Türk Telekomünikasyon Anonim Sirketi
Türk Telekomünikasyon Anonim Sirketi (TRKNF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TRKNF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRKNF | $0.80 | +0.00% | 2.8B | 39.93 | $0.02 | N/A |
| DTEGF | $39.29 | +0.00% | 189.9B | 13.27 | $2.92 | +2.54% |
| DTEGY | $38.34 | +0.00% | 189.6B | 13.21 | $2.93 | +2.57% |
| SFTBY | $14.31 | +0.01% | 157.7B | 7.91 | $1.75 | +0.88% |
| SFTBF | $28.80 | +0.00% | 156.7B | 7.86 | $3.50 | +0.26% |
| NPPXF | $1.00 | -1.96% | 80.1B | 12.25 | $0.08 | +3.59% |
| NTTYY | $24.53 | +0.16% | 79.5B | 11.86 | $2.05 | +2.90% |
| AMXVF | $1.05 | +7.14% | 73.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| AMXOF | $1.20 | +20.00% | 72.3B | 15.00 | $0.08 | +1.24% |
| SFBQF | $1.41 | +0.00% | 67.1B | 20.07 | $0.07 | +4.10% |
Stock Comparison
TRKNF vs DTEGF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DTEGF has a market cap of 189.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while DTEGF trades at $39.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas DTEGF's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTEGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF is less volatile compared to DTEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRKNF.Check DTEGF's competition here
TRKNF vs DTEGY Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DTEGY has a market cap of 189.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while DTEGY trades at $38.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas DTEGY's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTEGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF is less volatile compared to DTEGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRKNF.Check DTEGY's competition here
TRKNF vs SFTBY Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SFTBY has a market cap of 157.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while SFTBY trades at $14.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas SFTBY's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SFTBY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF is less volatile compared to SFTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRKNF.Check SFTBY's competition here
TRKNF vs SFTBF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SFTBF has a market cap of 156.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while SFTBF trades at $28.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas SFTBF's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SFTBF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF is less volatile compared to SFTBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRKNF.Check SFTBF's competition here
TRKNF vs NPPXF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NPPXF has a market cap of 80.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while NPPXF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas NPPXF's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NPPXF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF is less volatile compared to NPPXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRKNF.Check NPPXF's competition here
TRKNF vs NTTYY Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NTTYY has a market cap of 79.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while NTTYY trades at $24.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas NTTYY's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTTYY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF is less volatile compared to NTTYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRKNF.Check NTTYY's competition here
TRKNF vs AMXVF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AMXVF has a market cap of 73.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while AMXVF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas AMXVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMXVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF is less volatile compared to AMXVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRKNF.Check AMXVF's competition here
TRKNF vs AMXOF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AMXOF has a market cap of 72.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while AMXOF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas AMXOF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMXOF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and AMXOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMXOF's competition here
TRKNF vs SFBQF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SFBQF has a market cap of 67.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while SFBQF trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas SFBQF's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SFBQF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and SFBQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SFBQF's competition here
TRKNF vs AMOVF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AMOVF has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while AMOVF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas AMOVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMOVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and AMOVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMOVF's competition here
TRKNF vs KDDIY Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, KDDIY has a market cap of 66.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while KDDIY trades at $16.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas KDDIY's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KDDIY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF is less volatile compared to KDDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRKNF.Check KDDIY's competition here
TRKNF vs SNGNF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SNGNF has a market cap of 65.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while SNGNF trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas SNGNF's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNGNF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and SNGNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SNGNF's competition here
TRKNF vs SGAPY Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SGAPY has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while SGAPY trades at $39.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas SGAPY's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SGAPY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF is less volatile compared to SGAPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRKNF.Check SGAPY's competition here
TRKNF vs SOBKY Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SOBKY has a market cap of 65.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while SOBKY trades at $13.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas SOBKY's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SOBKY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF is less volatile compared to SOBKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRKNF.Check SOBKY's competition here
TRKNF vs KDDIF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, KDDIF has a market cap of 64.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while KDDIF trades at $17.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas KDDIF's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KDDIF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and KDDIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KDDIF's competition here
TRKNF vs ORANY Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ORANY has a market cap of 55.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while ORANY trades at $21.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas ORANY's P/E ratio is 40.21. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ORANY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF is less volatile compared to ORANY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRKNF.Check ORANY's competition here
TRKNF vs FNCTF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FNCTF has a market cap of 50.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while FNCTF trades at $18.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas FNCTF's P/E ratio is 44.07. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FNCTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and FNCTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FNCTF's competition here
TRKNF vs CLLNY Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CLLNY has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while CLLNY trades at $17.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas CLLNY's P/E ratio is -128.14. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLLNY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF is less volatile compared to CLLNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRKNF.Check CLLNY's competition here
TRKNF vs SCMWY Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SCMWY has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while SCMWY trades at $91.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas SCMWY's P/E ratio is 28.47. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCMWY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF is less volatile compared to SCMWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRKNF.Check SCMWY's competition here
TRKNF vs SWZCF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SWZCF has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while SWZCF trades at $897.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas SWZCF's P/E ratio is 28.90. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SWZCF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and SWZCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SWZCF's competition here
TRKNF vs TLGPY Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TLGPY has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while TLGPY trades at $18.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas TLGPY's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TLGPY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF is less volatile compared to TLGPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRKNF.Check TLGPY's competition here
TRKNF vs TTRAF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TTRAF has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while TTRAF trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas TTRAF's P/E ratio is 25.93. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TTRAF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF is less volatile compared to TTRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRKNF.Check TTRAF's competition here
