Nippon Sanso Holdings Corporation
Nippon Sanso Holdings Corporation (TYNPF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TYNPF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TYNPF | $37.91 | +11.53% | 16.4B | 24.30 | $1.56 | +0.92% |
| SHECF | $30.69 | +9.51% | 57.4B | 16.64 | $1.84 | +2.35% |
| SHECY | $14.40 | -0.07% | 55B | 15.80 | $0.91 | +1.56% |
| BASFY | $12.02 | -2.28% | 42.9B | 100.17 | $0.12 | +5.24% |
| BFFAF | $47.36 | -8.04% | 42.3B | 96.65 | $0.49 | +5.39% |
| SLMNP | $890.00 | +0.00% | 26.3B | 978.02 | $0.91 | +6.74% |
| AHKSY | $14.23 | +2.37% | 9.9B | 10.84 | $1.32 | N/A |
| AHKSF | $6.97 | +0.00% | 9.5B | 10.56 | $0.66 | +3.69% |
| GNENF | $3.28 | +0.00% | 8.6B | -23.43 | -$0.14 | +0.63% |
| MTLHY | $27.37 | +0.00% | 7.8B | 25.82 | $1.06 | +3.58% |
Stock Comparison
TYNPF vs SHECF Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, SHECF has a market cap of 57.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while SHECF trades at $30.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas SHECF's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHECF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to SHECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check SHECF's competition here
TYNPF vs SHECY Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, SHECY has a market cap of 55B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while SHECY trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas SHECY's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHECY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to SHECY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check SHECY's competition here
TYNPF vs BASFY Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, BASFY has a market cap of 42.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while BASFY trades at $12.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas BASFY's P/E ratio is 100.17. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BASFY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to BASFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check BASFY's competition here
TYNPF vs BFFAF Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, BFFAF has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while BFFAF trades at $47.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas BFFAF's P/E ratio is 96.65. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BFFAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to BFFAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check BFFAF's competition here
TYNPF vs SLMNP Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, SLMNP has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while SLMNP trades at $890.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas SLMNP's P/E ratio is 978.02. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SLMNP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to SLMNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check SLMNP's competition here
TYNPF vs AHKSY Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, AHKSY has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while AHKSY trades at $14.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas AHKSY's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AHKSY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to AHKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check AHKSY's competition here
TYNPF vs AHKSF Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, AHKSF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while AHKSF trades at $6.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas AHKSF's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AHKSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to AHKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check AHKSF's competition here
TYNPF vs GNENF Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, GNENF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while GNENF trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas GNENF's P/E ratio is -23.43. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GNENF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to GNENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check GNENF's competition here
TYNPF vs MTLHY Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, MTLHY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while MTLHY trades at $27.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas MTLHY's P/E ratio is 25.82. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MTLHY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to MTLHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check MTLHY's competition here
TYNPF vs MTLHF Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, MTLHF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while MTLHF trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas MTLHF's P/E ratio is 24.76. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MTLHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to MTLHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check MTLHF's competition here
TYNPF vs PECGF Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, PECGF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while PECGF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas PECGF's P/E ratio is 42.81. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PECGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to PECGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check PECGF's competition here
TYNPF vs IMCDY Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, IMCDY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while IMCDY trades at $54.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas IMCDY's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IMCDY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to IMCDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check IMCDY's competition here
TYNPF vs GNENY Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, GNENY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while GNENY trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas GNENY's P/E ratio is -24.97. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GNENY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to GNENY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check GNENY's competition here
TYNPF vs TOSCF Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, TOSCF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while TOSCF trades at $15.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas TOSCF's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TOSCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to TOSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check TOSCF's competition here
TYNPF vs NNCHY Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, NNCHY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while NNCHY trades at $35.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas NNCHY's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NNCHY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to NNCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check NNCHY's competition here
TYNPF vs BCHMF Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, BCHMF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while BCHMF trades at $61.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas BCHMF's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BCHMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to BCHMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check BCHMF's competition here
TYNPF vs SOMMF Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, SOMMF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while SOMMF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas SOMMF's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SOMMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to SOMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check SOMMF's competition here
TYNPF vs SHWDY Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, SHWDY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while SHWDY trades at $24.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas SHWDY's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHWDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to SHWDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check SHWDY's competition here
TYNPF vs SHWDF Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, SHWDF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while SHWDF trades at $23.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas SHWDF's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHWDF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to SHWDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check SHWDF's competition here
TYNPF vs PTGCF Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, PTGCF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while PTGCF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas PTGCF's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PTGCF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to PTGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check PTGCF's competition here
TYNPF vs SOMMY Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, SOMMY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while SOMMY trades at $12.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas SOMMY's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SOMMY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to SOMMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check SOMMY's competition here
TYNPF vs KURRY Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, KURRY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while KURRY trades at $35.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas KURRY's P/E ratio is 25.38. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KURRY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to KURRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check KURRY's competition here
TYNPF vs KURRF Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, KURRF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while KURRF trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas KURRF's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KURRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to KURRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check KURRF's competition here
TYNPF vs KOYJF Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, KOYJF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while KOYJF trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas KOYJF's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KOYJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to KOYJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check KOYJF's competition here
TYNPF vs SVYSF Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, SVYSF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while SVYSF trades at $31.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas SVYSF's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SVYSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to SVYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check SVYSF's competition here
TYNPF vs SLVYY Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, SLVYY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while SLVYY trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas SLVYY's P/E ratio is 20.77. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SLVYY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to SLVYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check SLVYY's competition here
TYNPF vs INDOY Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, INDOY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while INDOY trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas INDOY's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INDOY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to INDOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check INDOY's competition here
TYNPF vs KPLUY Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, KPLUY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while KPLUY trades at $7.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas KPLUY's P/E ratio is 767.50. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KPLUY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to KPLUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check KPLUY's competition here
TYNPF vs PCHUY Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, PCHUY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while PCHUY trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas PCHUY's P/E ratio is -2.48. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PCHUY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to PCHUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check PCHUY's competition here
TYNPF vs RBTEF Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, RBTEF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while RBTEF trades at $922.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas RBTEF's P/E ratio is 18.45. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RBTEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to RBTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check RBTEF's competition here
TYNPF vs DENKF Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, DENKF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while DENKF trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas DENKF's P/E ratio is 30.60. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DENKF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to DENKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check DENKF's competition here
TYNPF vs MXCHF Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, MXCHF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while MXCHF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas MXCHF's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MXCHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to MXCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check MXCHF's competition here
TYNPF vs NPKYY Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, NPKYY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while NPKYY trades at $8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas NPKYY's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NPKYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to NPKYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check NPKYY's competition here
TYNPF vs NPKYF Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, NPKYF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while NPKYF trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas NPKYF's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NPKYF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to NPKYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check NPKYF's competition here
TYNPF vs VYTPF Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, VYTPF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while VYTPF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas VYTPF's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VYTPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to VYTPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check VYTPF's competition here
TYNPF vs FRRSF Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, FRRSF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while FRRSF trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas FRRSF's P/E ratio is -605.00. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FRRSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to FRRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check FRRSF's competition here
TYNPF vs LNZNF Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, LNZNF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while LNZNF trades at $26.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas LNZNF's P/E ratio is -7.47. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LNZNF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to LNZNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check LNZNF's competition here
TYNPF vs TOAGF Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, TOAGF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while TOAGF trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas TOAGF's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TOAGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to TOAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check TOAGF's competition here
TYNPF vs BRGAY Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, BRGAY has a market cap of 876.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while BRGAY trades at $35.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas BRGAY's P/E ratio is 24.24. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BRGAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to BRGAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check BRGAY's competition here
TYNPF vs MXCHY Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, MXCHY has a market cap of 624.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while MXCHY trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas MXCHY's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MXCHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to MXCHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check MXCHY's competition here
TYNPF vs SGLFF Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, SGLFF has a market cap of 507.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while SGLFF trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas SGLFF's P/E ratio is -4.41. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SGLFF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to SGLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check SGLFF's competition here
TYNPF vs TYGIF Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, TYGIF has a market cap of 381M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while TYGIF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas TYGIF's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TYGIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to TYGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check TYGIF's competition here
TYNPF vs CDSAF Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, CDSAF has a market cap of 372M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while CDSAF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas CDSAF's P/E ratio is 62.00. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CDSAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to CDSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check CDSAF's competition here
TYNPF vs NNXPF Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, NNXPF has a market cap of 368.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while NNXPF trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas NNXPF's P/E ratio is -53.95. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NNXPF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to NNXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check NNXPF's competition here
TYNPF vs CRDE Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, CRDE has a market cap of 277.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while CRDE trades at $19,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas CRDE's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CRDE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TYNPF has daily volatility of 0.45 and CRDE has daily volatility of N/A.Check CRDE's competition here
