Trinity Exploration & Production plc
Trinity Exploration & Production plc (TRIN.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TRIN.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRIN.L | £68.00 | N/A | 26.4M | -7.56 | -£0.09 | N/A |
| WDS.L | £1,260.00 | N/A | 23.9B | 16.36 | £0.77 | +9.05% |
| NVTK.IL | £70.50 | +0.00% | 21.1B | 3.67 | £19.21 | N/A |
| 0HTF.L | £485.50 | -0.10% | 12.9B | -13.28 | -£36.63 | +19.64% |
| 0V1L.L | £104.50 | +0.90% | 12.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 0HVD.L | £14.09 | +6.30% | 9.9B | N/A | N/A | +4.69% |
| ITH.L | £220.00 | +2.80% | 3.7B | -27.62 | -£0.08 | +11.99% |
| HBR.L | £231.49 | +0.82% | 3.3B | -10.47 | -£0.22 | +7.57% |
| ENOG.L | £962.00 | +2.72% | 1.7B | 20.63 | £0.46 | +5.54% |
| SEPL.L | £238.50 | -2.45% | 1.5B | -0.10 | -£23.86 | +3.91% |
Stock Comparison
TRIN.L vs WDS.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, WDS.L has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while WDS.L trades at £1,260.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas WDS.L's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WDS.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L and WDS.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WDS.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs NVTK.IL Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, NVTK.IL has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while NVTK.IL trades at £70.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas NVTK.IL's P/E ratio is 3.67. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NVTK.IL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L and NVTK.IL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NVTK.IL's competition here
TRIN.L vs 0HTF.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, 0HTF.L has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while 0HTF.L trades at £485.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas 0HTF.L's P/E ratio is -13.28. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 0HTF.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to 0HTF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check 0HTF.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs 0V1L.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, 0V1L.L has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while 0V1L.L trades at £104.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas 0V1L.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 0V1L.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to 0V1L.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check 0V1L.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs 0HVD.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, 0HVD.L has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while 0HVD.L trades at £14.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas 0HVD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 0HVD.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to 0HVD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check 0HVD.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs ITH.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, ITH.L has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while ITH.L trades at £220.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas ITH.L's P/E ratio is -27.62. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ITH.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to ITH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check ITH.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs HBR.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, HBR.L has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while HBR.L trades at £231.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas HBR.L's P/E ratio is -10.47. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HBR.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to HBR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check HBR.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs ENOG.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, ENOG.L has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while ENOG.L trades at £962.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas ENOG.L's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ENOG.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to ENOG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check ENOG.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs SEPL.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, SEPL.L has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while SEPL.L trades at £238.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas SEPL.L's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SEPL.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to SEPL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check SEPL.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs SQZ.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, SQZ.L has a market cap of 687M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while SQZ.L trades at £178.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas SQZ.L's P/E ratio is -29.13. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SQZ.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to SQZ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check SQZ.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs KOS.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, KOS.L has a market cap of 643.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while KOS.L trades at £134.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas KOS.L's P/E ratio is -5.38. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to KOS.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to KOS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check KOS.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs DEC.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, DEC.L has a market cap of 577.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while DEC.L trades at £1,223.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas DEC.L's P/E ratio is -8.93. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DEC.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to DEC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check DEC.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs RKH.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, RKH.L has a market cap of 468.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while RKH.L trades at £74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas RKH.L's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RKH.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to RKH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check RKH.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs GKP.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, GKP.L has a market cap of 399.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while GKP.L trades at £180.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas GKP.L's P/E ratio is 92.00. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GKP.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to GKP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check GKP.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs PANR.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, PANR.L has a market cap of 387.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while PANR.L trades at £32.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas PANR.L's P/E ratio is -31.30. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PANR.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to PANR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check PANR.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs 0MDP.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, 0MDP.L has a market cap of 332.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while 0MDP.L trades at £6.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas 0MDP.L's P/E ratio is 3.90. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 0MDP.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to 0MDP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check 0MDP.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs PTAL.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, PTAL.L has a market cap of 326.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while PTAL.L trades at £37.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas PTAL.L's P/E ratio is 5.96. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PTAL.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to PTAL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check PTAL.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs EGY.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, EGY.L has a market cap of 307.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while EGY.L trades at £295.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas EGY.L's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to EGY.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L and EGY.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EGY.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs ENQ.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, ENQ.L has a market cap of 236.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while ENQ.L trades at £12.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas ENQ.L's P/E ratio is 3.19. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ENQ.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to ENQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check ENQ.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs GENL.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, GENL.L has a market cap of 172.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while GENL.L trades at £62.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas GENL.L's P/E ratio is -4.81. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GENL.L's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to GENL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check GENL.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs TLW.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, TLW.L has a market cap of 166.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while TLW.L trades at £11.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas TLW.L's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TLW.L's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to TLW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check TLW.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs HUR.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, HUR.L has a market cap of 155.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while HUR.L trades at £7.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas HUR.L's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HUR.L's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L and HUR.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HUR.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs I3E.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, I3E.L has a market cap of 153.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while I3E.L trades at £12.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas I3E.L's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to I3E.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to I3E.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check I3E.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs CNE.