United American Corp, Inc.
United American Corp, Inc. (UAMA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (UAMA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UAMA | $0.00 | -0.00% | 11.5K | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| DTEGY | $36.38 | +4.51% | 168.9B | 11.49 | $3.00 | +2.88% |
| DTEGF | $36.47 | +5.12% | 168.9B | 12.13 | $2.84 | +2.92% |
| SFTBY | $42.19 | -2.68% | 134.3B | 17.86 | $2.64 | +0.20% |
| SFTBF | $84.60 | -3.31% | 133.9B | 17.70 | $5.31 | +0.32% |
| NTTYY | $26.40 | -0.94% | 90B | 13.40 | $2.03 | +2.31% |
| NPPXF | $1.03 | -7.79% | 81.2B | 12.28 | $0.08 | +3.33% |
| SFBQF | $1.44 | -5.26% | 74.5B | 22.36 | $0.07 | +21.01% |
| AMXVF | $1.05 | +7.14% | 73.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| KDDIY | $16.98 | -0.83% | 69.9B | 15.27 | $1.15 | +0.90% |
Stock Comparison
UAMA vs DTEGY Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, DTEGY has a market cap of 168.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while DTEGY trades at $36.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTEGY's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DTEGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to DTEGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check DTEGY's competition here
UAMA vs DTEGF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, DTEGF has a market cap of 168.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while DTEGF trades at $36.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTEGF's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DTEGF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to DTEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check DTEGF's competition here
UAMA vs SFTBY Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, SFTBY has a market cap of 134.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while SFTBY trades at $42.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFTBY's P/E ratio is 17.86. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SFTBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to SFTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check SFTBY's competition here
UAMA vs SFTBF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, SFTBF has a market cap of 133.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while SFTBF trades at $84.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFTBF's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SFTBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and SFTBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SFTBF's competition here
UAMA vs NTTYY Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, NTTYY has a market cap of 90B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while NTTYY trades at $26.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTTYY's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NTTYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to NTTYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check NTTYY's competition here
UAMA vs NPPXF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, NPPXF has a market cap of 81.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while NPPXF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPPXF's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NPPXF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and NPPXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NPPXF's competition here
UAMA vs SFBQF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, SFBQF has a market cap of 74.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while SFBQF trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFBQF's P/E ratio is 22.36. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SFBQF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to SFBQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check SFBQF's competition here
UAMA vs AMXVF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, AMXVF has a market cap of 73.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while AMXVF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMXVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AMXVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to AMXVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check AMXVF's competition here
UAMA vs KDDIY Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, KDDIY has a market cap of 69.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while KDDIY trades at $16.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KDDIY's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KDDIY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to KDDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check KDDIY's competition here
UAMA vs AMOVF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, AMOVF has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while AMOVF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMOVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AMOVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and AMOVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMOVF's competition here
UAMA vs KDDIF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, KDDIF has a market cap of 61.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while KDDIF trades at $16.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KDDIF's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KDDIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and KDDIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KDDIF's competition here
UAMA vs SGAPY Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, SGAPY has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while SGAPY trades at $31.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGAPY's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SGAPY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to SGAPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check SGAPY's competition here
UAMA vs SNGNF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, SNGNF has a market cap of 49.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while SNGNF trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNGNF's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SNGNF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and SNGNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SNGNF's competition here
UAMA vs CLLNY Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, CLLNY has a market cap of 47.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while CLLNY trades at $17.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLLNY's P/E ratio is 79.45. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CLLNY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to CLLNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check CLLNY's competition here
UAMA vs FNCTF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, FNCTF has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while FNCTF trades at $15.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNCTF's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FNCTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and FNCTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FNCTF's competition here
UAMA vs TTRAF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, TTRAF has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while TTRAF trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTRAF's P/E ratio is 37.22. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TTRAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and TTRAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TTRAF's competition here
UAMA vs SCMWY Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, SCMWY has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while SCMWY trades at $72.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCMWY's P/E ratio is 22.43. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SCMWY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to SCMWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check SCMWY's competition here
UAMA vs TLGPY Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, TLGPY has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while TLGPY trades at $16.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLGPY's P/E ratio is 34.58. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TLGPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to TLGPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check TLGPY's competition here
UAMA vs SWZCF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, SWZCF has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while SWZCF trades at $696.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWZCF's P/E ratio is 21.84. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SWZCF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and SWZCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SWZCF's competition here
UAMA vs TEFOF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, TEFOF has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while TEFOF trades at $5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEFOF's P/E ratio is -33.48. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TEFOF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and TEFOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TEFOF's competition here
UAMA vs AVIFY Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, AVIFY has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while AVIFY trades at $9.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVIFY's P/E ratio is 24.17. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AVIFY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and AVIFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AVIFY's competition here
UAMA vs VODPF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, VODPF has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while VODPF trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VODPF's P/E ratio is -6.22. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VODPF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and VODPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VODPF's competition here
UAMA vs BTGOF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, BTGOF has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while BTGOF trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTGOF's P/E ratio is 18.93. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BTGOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to BTGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check BTGOF's competition here
UAMA vs CTOWY Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, CTOWY has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while CTOWY trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTOWY's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CTOWY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to CTOWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check CTOWY's competition here
UAMA vs CHWRF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, CHWRF has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while CHWRF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHWRF's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CHWRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and CHWRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHWRF's competition here
UAMA vs TELNY Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, TELNY has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while TELNY trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TELNY's P/E ratio is 21.22. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TELNY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to TELNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check TELNY's competition here
UAMA vs TELNF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, TELNF has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while TELNF trades at $16.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TELNF's P/E ratio is 21.27. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TELNF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and TELNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TELNF's competition here
UAMA vs RCIAF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, RCIAF has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while RCIAF trades at $36.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCIAF's P/E ratio is 18.18. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RCIAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and RCIAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RCIAF's competition here
UAMA vs KKPNF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, KKPNF has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while KKPNF trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KKPNF's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KKPNF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to KKPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check KKPNF's competition here
UAMA vs KKPNY Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, KKPNY has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while KKPNY trades at $4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KKPNY's P/E ratio is 20.77. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KKPNY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to KKPNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check KKPNY's competition here
UAMA vs TLKMF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, TLKMF has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while TLKMF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLKMF's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TLKMF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and TLKMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TLKMF's competition here
UAMA vs AVIVF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, AVIVF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while AVIVF trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVIVF's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AVIVF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to AVIVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check AVIVF's competition here
UAMA vs ELMUY Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, ELMUY has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while ELMUY trades at $27.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELMUY's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ELMUY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to ELMUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check ELMUY's competition here
UAMA vs AVIKF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, AVIKF has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while AVIKF trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVIKF's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AVIKF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to AVIKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check AVIKF's competition here
UAMA vs MTNOY Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, MTNOY has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while MTNOY trades at $8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTNOY's P/E ratio is -30.87. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MTNOY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to MTNOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check MTNOY's competition here
UAMA vs VDMCY Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, VDMCY has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while VDMCY trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDMCY's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VDMCY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to VDMCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check VDMCY's competition here
UAMA vs HLTOY Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, HLTOY has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while HLTOY trades at $9.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLTOY's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HLTOY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to HLTOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check HLTOY's competition here
UAMA vs SJRWF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, SJRWF has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while SJRWF trades at $30.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SJRWF's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SJRWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and SJRWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SJRWF's competition here
UAMA vs TLSNF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, TLSNF has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while TLSNF trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLSNF's P/E ratio is 26.57. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TLSNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and TLSNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TLSNF's competition here
UAMA vs TLSNY Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, TLSNY has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while TLSNY trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLSNY's P/E ratio is 25.56. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TLSNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to TLSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check TLSNY's competition here
UAMA vs MTNOF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, MTNOF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while MTNOF trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTNOF's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MTNOF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and MTNOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MTNOF's competition here
UAMA vs BECEF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, BECEF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while BECEF trades at $13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BECEF's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BECEF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and BECEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BECEF's competition here
UAMA vs BCEPF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, BCEPF has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while BCEPF trades at $13.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCEPF's P/E ratio is 5.44. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BCEPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and BCEPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCEPF's competition here
UAMA vs HKTTY Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, HKTTY has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while HKTTY trades at $16.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKTTY's P/E ratio is 18.78. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HKTTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and HKTTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HKTTY's competition here
UAMA vs TCPFF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, TCPFF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while TCPFF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCPFF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TCPFF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to TCPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check TCPFF's competition here
UAMA vs TLTZY Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, TLTZY has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while TLTZY trades at $7.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLTZY's P/E ratio is 26.51. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TLTZY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to TLTZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check TLTZY's competition here
UAMA vs VODAF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, VODAF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while VODAF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VODAF's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VODAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and VODAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VODAF's competition here
UAMA vs AAFRF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, AAFRF has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while AAFRF trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAFRF's P/E ratio is 33.11. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AAFRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and AAFRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AAFRF's competition here
