TTW Public Company Limited
TTW Public Company Limited (TTAPY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TTAPY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Water Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTAPY | $13.41 | +0.00% | 1.1B | 11.76 | $1.14 | +5.71% |
| UUGWF | $15.74 | +0.00% | 10.7B | 30.27 | $0.52 | +4.13% |
| SVTRF | $35.47 | +0.00% | 10.7B | 34.44 | $1.03 | +4.51% |
| STRNY | $35.31 | +0.14% | 10.6B | 34.37 | $1.03 | +4.56% |
| UUGRY | $29.76 | +0.10% | 10.2B | 28.68 | $1.04 | +4.56% |
| GGDVY | $42.00 | +0.00% | 5.5B | 10.50 | $4.00 | +5.08% |
| GGDVF | $0.81 | +0.00% | 5.3B | 10.13 | $0.08 | +4.97% |
| BJWTY | $22.00 | +0.00% | 3.2B | 14.97 | $1.47 | +6.56% |
| BJWTF | $0.31 | +0.00% | 3.1B | 15.55 | $0.02 | +6.65% |
| PEGRF | $6.40 | +0.31% | 3B | -29.07 | -$0.22 | +6.64% |
Stock Comparison
TTAPY vs UUGWF Comparison July 2025
TTAPY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAPY stands at 1.1B. In comparison, UUGWF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAPY is priced at $13.41, while UUGWF trades at $15.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas UUGWF's P/E ratio is 30.27. In terms of profitability, TTAPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UUGWF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAPY is more volatile compared to UUGWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAPY.Check UUGWF's competition here
TTAPY vs SVTRF Comparison July 2025
TTAPY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAPY stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SVTRF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAPY is priced at $13.41, while SVTRF trades at $35.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas SVTRF's P/E ratio is 34.44. In terms of profitability, TTAPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SVTRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAPY is less volatile compared to SVTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAPY.Check SVTRF's competition here
TTAPY vs STRNY Comparison July 2025
TTAPY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAPY stands at 1.1B. In comparison, STRNY has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAPY is priced at $13.41, while STRNY trades at $35.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas STRNY's P/E ratio is 34.37. In terms of profitability, TTAPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STRNY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAPY is more volatile compared to STRNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAPY.Check STRNY's competition here
TTAPY vs UUGRY Comparison July 2025
TTAPY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAPY stands at 1.1B. In comparison, UUGRY has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAPY is priced at $13.41, while UUGRY trades at $29.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas UUGRY's P/E ratio is 28.68. In terms of profitability, TTAPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UUGRY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAPY is more volatile compared to UUGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAPY.Check UUGRY's competition here
TTAPY vs GGDVY Comparison July 2025
TTAPY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAPY stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GGDVY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAPY is priced at $13.41, while GGDVY trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas GGDVY's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, TTAPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GGDVY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAPY is more volatile compared to GGDVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAPY.Check GGDVY's competition here
TTAPY vs GGDVF Comparison July 2025
TTAPY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAPY stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GGDVF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAPY is priced at $13.41, while GGDVF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas GGDVF's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, TTAPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GGDVF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAPY is more volatile compared to GGDVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAPY.Check GGDVF's competition here
TTAPY vs BJWTY Comparison July 2025
TTAPY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAPY stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BJWTY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAPY is priced at $13.41, while BJWTY trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas BJWTY's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, TTAPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BJWTY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAPY is less volatile compared to BJWTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAPY.Check BJWTY's competition here
TTAPY vs BJWTF Comparison July 2025
TTAPY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAPY stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BJWTF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAPY is priced at $13.41, while BJWTF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas BJWTF's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, TTAPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BJWTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAPY is more volatile compared to BJWTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAPY.Check BJWTF's competition here
TTAPY vs PEGRF Comparison July 2025
TTAPY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAPY stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PEGRF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAPY is priced at $13.41, while PEGRF trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas PEGRF's P/E ratio is -29.07. In terms of profitability, TTAPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PEGRF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAPY is more volatile compared to PEGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAPY.Check PEGRF's competition here
TTAPY vs MWTCF Comparison July 2025
TTAPY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAPY stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MWTCF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAPY is priced at $13.41, while MWTCF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas MWTCF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, TTAPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MWTCF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAPY is more volatile compared to MWTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAPY.Check MWTCF's competition here
TTAPY vs MWTCY Comparison July 2025
TTAPY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAPY stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MWTCY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAPY is priced at $13.41, while MWTCY trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas MWTCY's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, TTAPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MWTCY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAPY is more volatile compared to MWTCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAPY.Check MWTCY's competition here
TTAPY vs PEGRY Comparison July 2025
TTAPY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAPY stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PEGRY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAPY is priced at $13.41, while PEGRY trades at $13.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas PEGRY's P/E ratio is -30.55. In terms of profitability, TTAPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PEGRY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAPY is more volatile compared to PEGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAPY.Check PEGRY's competition here
TTAPY vs CWAFF Comparison July 2025
TTAPY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAPY stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CWAFF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAPY is priced at $13.41, while CWAFF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas CWAFF's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, TTAPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CWAFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAPY is less volatile compared to CWAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAPY.Check CWAFF's competition here
TTAPY vs TTAPF Comparison July 2025
TTAPY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAPY stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TTAPF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTAPY is priced at $13.41, while TTAPF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas TTAPF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, TTAPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TTAPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAPY is more volatile compared to TTAPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAPY.Check TTAPF's competition here
TTAPY vs MSEXP Comparison July 2025
TTAPY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAPY stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MSEXP has a market cap of 936.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTAPY is priced at $13.41, while MSEXP trades at $555.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas MSEXP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTAPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MSEXP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAPY is more volatile compared to MSEXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAPY.Check MSEXP's competition here
TTAPY vs TTWPF Comparison July 2025
