TD Income Builder ETF
TD Income Builder ETF TPAY.TO Peers
See (TPAY.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Income Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TPAY.TO | $21.20 | -0.05% | 7.29M | N/A | N/A | +0.35% |
| BNC.TO | $28.34 | +0.28% | 8.57B | 13.95 | $2.03 | +8.99% |
| EIT-UN.TO | $15.66 | +0.45% | 2.85B | 21.16 | $0.74 | +8.06% |
| NUBF.TO | $21.15 | -0.28% | 2.43B | 14.57 | $1.45 | +4.22% |
| NREA.TO | $24.53 | +0.66% | 1.34B | 21.45 | $1.14 | +1.86% |
| PFIA.TO | $10.10 | +0.30% | 1.31B | N/A | N/A | +3.74% |
| AD-UN.TO | $18.62 | -0.21% | 845.67M | 4.62 | $4.03 | +7.27% |
| MKB.TO | $19.11 | -0.73% | 802.86M | N/A | N/A | +3.67% |
| FIE.TO | $8.45 | N/A | 801.06M | 13.45 | $0.63 | +5.69% |
| HDIF.TO | $8.29 | -0.12% | 404.59M | 19.62 | $0.42 | +10.70% |
Stock Comparison
TPAY.TO vs BNC.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, BNC.TO has a market cap of 8.57B. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while BNC.TO trades at $28.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNC.TO's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is more volatile compared to BNC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs EIT-UN.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, EIT-UN.TO has a market cap of 2.85B. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while EIT-UN.TO trades at $15.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EIT-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 21.16. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EIT-UN.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is less volatile compared to EIT-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs NUBF.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, NUBF.TO has a market cap of 2.43B. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while NUBF.TO trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NUBF.TO's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NUBF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is more volatile compared to NUBF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs NREA.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, NREA.TO has a market cap of 1.34B. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while NREA.TO trades at $24.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NREA.TO's P/E ratio is 21.45. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NREA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is more volatile compared to NREA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs PFIA.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, PFIA.TO has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while PFIA.TO trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFIA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PFIA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is more volatile compared to PFIA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs AD-UN.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, AD-UN.TO has a market cap of 845.67M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while AD-UN.TO trades at $18.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AD-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 4.62. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AD-UN.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is less volatile compared to AD-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs MKB.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, MKB.TO has a market cap of 802.86M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while MKB.TO trades at $19.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MKB.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is less volatile compared to MKB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs FIE.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, FIE.TO has a market cap of 801.06M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while FIE.TO trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIE.TO's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is less volatile compared to FIE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs HDIF.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, HDIF.TO has a market cap of 404.59M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while HDIF.TO trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HDIF.TO's P/E ratio is 19.62. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HDIF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is less volatile compared to HDIF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs XTR.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, XTR.TO has a market cap of 349.72M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while XTR.TO trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XTR.TO's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XTR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is more volatile compared to XTR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs CIC.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, CIC.TO has a market cap of 243.97M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while CIC.TO trades at $12.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIC.TO's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is less volatile compared to CIC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs VCIP.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, VCIP.TO has a market cap of 224.45M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while VCIP.TO trades at $26.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCIP.TO's P/E ratio is 19.53. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCIP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is less volatile compared to VCIP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs IFRF.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, IFRF.TO has a market cap of 197.74M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while IFRF.TO trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IFRF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IFRF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is more volatile compared to IFRF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs CCOR.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, CCOR.TO has a market cap of 170.49M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while CCOR.TO trades at $17.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCOR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCOR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is more volatile compared to CCOR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs PBY-UN.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, PBY-UN.TO has a market cap of 143.32M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while PBY-UN.TO trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PBY-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PBY-UN.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is less volatile compared to PBY-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs ZMI.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, ZMI.TO has a market cap of 126.60M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while ZMI.TO trades at $17.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZMI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZMI.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is less volatile compared to ZMI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs MGB.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, MGB.TO has a market cap of 116.19M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while MGB.TO trades at $15.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is more volatile compared to MGB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs HUBL.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, HUBL.TO has a market cap of 112.54M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while HUBL.TO trades at $12.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUBL.TO's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HUBL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is less volatile compared to HUBL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs FAP.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, FAP.TO has a market cap of 109.50M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while FAP.TO trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FAP.TO's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FAP.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is less volatile compared to FAP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs MID-UN.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, MID-UN.TO has a market cap of 100.43M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while MID-UN.TO trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MID-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 8.73. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MID-UN.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is less volatile compared to MID-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs PLDI.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, PLDI.TO has a market cap of 98.20M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while PLDI.TO trades at $18.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLDI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PLDI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is more volatile compared to PLDI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs BMAX.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, BMAX.TO has a market cap of 91.98M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while BMAX.TO trades at $13.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BMAX.TO's P/E ratio is 22.26. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BMAX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is less volatile compared to BMAX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs PIC-A.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, PIC-A.TO has a market cap of 88.41M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while PIC-A.TO trades at $5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIC-A.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PIC-A.TO's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is less volatile compared to PIC-A.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs TLF.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, TLF.TO has a market cap of 82.82M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while TLF.TO trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLF.TO's P/E ratio is 35.47. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TLF.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is less volatile compared to TLF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs BGI-UN.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, BGI-UN.TO has a market cap of 82.02M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while BGI-UN.TO trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGI-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BGI-UN.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is less volatile compared to BGI-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs FFI-UN.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, FFI-UN.TO has a market cap of 73.67M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while FFI-UN.TO trades at $12.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFI-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 5.23. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FFI-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is less volatile compared to FFI-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs XINC.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, XINC.TO has a market cap of 73.28M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while XINC.TO trades at $20.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XINC.TO's P/E ratio is 19.71. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XINC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is less volatile compared to XINC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs HTAE.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, HTAE.TO has a market cap of 71.33M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while HTAE.TO trades at $15.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTAE.TO's P/E ratio is 35.47. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HTAE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is less volatile compared to HTAE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs RBN-UN.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, RBN-UN.TO has a market cap of 58.96M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while RBN-UN.TO trades at $7.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBN-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RBN-UN.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is less volatile compared to RBN-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs XSC.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, XSC.TO has a market cap of 58.80M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while XSC.TO trades at $17.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSC.TO's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is more volatile compared to XSC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs HGR.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, HGR.TO has a market cap of 55.33M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while HGR.TO trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGR.TO's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HGR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is less volatile compared to HGR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs HHLE.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, HHLE.TO has a market cap of 55.03M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while HHLE.TO trades at $8.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HHLE.TO's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HHLE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is less volatile compared to HHLE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs XSI.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, XSI.TO has a market cap of 43.95M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while XSI.TO trades at $17.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSI.TO's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is more volatile compared to XSI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs SKG-UN.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, SKG-UN.TO has a market cap of 36.16M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while SKG-UN.TO trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKG-UN.TO's P/E ratio is -12.68. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SKG-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is less volatile compared to SKG-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs FCGI.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, FCGI.TO has a market cap of 31.59M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while FCGI.TO trades at $14.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCGI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCGI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is less volatile compared to FCGI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs RIFI.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, RIFI.TO has a market cap of 27.18M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while RIFI.TO trades at $17.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIFI.TO's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RIFI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is more volatile compared to RIFI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs INC-UN.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, INC-UN.TO has a market cap of 26.46M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while INC-UN.TO trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INC-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INC-UN.TO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is less volatile compared to INC-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs EARN.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, EARN.TO has a market cap of 25.41M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while EARN.TO trades at $48.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EARN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EARN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is more volatile compared to EARN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs PIN.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, PIN.TO has a market cap of 16.28M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while PIN.TO trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIN.TO's P/E ratio is 16.84. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PIN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is more volatile compared to PIN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs PHR.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, PHR.TO has a market cap of 15.68M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while PHR.TO trades at $19.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHR.TO's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is more volatile compared to PHR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs ETP.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, ETP.TO has a market cap of 13.92M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while ETP.TO trades at $17.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETP.TO's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ETP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is more volatile compared to ETP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs ZWQT.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, ZWQT.TO has a market cap of 11.70M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while ZWQT.TO trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZWQT.TO's P/E ratio is 17.13. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZWQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is more volatile compared to ZWQT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs REIT.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, REIT.TO has a market cap of 9.97M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while REIT.TO trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REIT.TO's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REIT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is more volatile compared to REIT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs BSO-UN.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, BSO-UN.TO has a market cap of 9.68M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while BSO-UN.TO trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSO-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BSO-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is less volatile compared to BSO-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs FGX.NE Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, FGX.NE has a market cap of 9.08M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while FGX.NE trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGX.NE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGX.NE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is more volatile compared to FGX.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs CIQ-UN.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, CIQ-UN.TO has a market cap of 7.51M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while CIQ-UN.TO trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIQ-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIQ-UN.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is more volatile compared to CIQ-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs FCMI.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, FCMI.TO has a market cap of 6.48M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while FCMI.TO trades at $13.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCMI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCMI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is more volatile compared to FCMI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs CES.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, CES.TO has a market cap of 4.84M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while CES.TO trades at $24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CES.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CES.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is less volatile compared to CES.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs ENI-UN.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, ENI-UN.TO has a market cap of 4.71M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while ENI-UN.TO trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENI-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ENI-UN.TO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is more volatile compared to ENI-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs HID.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, HID.TO has a market cap of 4.35M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while HID.TO trades at $21.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HID.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HID.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is less volatile compared to HID.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.
TPAY.TO vs HBFE.TO Comparison
TPAY.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPAY.TO stands at 7.29M. In comparison, HBFE.TO has a market cap of 3.54M. Regarding current trading prices, TPAY.TO is priced at $21.20, while HBFE.TO trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBFE.TO's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, TPAY.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HBFE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TPAY.TO is less volatile compared to HBFE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPAY.TO.