Nippon Sanso Holdings Corporation
Nippon Sanso Holdings Corporation TYNPF Peers
See (TYNPF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TYNPF | $34.77 | -0.01% | 15.05B | 19.64 | $1.77 | +1.00% |
| SHECF | $31.21 | N/A | 61.79B | 17.15 | $1.82 | +0.01% |
| SHECY | $15.12 | +2.09% | 59.87B | 16.43 | $0.92 | +0.72% |
| BASFY | $12.67 | +1.77% | 45.23B | 30.90 | $0.41 | +3.81% |
| BFFAF | $49.06 | -0.89% | 43.85B | 29.91 | $1.64 | +5.81% |
| SLMNP | $880.00 | N/A | 25.96B | 967.03 | $0.91 | +6.90% |
| PCHUY | $4.26 | +19.72% | 19.21B | -4.26 | -$1.00 | +1.74% |
| AHKSF | $7.41 | +4.81% | 10.06B | 17.64 | $0.42 | +3.47% |
| AHKSY | $13.82 | -0.90% | 9.38B | 16.45 | $0.84 | N/A |
| IMCDY | $69.65 | +0.91% | 8.23B | 25.33 | $2.75 | +2.47% |
Stock Comparison
TYNPF vs SHECF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, SHECF has a market cap of 61.79B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while SHECF trades at $31.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas SHECF's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHECF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to SHECF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs SHECY Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, SHECY has a market cap of 59.87B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while SHECY trades at $15.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas SHECY's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHECY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to SHECY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs BASFY Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, BASFY has a market cap of 45.23B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while BASFY trades at $12.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas BASFY's P/E ratio is 30.90. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BASFY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to BASFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs BFFAF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, BFFAF has a market cap of 43.85B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while BFFAF trades at $49.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas BFFAF's P/E ratio is 29.91. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BFFAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to BFFAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs SLMNP Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, SLMNP has a market cap of 25.96B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while SLMNP trades at $880.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas SLMNP's P/E ratio is 967.03. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SLMNP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to SLMNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs PCHUY Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, PCHUY has a market cap of 19.21B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while PCHUY trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas PCHUY's P/E ratio is -4.26. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCHUY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to PCHUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs AHKSF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, AHKSF has a market cap of 10.06B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while AHKSF trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas AHKSF's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AHKSF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to AHKSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs AHKSY Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, AHKSY has a market cap of 9.38B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while AHKSY trades at $13.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas AHKSY's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AHKSY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to AHKSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs IMCDY Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, IMCDY has a market cap of 8.23B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while IMCDY trades at $69.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas IMCDY's P/E ratio is 25.33. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IMCDY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to IMCDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs MTLHF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, MTLHF has a market cap of 7.46B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while MTLHF trades at $5.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas MTLHF's P/E ratio is 14.16. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MTLHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to MTLHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs MTLHY Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, MTLHY has a market cap of 7.27B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while MTLHY trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas MTLHY's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MTLHY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to MTLHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs GNENF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, GNENF has a market cap of 7.11B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while GNENF trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas GNENF's P/E ratio is -17.79. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GNENF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to GNENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs PECGF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, PECGF has a market cap of 6.74B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while PECGF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas PECGF's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PECGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to PECGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs BCHMF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, BCHMF has a market cap of 4.80B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while BCHMF trades at $64.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas BCHMF's P/E ratio is 32.85. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BCHMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to BCHMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs SOMMF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, SOMMF has a market cap of 4.50B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while SOMMF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas SOMMF's P/E ratio is -3.72. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOMMF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to SOMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs NNCHY Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, NNCHY has a market cap of 4.36B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while NNCHY trades at $31.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas NNCHY's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NNCHY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to NNCHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs TOSCF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, TOSCF has a market cap of 4.32B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while TOSCF trades at $13.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas TOSCF's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TOSCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to TOSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs SHWDF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, SHWDF has a market cap of 4.18B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while SHWDF trades at $23.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas SHWDF's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHWDF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to SHWDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs SHWDY Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, SHWDY has a market cap of 4.09B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while SHWDY trades at $22.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas SHWDY's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHWDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to SHWDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs KURRY Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, KURRY has a market cap of 4.07B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while KURRY trades at $37.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas KURRY's P/E ratio is 18.76. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KURRY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to KURRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs PTGCF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, PTGCF has a market cap of 4.05B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while PTGCF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas PTGCF's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PTGCF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to PTGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs SOMMY Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, SOMMY has a market cap of 3.96B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while SOMMY trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas SOMMY's P/E ratio is -3.28. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOMMY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to SOMMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs GNENY Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, GNENY has a market cap of 3.73B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while GNENY trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas GNENY's P/E ratio is -16.50. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GNENY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to GNENY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs KURRF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, KURRF has a market cap of 3.68B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while KURRF trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas KURRF's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KURRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to KURRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs SLVYY Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, SLVYY has a market cap of 3.64B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while SLVYY trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas SLVYY's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SLVYY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to SLVYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs SVYSF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, SVYSF has a market cap of 3.55B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while SVYSF trades at $33.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas SVYSF's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SVYSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to SVYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs KOYJF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, KOYJF has a market cap of 3.09B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while KOYJF trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas KOYJF's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KOYJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to KOYJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs INDOY Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, INDOY has a market cap of 3.06B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while INDOY trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas INDOY's P/E ratio is -4.91. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INDOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to INDOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs KPLUY Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, KPLUY has a market cap of 3.01B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while KPLUY trades at $8.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas KPLUY's P/E ratio is -39.95. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KPLUY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to KPLUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs RBTEF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, RBTEF has a market cap of 1.81B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while RBTEF trades at $924.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas RBTEF's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RBTEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to RBTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs DENKF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, DENKF has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while DENKF trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas DENKF's P/E ratio is 30.60. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DENKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to DENKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs MXCHF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, MXCHF has a market cap of 1.38B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while MXCHF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas MXCHF's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MXCHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to MXCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs NPKYY Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, NPKYY has a market cap of 1.37B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while NPKYY trades at $8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas NPKYY's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NPKYY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to NPKYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs NPKYF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, NPKYF has a market cap of 1.37B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while NPKYF trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas NPKYF's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NPKYF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to NPKYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs TOAGF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, TOAGF has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while TOAGF trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas TOAGF's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TOAGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to TOAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs VYTPF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, VYTPF has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while VYTPF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas VYTPF's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VYTPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to VYTPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs LNZNF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, LNZNF has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while LNZNF trades at $31.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas LNZNF's P/E ratio is -6.79. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LNZNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to LNZNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs FRRSF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, FRRSF has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while FRRSF trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas FRRSF's P/E ratio is -605.00. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FRRSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to FRRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs BRGAY Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, BRGAY has a market cap of 876.35M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while BRGAY trades at $35.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas BRGAY's P/E ratio is 24.24. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BRGAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to BRGAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs MXCHY Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, MXCHY has a market cap of 648.10M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while MXCHY trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas MXCHY's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MXCHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to MXCHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs SGLFF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, SGLFF has a market cap of 446.29M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while SGLFF trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas SGLFF's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SGLFF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to SGLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs TYGIF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, TYGIF has a market cap of 380.97M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while TYGIF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas TYGIF's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TYGIF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to TYGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs CDSAF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, CDSAF has a market cap of 372.00M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while CDSAF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas CDSAF's P/E ratio is 62.00. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CDSAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to CDSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs NNXPF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, NNXPF has a market cap of 295.15M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while NNXPF trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas NNXPF's P/E ratio is -43.25. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NNXPF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to NNXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs CRDE Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, CRDE has a market cap of 277.51M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while CRDE trades at $19,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas CRDE's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRDE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TYNPF has daily volatility of 21.88 and CRDE has daily volatility of N/A.
TYNPF vs CNSJF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, CNSJF has a market cap of 183.14M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while CNSJF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas CNSJF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNSJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to CNSJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs BLGO Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, BLGO has a market cap of 75.14M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while BLGO trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas BLGO's P/E ratio is -24.90. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BLGO's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to BLGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs BNOW Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, BNOW has a market cap of 73.42M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while BNOW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas BNOW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BNOW's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to BNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs PLYR Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, PLYR has a market cap of 67.73M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while PLYR trades at $60.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas PLYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PLYR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to PLYR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs BSWGF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, BSWGF has a market cap of 23.49M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while BSWGF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas BSWGF's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BSWGF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to BSWGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs FGPHF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, FGPHF has a market cap of 17.97M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while FGPHF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas FGPHF's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FGPHF's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to FGPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs CHHYF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, CHHYF has a market cap of 6.33M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while CHHYF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas CHHYF's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHHYF's ROE of +1.74%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to CHHYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs AGTT Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, AGTT has a market cap of 4.31M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while AGTT trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas AGTT's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGTT's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to AGTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs FHELF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, FHELF has a market cap of 3.74M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while FHELF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas FHELF's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FHELF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to FHELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs EESE Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, EESE has a market cap of 2.67M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while EESE trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas EESE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EESE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to EESE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs OPCGF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, OPCGF has a market cap of 434233.00. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while OPCGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas OPCGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OPCGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to OPCGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs CHCC Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, CHCC has a market cap of 165082.00. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while CHCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas CHCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHCC's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to CHCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs AFPW Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, AFPW has a market cap of 141092.00. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while AFPW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas AFPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AFPW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to AFPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs HZRGF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, HZRGF has a market cap of 138317.00. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while HZRGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas HZRGF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HZRGF's ROE of -1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to HZRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs FLRE Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, FLRE has a market cap of 22253.00. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while FLRE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas FLRE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FLRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to FLRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs LBTI Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, LBTI has a market cap of 18599.00. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while LBTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas LBTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LBTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to LBTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs VULC Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, VULC has a market cap of 9780.00. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while VULC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas VULC's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VULC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to VULC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs NUEC Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, NUEC has a market cap of 2421.00. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while NUEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas NUEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NUEC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to NUEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs MKDTY Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, MKDTY has a market cap of 1218.00. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while MKDTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas MKDTY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MKDTY's ROE of +7.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to MKDTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs RKTE Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 15.05B. In comparison, RKTE has a market cap of 511.00. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $34.77, while RKTE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.64, whereas RKTE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RKTE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to RKTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.