Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TTWO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTWO | $201.37 | +0.83% | 36.3B | -8.67 | -$22.57 | N/A |
| ATVI | $94.42 | -0.05% | 74.3B | 34.59 | $2.73 | +1.05% |
| NTES | $119.16 | +0.63% | 74.3B | 15.33 | $7.59 | +2.60% |
| EA | $199.88 | -0.26% | 50.2B | 74.81 | $2.68 | +0.38% |
| RBLX | $64.44 | +3.94% | 44.2B | -40.54 | -$1.54 | N/A |
| BILI | $30.96 | +2.18% | 12.5B | 114.73 | $0.26 | N/A |
| AVID | $27.05 | +0.02% | 1.2B | 37.56 | $0.72 | N/A |
| PLTK | $3.46 | -0.29% | 1.2B | 13.06 | $0.24 | +12.66% |
| SCPL | $22.95 | +0.02% | 495.6M | 23.18 | $0.99 | N/A |
| SOHU | $16.30 | -0.46% | 486.2M | 1.16 | $13.96 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TTWO vs ATVI Comparison February 2026
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 36.3B. In comparison, ATVI has a market cap of 74.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $201.37, while ATVI trades at $94.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.67, whereas ATVI's P/E ratio is 34.59. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -1.26%, compared to ATVI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to ATVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.Check ATVI's competition here
TTWO vs NTES Comparison February 2026
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 36.3B. In comparison, NTES has a market cap of 74.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $201.37, while NTES trades at $119.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.67, whereas NTES's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -1.26%, compared to NTES's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to NTES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.Check NTES's competition here
TTWO vs EA Comparison February 2026
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 36.3B. In comparison, EA has a market cap of 50.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $201.37, while EA trades at $199.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.67, whereas EA's P/E ratio is 74.81. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -1.26%, compared to EA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to EA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.Check EA's competition here
TTWO vs RBLX Comparison February 2026
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 36.3B. In comparison, RBLX has a market cap of 44.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $201.37, while RBLX trades at $64.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.67, whereas RBLX's P/E ratio is -40.54. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -1.26%, compared to RBLX's ROE of -2.91%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to RBLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.Check RBLX's competition here
TTWO vs BILI Comparison February 2026
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 36.3B. In comparison, BILI has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $201.37, while BILI trades at $30.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.67, whereas BILI's P/E ratio is 114.73. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -1.26%, compared to BILI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to BILI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.Check BILI's competition here
TTWO vs AVID Comparison February 2026
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 36.3B. In comparison, AVID has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $201.37, while AVID trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.67, whereas AVID's P/E ratio is 37.56. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -1.26%, compared to AVID's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to AVID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.Check AVID's competition here
TTWO vs PLTK Comparison February 2026
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 36.3B. In comparison, PLTK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $201.37, while PLTK trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.67, whereas PLTK's P/E ratio is 13.06. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -1.26%, compared to PLTK's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to PLTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.Check PLTK's competition here
TTWO vs SCPL Comparison February 2026
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 36.3B. In comparison, SCPL has a market cap of 495.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $201.37, while SCPL trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.67, whereas SCPL's P/E ratio is 23.18. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -1.26%, compared to SCPL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to SCPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.Check SCPL's competition here
TTWO vs SOHU Comparison February 2026
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 36.3B. In comparison, SOHU has a market cap of 486.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $201.37, while SOHU trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.67, whereas SOHU's P/E ratio is 1.16. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -1.26%, compared to SOHU's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to SOHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.Check SOHU's competition here
TTWO vs GRVY Comparison February 2026
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 36.3B. In comparison, GRVY has a market cap of 436.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $201.37, while GRVY trades at $65.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.67, whereas GRVY's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -1.26%, compared to GRVY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to GRVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.Check GRVY's competition here
TTWO vs DDI Comparison February 2026
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 36.3B. In comparison, DDI has a market cap of 426.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $201.37, while DDI trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.67, whereas DDI's P/E ratio is 4.15. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -1.26%, compared to DDI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to DDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.Check DDI's competition here
TTWO vs GDEV Comparison February 2026
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 36.3B. In comparison, GDEV has a market cap of 261.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $201.37, while GDEV trades at $15.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.67, whereas GDEV's P/E ratio is 5.64. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -1.26%, compared to GDEV's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to GDEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.Check GDEV's competition here
TTWO vs GDC Comparison February 2026
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 36.3B. In comparison, GDC has a market cap of 189.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $201.37, while GDC trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.67, whereas GDC's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -1.26%, compared to GDC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to GDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.Check GDC's competition here
TTWO vs MGRT Comparison February 2026
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 36.3B. In comparison, MGRT has a market cap of 85.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $201.37, while MGRT trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.67, whereas MGRT's P/E ratio is 36.41. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -1.26%, compared to MGRT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to MGRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.Check MGRT's competition here
TTWO vs GCL Comparison February 2026
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 36.3B. In comparison, GCL has a market cap of 80.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $201.37, while GCL trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.67, whereas GCL's P/E ratio is 66.00. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -1.26%, compared to GCL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to GCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.Check GCL's competition here
TTWO vs GMGI Comparison February 2026
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 36.3B. In comparison, GMGI has a market cap of 72M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $201.37, while GMGI trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.67, whereas GMGI's P/E ratio is -12.75. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -1.26%, compared to GMGI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to GMGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.Check GMGI's competition here
TTWO vs MYPS Comparison February 2026
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 36.3B. In comparison, MYPS has a market cap of 58.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $201.37, while MYPS trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.67, whereas MYPS's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -1.26%, compared to MYPS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to MYPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.Check MYPS's competition here
TTWO vs GMHS Comparison February 2026
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 36.3B. In comparison, GMHS has a market cap of 55.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $201.37, while GMHS trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.67, whereas GMHS's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -1.26%, compared to GMHS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to GMHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.Check GMHS's competition here
TTWO vs SKLZ Comparison February 2026
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 36.3B. In comparison, SKLZ has a market cap of 53.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $201.37, while SKLZ trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.67, whereas SKLZ's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -1.26%, compared to SKLZ's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to SKLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.Check SKLZ's competition here
