Turbodyne Technologies, Inc.
Turbodyne Technologies, Inc. TRBD Peers
See (TRBD) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRBD | $0.00 | +9900.00% | 100K | -0.10 | -$0.00 | N/A |
| CAOHF | $0.15 | +150000.00% | 91.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FYGGY | $1.50 | N/A | 48.1B | 13.64 | $0.11 | +0.57% |
| DNZOF | $14.21 | -0.35% | 40B | 15.79 | $0.90 | +2.96% |
| DNZOY | $13.41 | -0.48% | 37.8B | 13.28 | $1.01 | +0.92% |
| BRDCY | $21.37 | -0.05% | 29.1B | 15.26 | $1.40 | +2.07% |
| BRDCF | $42.40 | -0.24% | 28.7B | 15.14 | $2.80 | +3.11% |
| MGDDY | $19.10 | -0.83% | 27B | 8.55 | $2.23 | +3.92% |
| MGDDF | $37.52 | -0.69% | 26.5B | 3.36 | $11.17 | +4.15% |
| CTTAF | $89.28 | +0.15% | 17.9B | 13.49 | $6.62 | +2.78% |
Stock Comparison
TRBD vs CAOHF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, CAOHF has a market cap of 91.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while CAOHF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CAOHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CAOHF's ROE of -14.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is less volatile compared to CAOHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs FYGGY Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, FYGGY has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while FYGGY trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas FYGGY's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FYGGY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to FYGGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs DNZOF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, DNZOF has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while DNZOF trades at $14.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas DNZOF's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DNZOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to DNZOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs DNZOY Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, DNZOY has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while DNZOY trades at $13.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas DNZOY's P/E ratio is 13.28. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DNZOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to DNZOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs BRDCY Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, BRDCY has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while BRDCY trades at $21.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas BRDCY's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRDCY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to BRDCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs BRDCF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, BRDCF has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while BRDCF trades at $42.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas BRDCF's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRDCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to BRDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs MGDDY Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, MGDDY has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while MGDDY trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas MGDDY's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MGDDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to MGDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs MGDDF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, MGDDF has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while MGDDF trades at $37.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas MGDDF's P/E ratio is 3.36. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MGDDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to MGDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs CTTAF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, CTTAF has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while CTTAF trades at $89.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CTTAF's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CTTAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to CTTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs CTTAY Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, CTTAY has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while CTTAY trades at $8.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CTTAY's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CTTAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to CTTAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs KNBHF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, KNBHF has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while KNBHF trades at $101.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas KNBHF's P/E ratio is 33.82. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KNBHF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to KNBHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs KNRRY Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, KNRRY has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while KNRRY trades at $25.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas KNRRY's P/E ratio is 33.32. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KNRRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to KNRRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs SMTOY Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, SMTOY has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while SMTOY trades at $20.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SMTOY's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMTOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to SMTOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs PTAIY Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, PTAIY has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while PTAIY trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas PTAIY's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PTAIY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to PTAIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs PTAIF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, PTAIF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while PTAIF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas PTAIF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PTAIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to PTAIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs HLLGY Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, HLLGY has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while HLLGY trades at $49.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas HLLGY's P/E ratio is 31.07. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HLLGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to HLLGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs HLKHF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, HLKHF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while HLKHF trades at $92.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas HLKHF's P/E ratio is 25.81. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HLKHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to HLKHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs ASEKY Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, ASEKY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while ASEKY trades at $12.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ASEKY's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASEKY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to ASEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs ASEKF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, ASEKF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while ASEKF trades at $10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ASEKF's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASEKF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to ASEKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs NGKSY Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, NGKSY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while NGKSY trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas NGKSY's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NGKSY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to NGKSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs NGKSF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, NGKSF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while NGKSF trades at $30.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas NGKSF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NGKSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to NGKSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs SFFLY Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, SFFLY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while SFFLY trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SFFLY's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SFFLY's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to SFFLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs PLLIF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, PLLIF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while PLLIF trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas PLLIF's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PLLIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to PLLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs YORUF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, YORUF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while YORUF trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas YORUF's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to YORUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to YORUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs FESTF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, FESTF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while FESTF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas FESTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FESTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to FESTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs KOTMF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, KOTMF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while KOTMF trades at $13.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas KOTMF's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KOTMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to KOTMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs BRBOY Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, BRBOY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while BRBOY trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas BRBOY's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRBOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to BRBOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs KOTMY Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, KOTMY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while KOTMY trades at $12.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas KOTMY's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KOTMY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to KOTMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs SCFLF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, SCFLF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while SCFLF trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SCFLF's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCFLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to SCFLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs BRBOF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, BRBOF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while BRBOF trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas BRBOF's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRBOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to BRBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs MNTHY Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, MNTHY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while MNTHY trades at $53.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas MNTHY's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MNTHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to MNTHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs YORUY Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, YORUY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while YORUY trades at $18.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas YORUY's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to YORUY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to YORUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs STAEY Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, STAEY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while STAEY trades at $9.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas STAEY's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STAEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to STAEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs LIMAF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, LIMAF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while LIMAF trades at $45.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas LIMAF's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LIMAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to LIMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs SMTUF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, SMTUF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while SMTUF trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SMTUF's P/E ratio is 29.29. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMTUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to SMTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs VLEEF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, VLEEF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while VLEEF trades at $10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas VLEEF's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLEEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to VLEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs VLEEY Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, VLEEY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while VLEEY trades at $5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas VLEEY's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLEEY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to VLEEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs STAEF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, STAEF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while STAEF trades at $16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas STAEF's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STAEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to STAEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs TDBOF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, TDBOF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while TDBOF trades at $13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas TDBOF's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TDBOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to TDBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs NHKGF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, NHKGF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while NHKGF trades at $11.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas NHKGF's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NHKGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to NHKGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs VTSCF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, VTSCF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while VTSCF trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas VTSCF's P/E ratio is 82.35. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VTSCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to VTSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs MNTHF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, MNTHF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while MNTHF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas MNTHF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MNTHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to MNTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs MBUMF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, MBUMF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while MBUMF trades at $18.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas MBUMF's P/E ratio is 24.09. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MBUMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to MBUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs NPSKY Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, NPSKY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while NPSKY trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas NPSKY's P/E ratio is 26.14. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NPSKY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to NPSKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs TGOSY Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, TGOSY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while TGOSY trades at $33.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas TGOSY's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TGOSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to TGOSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs ARBFF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, ARBFF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while ARBFF trades at $25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ARBFF's P/E ratio is 31.56. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARBFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to ARBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs NPSKF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, NPSKF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while NPSKF trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas NPSKF's P/E ratio is 30.57. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NPSKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to NPSKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs FURCF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, FURCF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while FURCF trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas FURCF's P/E ratio is -7.02. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FURCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to FURCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs JEHLY Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, JEHLY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while JEHLY trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas JEHLY's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JEHLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to JEHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs MBUMY Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, MBUMY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while MBUMY trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas MBUMY's P/E ratio is 26.92. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MBUMY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to MBUMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs GMPUF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, GMPUF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while GMPUF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas GMPUF's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GMPUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to GMPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs UNIEF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, UNIEF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while UNIEF trades at $35.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas UNIEF's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UNIEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to UNIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs JELCF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, JELCF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while JELCF trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas JELCF's P/E ratio is 6.58. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JELCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to JELCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs GUDDY Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, GUDDY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while GUDDY trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas GUDDY's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GUDDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to GUDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs NTXVF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, NTXVF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while NTXVF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas NTXVF's P/E ratio is 30.24. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NTXVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to NTXVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs PASTF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, PASTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while PASTF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas PASTF's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PASTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to PASTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs NIFCY Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, NIFCY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while NIFCY trades at $13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas NIFCY's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NIFCY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to NIFCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs NKRKF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, NKRKF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while NKRKF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas NKRKF's P/E ratio is -27.59. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NKRKF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to NKRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs NKRKY Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, NKRKY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while NKRKY trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas NKRKY's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NKRKY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to NKRKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs ATNNF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, ATNNF has a market cap of 960.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while ATNNF trades at $165.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ATNNF's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATNNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to ATNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs TIANF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, TIANF has a market cap of 939.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while TIANF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas TIANF's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TIANF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to TIANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs GUDHF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, GUDHF has a market cap of 867.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while GUDHF trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas GUDHF's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GUDHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to GUDHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs SFHLF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, SFHLF has a market cap of 848M. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while SFHLF trades at $18.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SFHLF's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SFHLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to SFHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs ABDDF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, ABDDF has a market cap of 757.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while ABDDF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ABDDF's P/E ratio is 143.48. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABDDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to ABDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs FAURY Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, FAURY has a market cap of 689.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while FAURY trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas FAURY's P/E ratio is -11.74. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FAURY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to FAURY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs PWRHF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, PWRHF has a market cap of 647.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while PWRHF trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas PWRHF's P/E ratio is 40.25. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PWRHF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to PWRHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs FCVFF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, FCVFF has a market cap of 509.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while FCVFF trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas FCVFF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FCVFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to FCVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs MRETF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, MRETF has a market cap of 446.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while MRETF trades at $6.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas MRETF's P/E ratio is -10.77. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MRETF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to MRETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs TCISF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, TCISF has a market cap of 420M. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while TCISF trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas TCISF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TCISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to TCISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs SAEOF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, SAEOF has a market cap of 401.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while SAEOF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SAEOF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SAEOF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to SAEOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs VTSCY Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, VTSCY has a market cap of 400.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while VTSCY trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas VTSCY's P/E ratio is 76.92. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VTSCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to VTSCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs UFMG Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, UFMG has a market cap of 386M. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while UFMG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas UFMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UFMG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to UFMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs NMAKF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, NMAKF has a market cap of 338.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while NMAKF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas NMAKF's P/E ratio is -11.60. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NMAKF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to NMAKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs ELLRY Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, ELLRY has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while ELLRY trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ELLRY's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ELLRY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to ELLRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs NPSGF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, NPSGF has a market cap of 294.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while NPSGF trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas NPSGF's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NPSGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to NPSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs EGKLF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, EGKLF has a market cap of 285.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while EGKLF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas EGKLF's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EGKLF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to EGKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs NPSGY Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, NPSGY has a market cap of 270M. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while NPSGY trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas NPSGY's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NPSGY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to NPSGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs IOCJY Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, IOCJY has a market cap of 247.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while IOCJY trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas IOCJY's P/E ratio is 6.11. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IOCJY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to IOCJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs XNGIF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, XNGIF has a market cap of 244.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while XNGIF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas XNGIF's P/E ratio is 6.43. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to XNGIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to XNGIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs CMMCF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, CMMCF has a market cap of 221.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while CMMCF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CMMCF's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMMCF's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to CMMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs AKBIF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, AKBIF has a market cap of 215.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while AKBIF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas AKBIF's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AKBIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to AKBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs EXCOF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, EXCOF has a market cap of 185.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while EXCOF trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas EXCOF's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EXCOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to EXCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs AMGRF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, AMGRF has a market cap of 162.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while AMGRF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas AMGRF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMGRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to AMGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs HWAFF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, HWAFF has a market cap of 158M. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while HWAFF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas HWAFF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HWAFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to HWAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs WLMTF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, WLMTF has a market cap of 152.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while WLMTF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas WLMTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WLMTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to WLMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs SCTH Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, SCTH has a market cap of 139.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while SCTH trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SCTH's P/E ratio is -395.00. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCTH's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to SCTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs KGAUF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, KGAUF has a market cap of 130.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while KGAUF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas KGAUF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KGAUF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to KGAUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs LEAT Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, LEAT has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while LEAT trades at $8.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas LEAT's P/E ratio is -165.60. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LEAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to LEAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs STSGF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, STSGF has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while STSGF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas STSGF's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STSGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to STSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs NWFAF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, NWFAF has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while NWFAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas NWFAF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NWFAF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to NWFAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs VOAXF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, VOAXF has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while VOAXF trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas VOAXF's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VOAXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to VOAXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs CREVF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, CREVF has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while CREVF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CREVF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CREVF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to CREVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs CCEGF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, CCEGF has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while CCEGF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CCEGF's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CCEGF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to CCEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs ATHHF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, ATHHF has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while ATHHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ATHHF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATHHF's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to ATHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs OPTI Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, OPTI has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while OPTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas OPTI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OPTI's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to OPTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs AMTY Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, AMTY has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while AMTY trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas AMTY's P/E ratio is 3.70. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to AMTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs NFGRF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, NFGRF has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while NFGRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas NFGRF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NFGRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to NFGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs AFFL Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, AFFL has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while AFFL trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas AFFL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AFFL's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to AFFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.
TRBD vs SPKTF Comparison
TRBD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRBD stands at 100K. In comparison, SPKTF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRBD is priced at $0.00, while SPKTF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRBD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SPKTF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, TRBD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPKTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRBD is more volatile compared to SPKTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRBD.