Telstra Group Limited
Telstra Group Limited TTRAF Peers
See (TTRAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTRAF | $2.91 | +3.56% | 33.27B | 32.33 | $0.09 | +4.08% |
| AXTLF | $0.10 | N/A | 33.79T | -11.11 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| DTEGF | $38.94 | +2.64% | 190.82B | 14.21 | $2.74 | +2.93% |
| DTEGY | $38.70 | +1.63% | 189.65B | 14.12 | $2.74 | +2.75% |
| CUCSY | $13.06 | +8.29% | 88.90B | 7.42 | $1.76 | +5.79% |
| NTTYY | $26.57 | -0.31% | 87.93B | 11.76 | $2.26 | +1.22% |
| NPPXF | $1.05 | -1.26% | 86.54B | 13.08 | $0.08 | +3.07% |
| SFTBF | $52.50 | -5.66% | 75.47B | 9.81 | $5.35 | +0.57% |
| SFTBY | $25.91 | -2.02% | 74.09B | 9.70 | $2.67 | +0.19% |
| AMXVF | $1.05 | +7.14% | 73.58B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TTRAF vs AXTLF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, AXTLF has a market cap of 33.79T. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while AXTLF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas AXTLF's P/E ratio is -11.11. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AXTLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to AXTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs DTEGF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, DTEGF has a market cap of 190.82B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while DTEGF trades at $38.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas DTEGF's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTEGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to DTEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs DTEGY Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, DTEGY has a market cap of 189.65B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while DTEGY trades at $38.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas DTEGY's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTEGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to DTEGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs CUCSY Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, CUCSY has a market cap of 88.90B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while CUCSY trades at $13.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas CUCSY's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CUCSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to CUCSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs NTTYY Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, NTTYY has a market cap of 87.93B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while NTTYY trades at $26.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas NTTYY's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NTTYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to NTTYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs NPPXF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, NPPXF has a market cap of 86.54B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while NPPXF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas NPPXF's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NPPXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to NPPXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs SFTBF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, SFTBF has a market cap of 75.47B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while SFTBF trades at $52.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas SFTBF's P/E ratio is 9.81. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SFTBF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to SFTBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs SFTBY Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, SFTBY has a market cap of 74.09B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while SFTBY trades at $25.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas SFTBY's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SFTBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to SFTBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs AMXVF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, AMXVF has a market cap of 73.58B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while AMXVF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas AMXVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMXVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to AMXVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs SFBQF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, SFBQF has a market cap of 73.52B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while SFBQF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas SFBQF's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SFBQF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to SFBQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs KDDIY Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, KDDIY has a market cap of 69.49B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while KDDIY trades at $17.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas KDDIY's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KDDIY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to KDDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs KDDIF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, KDDIF has a market cap of 68.55B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while KDDIF trades at $17.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas KDDIF's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KDDIF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to KDDIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs AMOVF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, AMOVF has a market cap of 66.57B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while AMOVF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas AMOVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMOVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to AMOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs AARTY Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, AARTY has a market cap of 55.12B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while AARTY trades at $15.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas AARTY's P/E ratio is 25.12. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AARTY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to AARTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs CLLNY Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, CLLNY has a market cap of 53.03B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while CLLNY trades at $18.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas CLLNY's P/E ratio is -469.75. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLLNY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to CLLNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs SGAPY Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, SGAPY has a market cap of 49.18B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while SGAPY trades at $29.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas SGAPY's P/E ratio is -496.75. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SGAPY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to SGAPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs SNGNF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, SNGNF has a market cap of 48.38B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while SNGNF trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas SNGNF's P/E ratio is -293.00. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNGNF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to SNGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs FNCTF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, FNCTF has a market cap of 38.44B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while FNCTF trades at $14.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas FNCTF's P/E ratio is 18.08. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FNCTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to FNCTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs SCMWY Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, SCMWY has a market cap of 35.55B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while SCMWY trades at $68.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas SCMWY's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCMWY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to SCMWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs TLGPY Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, TLGPY has a market cap of 34.58B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while TLGPY trades at $15.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas TLGPY's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TLGPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to TLGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs SWZCF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, SWZCF has a market cap of 33.24B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while SWZCF trades at $641.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas SWZCF's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SWZCF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to SWZCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs TEFOF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, TEFOF has a market cap of 29.29B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while TEFOF trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas TEFOF's P/E ratio is -51.90. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TEFOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to TEFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs AVIFY Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, AVIFY has a market cap of 27.51B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while AVIFY trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas AVIFY's P/E ratio is 24.34. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AVIFY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to AVIFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs CHWRF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, CHWRF has a market cap of 26.53B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while CHWRF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas CHWRF's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHWRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to CHWRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs AVIKF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, AVIKF has a market cap of 26.14B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while AVIKF trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas AVIKF's P/E ratio is 25.03. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AVIKF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to AVIKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs CTOWY Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, CTOWY has a market cap of 25.97B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while CTOWY trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas CTOWY's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CTOWY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to CTOWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs VODPF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, VODPF has a market cap of 25.07B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while VODPF trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas VODPF's P/E ratio is -5.61. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VODPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to VODPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs BTGOF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, BTGOF has a market cap of 22.50B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while BTGOF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas BTGOF's P/E ratio is 20.91. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BTGOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to BTGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs TELNF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, TELNF has a market cap of 21.51B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while TELNF trades at $15.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas TELNF's P/E ratio is 23.82. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TELNF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to TELNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs TELNY Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, TELNY has a market cap of 21.29B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while TELNY trades at $15.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas TELNY's P/E ratio is 23.58. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TELNY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to TELNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs BCEPF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, BCEPF has a market cap of 20.04B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while BCEPF trades at $12.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas BCEPF's P/E ratio is 5.03. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCEPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to BCEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs KKPNY Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, KKPNY has a market cap of 18.50B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while KKPNY trades at $4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas KKPNY's P/E ratio is 21.64. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KKPNY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to KKPNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs ELMUY Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, ELMUY has a market cap of 17.98B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while ELMUY trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas ELMUY's P/E ratio is 22.05. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ELMUY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to ELMUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs KKPNF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, KKPNF has a market cap of 17.89B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while KKPNF trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas KKPNF's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KKPNF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to KKPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs TLKMF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, TLKMF has a market cap of 17.83B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while TLKMF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas TLKMF's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TLKMF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to TLKMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs AVIVF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, AVIVF has a market cap of 17.46B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while AVIVF trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas AVIVF's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AVIVF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to AVIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs HLTOY Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, HLTOY has a market cap of 15.75B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while HLTOY trades at $9.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas HLTOY's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HLTOY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to HLTOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs TLSNY Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, TLSNY has a market cap of 15.30B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while TLSNY trades at $7.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas TLSNY's P/E ratio is 29.92. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TLSNY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to TLSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs VDMCY Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, VDMCY has a market cap of 14.91B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while VDMCY trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas VDMCY's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VDMCY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to VDMCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs SJRWF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, SJRWF has a market cap of 14.71B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while SJRWF trades at $30.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas SJRWF's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SJRWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to SJRWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs LBRDB Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, LBRDB has a market cap of 14.35B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while LBRDB trades at $100.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas LBRDB's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LBRDB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to LBRDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs RCIAF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, RCIAF has a market cap of 14.13B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while RCIAF trades at $28.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas RCIAF's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RCIAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to RCIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs TLSNF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, TLSNF has a market cap of 14.12B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while TLSNF trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas TLSNF's P/E ratio is 27.62. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TLSNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to TLSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs TCPFF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, TCPFF has a market cap of 12.44B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while TCPFF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas TCPFF's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TCPFF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to TCPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs MTNOF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, MTNOF has a market cap of 12.03B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while MTNOF trades at $6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas MTNOF's P/E ratio is -22.97. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTNOF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to MTNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs MTNOY Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, MTNOY has a market cap of 12.01B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while MTNOY trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas MTNOY's P/E ratio is -22.93. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTNOY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to MTNOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs BCPPF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, BCPPF has a market cap of 11.98B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while BCPPF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas BCPPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCPPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to BCPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs TELDY Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, TELDY has a market cap of 11.90B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while TELDY trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas TELDY's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TELDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to TELDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs VODAF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, VODAF has a market cap of 11.12B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while VODAF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas VODAF's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VODAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to VODAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs TLTZY Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, TLTZY has a market cap of 10.94B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while TLTZY trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas TLTZY's P/E ratio is 27.59. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TLTZY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to TLTZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs BECEF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, BECEF has a market cap of 10.67B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while BECEF trades at $11.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas BECEF's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BECEF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to BECEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs TIAIY Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, TIAIY has a market cap of 9.66B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while TIAIY trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas TIAIY's P/E ratio is -25.42. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TIAIY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to TIAIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs TLTZF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, TLTZF has a market cap of 9.64B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while TLTZF trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas TLTZF's P/E ratio is 24.31. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TLTZF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to TLTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs HKTTY Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, HKTTY has a market cap of 9.48B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while HKTTY trades at $12.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas HKTTY's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HKTTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to HKTTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs BCEXF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, BCEXF has a market cap of 9.22B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while BCEXF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas BCEXF's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCEXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to BCEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs TIAOF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, TIAOF has a market cap of 9.18B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while TIAOF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas TIAOF's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TIAOF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to TIAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs FRTAY Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, FRTAY has a market cap of 9.13B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while FRTAY trades at $19.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas FRTAY's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FRTAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to FRTAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs DIGBF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, DIGBF has a market cap of 8.80B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while DIGBF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas DIGBF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DIGBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to DIGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs TIAJF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, TIAJF has a market cap of 8.75B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while TIAJF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas TIAJF's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TIAJF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to TIAJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs ELMUF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, ELMUF has a market cap of 8.01B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while ELMUF trades at $49.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas ELMUF's P/E ratio is 19.65. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ELMUF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to ELMUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs SHNUF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, SHNUF has a market cap of 7.78B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while SHNUF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas SHNUF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHNUF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to SHNUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs SOBKY Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, SOBKY has a market cap of 7.07B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while SOBKY trades at $14.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas SOBKY's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOBKY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to SOBKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs TELDF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, TELDF has a market cap of 7.02B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while TELDF trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas TELDF's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TELDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to TELDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs HKTTF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, HKTTF has a market cap of 6.96B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while HKTTF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas HKTTF's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HKTTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to HKTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs QBCRF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, QBCRF has a market cap of 6.37B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while QBCRF trades at $27.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas QBCRF's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to QBCRF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to QBCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs MYTEF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, MYTEF has a market cap of 6.29B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while MYTEF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas MYTEF's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MYTEF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to MYTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs HLTOF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, HLTOF has a market cap of 6.27B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while HLTOF trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas HLTOF's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HLTOF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to HLTOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs QBCAF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, QBCAF has a market cap of 5.99B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while QBCAF trades at $26.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas QBCAF's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to QBCAF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to QBCAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs TRKNY Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, TRKNY has a market cap of 5.57B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while TRKNY trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas TRKNY's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TRKNY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to TRKNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs MAXSF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, MAXSF has a market cap of 5.56B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while MAXSF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas MAXSF's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MAXSF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to MAXSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs PCCWY Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, PCCWY has a market cap of 5.10B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while PCCWY trades at $6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas PCCWY's P/E ratio is -131.80. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCCWY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to PCCWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs TKAGY Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, TKAGY has a market cap of 5.07B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while TKAGY trades at $15.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas TKAGY's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TKAGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to TKAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs PHTCF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, PHTCF has a market cap of 4.86B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while PHTCF trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas PHTCF's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PHTCF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to PHTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs AAFRF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, AAFRF has a market cap of 4.83B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while AAFRF trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas AAFRF's P/E ratio is 66.00. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AAFRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to AAFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs TCMFF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, TCMFF has a market cap of 4.74B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while TCMFF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas TCMFF's P/E ratio is 110.00. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TCMFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to TCMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs FRTAF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, FRTAF has a market cap of 4.72B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while FRTAF trades at $39.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas FRTAF's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FRTAF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to FRTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs GTMEY Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, GTMEY has a market cap of 4.70B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while GTMEY trades at $32.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas GTMEY's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GTMEY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to GTMEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs PCWLF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, PCWLF has a market cap of 4.64B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while PCWLF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas PCWLF's P/E ratio is -60.00. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCWLF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to PCWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs BZQIF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, BZQIF has a market cap of 4.54B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while BZQIF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas BZQIF's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BZQIF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to BZQIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs UDIRF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, UDIRF has a market cap of 4.24B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while UDIRF trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas UDIRF's P/E ratio is -70.14. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UDIRF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to UDIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs CUCSF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, CUCSF has a market cap of 4.07B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while CUCSF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas CUCSF's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CUCSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to CUCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs TFAOF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, TFAOF has a market cap of 3.73B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while TFAOF trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas TFAOF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to TFAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs BZQIY Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, BZQIY has a market cap of 3.65B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while BZQIY trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas BZQIY's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BZQIY's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to BZQIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs IIJIF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, IIJIF has a market cap of 3.58B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while IIJIF trades at $20.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas IIJIF's P/E ratio is 24.99. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IIJIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to IIJIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs AXXTF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, AXXTF has a market cap of 3.55B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while AXXTF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas AXXTF's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AXXTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to AXXTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs IIJIY Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, IIJIY has a market cap of 3.18B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while IIJIY trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas IIJIY's P/E ratio is 23.38. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IIJIY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to IIJIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs MICCF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, MICCF has a market cap of 3.16B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while MICCF trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas MICCF's P/E ratio is 70.96. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MICCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to MICCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs PTITF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, PTITF has a market cap of 3.13B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while PTITF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas PTITF's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PTITF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to PTITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs TACYY Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, TACYY has a market cap of 2.90B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while TACYY trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas TACYY's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TACYY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to TACYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs TRKNF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, TRKNF has a market cap of 2.80B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while TRKNF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas TRKNF's P/E ratio is 39.93. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TRKNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to TRKNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs TLGHY Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, TLGHY has a market cap of 2.73B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while TLGHY trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas TLGHY's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TLGHY's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to TLGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs BGAOY Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, BGAOY has a market cap of 2.71B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while BGAOY trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas BGAOY's P/E ratio is 4.94. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BGAOY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to BGAOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs PTTWF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, PTTWF has a market cap of 2.69B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while PTTWF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas PTTWF's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PTTWF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to PTTWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs GMOYF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, GMOYF has a market cap of 2.59B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while GMOYF trades at $25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas GMOYF's P/E ratio is 29.36. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GMOYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to GMOYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs BGAOF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, BGAOF has a market cap of 2.55B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while BGAOF trades at $7.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas BGAOF's P/E ratio is 4.70. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BGAOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to BGAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs NZTCF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, NZTCF has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while NZTCF trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas NZTCF's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NZTCF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to NZTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs SPKKY Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, SPKKY has a market cap of 2.49B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while SPKKY trades at $6.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas SPKKY's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPKKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is more volatile compared to SPKKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs CLCMF Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, CLCMF has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while CLCMF trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas CLCMF's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLCMF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to CLCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.
TTRAF vs PTXKY Comparison
TTRAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTRAF stands at 33.27B. In comparison, PTXKY has a market cap of 2.39B. Regarding current trading prices, TTRAF is priced at $2.91, while PTXKY trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.33, whereas PTXKY's P/E ratio is 17.57. In terms of profitability, TTRAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PTXKY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTRAF is less volatile compared to PTXKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTRAF.