Tirupati Tyres Limited
Tirupati Tyres Limited (TTIL.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TTIL.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Distribution Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTIL.BO | ₹8.51 | +0.00% | 208M | 7.15 | ₹1.19 | N/A |
| AEGISLOG.BO | ₹699.75 | +0.89% | 246.8B | 32.05 | ₹21.94 | +1.14% |
| LLOYDSENT.BO | ₹54.00 | -1.96% | 67.8B | 23.39 | ₹2.28 | +0.38% |
| SGMART.NS | ₹430.45 | -2.39% | 54.5B | 51.35 | ₹8.43 | N/A |
| EFCIL.BO | ₹242.60 | -7.90% | 26.4B | 16.59 | ₹15.99 | N/A |
| VINCOFE.BO | ₹147.00 | +2.12% | 21.4B | 31.42 | ₹4.71 | +0.07% |
| KHAZANCHI.BO | ₹770.00 | -0.35% | 19.1B | 30.53 | ₹25.33 | +0.06% |
| TCC.BO | ₹438.70 | +1.22% | 15.6B | 38.31 | ₹11.40 | N/A |
| CROPSTER.BO | ₹11.22 | -18.40% | 11.2B | 3.15 | ₹4.23 | N/A |
| YSL.BO | ₹27,900.00 | -0.71% | 8.6B | 7.83 | ₹3,563.08 | +1.79% |
Stock Comparison
TTIL.BO vs AEGISLOG.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, AEGISLOG.BO has a market cap of 246.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while AEGISLOG.BO trades at ₹699.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas AEGISLOG.BO's P/E ratio is 32.05. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AEGISLOG.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is less volatile compared to AEGISLOG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check AEGISLOG.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs LLOYDSENT.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, LLOYDSENT.BO has a market cap of 67.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while LLOYDSENT.BO trades at ₹54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas LLOYDSENT.BO's P/E ratio is 23.39. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LLOYDSENT.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is less volatile compared to LLOYDSENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check LLOYDSENT.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs SGMART.NS Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, SGMART.NS has a market cap of 54.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while SGMART.NS trades at ₹430.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas SGMART.NS's P/E ratio is 51.35. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SGMART.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to SGMART.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check SGMART.NS's competition here
TTIL.BO vs EFCIL.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, EFCIL.BO has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while EFCIL.BO trades at ₹242.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas EFCIL.BO's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EFCIL.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is less volatile compared to EFCIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check EFCIL.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs VINCOFE.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, VINCOFE.BO has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while VINCOFE.BO trades at ₹147.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas VINCOFE.BO's P/E ratio is 31.42. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VINCOFE.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to VINCOFE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check VINCOFE.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs KHAZANCHI.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, KHAZANCHI.BO has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while KHAZANCHI.BO trades at ₹770.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas KHAZANCHI.BO's P/E ratio is 30.53. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KHAZANCHI.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to KHAZANCHI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check KHAZANCHI.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs TCC.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, TCC.BO has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while TCC.BO trades at ₹438.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas TCC.BO's P/E ratio is 38.31. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TCC.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to TCC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check TCC.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs CROPSTER.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, CROPSTER.BO has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while CROPSTER.BO trades at ₹11.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas CROPSTER.BO's P/E ratio is 3.15. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CROPSTER.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is less volatile compared to CROPSTER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check CROPSTER.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs YSL.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, YSL.BO has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while YSL.BO trades at ₹27,900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas YSL.BO's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YSL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to YSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check YSL.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs MERCURYEV.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, MERCURYEV.BO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while MERCURYEV.BO trades at ₹32.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas MERCURYEV.BO's P/E ratio is 79.16. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MERCURYEV.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is less volatile compared to MERCURYEV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check MERCURYEV.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs VERITAS.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, VERITAS.BO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while VERITAS.BO trades at ₹175.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas VERITAS.BO's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VERITAS.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to VERITAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check VERITAS.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs BLACKROSE.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, BLACKROSE.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while BLACKROSE.BO trades at ₹82.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas BLACKROSE.BO's P/E ratio is 32.00. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BLACKROSE.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to BLACKROSE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check BLACKROSE.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs EUROASIA.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, EUROASIA.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while EUROASIA.BO trades at ₹306.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas EUROASIA.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EUROASIA.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to EUROASIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check EUROASIA.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs SWISSMLTRY.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, SWISSMLTRY.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while SWISSMLTRY.BO trades at ₹16.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas SWISSMLTRY.BO's P/E ratio is 46.78. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SWISSMLTRY.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to SWISSMLTRY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check SWISSMLTRY.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs AERPACE.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, AERPACE.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while AERPACE.BO trades at ₹25.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas AERPACE.BO's P/E ratio is -37.96. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AERPACE.BO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to AERPACE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check AERPACE.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs SRD.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, SRD.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while SRD.BO trades at ₹52.