Telstra Group Limited

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, DTEGF has a market cap of 180.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while DTEGF trades at $36.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas DTEGF's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTEGF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to DTEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check DTEGF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, DTEGY has a market cap of 180.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while DTEGY trades at $36.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas DTEGY's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTEGY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to DTEGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check DTEGY's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, SFTBF has a market cap of 148.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while SFTBF trades at $103.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas SFTBF's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SFTBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to SFTBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check SFTBF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, SFTBY has a market cap of 148B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while SFTBY trades at $51.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas SFTBY's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SFTBY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to SFTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check SFTBY's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, NTTYY has a market cap of 92.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while NTTYY trades at $27.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas NTTYY's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NTTYY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to NTTYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check NTTYY's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, NPPXF has a market cap of 81.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while NPPXF trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas NPPXF's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NPPXF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to NPPXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check NPPXF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, SFBQF has a market cap of 77.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while SFBQF trades at $1.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas SFBQF's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SFBQF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to SFBQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check SFBQF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, AMXVF has a market cap of 73.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while AMXVF trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas AMXVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMXVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to AMXVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check AMXVF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, KDDIY has a market cap of 72.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while KDDIY trades at $18.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas KDDIY's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KDDIY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to KDDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check KDDIY's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, KDDIF has a market cap of 71B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while KDDIF trades at $17.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas KDDIF's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KDDIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to KDDIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check KDDIF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, AMOVF has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while AMOVF trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas AMOVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMOVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to AMOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check AMOVF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, SGAPY has a market cap of 54.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while SGAPY trades at $32.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas SGAPY's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SGAPY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to SGAPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check SGAPY's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, SNGNF has a market cap of 53.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while SNGNF trades at $3.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas SNGNF's P/E ratio is 16.95. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNGNF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to SNGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check SNGNF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, CLLNY has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while CLLNY trades at $18.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas CLLNY's P/E ratio is 82.30. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLLNY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to CLLNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check CLLNY's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, FNCTF has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while FNCTF trades at $16.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas FNCTF's P/E ratio is 41.85. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FNCTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to FNCTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check FNCTF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, SWZCF has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while SWZCF trades at $740.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas SWZCF's P/E ratio is 23.26. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SWZCF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to SWZCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check SWZCF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, SCMWY has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while SCMWY trades at $73.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas SCMWY's P/E ratio is 23.24. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCMWY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to SCMWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check SCMWY's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, TLGPY has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while TLGPY trades at $16.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas TLGPY's P/E ratio is 27.02. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TLGPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to TLGPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check TLGPY's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, TEFOF has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while TEFOF trades at $5.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas TEFOF's P/E ratio is -35.22. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TEFOF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to TEFOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check TEFOF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, VODPF has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while VODPF trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas VODPF's P/E ratio is -6.56. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VODPF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to VODPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check VODPF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, BTGOF has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while BTGOF trades at $2.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas BTGOF's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BTGOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to BTGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check BTGOF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, CHWRF has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while CHWRF trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas CHWRF's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHWRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to CHWRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check CHWRF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, AVIFY has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while AVIFY trades at $7.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas AVIFY's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AVIFY's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to AVIFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check AVIFY's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, TELNY has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while TELNY trades at $16.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas TELNY's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TELNY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to TELNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check TELNY's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, TELNF has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while TELNF trades at $16.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas TELNF's P/E ratio is 22.33. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TELNF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to TELNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check TELNF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, CTOWY has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while CTOWY trades at $11.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas CTOWY's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CTOWY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to CTOWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check CTOWY's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, KKPNY has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while KKPNY trades at $4.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas KKPNY's P/E ratio is 21.45. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KKPNY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to KKPNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check KKPNY's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, RCIAF has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while RCIAF trades at $36.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas RCIAF's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RCIAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to RCIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check RCIAF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, KKPNF has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while KKPNF trades at $4.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas KKPNF's P/E ratio is 22.04. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KKPNF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to KKPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check KKPNF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, AVIVF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while AVIVF trades at $5.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas AVIVF's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AVIVF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to AVIVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check AVIVF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, ELMUY has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while ELMUY trades at $27.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas ELMUY's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ELMUY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to ELMUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check ELMUY's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, AVIKF has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while AVIKF trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas AVIKF's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AVIKF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to AVIKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check AVIKF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, TLKMF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while TLKMF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas TLKMF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TLKMF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to TLKMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check TLKMF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, MTNOF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while MTNOF trades at $9.