Trustpilot Group plc

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, 0A7O.L has a market cap of 105.23B. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while 0A7O.L trades at $414.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas 0A7O.L's P/E ratio is -7.78. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 0A7O.L's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to 0A7O.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, 0A3O.L has a market cap of 35.74B. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while 0A3O.L trades at $107.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas 0A3O.L's P/E ratio is 35666.67. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 0A3O.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to 0A3O.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, 0IL6.L has a market cap of 15.47B. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while 0IL6.L trades at $269.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas 0IL6.L's P/E ratio is 47.48. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 0IL6.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to 0IL6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, SGE.L has a market cap of 12.34B. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while SGE.L trades at $1,267.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas SGE.L's P/E ratio is 39.61. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SGE.L's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to SGE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, 0U3Q.L has a market cap of 5.52B. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while 0U3Q.L trades at $200.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas 0U3Q.L's P/E ratio is 92.21. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 0U3Q.L's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to 0U3Q.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, 0QOA.L has a market cap of 4.25B. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while 0QOA.L trades at $74.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas 0QOA.L's P/E ratio is 30.90. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 0QOA.L's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to 0QOA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, 0DWV.L has a market cap of 3.54B. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while 0DWV.L trades at $181.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas 0DWV.L's P/E ratio is 115.34. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 0DWV.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to 0DWV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, 0OA4.L has a market cap of 2.90B. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while 0OA4.L trades at $180.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas 0OA4.L's P/E ratio is 1008.94. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 0OA4.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to 0OA4.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, 0M2A.L has a market cap of 1.34B. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while 0M2A.L trades at $13.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas 0M2A.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 0M2A.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to 0M2A.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, KNOS.L has a market cap of 986.48M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while KNOS.L trades at $804.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas KNOS.L's P/E ratio is 19.61. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to KNOS.L's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to KNOS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, 0RS2.L has a market cap of 958.19M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while 0RS2.L trades at $56.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas 0RS2.L's P/E ratio is 41.75. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 0RS2.L's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to 0RS2.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, 0GM9.L has a market cap of 880.02M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while 0GM9.L trades at $153.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas 0GM9.L's P/E ratio is -47.53. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 0GM9.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to 0GM9.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, LTG.L has a market cap of 791.52M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while LTG.L trades at $99.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas LTG.L's P/E ratio is 24.98. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to LTG.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to LTG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, ALFA.L has a market cap of 719.87M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while ALFA.L trades at $243.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas ALFA.L's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ALFA.L's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is less volatile compared to ALFA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, GBG.L has a market cap of 699.50M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while GBG.L trades at $278.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas GBG.L's P/E ratio is 92.83. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GBG.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to GBG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, ATG.L has a market cap of 653.93M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while ATG.L trades at $540.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas ATG.L's P/E ratio is 36.00. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ATG.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is less volatile compared to ATG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, DEV.L has a market cap of 508.63M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while DEV.L trades at $30.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas DEV.L's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DEV.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to DEV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, CER.L has a market cap of 497.01M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while CER.L trades at $1,685.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas CER.L's P/E ratio is 32.40. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CER.L's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is less volatile compared to CER.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, NCC.L has a market cap of 462.35M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while NCC.L trades at $151.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas NCC.L's P/E ratio is -18.87. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NCC.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is less volatile compared to NCC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, 0L8Z.L has a market cap of 363.20M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while 0L8Z.L trades at $4.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas 0L8Z.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 0L8Z.L's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to 0L8Z.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, PBEE.L has a market cap of 343.33M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while PBEE.L trades at $145.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas PBEE.L's P/E ratio is -145.00. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PBEE.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is less volatile compared to PBEE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, IQG.L has a market cap of 331.32M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while IQG.L trades at $478.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas IQG.L's P/E ratio is -239.00. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to IQG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to IQG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, BIG.L has a market cap of 299.65M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while BIG.L trades at $104.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas BIG.L's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BIG.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is less volatile compared to BIG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, IDOX.L has a market cap of 264.47M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while IDOX.L trades at $58.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas IDOX.L's P/E ratio is 58.00. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to IDOX.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is less volatile compared to IDOX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, DOTD.L has a market cap of 262.05M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while DOTD.L trades at $85.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas DOTD.L's P/E ratio is 21.35. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DOTD.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is less volatile compared to DOTD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, ACSO.L has a market cap of 194.00M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while ACSO.L trades at $481.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas ACSO.L's P/E ratio is 30.06. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ACSO.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to ACSO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, NET.L has a market cap of 186.17M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while NET.L trades at $112.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas NET.L's P/E ratio is 37.33. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NET.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to NET.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, APTD.L has a market cap of 166.48M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while APTD.L trades at $299.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas APTD.L's P/E ratio is 33.22. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to APTD.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to APTD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, 0AAW.L has a market cap of 156.19M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while 0AAW.L trades at $14.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas 0AAW.L's P/E ratio is -10.32. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 0AAW.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to 0AAW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, 0N6K.L has a market cap of 145.17M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while 0N6K.L trades at $3.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas 0N6K.L's P/E ratio is 35.96. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 0N6K.L's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is less volatile compared to 0N6K.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, TRCS.L has a market cap of 142.63M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while TRCS.L trades at $470.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas TRCS.L's P/E ratio is 235.00. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TRCS.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is less volatile compared to TRCS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, GHT.L has a market cap of 135.73M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while GHT.L trades at $161.