Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, NTDOY has a market cap of 101.64B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while NTDOY trades at $21.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas NTDOY's P/E ratio is 45.47. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to NTDOY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to NTDOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, NTDOF has a market cap of 100.59B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while NTDOF trades at $86.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas NTDOF's P/E ratio is 45.00. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to NTDOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to NTDOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, ATVI has a market cap of 74.29B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while ATVI trades at $94.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas ATVI's P/E ratio is 34.59. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to ATVI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to ATVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, NETTF has a market cap of 70.09B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while NETTF trades at $22.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas NETTF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to NETTF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to NETTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, NTES has a market cap of 69.81B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while NTES trades at $109.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas NTES's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to NTES's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to NTES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, RBLX has a market cap of 48.71B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while RBLX trades at $71.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas RBLX's P/E ratio is -53.99. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to RBLX's ROE of -4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to RBLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, EA has a market cap of 40.33B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while EA trades at $154.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas EA's P/E ratio is 39.37. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to EA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to EA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, KONMY has a market cap of 17.80B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while KONMY trades at $65.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas KONMY's P/E ratio is 32.66. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to KONMY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to KONMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, NEXOY has a market cap of 13.00B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while NEXOY trades at $16.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas NEXOY's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to NEXOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to NEXOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, NEXOF has a market cap of 12.50B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while NEXOF trades at $15.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas NEXOF's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to NEXOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to NEXOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, CCOEY has a market cap of 12.21B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while CCOEY trades at $14.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas CCOEY's P/E ratio is 54.07. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to CCOEY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to CCOEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, CCOEF has a market cap of 11.37B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while CCOEF trades at $27.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas CCOEF's P/E ratio is 51.28. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to CCOEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to CCOEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, DDI has a market cap of 9.91B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while DDI trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas DDI's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to DDI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to DDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, BILI has a market cap of 7.53B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while BILI trades at $18.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas BILI's P/E ratio is -41.52. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to BILI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to BILI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, BLBLF has a market cap of 7.22B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while BLBLF trades at $21.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas BLBLF's P/E ratio is -49.73. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to BLBLF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to BLBLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, SQNXF has a market cap of 6.99B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while SQNXF trades at $58.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas SQNXF's P/E ratio is 77.64. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SQNXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to SQNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, SQNNY has a market cap of 6.82B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while SQNNY trades at $28.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas SQNNY's P/E ratio is 76.76. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SQNNY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to SQNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, OTGLY has a market cap of 6.57B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while OTGLY trades at $16.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas OTGLY's P/E ratio is 58.75. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to OTGLY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to OTGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, KSFTF has a market cap of 6.04B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while KSFTF trades at $4.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas KSFTF's P/E ratio is 30.33. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to KSFTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to KSFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, OTGLF has a market cap of 5.77B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while OTGLF trades at $57.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas OTGLF's P/E ratio is 49.80. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to OTGLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to OTGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, SGAMF has a market cap of 4.49B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while SGAMF trades at $21.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas SGAMF's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SGAMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to SGAMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, BCDMF has a market cap of 4.41B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while BCDMF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas BCDMF's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to BCDMF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to BCDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, SGAMY has a market cap of 4.36B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while SGAMY trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas SGAMY's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SGAMY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to SGAMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, DNACF has a market cap of 2.74B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while DNACF trades at $24.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas DNACF's P/E ratio is 21.37. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to DNACF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to DNACF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, KYYWF has a market cap of 2.65B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while KYYWF trades at $31.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas KYYWF's P/E ratio is -101.77. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to KYYWF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to KYYWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, THQQF has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while THQQF trades at $11.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas THQQF's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to THQQF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to THQQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, PLTK has a market cap of 2.02B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while PLTK trades at $5.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas PLTK's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to PLTK's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to PLTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, PRXXF has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while PRXXF trades at $17.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas PRXXF's P/E ratio is 29.85. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to PRXXF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to PRXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, UBSFF has a market cap of 1.66B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while UBSFF trades at $12.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas UBSFF's P/E ratio is -26.42. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to UBSFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to UBSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, MIXIF has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while MIXIF trades at $24.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas MIXIF's P/E ratio is 18.91. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to MIXIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to MIXIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, UBSFY has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while UBSFY trades at $2.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas UBSFY's P/E ratio is -24.40. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to UBSFY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to UBSFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, KYYWY has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while KYYWY trades at $16.