UAMA vs TIAIY Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, TIAIY has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while TIAIY trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIAIY's P/E ratio is -26.90. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TIAIY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and TIAIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TIAIY's competition here
UAMA vs TIAOF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, TIAOF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while TIAOF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIAOF's P/E ratio is -24.42. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TIAOF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and TIAOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TIAOF's competition here
UAMA vs BCPPF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, BCPPF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while BCPPF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCPPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BCPPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and BCPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCPPF's competition here
UAMA vs TLTZF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, TLTZF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while TLTZF trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLTZF's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TLTZF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and TLTZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TLTZF's competition here
UAMA vs BCEXF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, BCEXF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while BCEXF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCEXF's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BCEXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and BCEXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCEXF's competition here
UAMA vs DIGBF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, DIGBF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while DIGBF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIGBF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DIGBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and DIGBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DIGBF's competition here
UAMA vs HKTTF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, HKTTF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while HKTTF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKTTF's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HKTTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and HKTTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HKTTF's competition here
UAMA vs TIAJF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, TIAJF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while TIAJF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIAJF's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TIAJF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and TIAJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TIAJF's competition here
UAMA vs ELMUF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, ELMUF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while ELMUF trades at $54.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELMUF's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ELMUF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to ELMUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check ELMUF's competition here
UAMA vs FRTAY Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, FRTAY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while FRTAY trades at $18.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRTAY's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FRTAY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and FRTAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FRTAY's competition here
UAMA vs LBRDB Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, LBRDB has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while LBRDB trades at $63.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBRDB's P/E ratio is 10.06. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LBRDB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to LBRDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check LBRDB's competition here
UAMA vs TELDF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, TELDF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while TELDF trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TELDF's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TELDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to TELDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check TELDF's competition here
UAMA vs SHNUF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, SHNUF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while SHNUF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHNUF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SHNUF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to SHNUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check SHNUF's competition here
UAMA vs TELDY Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, TELDY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while TELDY trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TELDY's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TELDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to TELDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check TELDY's competition here
UAMA vs SOBKY Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, SOBKY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while SOBKY trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOBKY's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SOBKY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to SOBKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check SOBKY's competition here
UAMA vs AARTY Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, AARTY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while AARTY trades at $20.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AARTY's P/E ratio is 33.58. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AARTY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to AARTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check AARTY's competition here
UAMA vs QBCRF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, QBCRF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while QBCRF trades at $28.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QBCRF's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to QBCRF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and QBCRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QBCRF's competition here
UAMA vs MYTEF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, MYTEF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while MYTEF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MYTEF's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MYTEF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to MYTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check MYTEF's competition here
UAMA vs HLTOF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, HLTOF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while HLTOF trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLTOF's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HLTOF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to HLTOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check HLTOF's competition here
UAMA vs QBCAF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, QBCAF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while QBCAF trades at $29.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QBCAF's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to QBCAF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and QBCAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QBCAF's competition here
UAMA vs MAXSF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, MAXSF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while MAXSF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAXSF's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MAXSF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and MAXSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MAXSF's competition here
UAMA vs AXXTF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, AXXTF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while AXXTF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXXTF's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AXXTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and AXXTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AXXTF's competition here
UAMA vs PCCWY Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, PCCWY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while PCCWY trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCCWY's P/E ratio is -137.15. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PCCWY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to PCCWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check PCCWY's competition here
UAMA vs BZQIF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, BZQIF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while BZQIF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZQIF's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BZQIF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and BZQIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BZQIF's competition here
UAMA vs PTITF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, PTITF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while PTITF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTITF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PTITF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to PTITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check PTITF's competition here
UAMA vs PCWLF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, PCWLF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while PCWLF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCWLF's P/E ratio is -66.50. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PCWLF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and PCWLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PCWLF's competition here