TTAPY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAPY stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TTWPF has a market cap of 917.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TTAPY is priced at $13.41, while TTWPF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas TTWPF's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, TTAPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TTWPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAPY is more volatile compared to TTWPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAPY.Check TTWPF's competition here
TTAPY vs AHWSF Comparison July 2025
TTAPY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAPY stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AHWSF has a market cap of 862.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TTAPY is priced at $13.41, while AHWSF trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas AHWSF's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, TTAPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AHWSF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAPY is less volatile compared to AHWSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAPY.Check AHWSF's competition here
TTAPY vs SGXXF Comparison July 2025
TTAPY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAPY stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SGXXF has a market cap of 579M. Regarding current trading prices, TTAPY is priced at $13.41, while SGXXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas SGXXF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TTAPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SGXXF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAPY is less volatile compared to SGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAPY.Check SGXXF's competition here
TTAPY vs BOTRF Comparison July 2025
TTAPY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAPY stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BOTRF has a market cap of 543.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTAPY is priced at $13.41, while BOTRF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas BOTRF's P/E ratio is 3.80. In terms of profitability, TTAPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BOTRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAPY is more volatile compared to BOTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAPY.Check BOTRF's competition here
TTAPY vs ARTNB Comparison July 2025
TTAPY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAPY stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ARTNB has a market cap of 336.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTAPY is priced at $13.41, while ARTNB trades at $33.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas ARTNB's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, TTAPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARTNB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAPY is more volatile compared to ARTNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAPY.Check ARTNB's competition here
TTAPY vs HEOFF Comparison July 2025
TTAPY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAPY stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HEOFF has a market cap of 280.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTAPY is priced at $13.41, while HEOFF trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas HEOFF's P/E ratio is -312.01. In terms of profitability, TTAPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HEOFF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAPY is more volatile compared to HEOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAPY.Check HEOFF's competition here
TTAPY vs AWAEF Comparison July 2025
TTAPY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAPY stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AWAEF has a market cap of 206.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTAPY is priced at $13.41, while AWAEF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas AWAEF's P/E ratio is 2.67. In terms of profitability, TTAPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AWAEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAPY is less volatile compared to AWAEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAPY.Check AWAEF's competition here
TTAPY vs DOMWF Comparison July 2025
TTAPY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAPY stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DOMWF has a market cap of 42.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TTAPY is priced at $13.41, while DOMWF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas DOMWF's P/E ratio is -6.04. In terms of profitability, TTAPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DOMWF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAPY is less volatile compared to DOMWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAPY.Check DOMWF's competition here
TTAPY vs CETI Comparison July 2025
TTAPY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAPY stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CETI has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTAPY is priced at $13.41, while CETI trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas CETI's P/E ratio is -4.39. In terms of profitability, TTAPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CETI's ROE of -9.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAPY is less volatile compared to CETI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAPY.Check CETI's competition here
TTAPY vs MPIR Comparison July 2025
TTAPY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAPY stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MPIR has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTAPY is priced at $13.41, while MPIR trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas MPIR's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, TTAPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MPIR's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAPY is more volatile compared to MPIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAPY.Check MPIR's competition here
TTAPY vs CNQQF Comparison July 2025
TTAPY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAPY stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CNQQF has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTAPY is priced at $13.41, while CNQQF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas CNQQF's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, TTAPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CNQQF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAPY is less volatile compared to CNQQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAPY.Check CNQQF's competition here
TTAPY vs PUFLF Comparison July 2025
TTAPY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAPY stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PUFLF has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTAPY is priced at $13.41, while PUFLF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas PUFLF's P/E ratio is -13.13. In terms of profitability, TTAPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PUFLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAPY is more volatile compared to PUFLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAPY.Check PUFLF's competition here
TTAPY vs AEPT Comparison July 2025
TTAPY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAPY stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AEPT has a market cap of 83.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TTAPY is priced at $13.41, while AEPT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas AEPT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TTAPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AEPT's ROE of +3.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAPY is more volatile compared to AEPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAPY.Check AEPT's competition here
TTAPY vs HYFXF Comparison July 2025
TTAPY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAPY stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HYFXF has a market cap of 78.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TTAPY is priced at $13.41, while HYFXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas HYFXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTAPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HYFXF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAPY is less volatile compared to HYFXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAPY.Check HYFXF's competition here
TTAPY vs TORW Comparison July 2025
TTAPY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAPY stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TORW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TTAPY is priced at $13.41, while TORW trades at $90.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas TORW's P/E ratio is 43.27. In terms of profitability, TTAPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TORW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTAPY is more volatile compared to TORW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAPY.Check TORW's competition here
TTAPY vs ACGPF Comparison July 2025
TTAPY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTAPY stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ACGPF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TTAPY is priced at $13.41, while ACGPF trades at $55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTAPY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas ACGPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTAPY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ACGPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTAPY is more volatile compared to ACGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTAPY.Check ACGPF's competition here