Uzabase, Inc.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for UBAZF
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for UBAZF
Uzabase, Inc. (UBAZF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (UBAZF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UBAZF | $11.05 | +0.00% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ERNXY | $35.61 | +7.55% | 83.2B | 22.66 | $1.46 | +1.47% |
| HKXCY | $50.99 | -0.60% | 64.4B | 28.46 | $1.79 | +3.01% |
| HKXCF | $49.52 | +0.55% | 62.6B | 27.67 | $1.79 | +3.24% |
| LDNXF | $119.99 | +1.73% | 57.7B | 36.40 | $3.14 | +1.60% |
| DBOEY | $29.71 | +0.64% | 54.4B | 23.58 | $1.26 | +1.53% |
| DBOEF | $299.60 | +2.81% | 53.9B | 23.51 | $12.59 | +1.51% |
| BOLSY | $11.27 | +3.39% | 18B | 22.40 | $0.48 | +4.30% |
| SPXCY | $31.73 | +1.56% | 17B | 33.73 | $0.94 | +1.70% |
| SPXCF | $15.85 | +1.93% | 17B | 33.72 | $0.47 | +2.02% |
Stock Comparison
UBAZF vs ERNXY Comparison April 2026
UBAZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBAZF stands at 0. In comparison, ERNXY has a market cap of 83.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UBAZF is priced at $11.05, while ERNXY trades at $35.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBAZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERNXY's P/E ratio is 22.66. In terms of profitability, UBAZF's ROE is N/A, compared to ERNXY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UBAZF and ERNXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ERNXY's competition here
UBAZF vs HKXCY Comparison April 2026
UBAZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBAZF stands at 0. In comparison, HKXCY has a market cap of 64.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UBAZF is priced at $11.05, while HKXCY trades at $50.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBAZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKXCY's P/E ratio is 28.46. In terms of profitability, UBAZF's ROE is N/A, compared to HKXCY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UBAZF is less volatile compared to HKXCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBAZF.Check HKXCY's competition here
UBAZF vs HKXCF Comparison April 2026
UBAZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBAZF stands at 0. In comparison, HKXCF has a market cap of 62.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UBAZF is priced at $11.05, while HKXCF trades at $49.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBAZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKXCF's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, UBAZF's ROE is N/A, compared to HKXCF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UBAZF is less volatile compared to HKXCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBAZF.Check HKXCF's competition here
UBAZF vs LDNXF Comparison April 2026
UBAZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBAZF stands at 0. In comparison, LDNXF has a market cap of 57.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UBAZF is priced at $11.05, while LDNXF trades at $119.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBAZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LDNXF's P/E ratio is 36.40. In terms of profitability, UBAZF's ROE is N/A, compared to LDNXF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBAZF is less volatile compared to LDNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBAZF.Check LDNXF's competition here
UBAZF vs DBOEY Comparison April 2026
UBAZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBAZF stands at 0. In comparison, DBOEY has a market cap of 54.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UBAZF is priced at $11.05, while DBOEY trades at $29.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBAZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBOEY's P/E ratio is 23.58. In terms of profitability, UBAZF's ROE is N/A, compared to DBOEY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UBAZF is less volatile compared to DBOEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBAZF.Check DBOEY's competition here
UBAZF vs DBOEF Comparison April 2026
UBAZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBAZF stands at 0. In comparison, DBOEF has a market cap of 53.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBAZF is priced at $11.05, while DBOEF trades at $299.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBAZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBOEF's P/E ratio is 23.51. In terms of profitability, UBAZF's ROE is N/A, compared to DBOEF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UBAZF is less volatile compared to DBOEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBAZF.Check DBOEF's competition here
UBAZF vs BOLSY Comparison April 2026
UBAZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBAZF stands at 0. In comparison, BOLSY has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, UBAZF is priced at $11.05, while BOLSY trades at $11.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBAZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOLSY's P/E ratio is 22.40. In terms of profitability, UBAZF's ROE is N/A, compared to BOLSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UBAZF is less volatile compared to BOLSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBAZF.Check BOLSY's competition here
UBAZF vs SPXCY Comparison April 2026
UBAZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBAZF stands at 0. In comparison, SPXCY has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, UBAZF is priced at $11.05, while SPXCY trades at $31.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBAZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPXCY's P/E ratio is 33.73. In terms of profitability, UBAZF's ROE is N/A, compared to SPXCY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, UBAZF is less volatile compared to SPXCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBAZF.Check SPXCY's competition here