TTWO vs BRAG Comparison February 2026
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 36.3B. In comparison, BRAG has a market cap of 42.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $201.37, while BRAG trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.67, whereas BRAG's P/E ratio is -4.94. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -1.26%, compared to BRAG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to BRAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.Check BRAG's competition here
TTWO vs GAME Comparison February 2026
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 36.3B. In comparison, GAME has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $201.37, while GAME trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.67, whereas GAME's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -1.26%, compared to GAME's ROE of -2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to GAME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.Check GAME's competition here
TTWO vs SNAL Comparison February 2026
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 36.3B. In comparison, SNAL has a market cap of 24.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $201.37, while SNAL trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.67, whereas SNAL's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -1.26%, compared to SNAL's ROE of +21.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to SNAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.Check SNAL's competition here
TTWO vs NCTY Comparison February 2026
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 36.3B. In comparison, NCTY has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $201.37, while NCTY trades at $5.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.67, whereas NCTY's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -1.26%, compared to NCTY's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to NCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.Check NCTY's competition here
TTWO vs MSGM Comparison February 2026
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 36.3B. In comparison, MSGM has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $201.37, while MSGM trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.67, whereas MSGM's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -1.26%, compared to MSGM's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to MSGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.Check MSGM's competition here
TTWO vs GIGM Comparison February 2026
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 36.3B. In comparison, GIGM has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $201.37, while GIGM trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.67, whereas GIGM's P/E ratio is -14.23. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -1.26%, compared to GIGM's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to GIGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.Check GIGM's competition here
TTWO vs GXAI Comparison February 2026
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 36.3B. In comparison, GXAI has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $201.37, while GXAI trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.67, whereas GXAI's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -1.26%, compared to GXAI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to GXAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.Check GXAI's competition here
TTWO vs MGAM Comparison February 2026
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 36.3B. In comparison, MGAM has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $201.37, while MGAM trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.67, whereas MGAM's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -1.26%, compared to MGAM's ROE of -3.83%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to MGAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.Check MGAM's competition here
TTWO vs GCLWW Comparison February 2026
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 36.3B. In comparison, GCLWW has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $201.37, while GCLWW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.67, whereas GCLWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -1.26%, compared to GCLWW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to GCLWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.Check GCLWW's competition here
TTWO vs NFTG Comparison February 2026
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 36.3B. In comparison, NFTG has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $201.37, while NFTG trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.67, whereas NFTG's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -1.26%, compared to NFTG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to NFTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.Check NFTG's competition here
TTWO vs TBH Comparison February 2026
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 36.3B. In comparison, TBH has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $201.37, while TBH trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.67, whereas TBH's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -1.26%, compared to TBH's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to TBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.Check TBH's competition here
TTWO vs MYPSW Comparison February 2026
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 36.3B. In comparison, MYPSW has a market cap of 889.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $201.37, while MYPSW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.67, whereas MYPSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -1.26%, compared to MYPSW's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to MYPSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.Check MYPSW's competition here
TTWO vs TRUG Comparison February 2026
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 36.3B. In comparison, TRUG has a market cap of 838.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $201.37, while TRUG trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.67, whereas TRUG's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -1.26%, compared to TRUG's ROE of -56.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to TRUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.Check TRUG's competition here
TTWO vs BHAT Comparison February 2026
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 36.3B. In comparison, BHAT has a market cap of 483.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $201.37, while BHAT trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.67, whereas BHAT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -1.26%, compared to BHAT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to BHAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.Check BHAT's competition here
TTWO vs GDEVW Comparison February 2026
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 36.3B. In comparison, GDEVW has a market cap of 281K. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $201.37, while GDEVW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.67, whereas GDEVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -1.26%, compared to GDEVW's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to GDEVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.Check GDEVW's competition here
TTWO vs GGL Comparison February 2026
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 36.3B. In comparison, GGL has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $201.37, while GGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.67, whereas GGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -1.26%, compared to GGL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TTWO has daily volatility of 2.90 and GGL has daily volatility of N/A.Check GGL's competition here
TTWO vs ZNGA Comparison February 2026
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 36.3B. In comparison, ZNGA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $201.37, while ZNGA trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.67, whereas ZNGA's P/E ratio is -98.55. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -1.26%, compared to ZNGA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to ZNGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.Check ZNGA's competition here
TTWO vs YVR Comparison February 2026
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 36.3B. In comparison, YVR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $201.37, while YVR trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.67, whereas YVR's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -1.26%, compared to YVR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to YVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.Check YVR's competition here
TTWO vs SCR Comparison February 2026
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 36.3B. In comparison, SCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $201.37, while SCR trades at $35.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.67, whereas SCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -1.26%, compared to SCR's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to SCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.Check SCR's competition here
TTWO vs CCNC Comparison February 2026
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 36.3B. In comparison, CCNC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $201.37, while CCNC trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.67, whereas CCNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -1.26%, compared to CCNC's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to CCNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.Check CCNC's competition here
TTWO vs HPY Comparison February 2026
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 36.3B. In comparison, HPY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $201.37, while HPY trades at $103.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.67, whereas HPY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -1.26%, compared to HPY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to HPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.Check HPY's competition here