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas SRD.BO's P/E ratio is -8.52. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SRD.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to SRD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check SRD.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs MARBLE.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, MARBLE.BO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while MARBLE.BO trades at ₹102.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas MARBLE.BO's P/E ratio is 25.75. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MARBLE.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is less volatile compared to MARBLE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check MARBLE.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs WARDWIZFBL.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, WARDWIZFBL.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while WARDWIZFBL.BO trades at ₹8.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas WARDWIZFBL.BO's P/E ratio is -53.25. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WARDWIZFBL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is less volatile compared to WARDWIZFBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check WARDWIZFBL.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs SICAGEN.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, SICAGEN.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while SICAGEN.BO trades at ₹52.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas SICAGEN.BO's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SICAGEN.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to SICAGEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check SICAGEN.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs ABANSENT.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, ABANSENT.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while ABANSENT.BO trades at ₹25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas ABANSENT.BO's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ABANSENT.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is less volatile compared to ABANSENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check ABANSENT.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs PARSHVA.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, PARSHVA.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while PARSHVA.BO trades at ₹163.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas PARSHVA.BO's P/E ratio is 905.56. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PARSHVA.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to PARSHVA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check PARSHVA.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs SAMOR.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, SAMOR.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while SAMOR.BO trades at ₹72.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas SAMOR.BO's P/E ratio is 153.08. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SAMOR.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to SAMOR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check SAMOR.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs SEML.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, SEML.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while SEML.BO trades at ₹92.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas SEML.BO's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SEML.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is less volatile compared to SEML.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check SEML.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs CHANDRIMA.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, CHANDRIMA.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while CHANDRIMA.BO trades at ₹7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas CHANDRIMA.BO's P/E ratio is -7.59. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CHANDRIMA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is less volatile compared to CHANDRIMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check CHANDRIMA.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs METROGLOBL.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, METROGLOBL.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while METROGLOBL.BO trades at ₹112.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas METROGLOBL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.30. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to METROGLOBL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to METROGLOBL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check METROGLOBL.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs MAXIMUS.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, MAXIMUS.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while MAXIMUS.BO trades at ₹9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas MAXIMUS.BO's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MAXIMUS.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to MAXIMUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check MAXIMUS.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs ISHANCH.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, ISHANCH.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while ISHANCH.BO trades at ₹61.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas ISHANCH.BO's P/E ratio is -30.35. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ISHANCH.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to ISHANCH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check ISHANCH.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs DHOOTIN.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, DHOOTIN.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while DHOOTIN.BO trades at ₹204.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas DHOOTIN.BO's P/E ratio is -13.94. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DHOOTIN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is less volatile compared to DHOOTIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check DHOOTIN.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs PURVFLEXI.NS Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, PURVFLEXI.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while PURVFLEXI.NS trades at ₹60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas PURVFLEXI.NS's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PURVFLEXI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to PURVFLEXI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check PURVFLEXI.NS's competition here
TTIL.BO vs BNL.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, BNL.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while BNL.BO trades at ₹118.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas BNL.BO's P/E ratio is 30.44. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BNL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to BNL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check BNL.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs SANINFRA.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, SANINFRA.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while SANINFRA.BO trades at ₹6.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas SANINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 70.30. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SANINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to SANINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check SANINFRA.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs OPTIFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, OPTIFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while OPTIFIN.BO trades at ₹14.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas OPTIFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 18.77. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OPTIFIN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to OPTIFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check OPTIFIN.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs MENAMANI.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, MENAMANI.BO has a market cap of 943.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while MENAMANI.BO trades at ₹8.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas MENAMANI.BO's P/E ratio is -235.00. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MENAMANI.BO's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to MENAMANI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check MENAMANI.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs INDXTRA.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, INDXTRA.BO has a market cap of 906.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while INDXTRA.BO trades at ₹6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas INDXTRA.BO's P/E ratio is -40.88. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to INDXTRA.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is less volatile compared to INDXTRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check INDXTRA.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs GEL.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, GEL.BO has a market cap of 887.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while GEL.BO trades at ₹284.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas GEL.BO's P/E ratio is 993.10. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GEL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to GEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check GEL.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs MRCAGRO.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, MRCAGRO.BO has a market cap of 885.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while MRCAGRO.BO trades at ₹44.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas MRCAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 91.98. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MRCAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is less volatile compared to MRCAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check MRCAGRO.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs KTIL.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, KTIL.BO has a market cap of 819.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while KTIL.BO trades at ₹68.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas KTIL.BO's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KTIL.BO's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to KTIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check KTIL.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs RAFL.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, RAFL.BO has a market cap of 774.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while RAFL.BO trades at ₹65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas RAFL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RAFL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to RAFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check RAFL.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs HRYNSHP.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, HRYNSHP.BO has a market cap of 718.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while HRYNSHP.BO trades at ₹115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas HRYNSHP.BO's P/E ratio is 18.84. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HRYNSHP.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is less volatile compared to HRYNSHP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check HRYNSHP.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs MYSORPETRO.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, MYSORPETRO.BO has a market cap of 643.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while MYSORPETRO.BO trades at ₹97.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas MYSORPETRO.BO's P/E ratio is -18.37. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MYSORPETRO.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to MYSORPETRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check MYSORPETRO.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs CONSTRONIC.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, CONSTRONIC.BO has a market cap of 608.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while CONSTRONIC.BO trades at ₹50.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas CONSTRONIC.BO's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is less volatile compared to CONSTRONIC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check CONSTRONIC.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs MISHKA.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, MISHKA.BO has a market cap of 589.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while MISHKA.BO trades at ₹40.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas MISHKA.BO's P/E ratio is 42.06. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MISHKA.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to MISHKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check MISHKA.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs RONI.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, RONI.BO has a market cap of 574.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while RONI.BO trades at ₹50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas RONI.BO's P/E ratio is 72.46. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RONI.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to RONI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check RONI.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs IFL.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, IFL.BO has a market cap of 572.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while IFL.BO trades at ₹0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas IFL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IFL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to IFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check IFL.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs NVENTURES.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, NVENTURES.BO has a market cap of 541.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while NVENTURES.BO trades at ₹111.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas NVENTURES.BO's P/E ratio is 223.08. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NVENTURES.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to NVENTURES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check NVENTURES.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs PALCO.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, PALCO.BO has a market cap of 476M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while PALCO.BO trades at ₹117.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas PALCO.BO's P/E ratio is -29.68. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PALCO.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is less volatile compared to PALCO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check PALCO.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs SSTL.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, SSTL.BO has a market cap of 450.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while SSTL.BO trades at ₹18.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas SSTL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SSTL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to SSTL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check SSTL.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs TAVERNIER.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, TAVERNIER.BO has a market cap of 415.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while TAVERNIER.BO trades at ₹69.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas TAVERNIER.BO's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TAVERNIER.BO's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to TAVERNIER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check TAVERNIER.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs VEL.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, VEL.BO has a market cap of 371M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while VEL.BO trades at ₹45.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas VEL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VEL.BO's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is less volatile compared to VEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check VEL.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs AAPLUSTRAD.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, AAPLUSTRAD.BO has a market cap of 347.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while AAPLUSTRAD.BO trades at ₹1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas AAPLUSTRAD.BO's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AAPLUSTRAD.