TYNPF vs CNSJF Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, CNSJF has a market cap of 183.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while CNSJF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas CNSJF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNSJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to CNSJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check CNSJF's competition here
TYNPF vs BNOW Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, BNOW has a market cap of 73.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while BNOW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas BNOW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BNOW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to BNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check BNOW's competition here
TYNPF vs HZRGF Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, HZRGF has a market cap of 70.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while HZRGF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas HZRGF's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HZRGF's ROE of -1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to HZRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check HZRGF's competition here
TYNPF vs BLGO Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, BLGO has a market cap of 56.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while BLGO trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas BLGO's P/E ratio is -18.46. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BLGO's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to BLGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check BLGO's competition here
TYNPF vs BSWGF Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, BSWGF has a market cap of 40.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while BSWGF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas BSWGF's P/E ratio is -11.11. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BSWGF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to BSWGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check BSWGF's competition here
TYNPF vs FGPHF Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, FGPHF has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while FGPHF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas FGPHF's P/E ratio is -2.46. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FGPHF's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to FGPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check FGPHF's competition here
TYNPF vs PLYR Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, PLYR has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while PLYR trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas PLYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PLYR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to PLYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check PLYR's competition here
TYNPF vs CHHYF Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, CHHYF has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while CHHYF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas CHHYF's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHHYF's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to CHHYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check CHHYF's competition here
TYNPF vs FHELF Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, FHELF has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while FHELF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas FHELF's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FHELF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to FHELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check FHELF's competition here
TYNPF vs EESE Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, EESE has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while EESE trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas EESE's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EESE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to EESE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check EESE's competition here
TYNPF vs AGTT Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, AGTT has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while AGTT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas AGTT's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AGTT's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to AGTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check AGTT's competition here
TYNPF vs OPCGF Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, OPCGF has a market cap of 437.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while OPCGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas OPCGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OPCGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to OPCGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check OPCGF's competition here
TYNPF vs CHCC Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, CHCC has a market cap of 165.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while CHCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas CHCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHCC's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to CHCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check CHCC's competition here
TYNPF vs AFPW Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, AFPW has a market cap of 141.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while AFPW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas AFPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AFPW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to AFPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check AFPW's competition here
TYNPF vs FLRE Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, FLRE has a market cap of 22.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while FLRE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas FLRE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FLRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to FLRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check FLRE's competition here
TYNPF vs LBTI Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, LBTI has a market cap of 18.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while LBTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas LBTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to LBTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check LBTI's competition here
TYNPF vs VULC Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, VULC has a market cap of 9.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while VULC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas VULC's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VULC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to VULC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check VULC's competition here
TYNPF vs MKDTY Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, MKDTY has a market cap of 3.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while MKDTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas MKDTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MKDTY's ROE of +7.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to MKDTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check MKDTY's competition here
TYNPF vs NUEC Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, NUEC has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while NUEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas NUEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NUEC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to NUEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check NUEC's competition here
TYNPF vs RKTE Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, RKTE has a market cap of 511. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while RKTE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas RKTE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RKTE's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to RKTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check RKTE's competition here
TYNPF vs ADKIL Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, ADKIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while ADKIL trades at $430.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas ADKIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADKIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to ADKIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check ADKIL's competition here
TYNPF vs BMRK Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, BMRK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while BMRK trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas BMRK's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BMRK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to BMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check BMRK's competition here
TYNPF vs ADKCF Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, ADKCF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while ADKCF trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas ADKCF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADKCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to ADKCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check ADKCF's competition here
TYNPF vs FIND Comparison August 2025
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 16.4B. In comparison, FIND has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $37.91, while FIND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.30, whereas FIND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FIND's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is more volatile compared to FIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.Check FIND's competition here