UAMA vs BZQIY Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, BZQIY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while BZQIY trades at $9.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZQIY's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BZQIY's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and BZQIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BZQIY's competition here
UAMA vs TKAGY Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, TKAGY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while TKAGY trades at $15.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKAGY's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TKAGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and TKAGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TKAGY's competition here
UAMA vs TRKNY Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, TRKNY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while TRKNY trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRKNY's P/E ratio is 19.89. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TRKNY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and TRKNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TRKNY's competition here
UAMA vs UDIRF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, UDIRF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while UDIRF trades at $27.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UDIRF's P/E ratio is -75.93. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to UDIRF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and UDIRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UDIRF's competition here
UAMA vs GTMEY Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, GTMEY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while GTMEY trades at $32.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTMEY's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GTMEY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and GTMEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GTMEY's competition here
UAMA vs PHTCF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, PHTCF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while PHTCF trades at $20.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHTCF's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PHTCF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and PHTCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PHTCF's competition here
UAMA vs CUCSY Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, CUCSY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while CUCSY trades at $10.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CUCSY's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CUCSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and CUCSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CUCSY's competition here
UAMA vs FRTAF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, FRTAF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while FRTAF trades at $33.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRTAF's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FRTAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and FRTAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FRTAF's competition here
UAMA vs CUCSF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, CUCSF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while CUCSF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CUCSF's P/E ratio is 8.03. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CUCSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to CUCSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check CUCSF's competition here
UAMA vs TCMFF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, TCMFF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while TCMFF trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCMFF's P/E ratio is 87.50. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TCMFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and TCMFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TCMFF's competition here
UAMA vs TFAOF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, TFAOF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while TFAOF trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TFAOF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TFAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and TFAOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TFAOF's competition here
UAMA vs IIJIF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, IIJIF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while IIJIF trades at $20.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IIJIF's P/E ratio is 26.16. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to IIJIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and IIJIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IIJIF's competition here
UAMA vs IIJIY Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, IIJIY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while IIJIY trades at $38.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IIJIY's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to IIJIY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and IIJIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IIJIY's competition here
UAMA vs BGAOF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, BGAOF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while BGAOF trades at $9.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGAOF's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BGAOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and BGAOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BGAOF's competition here
UAMA vs MICCF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, MICCF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while MICCF trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MICCF's P/E ratio is 70.96. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MICCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and MICCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MICCF's competition here
UAMA vs NZTCF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, NZTCF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while NZTCF trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NZTCF's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NZTCF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and NZTCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NZTCF's competition here
UAMA vs TACYY Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, TACYY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while TACYY trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TACYY's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TACYY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and TACYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TACYY's competition here
UAMA vs PTXKY Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, PTXKY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while PTXKY trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTXKY's P/E ratio is 21.27. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PTXKY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to PTXKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check PTXKY's competition here
UAMA vs SPKKY Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, SPKKY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while SPKKY trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPKKY's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SPKKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to SPKKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check SPKKY's competition here
UAMA vs TRKNF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, TRKNF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while TRKNF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRKNF's P/E ratio is 39.93. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TRKNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to TRKNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check TRKNF's competition here
UAMA vs TLGHY Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, TLGHY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while TLGHY trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLGHY's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TLGHY's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and TLGHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TLGHY's competition here
UAMA vs PTTWF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, PTTWF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while PTTWF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTTWF's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PTTWF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to PTTWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check PTTWF's competition here
UAMA vs BGAOY Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, BGAOY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while BGAOY trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGAOY's P/E ratio is 3.95. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BGAOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA and BGAOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BGAOY's competition here
UAMA vs GMOYF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, GMOYF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while GMOYF trades at $24.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMOYF's P/E ratio is 28.43. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GMOYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to GMOYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check GMOYF's competition here
UAMA vs CLCMF Comparison August 2025
UAMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMA stands at 11.5K. In comparison, CLCMF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMA is priced at $0.00, while CLCMF trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLCMF's P/E ratio is -3.63. In terms of profitability, UAMA's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CLCMF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMA is less volatile compared to CLCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMA.Check CLCMF's competition here