXNVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AXNVF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to AXNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check AXNVF's competition here
UBSFF vs VRVR Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, VRVR has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while VRVR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas VRVR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VRVR's ROE of +7.57%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to VRVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check VRVR's competition here
UBSFF vs WINR Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, WINR has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while WINR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas WINR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WINR's ROE of -53.95%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to WINR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check WINR's competition here
UBSFF vs HTSF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, HTSF has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while HTSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas HTSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HTSF's ROE of -816.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to HTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check HTSF's competition here
UBSFF vs TERA Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, TERA has a market cap of 1.3K. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while TERA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas TERA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TERA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to TERA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check TERA's competition here
UBSFF vs BLKCF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, BLKCF has a market cap of 1.3K. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while BLKCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas BLKCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BLKCF's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to BLKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check BLKCF's competition here
UBSFF vs SPLY Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, SPLY has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while SPLY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas SPLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SPLY's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to SPLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check SPLY's competition here
UBSFF vs IPUB Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, IPUB has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while IPUB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas IPUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IPUB's ROE of +14.89%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is more volatile compared to IPUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check IPUB's competition here
UBSFF vs FASDF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, FASDF has a market cap of 840. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while FASDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas FASDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FASDF's ROE of +17.41%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to FASDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check FASDF's competition here
UBSFF vs RIVX Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, RIVX has a market cap of 620. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while RIVX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas RIVX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RIVX's ROE of +15.73%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to RIVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check RIVX's competition here
UBSFF vs YVRLF Comparison February 2026
UBSFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBSFF stands at 642.7M. In comparison, YVRLF has a market cap of 483. Regarding current trading prices, UBSFF is priced at $4.77, while YVRLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.45, whereas YVRLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBSFF's ROE is -0.04%, compared to YVRLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBSFF is less volatile compared to YVRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBSFF.Check YVRLF's competition here