TRKNF vs AVIFY Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AVIFY has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while AVIFY trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas AVIFY's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AVIFY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF is less volatile compared to AVIFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRKNF.Check AVIFY's competition here
TRKNF vs AVIKF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AVIKF has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while AVIKF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas AVIKF's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AVIKF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and AVIKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AVIKF's competition here
TRKNF vs VODPF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VODPF has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while VODPF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas VODPF's P/E ratio is -7.89. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VODPF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and VODPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VODPF's competition here
TRKNF vs CTOWY Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CTOWY has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while CTOWY trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas CTOWY's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTOWY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and CTOWY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTOWY's competition here
TRKNF vs BTGOF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BTGOF has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while BTGOF trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas BTGOF's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BTGOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and BTGOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BTGOF's competition here
TRKNF vs TELNF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TELNF has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while TELNF trades at $18.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas TELNF's P/E ratio is 23.35. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TELNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and TELNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TELNF's competition here
TRKNF vs TELNY Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TELNY has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while TELNY trades at $18.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas TELNY's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TELNY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF is less volatile compared to TELNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRKNF.Check TELNY's competition here
TRKNF vs CHWRF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CHWRF has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while CHWRF trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas CHWRF's P/E ratio is 15.11. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHWRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and CHWRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHWRF's competition here
TRKNF vs TEFOF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TEFOF has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while TEFOF trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas TEFOF's P/E ratio is -17.74. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TEFOF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and TEFOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TEFOF's competition here
TRKNF vs MTNOY Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MTNOY has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while MTNOY trades at $12.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas MTNOY's P/E ratio is 47.46. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTNOY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF is less volatile compared to MTNOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRKNF.Check MTNOY's competition here
TRKNF vs TLKMF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TLKMF has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while TLKMF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas TLKMF's P/E ratio is 21.89. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TLKMF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF is less volatile compared to TLKMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRKNF.Check TLKMF's competition here
TRKNF vs RCIAF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RCIAF has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while RCIAF trades at $38.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas RCIAF's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RCIAF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and RCIAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RCIAF's competition here
TRKNF vs KKPNF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, KKPNF has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while KKPNF trades at $5.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas KKPNF's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KKPNF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF is less volatile compared to KKPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRKNF.Check KKPNF's competition here
TRKNF vs KKPNY Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, KKPNY has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while KKPNY trades at $5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas KKPNY's P/E ratio is 20.19. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KKPNY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF is less volatile compared to KKPNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRKNF.Check KKPNY's competition here
TRKNF vs VDMCY Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VDMCY has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while VDMCY trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas VDMCY's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VDMCY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF is less volatile compared to VDMCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRKNF.Check VDMCY's competition here
TRKNF vs TLSNY Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TLSNY has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while TLSNY trades at $9.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas TLSNY's P/E ratio is 34.17. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TLSNY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF is less volatile compared to TLSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRKNF.Check TLSNY's competition here
TRKNF vs TLSNF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TLSNF has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while TLSNF trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas TLSNF's P/E ratio is 32.67. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TLSNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and TLSNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TLSNF's competition here
TRKNF vs MTNOF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MTNOF has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while MTNOF trades at $10.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas MTNOF's P/E ratio is 42.56. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTNOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and MTNOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MTNOF's competition here
TRKNF vs TIAIY Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TIAIY has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while TIAIY trades at $8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas TIAIY's P/E ratio is -22.95. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TIAIY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and TIAIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TIAIY's competition here
TRKNF vs TIAJF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TIAJF has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while TIAJF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas TIAJF's P/E ratio is -22.30. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TIAJF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF is less volatile compared to TIAJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRKNF.Check TIAJF's competition here
TRKNF vs AVIVF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AVIVF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while AVIVF trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas AVIVF's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AVIVF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and AVIVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AVIVF's competition here
TRKNF vs AAFRF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AAFRF has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while AAFRF trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas AAFRF's P/E ratio is 30.40. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AAFRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and AAFRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AAFRF's competition here
TRKNF vs ELMUY Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ELMUY has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while ELMUY trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas ELMUY's P/E ratio is 20.16. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ELMUY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and ELMUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELMUY's competition here
TRKNF vs TIAOF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TIAOF has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while TIAOF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas TIAOF's P/E ratio is -19.23. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TIAOF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and TIAOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TIAOF's competition here
TRKNF vs HLTOY Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HLTOY has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while HLTOY trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas HLTOY's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HLTOY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF is less volatile compared to HLTOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRKNF.Check HLTOY's competition here
TRKNF vs VODAF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VODAF has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while VODAF trades at $7.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas VODAF's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VODAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and VODAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VODAF's competition here
TRKNF vs TLTZY Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TLTZY has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while TLTZY trades at $10.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas TLTZY's P/E ratio is 29.36. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TLTZY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF is less volatile compared to TLTZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRKNF.Check TLTZY's competition here
TRKNF vs SJRWF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SJRWF has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while SJRWF trades at $30.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas SJRWF's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SJRWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and SJRWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SJRWF's competition here
TRKNF vs BCEPF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BCEPF has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while BCEPF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas BCEPF's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BCEPF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and BCEPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCEPF's competition here
TRKNF vs BECEF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BECEF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while BECEF trades at $13.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas BECEF's P/E ratio is 5.47. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BECEF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and BECEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BECEF's competition here
TRKNF vs TLTZF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TLTZF has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while TLTZF trades at $18.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas TLTZF's P/E ratio is 25.18. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TLTZF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and TLTZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TLTZF's competition here
TRKNF vs TCPFF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TCPFF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while TCPFF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas TCPFF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TCPFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and TCPFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TCPFF's competition here
TRKNF vs BCPPF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BCPPF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while BCPPF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas BCPPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BCPPF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF is less volatile compared to BCPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRKNF.Check BCPPF's competition here
TRKNF vs HKTTY Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HKTTY has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while HKTTY trades at $15.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas HKTTY's P/E ratio is 18.14. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HKTTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and HKTTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HKTTY's competition here
TRKNF vs HKTTF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HKTTF has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while HKTTF trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas HKTTF's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HKTTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and HKTTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HKTTF's competition here
TRKNF vs BCEXF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BCEXF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while BCEXF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas BCEXF's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BCEXF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and BCEXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCEXF's competition here
TRKNF vs QBCRF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, QBCRF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while QBCRF trades at $38.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas QBCRF's P/E ratio is 14.75. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QBCRF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and QBCRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QBCRF's competition here
TRKNF vs DIGBF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DIGBF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while DIGBF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas DIGBF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DIGBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and DIGBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DIGBF's competition here
TRKNF vs QBCAF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, QBCAF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while QBCAF trades at $37.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas QBCAF's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QBCAF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and QBCAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QBCAF's competition here
TRKNF vs FRTAY Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FRTAY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while FRTAY trades at $18.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas FRTAY's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRTAY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and FRTAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FRTAY's competition here
TRKNF vs LBRDB Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LBRDB has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while LBRDB trades at $55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas LBRDB's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LBRDB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and LBRDB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LBRDB's competition here
TRKNF vs SHNUF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SHNUF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while SHNUF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas SHNUF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHNUF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF is less volatile compared to SHNUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRKNF.Check SHNUF's competition here
TRKNF vs HLTOF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HLTOF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while HLTOF trades at $18.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas HLTOF's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HLTOF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and HLTOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HLTOF's competition here
TRKNF vs TELDY Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TELDY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while TELDY trades at $12.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas TELDY's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TELDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and TELDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TELDY's competition here
TRKNF vs AARTY Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AARTY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while AARTY trades at $20.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas AARTY's P/E ratio is 33.58. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AARTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and AARTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AARTY's competition here
TRKNF vs BZQIY Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BZQIY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while BZQIY trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas BZQIY's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BZQIY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and BZQIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BZQIY's competition here
TRKNF vs BZQIF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BZQIF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while BZQIF trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas BZQIF's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BZQIF's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and BZQIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BZQIF's competition here
TRKNF vs ELMUF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ELMUF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while ELMUF trades at $43.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas ELMUF's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ELMUF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and ELMUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELMUF's competition here
TRKNF vs MYTEF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MYTEF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while MYTEF trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas MYTEF's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MYTEF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and MYTEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MYTEF's competition here
TRKNF vs TELDF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TELDF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while TELDF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas TELDF's P/E ratio is 17.69. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TELDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and TELDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TELDF's competition here
TRKNF vs PCWLF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PCWLF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while PCWLF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas PCWLF's P/E ratio is -76.18. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCWLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and PCWLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PCWLF's competition here