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas MTNOF's P/E ratio is 40.43. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTNOF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to MTNOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check MTNOF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, VDMCY has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while VDMCY trades at $8.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas VDMCY's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VDMCY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to VDMCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check VDMCY's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, MTNOY has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while MTNOY trades at $8.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas MTNOY's P/E ratio is 38.99. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTNOY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to MTNOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check MTNOY's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, HLTOY has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while HLTOY trades at $9.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas HLTOY's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HLTOY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to HLTOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check HLTOY's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, TLSNY has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while TLSNY trades at $7.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas TLSNY's P/E ratio is 26.79. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TLSNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to TLSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check TLSNY's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, SJRWF has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while SJRWF trades at $30.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas SJRWF's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SJRWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to SJRWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check SJRWF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, TLSNF has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while TLSNF trades at $3.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas TLSNF's P/E ratio is 26.57. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TLSNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to TLSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check TLSNF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, TIAIY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while TIAIY trades at $6.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas TIAIY's P/E ratio is -12.83. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TIAIY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to TIAIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check TIAIY's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, BCEPF has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while BCEPF trades at $13.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas BCEPF's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCEPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to BCEPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check BCEPF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, BECEF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while BECEF trades at $13.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas BECEF's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BECEF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to BECEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check BECEF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, TIAJF has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while TIAJF trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas TIAJF's P/E ratio is -11.72. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TIAJF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to TIAJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check TIAJF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, TCPFF has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while TCPFF trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas TCPFF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TCPFF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to TCPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check TCPFF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, TLTZY has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while TLTZY trades at $8.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas TLTZY's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TLTZY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to TLTZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check TLTZY's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, TLTZF has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while TLTZF trades at $17.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas TLTZF's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TLTZF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to TLTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check TLTZF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, HKTTF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while HKTTF trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas HKTTF's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HKTTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to HKTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check HKTTF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, TIAOF has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while TIAOF trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas TIAOF's P/E ratio is -10.60. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TIAOF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to TIAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check TIAOF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, VODAF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while VODAF trades at $5.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas VODAF's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VODAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to VODAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check VODAF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, AAFRF has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while AAFRF trades at $3.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas AAFRF's P/E ratio is 33.50. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AAFRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to AAFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check AAFRF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, HKTTY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while HKTTY trades at $13.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas HKTTY's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HKTTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to HKTTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check HKTTY's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, BCPPF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while BCPPF trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas BCPPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCPPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to BCPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check BCPPF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, BCEXF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while BCEXF trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas BCEXF's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCEXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to BCEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check BCEXF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, LBRDB has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while LBRDB trades at $63.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas LBRDB's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LBRDB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to LBRDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check LBRDB's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, DIGBF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while DIGBF trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas DIGBF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DIGBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to DIGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check DIGBF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, ELMUF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while ELMUF trades at $54.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas ELMUF's P/E ratio is 20.55. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ELMUF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to ELMUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check ELMUF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, TELDF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while TELDF trades at $2.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas TELDF's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TELDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to TELDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check TELDF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, SOBKY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while SOBKY trades at $16.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas SOBKY's P/E ratio is 22.58. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOBKY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to SOBKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check SOBKY's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, SHNUF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while SHNUF trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas SHNUF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHNUF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to SHNUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check SHNUF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, TELDY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while TELDY trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas TELDY's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TELDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to TELDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check TELDY's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, AARTY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while AARTY trades at $20.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas AARTY's P/E ratio is 33.58. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AARTY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to AARTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check AARTY's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, FRTAY has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while FRTAY trades at $15.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas FRTAY's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FRTAY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to FRTAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check FRTAY's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, QBCRF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while QBCRF trades at $29.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas QBCRF's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to QBCRF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to QBCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check QBCRF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, MYTEF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while MYTEF trades at $1.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas MYTEF's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MYTEF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to MYTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check MYTEF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, QBCAF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while QBCAF trades at $27.