Nippon Sanso Holdings Corporation
Nippon Sanso Holdings Corporation TYNPF Peers
See (TYNPF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TYNPF | $39.28 | -0.96% | 17B | 24.86 | $1.58 | +0.89% |
| SHECF | $30.18 | -1.69% | 59.2B | 16.23 | $1.86 | +2.38% |
| SHECY | $14.97 | -3.33% | 58.7B | 16.09 | $0.93 | +0.78% |
| BFFAF | $47.94 | -2.05% | 42.8B | 49.94 | $0.96 | +6.02% |
| BASFY | $11.86 | -1.25% | 42.3B | 49.42 | $0.24 | +6.12% |
| SLMNP | $870.06 | +3.44% | 25.7B | 956.11 | $0.91 | +6.90% |
| AHKSF | $6.55 | N/A | 8.9B | 9.49 | $0.69 | +3.93% |
| AHKSY | $12.82 | -3.70% | 8.8B | 9.29 | $1.38 | N/A |
| IMCDY | $64.50 | -0.07% | 7.6B | 23.03 | $2.80 | +1.68% |
| MTLHF | $5.24 | N/A | 7.5B | 23.82 | $0.22 | +4.16% |
Stock Comparison
TYNPF vs SHECF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, SHECF has a market cap of 59.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while SHECF trades at $30.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas SHECF's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHECF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to SHECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs SHECY Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, SHECY has a market cap of 58.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while SHECY trades at $14.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas SHECY's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHECY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to SHECY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs BFFAF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, BFFAF has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while BFFAF trades at $47.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas BFFAF's P/E ratio is 49.94. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BFFAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF and BFFAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TYNPF vs BASFY Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, BASFY has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while BASFY trades at $11.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas BASFY's P/E ratio is 49.42. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BASFY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to BASFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs SLMNP Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, SLMNP has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while SLMNP trades at $870.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas SLMNP's P/E ratio is 956.11. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SLMNP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to SLMNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs AHKSF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, AHKSF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while AHKSF trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas AHKSF's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AHKSF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to AHKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs AHKSY Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, AHKSY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while AHKSY trades at $12.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas AHKSY's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AHKSY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to AHKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs IMCDY Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, IMCDY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while IMCDY trades at $64.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas IMCDY's P/E ratio is 23.03. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IMCDY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to IMCDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs MTLHF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, MTLHF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while MTLHF trades at $5.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas MTLHF's P/E ratio is 23.82. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MTLHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to MTLHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs GNENF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, GNENF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while GNENF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas GNENF's P/E ratio is -18.57. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GNENF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to GNENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs MTLHY Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, MTLHY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while MTLHY trades at $24.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas MTLHY's P/E ratio is 22.25. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MTLHY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF and MTLHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TYNPF vs PECGF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, PECGF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while PECGF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas PECGF's P/E ratio is 42.13. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PECGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to PECGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs PTGCF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, PTGCF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while PTGCF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas PTGCF's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PTGCF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF and PTGCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TYNPF vs BCHMF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, BCHMF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while BCHMF trades at $61.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas BCHMF's P/E ratio is 31.18. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BCHMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to BCHMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs SOMMF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, SOMMF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while SOMMF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas SOMMF's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOMMF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to SOMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs KURRY Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, KURRY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while KURRY trades at $40.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas KURRY's P/E ratio is 28.35. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KURRY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to KURRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs TOSCF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, TOSCF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while TOSCF trades at $13.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas TOSCF's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TOSCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to TOSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs NNCHY Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, NNCHY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while NNCHY trades at $31.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas NNCHY's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NNCHY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to NNCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs GNENY Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, GNENY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while GNENY trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas GNENY's P/E ratio is -18.79. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GNENY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF and GNENY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TYNPF vs SHWDF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, SHWDF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while SHWDF trades at $23.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas SHWDF's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHWDF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to SHWDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs SHWDY Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, SHWDY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while SHWDY trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas SHWDY's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHWDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to SHWDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs SOMMY Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, SOMMY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while SOMMY trades at $11.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas SOMMY's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOMMY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to SOMMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs SVYSF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, SVYSF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while SVYSF trades at $35.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas SVYSF's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SVYSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF and SVYSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TYNPF vs KURRF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, KURRF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while KURRF trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas KURRF's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KURRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to KURRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs KOYJF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, KOYJF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while KOYJF trades at $23.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas KOYJF's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KOYJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to KOYJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs SLVYY Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, SLVYY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while SLVYY trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas SLVYY's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SLVYY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to SLVYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs KPLUY Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, KPLUY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while KPLUY trades at $9.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas KPLUY's P/E ratio is 959.00. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KPLUY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to KPLUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs INDOY Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, INDOY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while INDOY trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas INDOY's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INDOY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF and INDOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TYNPF vs PCHUY Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, PCHUY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while PCHUY trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas PCHUY's P/E ratio is -2.48. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCHUY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF and PCHUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TYNPF vs RBTEF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, RBTEF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while RBTEF trades at $975.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas RBTEF's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RBTEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to RBTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs DENKF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, DENKF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while DENKF trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas DENKF's P/E ratio is 30.60. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DENKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF and DENKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TYNPF vs NPKYY Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, NPKYY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while NPKYY trades at $8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas NPKYY's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NPKYY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to NPKYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs MXCHF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, MXCHF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while MXCHF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas MXCHF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MXCHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF and MXCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TYNPF vs NPKYF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, NPKYF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while NPKYF trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas NPKYF's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NPKYF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to NPKYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs VYTPF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, VYTPF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while VYTPF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas VYTPF's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VYTPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF and VYTPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TYNPF vs LNZNF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, LNZNF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while LNZNF trades at $31.