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas GHT.L's P/E ratio is 40.38. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GHT.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to GHT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, SAAS.L has a market cap of 124.64M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while SAAS.L trades at $107.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas SAAS.L's P/E ratio is -53.75. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SAAS.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to SAAS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, EYE.L has a market cap of 118.95M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while EYE.L trades at $400.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas EYE.L's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to EYE.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to EYE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, ELCO.L has a market cap of 116.84M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while ELCO.L trades at $140.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas ELCO.L's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ELCO.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is less volatile compared to ELCO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, SPE.L has a market cap of 106.56M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while SPE.L trades at $990.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas SPE.L's P/E ratio is -165.00. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SPE.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to SPE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, IGP.L has a market cap of 105.22M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while IGP.L trades at $180.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas IGP.L's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to IGP.L's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is less volatile compared to IGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, SPSY.L has a market cap of 96.46M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while SPSY.L trades at $200.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas SPSY.L's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SPSY.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to SPSY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, SPSC.L has a market cap of 95.49M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while SPSC.L trades at $250.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas SPSC.L's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SPSC.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to SPSC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, TRB.L has a market cap of 87.63M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while TRB.L trades at $41.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas TRB.L's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TRB.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to TRB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, 0QK1.L has a market cap of 83.58M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while 0QK1.L trades at $59.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas 0QK1.L's P/E ratio is -7.37. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 0QK1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to 0QK1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, CLBS.L has a market cap of 82.47M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while CLBS.L trades at $207.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas CLBS.L's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CLBS.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to CLBS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, RM.L has a market cap of 81.30M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while RM.L trades at $98.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas RM.L's P/E ratio is -19.60. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to RM.L's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to RM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, AOM.L has a market cap of 79.21M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while AOM.L trades at $111.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas AOM.L's P/E ratio is 55.50. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AOM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is less volatile compared to AOM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, ACC.L has a market cap of 77.90M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while ACC.L trades at $61.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas ACC.L's P/E ratio is -30.50. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ACC.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to ACC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, WAND.L has a market cap of 75.72M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while WAND.L trades at $63.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas WAND.L's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to WAND.L's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TRST.L has daily volatility of 3.63 and WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, OMG.L has a market cap of 72.20M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while OMG.L trades at $58.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas OMG.L's P/E ratio is 29.10. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to OMG.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is less volatile compared to OMG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, D4T4.L has a market cap of 70.56M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while D4T4.L trades at $177.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas D4T4.L's P/E ratio is 35.40. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to D4T4.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to D4T4.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, PULS.L has a market cap of 49.80M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while PULS.L trades at $39.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas PULS.L's P/E ratio is -7.80. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PULS.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to PULS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, SPA.L has a market cap of 48.52M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while SPA.L trades at $47.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas SPA.L's P/E ratio is 47.00. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SPA.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is less volatile compared to SPA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, SKL.L has a market cap of 32.21M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while SKL.L trades at $36.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas SKL.L's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SKL.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to SKL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, CRTA.L has a market cap of 31.27M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while CRTA.L trades at $24.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas CRTA.L's P/E ratio is -3.09. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CRTA.L's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is less volatile compared to CRTA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, SMRT.L has a market cap of 25.56M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while SMRT.L trades at $88.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas SMRT.L's P/E ratio is -14.72. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SMRT.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to SMRT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, GETB.L has a market cap of 24.33M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while GETB.L trades at $48.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas GETB.L's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GETB.L's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to GETB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, CHSS.L has a market cap of 23.24M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while CHSS.L trades at $3.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas CHSS.L's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CHSS.L's ROE of -4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to CHSS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, ESYS.L has a market cap of 20.71M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while ESYS.L trades at $32.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas ESYS.L's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ESYS.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to ESYS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, ITIM.L has a market cap of 17.59M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while ITIM.L trades at $56.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas ITIM.L's P/E ratio is -18.67. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ITIM.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to ITIM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, TEK.L has a market cap of 15.18M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while TEK.L trades at $7.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas TEK.L's P/E ratio is 1.40. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TEK.L's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is less volatile compared to TEK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, ALT.L has a market cap of 14.95M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while ALT.L trades at $20.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas ALT.L's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ALT.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is less volatile compared to ALT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, 0A8G.L has a market cap of 14.89M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while 0A8G.L trades at $6.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas 0A8G.L's P/E ratio is -50.49. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 0A8G.L's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to 0A8G.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, BIRD.L has a market cap of 14.52M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while BIRD.L trades at $3.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas BIRD.L's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BIRD.L's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is less volatile compared to BIRD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, CKT.L has a market cap of 14.31M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while CKT.L trades at $13.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas CKT.L's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CKT.L's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is less volatile compared to CKT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, CRDL.L has a market cap of 13.56M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while CRDL.L trades at $6.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas CRDL.L's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CRDL.L's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to CRDL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, PEN.L has a market cap of 13.40M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while PEN.L trades at $31.