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas QBCAF's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to QBCAF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to QBCAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check QBCAF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, HLTOF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while HLTOF trades at $15.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas HLTOF's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HLTOF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to HLTOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check HLTOF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, MAXSF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while MAXSF trades at $0.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas MAXSF's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MAXSF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to MAXSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check MAXSF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, AXXTF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while AXXTF trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas AXXTF's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AXXTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to AXXTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check AXXTF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, PCCWY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while PCCWY trades at $6.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas PCCWY's P/E ratio is -134.80. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCCWY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to PCCWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check PCCWY's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, PCWLF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while PCWLF trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas PCWLF's P/E ratio is -68.13. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCWLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to PCWLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check PCWLF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, BZQIF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while BZQIF trades at $1.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas BZQIF's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BZQIF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to BZQIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check BZQIF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, BZQIY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while BZQIY trades at $9.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas BZQIY's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BZQIY's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to BZQIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check BZQIY's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, PTITF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while PTITF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas PTITF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PTITF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to PTITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check PTITF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, TRKNY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while TRKNY trades at $2.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas TRKNY's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TRKNY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to TRKNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check TRKNY's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, TKAGY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while TKAGY trades at $15.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas TKAGY's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TKAGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to TKAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check TKAGY's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, UDIRF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while UDIRF trades at $27.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas UDIRF's P/E ratio is 33.75. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UDIRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to UDIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check UDIRF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, GTMEY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while GTMEY trades at $32.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas GTMEY's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GTMEY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to GTMEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check GTMEY's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, PHTCF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while PHTCF trades at $20.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas PHTCF's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PHTCF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to PHTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check PHTCF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, CUCSY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while CUCSY trades at $15.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas CUCSY's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CUCSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to CUCSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check CUCSY's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, FRTAF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while FRTAF trades at $33.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas FRTAF's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FRTAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to FRTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check FRTAF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, CUCSF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while CUCSF trades at $0.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas CUCSF's P/E ratio is 8.03. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CUCSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to CUCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check CUCSF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, TCMFF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while TCMFF trades at $1.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas TCMFF's P/E ratio is -19.44. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TCMFF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to TCMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check TCMFF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, TFAOF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while TFAOF trades at $12.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas TFAOF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to TFAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check TFAOF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, IIJIF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while IIJIF trades at $19.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas IIJIF's P/E ratio is 25.46. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IIJIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to IIJIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check IIJIF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, IIJIY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while IIJIY trades at $37.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas IIJIY's P/E ratio is 24.45. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IIJIY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to IIJIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check IIJIY's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, BGAOF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while BGAOF trades at $9.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas BGAOF's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BGAOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to BGAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check BGAOF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, PTXKY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while PTXKY trades at $3.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas PTXKY's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PTXKY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to PTXKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check PTXKY's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, MICCF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while MICCF trades at $18.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas MICCF's P/E ratio is 70.96. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MICCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to MICCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check MICCF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, TACYY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while TACYY trades at $6.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas TACYY's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TACYY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to TACYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check TACYY's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, TRKNF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while TRKNF trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas TRKNF's P/E ratio is 39.93. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TRKNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to TRKNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check TRKNF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, BGAOY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while BGAOY trades at $1.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas BGAOY's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BGAOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to BGAOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check BGAOY's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, SPKKY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while SPKKY trades at $7.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas SPKKY's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPKKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to SPKKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check SPKKY's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, TLGHY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while TLGHY trades at $11.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas TLGHY's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TLGHY's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to TLGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check TLGHY's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, PTTWF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while PTTWF trades at $2.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas PTTWF's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PTTWF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to PTTWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check PTTWF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, GMOYF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while GMOYF trades at $24.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas GMOYF's P/E ratio is 23.29. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GMOYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to GMOYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check GMOYF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, NZTCF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while NZTCF trades at $1.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas NZTCF's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NZTCF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to NZTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check NZTCF's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, CHRYY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while CHRYY trades at $27.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas CHRYY's P/E ratio is -452.17. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHRYY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to CHRYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check CHRYY's competition here

TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 35.1B. In comparison, CHRUF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $3.08, while CHRUF trades at $5.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas CHRUF's P/E ratio is -535.00. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHRUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to CHRUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.Check CHRUF's competition here