Umbra Applied Technologies Group, Inc.
Umbra Applied Technologies Group, Inc. (UATG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (UATG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UATG | $0.00 | +0.00% | 300K | -0.03 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| HTHIF | $29.53 | +2.13% | 132.5B | 33.72 | $0.86 | +1.00% |
| MSBHF | $21.00 | -2.33% | 82.5B | 13.44 | $1.60 | +3.16% |
| MTSUY | $20.97 | -1.36% | 81.8B | 13.30 | $1.60 | +2.57% |
| ITOCY | $107.92 | -1.25% | 77.1B | 13.05 | $8.36 | N/A |
| ITOCF | $53.87 | -0.74% | 76.6B | 12.97 | $4.18 | +2.51% |
| HTHIY | $28.37 | -2.51% | 66.4B | 33.79 | $0.86 | +0.74% |
| MITSY | $427.96 | -2.80% | 63.4B | 10.60 | $41.65 | +2.16% |
| MITSF | $21.50 | -2.85% | 62B | 10.32 | $2.09 | +3.15% |
| CTPCY | $7.45 | +0.00% | 45.1B | 5.65 | $1.37 | +4.97% |
Stock Comparison
UATG vs HTHIF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, HTHIF has a market cap of 132.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while HTHIF trades at $29.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HTHIF's P/E ratio is 33.72. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HTHIF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to HTHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check HTHIF's competition here
UATG vs MSBHF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, MSBHF has a market cap of 82.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while MSBHF trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MSBHF's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MSBHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to MSBHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check MSBHF's competition here
UATG vs MTSUY Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, MTSUY has a market cap of 81.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while MTSUY trades at $20.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MTSUY's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MTSUY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to MTSUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check MTSUY's competition here
UATG vs ITOCY Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, ITOCY has a market cap of 77.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while ITOCY trades at $107.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ITOCY's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ITOCY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to ITOCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check ITOCY's competition here
UATG vs ITOCF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, ITOCF has a market cap of 76.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while ITOCF trades at $53.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ITOCF's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ITOCF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to ITOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check ITOCF's competition here
UATG vs HTHIY Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, HTHIY has a market cap of 66.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while HTHIY trades at $28.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HTHIY's P/E ratio is 33.79. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HTHIY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to HTHIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check HTHIY's competition here
UATG vs MITSY Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, MITSY has a market cap of 63.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while MITSY trades at $427.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MITSY's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MITSY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to MITSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check MITSY's competition here
UATG vs MITSF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, MITSF has a market cap of 62B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while MITSF trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MITSF's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MITSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to MITSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check MITSF's competition here
UATG vs CTPCY Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, CTPCY has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while CTPCY trades at $7.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CTPCY's P/E ratio is 5.65. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CTPCY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to CTPCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check CTPCY's competition here
UATG vs CTPCF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, CTPCF has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while CTPCF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CTPCF's P/E ratio is 4.85. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CTPCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to CTPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check CTPCF's competition here
UATG vs MARUF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, MARUF has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while MARUF trades at $21.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MARUF's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MARUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to MARUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check MARUF's competition here
UATG vs MARUY Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, MARUY has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while MARUY trades at $213.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MARUY's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MARUY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to MARUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check MARUY's competition here
UATG vs SSUMY Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, SSUMY has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while SSUMY trades at $27.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SSUMY's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SSUMY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to SSUMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check SSUMY's competition here
UATG vs SSUMF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, SSUMF has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while SSUMF trades at $27.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SSUMF's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SSUMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to SSUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check SSUMF's competition here
UATG vs SEIBF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, SEIBF has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while SEIBF trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SEIBF's P/E ratio is 62.67. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SEIBF's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to SEIBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check SEIBF's competition here
UATG vs CKHUF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, CKHUF has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while CKHUF trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CKHUF's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CKHUF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to CKHUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check CKHUF's competition here
UATG vs CKHUY Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, CKHUY has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while CKHUY trades at $6.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CKHUY's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CKHUY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to CKHUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check CKHUY's competition here
UATG vs TYHOF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, TYHOF has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while TYHOF trades at $18.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas TYHOF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TYHOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to TYHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check TYHOF's competition here
UATG vs PITAF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, PITAF has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while PITAF trades at $21.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas PITAF's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PITAF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to PITAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check PITAF's competition here
UATG vs GPOVF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, GPOVF has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while GPOVF trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GPOVF's P/E ratio is 27.89. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GPOVF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to GPOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check GPOVF's competition here
UATG vs JARLF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, JARLF has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while JARLF trades at $55.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas JARLF's P/E ratio is 168.18. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to JARLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to JARLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check JARLF's competition here
UATG vs HALMY Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, HALMY has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while HALMY trades at $88.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HALMY's P/E ratio is 42.31. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HALMY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to HALMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check HALMY's competition here
UATG vs HLMAF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, HLMAF has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while HLMAF trades at $43.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HLMAF's P/E ratio is 41.33. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HLMAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to HLMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check HLMAF's competition here
UATG vs JMHLY Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, JMHLY has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while JMHLY trades at $56.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas JMHLY's P/E ratio is 164.29. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to JMHLY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to JMHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check JMHLY's competition here
UATG vs GPOVY Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, GPOVY has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while GPOVY trades at $14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GPOVY's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GPOVY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to GPOVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check GPOVY's competition here
UATG vs KPELY Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, KPELY has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while KPELY trades at $13.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas KPELY's P/E ratio is 18.22. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KPELY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to KPELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check KPELY's competition here
UATG vs KPELF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, KPELF has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while KPELF trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas KPELF's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KPELF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to KPELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check KPELF's competition here
UATG vs SWRAY Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, SWRAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while SWRAY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SWRAY's P/E ratio is 79.09. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SWRAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to SWRAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check SWRAY's competition here
UATG vs KHOLY Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, KHOLY has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while KHOLY trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas KHOLY's P/E ratio is 729.63. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KHOLY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to KHOLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check KHOLY's competition here
UATG vs SWRBF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, SWRBF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while SWRBF trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SWRBF's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SWRBF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to SWRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check SWRBF's competition here
UATG vs SWRAF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, SWRAF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while SWRAF trades at $8.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SWRAF's P/E ratio is 74.09. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SWRAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to SWRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check SWRAF's competition here
UATG vs MYTHY Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, MYTHY has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while MYTHY trades at $56.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MYTHY's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MYTHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to MYTHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check MYTHY's competition here
UATG vs SCVPF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, SCVPF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while SCVPF trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SCVPF's P/E ratio is 32.60. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SCVPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to SCVPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check SCVPF's competition here
UATG vs SCRPF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, SCRPF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while SCRPF trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SCRPF's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SCRPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to SCRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check SCRPF's competition here
UATG vs SKSUY Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, SKSUY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while SKSUY trades at $85.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SKSUY's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SKSUY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to SKSUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check SKSUY's competition here
UATG vs JGSHF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, JGSHF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while JGSHF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas JGSHF's P/E ratio is 22.36. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to JGSHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to JGSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check JGSHF's competition here
UATG vs FCODF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, FCODF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while FCODF trades at $1,721.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas FCODF's P/E ratio is 105.87. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FCODF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to FCODF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check FCODF's competition here
UATG vs HYUHF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, HYUHF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while HYUHF trades at $27.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HYUHF's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HYUHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to HYUHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check HYUHF's competition here
UATG vs MYTHF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, MYTHF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while MYTHF trades at $38.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MYTHF's P/E ratio is 7.61. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MYTHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to MYTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check MYTHF's competition here
UATG vs AYALY Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, AYALY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while AYALY trades at $11.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas AYALY's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AYALY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to AYALY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check AYALY's competition here
UATG vs AYYLF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, AYYLF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while AYYLF trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas AYYLF's P/E ratio is 8.21. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AYYLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to AYYLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check AYYLF's competition here
UATG vs AKAAF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, AKAAF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while AKAAF trades at $68.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas AKAAF's P/E ratio is 40.85. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AKAAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to AKAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check AKAAF's competition here
UATG vs FOSUY Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, FOSUY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while FOSUY trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas FOSUY's P/E ratio is -8.08. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FOSUY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to FOSUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check FOSUY's competition here
UATG vs FOSUF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, FOSUF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while FOSUF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas FOSUF's P/E ratio is -8.21. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FOSUF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to FOSUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check FOSUF's competition here
UATG vs SZHFF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, SZHFF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while SZHFF trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SZHFF's P/E ratio is 6.16. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SZHFF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to SZHFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check SZHFF's competition here
UATG vs BDVSF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, BDVSF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while BDVSF trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BDVSF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BDVSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to BDVSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check BDVSF's competition here
UATG vs ALFFF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, ALFFF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while ALFFF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ALFFF's P/E ratio is -80.00. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ALFFF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to ALFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check ALFFF's competition here
UATG vs KHEXF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, KHEXF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while KHEXF trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas KHEXF's P/E ratio is -22.96. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KHEXF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to KHEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check KHEXF's competition here
UATG vs BDVSY Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, BDVSY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while BDVSY trades at $25.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BDVSY's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BDVSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to BDVSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check BDVSY's competition here