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to AAPLUSTRAD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check AAPLUSTRAD.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs ACEMEN.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, ACEMEN.BO has a market cap of 323.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while ACEMEN.BO trades at ₹103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas ACEMEN.BO's P/E ratio is 5087.50. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ACEMEN.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is less volatile compared to ACEMEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check ACEMEN.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs CCAL.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, CCAL.BO has a market cap of 307.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while CCAL.BO trades at ₹18.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas CCAL.BO's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CCAL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to CCAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check CCAL.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs YASHINNO.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, YASHINNO.BO has a market cap of 303.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while YASHINNO.BO trades at ₹44.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas YASHINNO.BO's P/E ratio is 4499.00. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YASHINNO.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is less volatile compared to YASHINNO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check YASHINNO.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs SANBLUE.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, SANBLUE.BO has a market cap of 221.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while SANBLUE.BO trades at ₹42.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas SANBLUE.BO's P/E ratio is 85.27. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SANBLUE.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is less volatile compared to SANBLUE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check SANBLUE.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs OPCHAINS.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, OPCHAINS.BO has a market cap of 212.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while OPCHAINS.BO trades at ₹31.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas OPCHAINS.BO's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OPCHAINS.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to OPCHAINS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check OPCHAINS.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs PRADHIN.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, PRADHIN.BO has a market cap of 203M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while PRADHIN.BO trades at ₹0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas PRADHIN.BO's P/E ratio is 0.45. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PRADHIN.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to PRADHIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check PRADHIN.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs SRUSTEELS.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, SRUSTEELS.BO has a market cap of 202.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while SRUSTEELS.BO trades at ₹3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas SRUSTEELS.BO's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SRUSTEELS.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is less volatile compared to SRUSTEELS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check SRUSTEELS.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs PANTH.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, PANTH.BO has a market cap of 187.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while PANTH.BO trades at ₹7.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas PANTH.BO's P/E ratio is 1.65. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PANTH.BO's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is less volatile compared to PANTH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check PANTH.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs RAWEDGE.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, RAWEDGE.BO has a market cap of 182.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while RAWEDGE.BO trades at ₹17.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas RAWEDGE.BO's P/E ratio is -14.86. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RAWEDGE.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to RAWEDGE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check RAWEDGE.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs NEERAJ.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, NEERAJ.BO has a market cap of 178.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while NEERAJ.BO trades at ₹16.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas NEERAJ.BO's P/E ratio is 147.73. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NEERAJ.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to NEERAJ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check NEERAJ.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs NIVAKA.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, NIVAKA.BO has a market cap of 178.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while NIVAKA.BO trades at ₹1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas NIVAKA.BO's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NIVAKA.BO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is less volatile compared to NIVAKA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check NIVAKA.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs TAIIND.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, TAIIND.BO has a market cap of 177.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while TAIIND.BO trades at ₹29.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas TAIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 369.88. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TAIIND.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to TAIIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check TAIIND.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs RAMAPETRO.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, RAMAPETRO.BO has a market cap of 153.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while RAMAPETRO.BO trades at ₹14.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas RAMAPETRO.BO's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RAMAPETRO.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to RAMAPETRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check RAMAPETRO.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs FRONTCORP.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, FRONTCORP.BO has a market cap of 152.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while FRONTCORP.BO trades at ₹30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas FRONTCORP.BO's P/E ratio is -18.59. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FRONTCORP.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to FRONTCORP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check FRONTCORP.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs MULLER.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, MULLER.BO has a market cap of 140.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while MULLER.BO trades at ₹225.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas MULLER.BO's P/E ratio is 178.57. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MULLER.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to MULLER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check MULLER.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs REETECH.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, REETECH.BO has a market cap of 139.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while REETECH.BO trades at ₹33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas REETECH.BO's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to REETECH.BO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to REETECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check REETECH.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs ALCHCORP.