UBAZF vs SPXCF Comparison April 2026
UBAZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBAZF stands at 0. In comparison, SPXCF has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, UBAZF is priced at $11.05, while SPXCF trades at $15.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBAZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPXCF's P/E ratio is 33.72. In terms of profitability, UBAZF's ROE is N/A, compared to SPXCF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, UBAZF is less volatile compared to SPXCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBAZF.Check SPXCF's competition here
UBAZF vs EUXTF Comparison April 2026
UBAZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBAZF stands at 0. In comparison, EUXTF has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UBAZF is priced at $11.05, while EUXTF trades at $150.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBAZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUXTF's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, UBAZF's ROE is N/A, compared to EUXTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UBAZF and EUXTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EUXTF's competition here
UBAZF vs LNSTY Comparison April 2026
UBAZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBAZF stands at 0. In comparison, LNSTY has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, UBAZF is priced at $11.05, while LNSTY trades at $28.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBAZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNSTY's P/E ratio is 46.46. In terms of profitability, UBAZF's ROE is N/A, compared to LNSTY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UBAZF is less volatile compared to LNSTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBAZF.Check LNSTY's competition here
UBAZF vs OSCUF Comparison April 2026
UBAZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBAZF stands at 0. In comparison, OSCUF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, UBAZF is priced at $11.05, while OSCUF trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBAZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OSCUF's P/E ratio is 32.44. In terms of profitability, UBAZF's ROE is N/A, compared to OSCUF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UBAZF and OSCUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OSCUF's competition here
UBAZF vs JPXGY Comparison April 2026
UBAZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBAZF stands at 0. In comparison, JPXGY has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UBAZF is priced at $11.05, while JPXGY trades at $11.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBAZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPXGY's P/E ratio is 30.66. In terms of profitability, UBAZF's ROE is N/A, compared to JPXGY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UBAZF is less volatile compared to JPXGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBAZF.Check JPXGY's competition here
UBAZF vs TMXXF Comparison April 2026
UBAZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBAZF stands at 0. In comparison, TMXXF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBAZF is priced at $11.05, while TMXXF trades at $35.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBAZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMXXF's P/E ratio is 33.38. In terms of profitability, UBAZF's ROE is N/A, compared to TMXXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UBAZF and TMXXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TMXXF's competition here
UBAZF vs ASXFY Comparison April 2026
UBAZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBAZF stands at 0. In comparison, ASXFY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UBAZF is priced at $11.05, while ASXFY trades at $36.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBAZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASXFY's P/E ratio is 19.81. In terms of profitability, UBAZF's ROE is N/A, compared to ASXFY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UBAZF is less volatile compared to ASXFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBAZF.Check ASXFY's competition here
UBAZF vs ASXFF Comparison April 2026
UBAZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBAZF stands at 0. In comparison, ASXFF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UBAZF is priced at $11.05, while ASXFF trades at $34.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBAZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASXFF's P/E ratio is 18.58. In terms of profitability, UBAZF's ROE is N/A, compared to ASXFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UBAZF is less volatile compared to ASXFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBAZF.Check ASXFF's competition here
UBAZF vs BOMXF Comparison April 2026
UBAZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBAZF stands at 0. In comparison, BOMXF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UBAZF is priced at $11.05, while BOMXF trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBAZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOMXF's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, UBAZF's ROE is N/A, compared to BOMXF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UBAZF and BOMXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BOMXF's competition here
UBAZF vs BSMAF Comparison April 2026
UBAZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBAZF stands at 0. In comparison, BSMAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UBAZF is priced at $11.05, while BSMAF trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBAZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSMAF's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, UBAZF's ROE is N/A, compared to BSMAF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UBAZF is less volatile compared to BSMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBAZF.Check BSMAF's competition here
UBAZF vs JSEJF Comparison April 2026
UBAZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBAZF stands at 0. In comparison, JSEJF has a market cap of 764M. Regarding current trading prices, UBAZF is priced at $11.05, while JSEJF trades at $9.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBAZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JSEJF's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, UBAZF's ROE is N/A, compared to JSEJF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UBAZF and JSEJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JSEJF's competition here
UBAZF vs OTCM Comparison April 2026
UBAZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBAZF stands at 0. In comparison, OTCM has a market cap of 652.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UBAZF is priced at $11.05, while OTCM trades at $54.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBAZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OTCM's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, UBAZF's ROE is N/A, compared to OTCM's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, UBAZF is less volatile compared to OTCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBAZF.Check OTCM's competition here
UBAZF vs HEHSF Comparison April 2026
UBAZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBAZF stands at 0. In comparison, HEHSF has a market cap of 469.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UBAZF is priced at $11.05, while HEHSF trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBAZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HEHSF's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, UBAZF's ROE is N/A, compared to HEHSF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, UBAZF and HEHSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HEHSF's competition here
UBAZF vs HEXEY Comparison April 2026
UBAZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBAZF stands at 0. In comparison, HEXEY has a market cap of 410.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UBAZF is priced at $11.05, while HEXEY trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBAZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HEXEY's P/E ratio is 10.52. In terms of profitability, UBAZF's ROE is N/A, compared to HEXEY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, UBAZF is less volatile compared to HEXEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBAZF.Check HEXEY's competition here
UBAZF vs NZSTF Comparison April 2026
UBAZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBAZF stands at 0. In comparison, NZSTF has a market cap of 271M. Regarding current trading prices, UBAZF is priced at $11.05, while NZSTF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBAZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NZSTF's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, UBAZF's ROE is N/A, compared to NZSTF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UBAZF and NZSTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NZSTF's competition here
UBAZF vs QMCI Comparison April 2026
UBAZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBAZF stands at 0. In comparison, QMCI has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UBAZF is priced at $11.05, while QMCI trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBAZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QMCI's P/E ratio is -4.70. In terms of profitability, UBAZF's ROE is N/A, compared to QMCI's ROE of -4.28%. Regarding short-term risk, UBAZF is less volatile compared to QMCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBAZF.Check QMCI's competition here
UBAZF vs HNOI Comparison April 2026
UBAZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBAZF stands at 0. In comparison, HNOI has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UBAZF is priced at $11.05, while HNOI trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBAZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HNOI's P/E ratio is -4.73. In terms of profitability, UBAZF's ROE is N/A, compared to HNOI's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, UBAZF is less volatile compared to HNOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBAZF.Check HNOI's competition here
UBAZF vs ITNM Comparison April 2026
UBAZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBAZF stands at 0. In comparison, ITNM has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UBAZF is priced at $11.05, while ITNM trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBAZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITNM's P/E ratio is -113.64. In terms of profitability, UBAZF's ROE is N/A, compared to ITNM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UBAZF and ITNM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ITNM's competition here
UBAZF vs GLBR Comparison April 2026
UBAZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBAZF stands at 0. In comparison, GLBR has a market cap of 614. Regarding current trading prices, UBAZF is priced at $11.05, while GLBR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBAZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBAZF's ROE is N/A, compared to GLBR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UBAZF and GLBR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GLBR's competition here
UBAZF vs EMYIF Comparison April 2026
UBAZF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBAZF stands at 0. In comparison, EMYIF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UBAZF is priced at $11.05, while EMYIF trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBAZF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMYIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBAZF's ROE is N/A, compared to EMYIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UBAZF and EMYIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EMYIF's competition here