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas LNZNF's P/E ratio is -8.91. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LNZNF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to LNZNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs FRRSF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, FRRSF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while FRRSF trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas FRRSF's P/E ratio is -605.00. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FRRSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to FRRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs TOAGF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, TOAGF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while TOAGF trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas TOAGF's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TOAGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to TOAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs BRGAY Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, BRGAY has a market cap of 876.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while BRGAY trades at $35.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas BRGAY's P/E ratio is 24.24. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BRGAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF and BRGAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TYNPF vs MXCHY Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, MXCHY has a market cap of 633.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while MXCHY trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas MXCHY's P/E ratio is 7.82. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MXCHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to MXCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs SGLFF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, SGLFF has a market cap of 539.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while SGLFF trades at $4.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas SGLFF's P/E ratio is -4.74. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SGLFF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to SGLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs TYGIF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, TYGIF has a market cap of 381M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while TYGIF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas TYGIF's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TYGIF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to TYGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs CDSAF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, CDSAF has a market cap of 372M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while CDSAF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas CDSAF's P/E ratio is 62.00. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CDSAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF and CDSAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TYNPF vs NNXPF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, NNXPF has a market cap of 279.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while NNXPF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas NNXPF's P/E ratio is -41.01. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NNXPF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to NNXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs CRDE Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, CRDE has a market cap of 277.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while CRDE trades at $19,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas CRDE's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRDE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TYNPF has daily volatility of 0.00 and CRDE has daily volatility of N/A.
TYNPF vs CNSJF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, CNSJF has a market cap of 183.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while CNSJF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas CNSJF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNSJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF and CNSJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TYNPF vs BNOW Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, BNOW has a market cap of 73.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while BNOW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas BNOW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BNOW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF and BNOW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TYNPF vs BLGO Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, BLGO has a market cap of 62.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while BLGO trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas BLGO's P/E ratio is -20.47. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BLGO's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to BLGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs HZRGF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, HZRGF has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while HZRGF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas HZRGF's P/E ratio is -6.37. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HZRGF's ROE of -1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to HZRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs BSWGF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, BSWGF has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while BSWGF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas BSWGF's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BSWGF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to BSWGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs PLYR Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, PLYR has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while PLYR trades at $18.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas PLYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PLYR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to PLYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs FGPHF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, FGPHF has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while FGPHF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas FGPHF's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FGPHF's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to FGPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs CHHYF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, CHHYF has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while CHHYF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas CHHYF's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHHYF's ROE of +1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to CHHYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs FHELF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, FHELF has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while FHELF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas FHELF's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FHELF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to FHELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs EESE Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, EESE has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while EESE trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas EESE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EESE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to EESE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs AGTT Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, AGTT has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while AGTT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas AGTT's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGTT's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF and AGTT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TYNPF vs OPCGF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, OPCGF has a market cap of 444.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while OPCGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas OPCGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OPCGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF and OPCGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TYNPF vs CHCC Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, CHCC has a market cap of 165.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while CHCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas CHCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHCC's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF and CHCC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TYNPF vs FLRE Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, FLRE has a market cap of 22.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while FLRE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas FLRE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FLRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF and FLRE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TYNPF vs LBTI Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, LBTI has a market cap of 18.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while LBTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas LBTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LBTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF and LBTI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TYNPF vs VULC Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, VULC has a market cap of 9.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while VULC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas VULC's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VULC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF and VULC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TYNPF vs AFPW Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, AFPW has a market cap of 4.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while AFPW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas AFPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AFPW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF and AFPW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TYNPF vs NUEC Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, NUEC has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while NUEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas NUEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NUEC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to NUEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs MKDTY Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, MKDTY has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while MKDTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas MKDTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MKDTY's ROE of +7.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF and MKDTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TYNPF vs RKTE Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, RKTE has a market cap of 511. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while RKTE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas RKTE's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RKTE's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to RKTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.
TYNPF vs ADKCF Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, ADKCF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while ADKCF trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas ADKCF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ADKCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF and ADKCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TYNPF vs FIND Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, FIND has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while FIND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas FIND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FIND's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF and FIND have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TYNPF vs BMRK Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, BMRK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while BMRK trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas BMRK's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BMRK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF and BMRK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TYNPF vs ADKIL Comparison
TYNPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TYNPF stands at 17B. In comparison, ADKIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TYNPF is priced at $39.28, while ADKIL trades at $430.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TYNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas ADKIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TYNPF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ADKIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TYNPF is less volatile compared to ADKIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TYNPF.