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, CNE.L has a market cap of 146.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while CNE.L trades at £209.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas CNE.L's P/E ratio is -17.83. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CNE.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to CNE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check CNE.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs KIST.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, KIST.L has a market cap of 135.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while KIST.L trades at £163.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas KIST.L's P/E ratio is -3.48. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to KIST.L's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to KIST.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check KIST.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs SAVE.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, SAVE.L has a market cap of 116.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while SAVE.L trades at £7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas SAVE.L's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SAVE.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L and SAVE.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SAVE.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs AET.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, AET.L has a market cap of 110.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while AET.L trades at £49.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas AET.L's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AET.L's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to AET.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check AET.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs JSE.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, JSE.L has a market cap of 107.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while JSE.L trades at £19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas JSE.L's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to JSE.L's ROE of -4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to JSE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check JSE.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs GTE.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, GTE.L has a market cap of 102.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while GTE.L trades at £292.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas GTE.L's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GTE.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L and GTE.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GTE.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs PHAR.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, PHAR.L has a market cap of 88.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while PHAR.L trades at £21.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas PHAR.L's P/E ratio is 5.38. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PHAR.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to PHAR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check PHAR.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs BOR.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, BOR.L has a market cap of 87M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while BOR.L trades at £10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas BOR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BOR.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to BOR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check BOR.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs AEX.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, AEX.L has a market cap of 80.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while AEX.L trades at £1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas AEX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AEX.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to AEX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check AEX.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs FOG.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, FOG.L has a market cap of 78.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while FOG.L trades at £7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas FOG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FOG.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to FOG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check FOG.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs SLE.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, SLE.L has a market cap of 74.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while SLE.L trades at £16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas SLE.L's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SLE.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L and SLE.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SLE.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs BCE.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, BCE.L has a market cap of 72.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while BCE.L trades at £0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas BCE.L's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BCE.L's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L and BCE.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCE.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs ZPHR.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, ZPHR.L has a market cap of 67.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while ZPHR.L trades at £3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas ZPHR.L's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ZPHR.L's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to ZPHR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check ZPHR.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs ENW.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, ENW.L has a market cap of 64.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while ENW.L trades at £19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas ENW.L's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ENW.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to ENW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check ENW.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs WEN.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, WEN.L has a market cap of 58.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while WEN.L trades at £32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas WEN.L's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WEN.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TRIN.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and WEN.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check WEN.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs CASP.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, CASP.L has a market cap of 50.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while CASP.L trades at £2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas CASP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CASP.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L and CASP.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CASP.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs AXL.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, AXL.L has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while AXL.L trades at £14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas AXL.L's P/E ratio is 3.62. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AXL.L's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to AXL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check AXL.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs TXP.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, TXP.L has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while TXP.L trades at £14.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas TXP.L's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TXP.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to TXP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check TXP.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs JOG.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, JOG.L has a market cap of 35M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while JOG.L trades at £110.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas JOG.L's P/E ratio is -9.73. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to JOG.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to JOG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check JOG.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs VLU.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, VLU.L has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while VLU.L trades at £35.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas VLU.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to VLU.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L and VLU.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VLU.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs INDI.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, INDI.L has a market cap of 27.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while INDI.L trades at £13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas INDI.L's P/E ratio is 5.03. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to INDI.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to INDI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check INDI.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs ECO.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, ECO.L has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while ECO.L trades at £8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas ECO.L's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ECO.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to ECO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check ECO.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs EDR.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, EDR.L has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while EDR.L trades at £4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas EDR.L's P/E ratio is 4.40. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to EDR.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TRIN.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and EDR.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check EDR.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs PRD.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, PRD.L has a market cap of 23M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while PRD.L trades at £3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas PRD.L's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PRD.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to PRD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check PRD.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs CHAR.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, CHAR.L has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while CHAR.L trades at £1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas CHAR.L's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CHAR.L's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to CHAR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check CHAR.