UATG vs BJINF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, BJINF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while BJINF trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BJINF's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BJINF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to BJINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check BJINF's competition here
UATG vs KTERF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, KTERF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while KTERF trades at $36.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas KTERF's P/E ratio is 47.45. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KTERF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to KTERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check KTERF's competition here
UATG vs KINUF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, KINUF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while KINUF trades at $21.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas KINUF's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KINUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to KINUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check KINUF's competition here
UATG vs SMGBF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, SMGBF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while SMGBF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SMGBF's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SMGBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to SMGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check SMGBF's competition here
UATG vs KBDCY Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, KBDCY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while KBDCY trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas KBDCY's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KBDCY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to KBDCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check KBDCY's competition here
UATG vs NICFF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, NICFF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while NICFF trades at $22.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas NICFF's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NICFF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to NICFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check NICFF's competition here
UATG vs GULRF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, GULRF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while GULRF trades at $8.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GULRF's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GULRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to GULRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check GULRF's competition here
UATG vs BLJZY Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, BLJZY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while BLJZY trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BLJZY's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BLJZY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to BLJZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check BLJZY's competition here
UATG vs KBDCF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, KBDCF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while KBDCF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas KBDCF's P/E ratio is 9.24. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KBDCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to KBDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check KBDCF's competition here
UATG vs MMSMY Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, MMSMY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while MMSMY trades at $9.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MMSMY's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MMSMY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to MMSMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check MMSMY's competition here
UATG vs GULRY Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, GULRY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while GULRY trades at $15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GULRY's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GULRY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to GULRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check GULRY's competition here
UATG vs IWTNF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, IWTNF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while IWTNF trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas IWTNF's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IWTNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to IWTNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check IWTNF's competition here
UATG vs SWRBY Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, SWRBY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while SWRBY trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SWRBY's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SWRBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to SWRBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check SWRBY's competition here
UATG vs SGHIF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, SGHIF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while SGHIF trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SGHIF's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SGHIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to SGHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check SGHIF's competition here
UATG vs TINLF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, TINLF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while TINLF trades at $9.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas TINLF's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TINLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to TINLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check TINLF's competition here
UATG vs XZJCF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, XZJCF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while XZJCF trades at $22.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas XZJCF's P/E ratio is -25.04. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to XZJCF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to XZJCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check XZJCF's competition here
UATG vs NARRF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, NARRF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while NARRF trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas NARRF's P/E ratio is -16.57. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NARRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to NARRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check NARRF's competition here
UATG vs SGHIY Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, SGHIY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while SGHIY trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SGHIY's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SGHIY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to SGHIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check SGHIY's competition here
UATG vs TINLY Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, TINLY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while TINLY trades at $8.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas TINLY's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TINLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to TINLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check TINLY's competition here
UATG vs NLTBF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, NLTBF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while NLTBF trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas NLTBF's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NLTBF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to NLTBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check NLTBF's competition here
UATG vs MPCFF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, MPCFF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while MPCFF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MPCFF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MPCFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to MPCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check MPCFF's competition here
UATG vs CHCLY Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, CHCLY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while CHCLY trades at $27.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CHCLY's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CHCLY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to CHCLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check CHCLY's competition here
UATG vs GRGCF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, GRGCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while GRGCF trades at $31.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GRGCF's P/E ratio is 2.05. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GRGCF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to GRGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check GRGCF's competition here
UATG vs ALGGY Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, ALGGY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while ALGGY trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ALGGY's P/E ratio is 3.02. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ALGGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to ALGGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check ALGGY's competition here
UATG vs NSHBY Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, NSHBY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while NSHBY trades at $13.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas NSHBY's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NSHBY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to NSHBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check NSHBY's competition here
UATG vs ALGGF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, ALGGF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while ALGGF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ALGGF's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ALGGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to ALGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check ALGGF's competition here
UATG vs BRYAF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, BRYAF has a market cap of 887.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while BRYAF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BRYAF's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BRYAF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to BRYAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check BRYAF's competition here
UATG vs ICBT Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, ICBT has a market cap of 885.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while ICBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ICBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ICBT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to ICBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check ICBT's competition here
UATG vs BNHUF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, BNHUF has a market cap of 829.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while BNHUF trades at $27.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BNHUF's P/E ratio is -7.12. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BNHUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to BNHUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check BNHUF's competition here
UATG vs SHMWF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, SHMWF has a market cap of 793.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while SHMWF trades at $11.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SHMWF's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SHMWF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to SHMWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check SHMWF's competition here
UATG vs KKRAF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, KKRAF has a market cap of 544.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while KKRAF trades at $16.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas KKRAF's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KKRAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to KKRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check KKRAF's competition here
UATG vs MTLZF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, MTLZF has a market cap of 539.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while MTLZF trades at $1,525.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MTLZF's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MTLZF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to MTLZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check MTLZF's competition here
UATG vs INDHF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, INDHF has a market cap of 532.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while INDHF trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas INDHF's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to INDHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to INDHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check INDHF's competition here
UATG vs SBOX Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, SBOX has a market cap of 523.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while SBOX trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SBOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SBOX's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to SBOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check SBOX's competition here
UATG vs CVVIF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, CVVIF has a market cap of 436.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while CVVIF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CVVIF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CVVIF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to CVVIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check CVVIF's competition here
UATG vs BEVFF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, BEVFF has a market cap of 377.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while BEVFF trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BEVFF's P/E ratio is 20.25. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BEVFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to BEVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check BEVFF's competition here
UATG vs THAFF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, THAFF has a market cap of 314.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while THAFF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas THAFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to THAFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to THAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check THAFF's competition here
UATG vs CEEIF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, CEEIF has a market cap of 266.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while CEEIF trades at $23.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CEEIF's P/E ratio is 26.59. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CEEIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to CEEIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check CEEIF's competition here
UATG vs TJSCF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, TJSCF has a market cap of 249.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while TJSCF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas TJSCF's P/E ratio is 3.32. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TJSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to TJSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check TJSCF's competition here
UATG vs YMAIF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, YMAIF has a market cap of 215.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while YMAIF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas YMAIF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to YMAIF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to YMAIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check YMAIF's competition here
UATG vs HGRVF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, HGRVF has a market cap of 206.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while HGRVF trades at $7.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HGRVF's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HGRVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to HGRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check HGRVF's competition here
UATG vs DMCHY Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, DMCHY has a market cap of 203.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while DMCHY trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas DMCHY's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DMCHY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to DMCHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check DMCHY's competition here
UATG vs JGSMY Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, JGSMY has a market cap of 142.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while JGSMY trades at $6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas JGSMY's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to JGSMY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to JGSMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check JGSMY's competition here
UATG vs NOBGF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, NOBGF has a market cap of 79.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while NOBGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas NOBGF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NOBGF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to NOBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check NOBGF's competition here
UATG vs RSDEF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, RSDEF has a market cap of 77.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while RSDEF trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas RSDEF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RSDEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to RSDEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check RSDEF's competition here
UATG vs APTL Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, APTL has a market cap of 73.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while APTL trades at $57.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas APTL's P/E ratio is 5.55. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to APTL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to APTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check APTL's competition here
UATG vs ECSL Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, ECSL has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while ECSL trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ECSL's P/E ratio is -44.21. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ECSL's ROE of +2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to ECSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check ECSL's competition here
UATG vs GTII Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, GTII has a market cap of 47.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while GTII trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GTII's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GTII's ROE of -79.89%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is less volatile compared to GTII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check GTII's competition here
UATG vs CIBY Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, CIBY has a market cap of 45M. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while CIBY trades at $1,800.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CIBY's P/E ratio is -122.50. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CIBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to CIBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check CIBY's competition here
UATG vs SUNTF Comparison August 2025
UATG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UATG stands at 300K. In comparison, SUNTF has a market cap of 40.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UATG is priced at $0.00, while SUNTF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UATG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SUNTF's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, UATG's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SUNTF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UATG is more volatile compared to SUNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UATG.Check SUNTF's competition here