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, ALCHCORP.BO has a market cap of 135.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while ALCHCORP.BO trades at ₹27.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas ALCHCORP.BO's P/E ratio is -12.61. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALCHCORP.BO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to ALCHCORP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check ALCHCORP.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs GANONPRO.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, GANONPRO.BO has a market cap of 135.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while GANONPRO.BO trades at ₹15.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas GANONPRO.BO's P/E ratio is 55.85. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GANONPRO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is less volatile compared to GANONPRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check GANONPRO.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs SAENTER.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, SAENTER.BO has a market cap of 132.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while SAENTER.BO trades at ₹34.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas SAENTER.BO's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SAENTER.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to SAENTER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check SAENTER.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs COMPUPN.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, COMPUPN.BO has a market cap of 124.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while COMPUPN.BO trades at ₹4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas COMPUPN.BO's P/E ratio is -69.33. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to COMPUPN.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is less volatile compared to COMPUPN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check COMPUPN.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs SIBARAUT.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, SIBARAUT.BO has a market cap of 121.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while SIBARAUT.BO trades at ₹7.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas SIBARAUT.BO's P/E ratio is -22.94. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SIBARAUT.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is less volatile compared to SIBARAUT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check SIBARAUT.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs PMTELELIN.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, PMTELELIN.BO has a market cap of 117.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while PMTELELIN.BO trades at ₹11.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas PMTELELIN.BO's P/E ratio is -193.67. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PMTELELIN.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to PMTELELIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check PMTELELIN.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs PANKAJPIYUS.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, PANKAJPIYUS.BO has a market cap of 113.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while PANKAJPIYUS.BO trades at ₹284.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas PANKAJPIYUS.BO's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PANKAJPIYUS.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to PANKAJPIYUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check PANKAJPIYUS.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs 7NR.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, 7NR.BO has a market cap of 101.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while 7NR.BO trades at ₹3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas 7NR.BO's P/E ratio is 5.76. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 7NR.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to 7NR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check 7NR.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs AIHL.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, AIHL.BO has a market cap of 100.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while AIHL.BO trades at ₹47.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas AIHL.BO's P/E ratio is 191.96. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AIHL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to AIHL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check AIHL.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs KONNDOR.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, KONNDOR.BO has a market cap of 99.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while KONNDOR.BO trades at ₹18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas KONNDOR.BO's P/E ratio is -301.67. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KONNDOR.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to KONNDOR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check KONNDOR.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs ELEFLOR.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, ELEFLOR.BO has a market cap of 98.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while ELEFLOR.BO trades at ₹4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas ELEFLOR.BO's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ELEFLOR.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to ELEFLOR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check ELEFLOR.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs DEVINE.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, DEVINE.BO has a market cap of 90.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while DEVINE.BO trades at ₹9.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas DEVINE.BO's P/E ratio is 315.33. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DEVINE.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is less volatile compared to DEVINE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check DEVINE.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs FRASER.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, FRASER.BO has a market cap of 81.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while FRASER.BO trades at ₹10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas FRASER.BO's P/E ratio is -9.54. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FRASER.BO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is less volatile compared to FRASER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check FRASER.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs PARKERAC.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, PARKERAC.BO has a market cap of 80.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while PARKERAC.BO trades at ₹16.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas PARKERAC.BO's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PARKERAC.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to PARKERAC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check PARKERAC.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs ROJL.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, ROJL.BO has a market cap of 75.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while ROJL.BO trades at ₹1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas ROJL.BO's P/E ratio is -37.50. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ROJL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is less volatile compared to ROJL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check ROJL.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs AMANAYA.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, AMANAYA.BO has a market cap of 75.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while AMANAYA.BO trades at ₹20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas AMANAYA.BO's P/E ratio is 38.85. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMANAYA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to AMANAYA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check AMANAYA.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs FLORACORP.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, FLORACORP.BO has a market cap of 72.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while FLORACORP.BO trades at ₹8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas FLORACORP.BO's P/E ratio is -45.83. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FLORACORP.BO's ROE of -5.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is less volatile compared to FLORACORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check FLORACORP.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs TRIVENIENT.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, TRIVENIENT.BO has a market cap of 68.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while TRIVENIENT.BO trades at ₹1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas TRIVENIENT.BO's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TRIVENIENT.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to TRIVENIENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check TRIVENIENT.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs AMITINT.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, AMITINT.BO has a market cap of 66.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while AMITINT.BO trades at ₹3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas AMITINT.BO's P/E ratio is 39.22. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMITINT.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is less volatile compared to AMITINT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check AMITINT.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs ENTRINT.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, ENTRINT.BO has a market cap of 65.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while ENTRINT.BO trades at ₹21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas ENTRINT.BO's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ENTRINT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to ENTRINT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check ENTRINT.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs SAICOM.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, SAICOM.BO has a market cap of 63.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while SAICOM.BO trades at ₹0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas SAICOM.BO's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SAICOM.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to SAICOM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check SAICOM.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs PADMAIND.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, PADMAIND.BO has a market cap of 57.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while PADMAIND.BO trades at ₹9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas PADMAIND.BO's P/E ratio is 73.08. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PADMAIND.BO's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is less volatile compared to PADMAIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check PADMAIND.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs WWALUM.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, WWALUM.BO has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while WWALUM.BO trades at ₹16.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas WWALUM.BO's P/E ratio is 92.11. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WWALUM.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is less volatile compared to WWALUM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check WWALUM.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs UTLINDS.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, UTLINDS.BO has a market cap of 57M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while UTLINDS.BO trades at ₹1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas UTLINDS.BO's P/E ratio is 86.50. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UTLINDS.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to UTLINDS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check UTLINDS.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs DITCO.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, DITCO.BO has a market cap of 55.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while DITCO.BO trades at ₹15.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas DITCO.BO's P/E ratio is 40.45. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DITCO.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to DITCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check DITCO.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs NAKSH.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, NAKSH.BO has a market cap of 54.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while NAKSH.BO trades at ₹4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas NAKSH.BO's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NAKSH.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is less volatile compared to NAKSH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check NAKSH.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs PATRON.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, PATRON.BO has a market cap of 54M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while PATRON.BO trades at ₹2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas PATRON.BO's P/E ratio is 58.25. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PATRON.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to PATRON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check PATRON.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs ASHAI.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, ASHAI.BO has a market cap of 52.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while ASHAI.BO trades at ₹11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas ASHAI.BO's P/E ratio is 67.06. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASHAI.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to ASHAI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check ASHAI.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs VOLLF.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, VOLLF.BO has a market cap of 47.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while VOLLF.BO trades at ₹11.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas VOLLF.BO's P/E ratio is -12.01. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VOLLF.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to VOLLF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check VOLLF.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs SIMPLXPAP.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, SIMPLXPAP.BO has a market cap of 45.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while SIMPLXPAP.BO trades at ₹1,448.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas SIMPLXPAP.BO's P/E ratio is -34.70. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SIMPLXPAP.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to SIMPLXPAP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check SIMPLXPAP.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs WOMENNET.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, WOMENNET.BO has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while WOMENNET.BO trades at ₹7.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas WOMENNET.BO's P/E ratio is 66.50. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WOMENNET.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to WOMENNET.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check WOMENNET.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs TSPIRITUAL.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, TSPIRITUAL.BO has a market cap of 32.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while TSPIRITUAL.BO trades at ₹1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas TSPIRITUAL.BO's P/E ratio is -18.11. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TSPIRITUAL.BO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TTIL.BO is more volatile compared to TSPIRITUAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTIL.BO.Check TSPIRITUAL.BO's competition here
TTIL.BO vs SURANATP.BO Comparison February 2026
TTIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTIL.BO stands at 208M. In comparison, SURANATP.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TTIL.BO is priced at ₹8.51, while SURANATP.BO trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.15, whereas SURANATP.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTIL.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SURANATP.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TTIL.BO has daily volatility of 5.86 and SURANATP.BO has daily volatility of N/A.Check SURANATP.BO's competition here