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs BOIL.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, BOIL.L has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while BOIL.L trades at £0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas BOIL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BOIL.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to BOIL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check BOIL.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs PXEN.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, PXEN.L has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while PXEN.L trades at £4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas PXEN.L's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PXEN.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to PXEN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check PXEN.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs IGAS.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, IGAS.L has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while IGAS.L trades at £14.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas IGAS.L's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to IGAS.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L and IGAS.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IGAS.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs CEG.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, CEG.L has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while CEG.L trades at £7.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas CEG.L's P/E ratio is -7.48. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CEG.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to CEG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check CEG.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs PMG.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, PMG.L has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while PMG.L trades at £16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas PMG.L's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PMG.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to PMG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check PMG.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs UPL.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, UPL.L has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while UPL.L trades at £1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas UPL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to UPL.L's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to UPL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check UPL.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs SOU.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, SOU.L has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while SOU.L trades at £0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas SOU.L's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SOU.L's ROE of -8.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to SOU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check SOU.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs MATD.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, MATD.L has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while MATD.L trades at £0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas MATD.L's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MATD.L's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to MATD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check MATD.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs 88E.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, 88E.L has a market cap of 13.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while 88E.L trades at £1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas 88E.L's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 88E.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to 88E.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check 88E.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs TRP.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, TRP.L has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while TRP.L trades at £0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas TRP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TRP.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to TRP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check TRP.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs ZEN.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, ZEN.L has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while ZEN.L trades at £3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas ZEN.L's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ZEN.L's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to ZEN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check ZEN.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs ANGS.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, ANGS.L has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while ANGS.L trades at £0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas ANGS.L's P/E ratio is 0.08. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ANGS.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L and ANGS.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ANGS.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs TLOU.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, TLOU.L has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while TLOU.L trades at £0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas TLOU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TLOU.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to TLOU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check TLOU.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs LBE.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, LBE.L has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while LBE.L trades at £18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas LBE.L's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LBE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L and LBE.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LBE.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs SOUC.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, SOUC.L has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while SOUC.L trades at £3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas SOUC.L's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SOUC.L's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L and SOUC.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SOUC.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs PPP.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, PPP.L has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while PPP.L trades at £9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas PPP.L's P/E ratio is -9.55. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PPP.L's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L and PPP.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PPP.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs CAD.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, CAD.L has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while CAD.L trades at £3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas CAD.L's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CAD.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to CAD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check CAD.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs UJO.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, UJO.L has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while UJO.L trades at £5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas UJO.L's P/E ratio is 5.20. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to UJO.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to UJO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check UJO.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs ORCA.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, ORCA.L has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while ORCA.L trades at £8.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas ORCA.L's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ORCA.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L and ORCA.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ORCA.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs EOG.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, EOG.L has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while EOG.L trades at £0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas EOG.L's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to EOG.L's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to EOG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check EOG.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs DELT.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, DELT.L has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while DELT.L trades at £7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas DELT.L's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DELT.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to DELT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check DELT.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs MSMN.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, MSMN.L has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while MSMN.L trades at £0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas MSMN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MSMN.L's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to MSMN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check MSMN.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs BLOE.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, BLOE.L has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while BLOE.L trades at £0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas BLOE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BLOE.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to BLOE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check BLOE.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs GBP.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, GBP.L has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while GBP.L trades at £0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas GBP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GBP.L's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to GBP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check GBP.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs NOG.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, NOG.L has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while NOG.L trades at £3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas NOG.L's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NOG.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to NOG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check NOG.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs RBD.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, RBD.L has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while RBD.L trades at £0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas RBD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RBD.L's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to RBD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check RBD.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs IOG.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, IOG.L has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while IOG.L trades at £0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas IOG.L's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to IOG.L's ROE of -1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TRIN.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and IOG.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check IOG.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs SENX.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, SENX.L has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while SENX.L trades at £3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas SENX.L's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SENX.L's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to SENX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check SENX.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs BLVN.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, BLVN.L has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while BLVN.L trades at £0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas BLVN.L's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BLVN.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to BLVN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check BLVN.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs GEEC.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, GEEC.L has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while GEEC.L trades at £3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas GEEC.L's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GEEC.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L and GEEC.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GEEC.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs UOG.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, UOG.L has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while UOG.L trades at £0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas UOG.L's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to UOG.L's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to UOG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check UOG.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs EME.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, EME.L has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while EME.L trades at £0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas EME.L's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to EME.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to EME.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check EME.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs SYN.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, SYN.L has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while SYN.L trades at £0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas SYN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SYN.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to SYN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check SYN.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs AST.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, AST.L has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while AST.L trades at £0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas AST.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AST.L's ROE of +6.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to AST.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check AST.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs WTE.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, WTE.L has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while WTE.L trades at £1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas WTE.L's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WTE.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L and WTE.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WTE.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs CORO.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, CORO.L has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while CORO.L trades at £0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas CORO.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CORO.L's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L and CORO.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CORO.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs CLON.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, CLON.L has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while CLON.L trades at £0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas CLON.L's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CLON.L's ROE of +1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to CLON.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check CLON.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs COPL.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, COPL.L has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while COPL.L trades at £0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas COPL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to COPL.L's ROE of -1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L and COPL.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check COPL.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs SCIR.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, SCIR.L has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while SCIR.L trades at £0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas SCIR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SCIR.L's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to SCIR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check SCIR.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs PET.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, PET.L has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while PET.L trades at £0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas PET.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PET.L's ROE of -59.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L and PET.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PET.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs WCAT.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, WCAT.L has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while WCAT.L trades at £0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas WCAT.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WCAT.L's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to WCAT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check WCAT.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs UKOG.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, UKOG.L has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while UKOG.L trades at £0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas UKOG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to UKOG.L's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to UKOG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check UKOG.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs STA.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, STA.L has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while STA.L trades at £1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas STA.L's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to STA.L's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L and STA.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STA.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs TOM.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, TOM.L has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while TOM.L trades at £0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas TOM.L's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TOM.L's ROE of -2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to TOM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check TOM.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs NTOG.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, NTOG.L has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while NTOG.L trades at £0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas NTOG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NTOG.L's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to NTOG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check NTOG.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs LOGP.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, LOGP.L has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while LOGP.L trades at £0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas LOGP.L's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LOGP.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L and LOGP.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LOGP.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs MEN.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, MEN.L has a market cap of 990.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while MEN.L trades at £8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas MEN.L's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MEN.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to MEN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check MEN.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs ADME.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, ADME.L has a market cap of 949.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while ADME.L trades at £0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas ADME.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ADME.L's ROE of -5.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L and ADME.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADME.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs PTR.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, PTR.L has a market cap of 857.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while PTR.L trades at £0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas PTR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PTR.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to PTR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check PTR.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs ARG.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, ARG.L has a market cap of 823K. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while ARG.L trades at £0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas ARG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ARG.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TRIN.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and ARG.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check ARG.L's competition here
TRIN.L vs SDX.L Comparison August 2025
TRIN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIN.L stands at 26.4M. In comparison, SDX.L has a market cap of 531.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TRIN.L is priced at £68.00, while SDX.L trades at £0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -7.56, whereas SDX.L's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TRIN.L's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SDX.L's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIN.L is less volatile compared to SDX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIN.L.Check SDX.L's competition here