Teract S.A.
Teract S.A. TRACT.PA Peers
See (TRACT.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRACT.PA | $0.88 | +3.53% | 61.52M | -0.96 | -$0.92 | N/A |
| TKWY.AS | $19.33 | +0.36% | 3.82B | -8.02 | -$2.41 | N/A |
| BLV.PA | $15.30 | +0.79% | 1.54B | -510.00 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| FNAC.PA | $31.70 | -5.09% | 919.79M | 30.19 | $1.05 | +1.42% |
| FAST.AS | $20.10 | -0.50% | 388.61M | -14.57 | -$1.38 | N/A |
| BBED.AS | $5.98 | -0.33% | 162.58M | 22.15 | $0.27 | N/A |
| ALVU.PA | $11.90 | +1.71% | 115.22M | 15.87 | $0.75 | N/A |
| CAFO.PA | $7.94 | +0.25% | 73.02M | 4.93 | $1.61 | +2.64% |
| SRP.PA | $0.60 | -2.60% | 71.06M | -4.00 | -$0.15 | N/A |
| ALHRS.PA | $3.56 | -0.56% | 54.56M | -3.52 | -$1.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TRACT.PA vs TKWY.AS Comparison
TRACT.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRACT.PA stands at 61.52M. In comparison, TKWY.AS has a market cap of 3.82B. Regarding current trading prices, TRACT.PA is priced at $0.88, while TKWY.AS trades at $19.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRACT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas TKWY.AS's P/E ratio is -8.02. In terms of profitability, TRACT.PA's ROE is -0.39%, compared to TKWY.AS's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TRACT.PA is more volatile compared to TKWY.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRACT.PA.
TRACT.PA vs BLV.PA Comparison
TRACT.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRACT.PA stands at 61.52M. In comparison, BLV.PA has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, TRACT.PA is priced at $0.88, while BLV.PA trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRACT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas BLV.PA's P/E ratio is -510.00. In terms of profitability, TRACT.PA's ROE is -0.39%, compared to BLV.PA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRACT.PA is more volatile compared to BLV.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRACT.PA.
TRACT.PA vs FNAC.PA Comparison
TRACT.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRACT.PA stands at 61.52M. In comparison, FNAC.PA has a market cap of 919.79M. Regarding current trading prices, TRACT.PA is priced at $0.88, while FNAC.PA trades at $31.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRACT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas FNAC.PA's P/E ratio is 30.19. In terms of profitability, TRACT.PA's ROE is -0.39%, compared to FNAC.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRACT.PA is less volatile compared to FNAC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRACT.PA.
TRACT.PA vs FAST.AS Comparison
TRACT.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRACT.PA stands at 61.52M. In comparison, FAST.AS has a market cap of 388.61M. Regarding current trading prices, TRACT.PA is priced at $0.88, while FAST.AS trades at $20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRACT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas FAST.AS's P/E ratio is -14.57. In terms of profitability, TRACT.PA's ROE is -0.39%, compared to FAST.AS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRACT.PA is more volatile compared to FAST.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRACT.PA.
TRACT.PA vs BBED.AS Comparison
TRACT.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRACT.PA stands at 61.52M. In comparison, BBED.AS has a market cap of 162.58M. Regarding current trading prices, TRACT.PA is priced at $0.88, while BBED.AS trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRACT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas BBED.AS's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, TRACT.PA's ROE is -0.39%, compared to BBED.AS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRACT.PA is more volatile compared to BBED.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRACT.PA.
TRACT.PA vs ALVU.PA Comparison
TRACT.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRACT.PA stands at 61.52M. In comparison, ALVU.PA has a market cap of 115.22M. Regarding current trading prices, TRACT.PA is priced at $0.88, while ALVU.PA trades at $11.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRACT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas ALVU.PA's P/E ratio is 15.87. In terms of profitability, TRACT.PA's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ALVU.PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRACT.PA is less volatile compared to ALVU.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRACT.PA.
TRACT.PA vs CAFO.PA Comparison
TRACT.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRACT.PA stands at 61.52M. In comparison, CAFO.PA has a market cap of 73.02M. Regarding current trading prices, TRACT.PA is priced at $0.88, while CAFO.PA trades at $7.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRACT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas CAFO.PA's P/E ratio is 4.93. In terms of profitability, TRACT.PA's ROE is -0.39%, compared to CAFO.PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRACT.PA is more volatile compared to CAFO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRACT.PA.
TRACT.PA vs SRP.PA Comparison
TRACT.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRACT.PA stands at 61.52M. In comparison, SRP.PA has a market cap of 71.06M. Regarding current trading prices, TRACT.PA is priced at $0.88, while SRP.PA trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRACT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas SRP.PA's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, TRACT.PA's ROE is -0.39%, compared to SRP.PA's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TRACT.PA is more volatile compared to SRP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRACT.PA.
TRACT.PA vs ALHRS.PA Comparison
TRACT.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRACT.PA stands at 61.52M. In comparison, ALHRS.PA has a market cap of 54.56M. Regarding current trading prices, TRACT.PA is priced at $0.88, while ALHRS.PA trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRACT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas ALHRS.PA's P/E ratio is -3.52. In terms of profitability, TRACT.PA's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ALHRS.PA's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRACT.PA is more volatile compared to ALHRS.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRACT.PA.
TRACT.PA vs ALHUN.PA Comparison
TRACT.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRACT.PA stands at 61.52M. In comparison, ALHUN.PA has a market cap of 39.60M. Regarding current trading prices, TRACT.PA is priced at $0.88, while ALHUN.PA trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRACT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas ALHUN.PA's P/E ratio is 21.35. In terms of profitability, TRACT.PA's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ALHUN.PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRACT.PA is more volatile compared to ALHUN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRACT.PA.