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas PEN.L's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PEN.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is less volatile compared to PEN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, ARC.L has a market cap of 10.43M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while ARC.L trades at $78.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas ARC.L's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ARC.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is less volatile compared to ARC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, ZOO.L has a market cap of 9.09M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while ZOO.L trades at $9.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas ZOO.L's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ZOO.L's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is less volatile compared to ZOO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, ING.L has a market cap of 8.85M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while ING.L trades at $61.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas ING.L's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ING.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is less volatile compared to ING.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, S247.L has a market cap of 8.51M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while S247.L trades at $7.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas S247.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to S247.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to S247.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, TERN.L has a market cap of 6.76M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while TERN.L trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas TERN.L's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TERN.L's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is less volatile compared to TERN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, 4GBL.L has a market cap of 6.59M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while 4GBL.L trades at $25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas 4GBL.L's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 4GBL.L's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to 4GBL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, EXR.L has a market cap of 6.04M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while EXR.L trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas EXR.L's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to EXR.L's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is less volatile compared to EXR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, MBT.L has a market cap of 5.05M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while MBT.L trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas MBT.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MBT.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to MBT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, 0O8X.L has a market cap of 3.71M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while 0O8X.L trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas 0O8X.L's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to 0O8X.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to 0O8X.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, TIDE.L has a market cap of 3.19M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while TIDE.L trades at $48.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas TIDE.L's P/E ratio is -48.50. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TIDE.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to TIDE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, RTOP.L has a market cap of 2.70M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while RTOP.L trades at $4.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas RTOP.L's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to RTOP.L's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to RTOP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, AIQ.L has a market cap of 2.59M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while AIQ.L trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas AIQ.L's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AIQ.L's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to AIQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, ACRM.L has a market cap of 2.56M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while ACRM.L trades at $1.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas ACRM.L's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ACRM.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is less volatile compared to ACRM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, RDT.L has a market cap of 2.48M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while RDT.L trades at $3.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas RDT.L's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to RDT.L's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is less volatile compared to RDT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, OBC.L has a market cap of 2.22M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while OBC.L trades at $15.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas OBC.L's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to OBC.L's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TRST.L has daily volatility of 3.63 and OBC.L has daily volatility of N/A.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, MBO.L has a market cap of 2.02M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while MBO.L trades at $1.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas MBO.L's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MBO.L's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to MBO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, SYME.L has a market cap of 2.01M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while SYME.L trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas SYME.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SYME.L's ROE of +6.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to SYME.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, SORT.L has a market cap of 1.76M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while SORT.L trades at $23.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas SORT.L's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SORT.L's ROE of -2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is less volatile compared to SORT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, DSG.L has a market cap of 1.74M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while DSG.L trades at $8.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas DSG.L's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DSG.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to DSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, LOOP.L has a market cap of 1.43M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while LOOP.L trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas LOOP.L's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to LOOP.L's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to LOOP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, ENET.L has a market cap of 1.29M. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while ENET.L trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas ENET.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ENET.L's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is less volatile compared to ENET.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, PTRO.L has a market cap of 954336.00. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while PTRO.L trades at $1.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas PTRO.L's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PTRO.L's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TRST.L has daily volatility of 3.63 and PTRO.L has daily volatility of N/A.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, INX.L has a market cap of 665361.00. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while INX.L trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas INX.L's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to INX.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is less volatile compared to INX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, LSAI.L has a market cap of 9108.00. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while LSAI.L trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas LSAI.L's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to LSAI.L's ROE of -2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to LSAI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, IDEA.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while IDEA.L trades at $349.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas IDEA.L's P/E ratio is 174.50. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to IDEA.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is more volatile compared to IDEA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, DMTR.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while DMTR.L trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas DMTR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DMTR.L's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TRST.L has daily volatility of 3.63 and DMTR.L has daily volatility of N/A.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, MNO.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while MNO.L trades at $12.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas MNO.L's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MNO.L's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is less volatile compared to MNO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, SIM.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while SIM.L trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas SIM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SIM.L's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TRST.L has daily volatility of 3.63 and SIM.L has daily volatility of N/A.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, ATQT.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while ATQT.L trades at $30.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas ATQT.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ATQT.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TRST.L has daily volatility of 3.63 and ATQT.L has daily volatility of N/A.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, AVV.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while AVV.L trades at $3,219.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas AVV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AVV.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TRST.L has daily volatility of 3.63 and AVV.L has daily volatility of N/A.

TRST.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRST.L stands at 988.52M. In comparison, VRE.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TRST.L is priced at $239.80, while VRE.L trades at $18.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRST.L currently has a P/E ratio of 239.80, whereas VRE.L's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, TRST.L's ROE is +0.36%, compared to VRE.L's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRST.L is less volatile compared to VRE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRST.L.