TRKNF vs PCCWY Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PCCWY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while PCCWY trades at $7.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas PCCWY's P/E ratio is -145.80. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCCWY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and PCCWY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PCCWY's competition here
TRKNF vs MAXSF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MAXSF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while MAXSF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas MAXSF's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MAXSF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and MAXSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MAXSF's competition here
TRKNF vs AXXTF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AXXTF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while AXXTF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas AXXTF's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AXXTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and AXXTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AXXTF's competition here
TRKNF vs TKAGY Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TKAGY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while TKAGY trades at $15.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas TKAGY's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TKAGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and TKAGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TKAGY's competition here
TRKNF vs TRKNY Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TRKNY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while TRKNY trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas TRKNY's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRKNY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and TRKNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TRKNY's competition here
TRKNF vs UDIRF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, UDIRF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while UDIRF trades at $27.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas UDIRF's P/E ratio is 33.34. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UDIRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and UDIRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UDIRF's competition here
TRKNF vs PHTCF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PHTCF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while PHTCF trades at $20.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas PHTCF's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PHTCF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and PHTCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PHTCF's competition here
TRKNF vs CUCSF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CUCSF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while CUCSF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas CUCSF's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CUCSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and CUCSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CUCSF's competition here
TRKNF vs PTITF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PTITF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while PTITF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas PTITF's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PTITF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and PTITF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTITF's competition here
TRKNF vs FRTAF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FRTAF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while FRTAF trades at $35.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas FRTAF's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRTAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and FRTAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FRTAF's competition here
TRKNF vs GTMEY Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GTMEY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while GTMEY trades at $26.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas GTMEY's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GTMEY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and GTMEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GTMEY's competition here
TRKNF vs TFAOF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TFAOF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while TFAOF trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas TFAOF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and TFAOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TFAOF's competition here
TRKNF vs CUCSY Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CUCSY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while CUCSY trades at $16.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas CUCSY's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CUCSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and CUCSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CUCSY's competition here
TRKNF vs PTXKY Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PTXKY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while PTXKY trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas PTXKY's P/E ratio is -10.88. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PTXKY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF is less volatile compared to PTXKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRKNF.Check PTXKY's competition here
TRKNF vs TCMFF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TCMFF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while TCMFF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas TCMFF's P/E ratio is -8.82. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TCMFF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and TCMFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TCMFF's competition here
TRKNF vs MICCF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MICCF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while MICCF trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas MICCF's P/E ratio is 70.96. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MICCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and MICCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MICCF's competition here
TRKNF vs BGAOY Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BGAOY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while BGAOY trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas BGAOY's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BGAOY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and BGAOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BGAOY's competition here
TRKNF vs IIJIF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, IIJIF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while IIJIF trades at $17.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas IIJIF's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IIJIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and IIJIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IIJIF's competition here
TRKNF vs TACYY Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TACYY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while TACYY trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas TACYY's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TACYY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and TACYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TACYY's competition here
TRKNF vs HTWSF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HTWSF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while HTWSF trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas HTWSF's P/E ratio is 33.63. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HTWSF's ROE of +2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and HTWSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HTWSF's competition here
TRKNF vs TLGHY Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TLGHY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while TLGHY trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas TLGHY's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TLGHY's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and TLGHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TLGHY's competition here
TRKNF vs BGAOF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BGAOF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while BGAOF trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas BGAOF's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BGAOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and BGAOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BGAOF's competition here
TRKNF vs NZTCF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NZTCF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while NZTCF trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas NZTCF's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NZTCF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and NZTCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NZTCF's competition here
TRKNF vs ZONNF Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ZONNF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while ZONNF trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas ZONNF's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZONNF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and ZONNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZONNF's competition here
TRKNF vs IIJIY Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, IIJIY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while IIJIY trades at $28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas IIJIY's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IIJIY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF and IIJIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IIJIY's competition here
TRKNF vs SPKKY Comparison February 2026
TRKNF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRKNF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SPKKY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRKNF is priced at $0.80, while SPKKY trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.93, whereas SPKKY's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, TRKNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPKKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRKNF is less volatile compared to SPKKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRKNF.Check SPKKY's competition here