Titanium Transportation Group Inc.

TTNM.TO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTNM.TO stands at 65.4M. In comparison, AND.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTNM.TO is priced at CA$1.43, while AND.TO trades at CA$53.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTNM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas AND.TO's P/E ratio is 31.18. In terms of profitability, TTNM.TO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to AND.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TTNM.TO and AND.TO have similar daily volatility (0.70).Check AND.TO's competition here

TTNM.TO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTNM.TO stands at 65.4M. In comparison, CJT.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TTNM.TO is priced at CA$1.43, while CJT.TO trades at CA$98.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTNM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas CJT.TO's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, TTNM.TO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CJT.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TTNM.TO is less volatile compared to CJT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTNM.TO.Check CJT.TO's competition here

TTNM.TO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTNM.TO stands at 65.4M. In comparison, PDO.CN has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTNM.TO is priced at CA$1.43, while PDO.CN trades at CA$0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTNM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas PDO.CN's P/E ratio is -33.50. In terms of profitability, TTNM.TO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to PDO.CN's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TTNM.TO is less volatile compared to PDO.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTNM.TO.Check PDO.CN's competition here

TTNM.TO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTNM.TO stands at 65.4M. In comparison, PKG.CN has a market cap of 556.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TTNM.TO is priced at CA$1.43, while PKG.CN trades at CA$0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTNM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas PKG.CN's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, TTNM.TO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to PKG.CN's ROE of +4.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TTNM.TO is more volatile compared to PKG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTNM.TO.Check PKG.CN's competition here