TRACT.PA vs CNV.PA Comparison
TRACT.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRACT.PA stands at 61.52M. In comparison, CNV.PA has a market cap of 32.17M. Regarding current trading prices, TRACT.PA is priced at $0.88, while CNV.PA trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRACT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas CNV.PA's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, TRACT.PA's ROE is -0.39%, compared to CNV.PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRACT.PA is less volatile compared to CNV.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRACT.PA.
TRACT.PA vs PSAT.PA Comparison
TRACT.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRACT.PA stands at 61.52M. In comparison, PSAT.PA has a market cap of 18.40M. Regarding current trading prices, TRACT.PA is priced at $0.88, while PSAT.PA trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRACT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas PSAT.PA's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, TRACT.PA's ROE is -0.39%, compared to PSAT.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRACT.PA is more volatile compared to PSAT.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRACT.PA.
TRACT.PA vs ALVAP.PA Comparison
TRACT.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRACT.PA stands at 61.52M. In comparison, ALVAP.PA has a market cap of 15.49M. Regarding current trading prices, TRACT.PA is priced at $0.88, while ALVAP.PA trades at $5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRACT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas ALVAP.PA's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, TRACT.PA's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ALVAP.PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRACT.PA is less volatile compared to ALVAP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRACT.PA.
TRACT.PA vs ALX.AS Comparison
TRACT.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRACT.PA stands at 61.52M. In comparison, ALX.AS has a market cap of 9.58M. Regarding current trading prices, TRACT.PA is priced at $0.88, while ALX.AS trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRACT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas ALX.AS's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, TRACT.PA's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ALX.AS's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRACT.PA is more volatile compared to ALX.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRACT.PA.
TRACT.PA vs ALUPG.PA Comparison
TRACT.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRACT.PA stands at 61.52M. In comparison, ALUPG.PA has a market cap of 7.70M. Regarding current trading prices, TRACT.PA is priced at $0.88, while ALUPG.PA trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRACT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas ALUPG.PA's P/E ratio is 86.00. In terms of profitability, TRACT.PA's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ALUPG.PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRACT.PA is more volatile compared to ALUPG.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRACT.PA.
TRACT.PA vs ALEMV.PA Comparison
TRACT.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRACT.PA stands at 61.52M. In comparison, ALEMV.PA has a market cap of 6.54M. Regarding current trading prices, TRACT.PA is priced at $0.88, while ALEMV.PA trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRACT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas ALEMV.PA's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, TRACT.PA's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ALEMV.PA's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TRACT.PA is less volatile compared to ALEMV.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRACT.PA.
TRACT.PA vs ALSPT.PA Comparison
TRACT.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRACT.PA stands at 61.52M. In comparison, ALSPT.PA has a market cap of 6.01M. Regarding current trading prices, TRACT.PA is priced at $0.88, while ALSPT.PA trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRACT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas ALSPT.PA's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, TRACT.PA's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ALSPT.PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRACT.PA is less volatile compared to ALSPT.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRACT.PA.
TRACT.PA vs ALVIA.PA Comparison
TRACT.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRACT.PA stands at 61.52M. In comparison, ALVIA.PA has a market cap of 5.94M. Regarding current trading prices, TRACT.PA is priced at $0.88, while ALVIA.PA trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRACT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas ALVIA.PA's P/E ratio is 24.59. In terms of profitability, TRACT.PA's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ALVIA.PA's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TRACT.PA is more volatile compared to ALVIA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRACT.PA.
TRACT.PA vs MLBBO.PA Comparison
TRACT.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRACT.PA stands at 61.52M. In comparison, MLBBO.PA has a market cap of 5.31M. Regarding current trading prices, TRACT.PA is priced at $0.88, while MLBBO.PA trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRACT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas MLBBO.PA's P/E ratio is 244.00. In terms of profitability, TRACT.PA's ROE is -0.39%, compared to MLBBO.PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRACT.PA is less volatile compared to MLBBO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRACT.PA.
TRACT.PA vs MLTRO.PA Comparison
TRACT.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRACT.PA stands at 61.52M. In comparison, MLTRO.PA has a market cap of 2.02M. Regarding current trading prices, TRACT.PA is priced at $0.88, while MLTRO.PA trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRACT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas MLTRO.PA's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, TRACT.PA's ROE is -0.39%, compared to MLTRO.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRACT.PA is more volatile compared to MLTRO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRACT.PA.
TRACT.PA vs MLCLP.PA Comparison
TRACT.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRACT.PA stands at 61.52M. In comparison, MLCLP.PA has a market cap of 968338.00. Regarding current trading prices, TRACT.PA is priced at $0.88, while MLCLP.PA trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRACT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas MLCLP.PA's P/E ratio is 1.47. In terms of profitability, TRACT.PA's ROE is -0.39%, compared to MLCLP.PA's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TRACT.PA is more volatile compared to MLCLP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRACT.PA.
TRACT.PA vs ALPHS.PA Comparison
TRACT.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRACT.PA stands at 61.52M. In comparison, ALPHS.PA has a market cap of 1973.00. Regarding current trading prices, TRACT.PA is priced at $0.88, while ALPHS.PA trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRACT.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.96, whereas ALPHS.PA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TRACT.PA's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ALPHS.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRACT.PA is less volatile compared to ALPHS.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRACT.PA.