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas KYYWY's P/E ratio is -53.74. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to KYYWY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to KYYWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, XDNCF has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while XDNCF trades at $2.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas XDNCF's P/E ratio is 270.00. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to XDNCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to XDNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, AVID has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while AVID trades at $27.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas AVID's P/E ratio is 37.56. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to AVID's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to AVID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, GREZF has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while GREZF trades at $6.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas GREZF's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to GREZF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to GREZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, GUNGF has a market cap of 939.50M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while GUNGF trades at $17.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas GUNGF's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to GUNGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to GUNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, RVTTY has a market cap of 778.80M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while RVTTY trades at $10.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas RVTTY's P/E ratio is 25.76. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to RVTTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to RVTTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, IGGGF has a market cap of 554.31M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while IGGGF trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas IGGGF's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to IGGGF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to IGGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, SCPL has a market cap of 495.60M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while SCPL trades at $22.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas SCPL's P/E ratio is 23.18. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SCPL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to SCPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, TSVNF has a market cap of 489.59M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while TSVNF trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas TSVNF's P/E ratio is -113.33. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to TSVNF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to TSVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, GRVY has a market cap of 421.59M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while GRVY trades at $60.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas GRVY's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to GRVY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to GRVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, BOYAF has a market cap of 401.39M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while BOYAF trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas BOYAF's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to BOYAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to BOYAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, SOHU has a market cap of 360.18M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while SOHU trades at $11.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas SOHU's P/E ratio is -3.83. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SOHU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to SOHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, BLITF has a market cap of 333.67M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while BLITF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas BLITF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to BLITF's ROE of -75.92%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to BLITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, GCL has a market cap of 305.59M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while GCL trades at $2.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas GCL's P/E ratio is -242.00. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to GCL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to GCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, GDEV has a market cap of 301.68M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while GDEV trades at $16.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas GDEV's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to GDEV's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to GDEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, SCFR has a market cap of 299.71M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while SCFR trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas SCFR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SCFR's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to SCFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, GMGI has a market cap of 247.00M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while GMGI trades at $1.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas GMGI's P/E ratio is -187.00. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to GMGI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to GMGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, STLFF has a market cap of 210.95M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while STLFF trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas STLFF's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to STLFF's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to STLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, RMDEF has a market cap of 207.05M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while RMDEF trades at $15.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas RMDEF's P/E ratio is -169.32. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to RMDEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to RMDEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, AKAFF has a market cap of 197.84M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while AKAFF trades at $13.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas AKAFF's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to AKAFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to AKAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, MYPS has a market cap of 175.69M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while MYPS trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas MYPS's P/E ratio is -6.36. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to MYPS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to MYPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, MYPSW has a market cap of 168.10M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while MYPSW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas MYPSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to MYPSW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to MYPSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, FRRDF has a market cap of 135.09M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while FRRDF trades at $3.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas FRRDF's P/E ratio is 6.86. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to FRRDF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to FRRDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, BRAG has a market cap of 106.54M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while BRAG trades at $4.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas BRAG's P/E ratio is -18.48. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to BRAG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to BRAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, ENADF has a market cap of 106.32M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while ENADF trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas ENADF's P/E ratio is -4.29. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to ENADF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to ENADF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, FGRTF has a market cap of 99.34M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while FGRTF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas FGRTF's P/E ratio is -5.39. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to FGRTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to FGRTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, GENTF has a market cap of 80.95M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while GENTF trades at $9.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas GENTF's P/E ratio is 6.62. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to GENTF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to GENTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, SKLZ has a market cap of 76.71M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while SKLZ trades at $4.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas SKLZ's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SKLZ's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to SKLZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, GMHS has a market cap of 69.64M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while GMHS trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas GMHS's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to GMHS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to GMHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, PONGF has a market cap of 61.79M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while PONGF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas PONGF's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to PONGF's ROE of -4.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to PONGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, IDGAF has a market cap of 55.72M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while IDGAF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas IDGAF's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to IDGAF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to IDGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, SNAL has a market cap of 39.63M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while SNAL trades at $1.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas SNAL's P/E ratio is 21.30. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SNAL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to SNAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, POPRF has a market cap of 36.65M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while POPRF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas POPRF's P/E ratio is -12.99. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to POPRF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to POPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, GDC has a market cap of 31.87M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while GDC trades at $2.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas GDC's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to GDC's ROE of -3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to GDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, GAME has a market cap of 26.61M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while GAME trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas GAME's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to GAME's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to GAME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, EAGRF has a market cap of 23.33M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while EAGRF trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas EAGRF's P/E ratio is -28.61. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to EAGRF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to EAGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, GAMGF has a market cap of 22.03M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while GAMGF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas GAMGF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to GAMGF's ROE of -6.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to GAMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, GIGM has a market cap of 17.08M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while GIGM trades at $1.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas GIGM's P/E ratio is -7.36. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to GIGM's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to GIGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, VSQTF has a market cap of 14.65M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while VSQTF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas VSQTF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to VSQTF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to VSQTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, ZUKI has a market cap of 13.49M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while ZUKI trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas ZUKI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to ZUKI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to ZUKI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, MSGM has a market cap of 13.05M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while MSGM trades at $2.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas MSGM's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to MSGM's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to MSGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, SMPBF has a market cap of 10.76M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while SMPBF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas SMPBF's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SMPBF's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to SMPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, BHAT has a market cap of 10.17M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while BHAT trades at $2.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas BHAT's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to BHAT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to BHAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, SRVTF has a market cap of 9.33M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while SRVTF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas SRVTF's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SRVTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to SRVTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, TRUG has a market cap of 8.97M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while TRUG trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas TRUG's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to TRUG's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to TRUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, SCTGF has a market cap of 8.47M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while SCTGF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas SCTGF's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SCTGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to SCTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, GXAI has a market cap of 8.21M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while GXAI trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas GXAI's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to GXAI's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to GXAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, TBH has a market cap of 6.62M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while TBH trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas TBH's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to TBH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to TBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, WIGAF has a market cap of 5.98M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while WIGAF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas WIGAF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to WIGAF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to WIGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, ENDRF has a market cap of 4.43M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while ENDRF trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas ENDRF's P/E ratio is 0.79. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to ENDRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to ENDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, NVNT has a market cap of 4.05M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while NVNT trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas NVNT's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to NVNT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to NVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, YDRMF has a market cap of 3.87M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while YDRMF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas YDRMF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to YDRMF's ROE of +2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to YDRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, MGAM has a market cap of 3.53M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while MGAM trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas MGAM's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to MGAM's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to MGAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, NFTG has a market cap of 2.97M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while NFTG trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas NFTG's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to NFTG's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to NFTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, GGAMF has a market cap of 1.92M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while GGAMF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas GGAMF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to GGAMF's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to GGAMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, GCLWW has a market cap of 1.31M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while GCLWW trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas GCLWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to GCLWW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to GCLWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, PRYNF has a market cap of 1.22M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while PRYNF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas PRYNF's P/E ratio is -5.24. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to PRYNF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to PRYNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, TAPM has a market cap of 1.12M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while TAPM trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas TAPM's P/E ratio is -5.69. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to TAPM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to TAPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, SWMIF has a market cap of 742244.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while SWMIF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas SWMIF's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SWMIF's ROE of +752.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to SWMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, APETF has a market cap of 729894.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while APETF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas APETF's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to APETF's ROE of -26.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to APETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, EPYFF has a market cap of 715820.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while EPYFF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas EPYFF's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to EPYFF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to EPYFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, KSMRF has a market cap of 680168.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while KSMRF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas KSMRF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to KSMRF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to KSMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, IMGX has a market cap of 642041.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while IMGX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas IMGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to IMGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to IMGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, FRZT has a market cap of 615459.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while FRZT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas FRZT's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to FRZT's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to FRZT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, ATIG has a market cap of 592953.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while ATIG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas ATIG's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to ATIG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to ATIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, NCTY has a market cap of 454935.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while NCTY trades at $11.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas NCTY's P/E ratio is -5.41. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to NCTY's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to NCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, WGRFF has a market cap of 443540.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while WGRFF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas WGRFF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to WGRFF's ROE of +2.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to WGRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, GMETF has a market cap of 427616.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while GMETF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas GMETF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to GMETF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to GMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, IENT has a market cap of 405670.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while IENT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas IENT's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to IENT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to IENT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, GDEVW has a market cap of 299147.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while GDEVW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas GDEVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to GDEVW's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to GDEVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, TIIDF has a market cap of 131075.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while TIIDF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas TIIDF's P/E ratio is -3.62. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to TIIDF's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to TIIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, COUV has a market cap of 62507.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while COUV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas COUV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to COUV's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to COUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, CLIS has a market cap of 34329.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while CLIS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas CLIS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to CLIS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to CLIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, NTEK has a market cap of 17865.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while NTEK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas NTEK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to NTEK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to NTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, STIE has a market cap of 16988.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while STIE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas STIE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to STIE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to STIE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, LIVC has a market cap of 16291.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while LIVC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas LIVC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to LIVC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to LIVC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, PLGC has a market cap of 13944.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while PLGC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas PLGC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to PLGC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to PLGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, WINRW has a market cap of 9484.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while WINRW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas WINRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to WINRW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to WINRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, GMGT has a market cap of 9140.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while GMGT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas GMGT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to GMGT's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to GMGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, ADTR has a market cap of 4416.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while ADTR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas ADTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to ADTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to ADTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, FASDF has a market cap of 4200.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while FASDF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas FASDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to FASDF's ROE of +16.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to FASDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, VRVR has a market cap of 4126.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while VRVR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas VRVR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to VRVR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to VRVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, SPYR has a market cap of 3507.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while SPYR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas SPYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SPYR's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to SPYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, AXNVF has a market cap of 2559.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while AXNVF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas AXNVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to AXNVF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to AXNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, WINR has a market cap of 2371.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while WINR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas WINR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to WINR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to WINR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, HTSF has a market cap of 1800.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while HTSF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas HTSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to HTSF's ROE of -816.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to HTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, TERA has a market cap of 1348.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while TERA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas TERA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to TERA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to TERA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, BLKCF has a market cap of 1224.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while BLKCF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas BLKCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to BLKCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to BLKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, SPLY has a market cap of 1187.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while SPLY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas SPLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SPLY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to SPLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, GGL has a market cap of 1058.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while GGL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas GGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to GGL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TTWO has daily volatility of 5.17 and GGL has daily volatility of N/A.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, IPUB has a market cap of 1040.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while IPUB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas IPUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to IPUB's ROE of +14.89%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to IPUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, RIVX has a market cap of 620.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while RIVX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas RIVX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to RIVX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to RIVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, YVRLF has a market cap of 483.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while YVRLF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas YVRLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to YVRLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to YVRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, CCNC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while CCNC trades at $3.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas CCNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to CCNC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to CCNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, ZNGA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while ZNGA trades at $8.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas ZNGA's P/E ratio is -98.55. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to ZNGA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to ZNGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, SCR comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while SCR trades at $35.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas SCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SCR's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to SCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, GBNW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while GBNW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas GBNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to GBNW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to GBNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.

TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 39.76B. In comparison, YVR comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $225.26, while YVR trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.54, whereas YVR's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.63%, compared to YVR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to YVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.