Total Energy Services Inc.
Total Energy Services Inc. (TOT.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TOT.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOT.TO | CA$22.16 | -2.38% | 781.2M | 10.99 | CA$1.95 | +1.97% |
| CEU.TO | CA$17.77 | -3.48% | 3.7B | 19.01 | CA$0.92 | +1.03% |
| EFX.TO | CA$28.02 | -3.71% | 3.4B | 38.36 | CA$0.72 | +0.58% |
| TVK.TO | CA$130.99 | -0.94% | 2.9B | 31.80 | CA$4.21 | +0.56% |
| TCW.TO | CA$7.28 | -0.41% | 1.5B | 12.63 | CA$0.57 | +2.99% |
| SCL.TO | CA$16.57 | +1.04% | 1.2B | 552.33 | CA$0.03 | N/A |
| PSI.TO | CA$13.13 | -0.83% | 1B | 19.10 | CA$0.68 | +3.98% |
| MATR.TO | CA$8.98 | -1.32% | 548.5M | 19.43 | CA$0.46 | N/A |
| NOA.TO | CA$18.92 | +0.80% | 538.5M | 16.25 | CA$1.14 | +2.59% |
| CFW.TO | CA$6.61 | +0.92% | 535.2M | 13.48 | CA$0.48 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TOT.TO vs CEU.TO Comparison April 2026
TOT.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOT.TO stands at 781.2M. In comparison, CEU.TO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TOT.TO is priced at CA$22.16, while CEU.TO trades at CA$17.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas CEU.TO's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, TOT.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CEU.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TOT.TO is more volatile compared to CEU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOT.TO.Check CEU.TO's competition here
TOT.TO vs EFX.TO Comparison April 2026
TOT.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOT.TO stands at 781.2M. In comparison, EFX.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TOT.TO is priced at CA$22.16, while EFX.TO trades at CA$28.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas EFX.TO's P/E ratio is 38.36. In terms of profitability, TOT.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EFX.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TOT.TO is more volatile compared to EFX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOT.TO.Check EFX.TO's competition here
TOT.TO vs TVK.TO Comparison April 2026
TOT.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOT.TO stands at 781.2M. In comparison, TVK.TO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TOT.TO is priced at CA$22.16, while TVK.TO trades at CA$130.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas TVK.TO's P/E ratio is 31.80. In terms of profitability, TOT.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TVK.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TOT.TO is less volatile compared to TVK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOT.TO.Check TVK.TO's competition here
TOT.TO vs TCW.TO Comparison April 2026
TOT.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOT.TO stands at 781.2M. In comparison, TCW.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TOT.TO is priced at CA$22.16, while TCW.TO trades at CA$7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas TCW.TO's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, TOT.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TCW.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TOT.TO is more volatile compared to TCW.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOT.TO.Check TCW.TO's competition here
TOT.TO vs SCL.TO Comparison April 2026
TOT.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOT.TO stands at 781.2M. In comparison, SCL.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TOT.TO is priced at CA$22.16, while SCL.TO trades at CA$16.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas SCL.TO's P/E ratio is 552.33. In terms of profitability, TOT.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCL.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TOT.TO is more volatile compared to SCL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOT.TO.Check SCL.TO's competition here
TOT.TO vs PSI.TO Comparison April 2026
TOT.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOT.TO stands at 781.2M. In comparison, PSI.TO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TOT.TO is priced at CA$22.16, while PSI.TO trades at CA$13.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas PSI.TO's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, TOT.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSI.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TOT.TO is more volatile compared to PSI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOT.TO.Check PSI.TO's competition here
TOT.TO vs MATR.TO Comparison April 2026
TOT.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOT.TO stands at 781.2M. In comparison, MATR.TO has a market cap of 548.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TOT.TO is priced at CA$22.16, while MATR.TO trades at CA$8.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas MATR.TO's P/E ratio is 19.43. In terms of profitability, TOT.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MATR.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TOT.TO is more volatile compared to MATR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOT.TO.Check MATR.TO's competition here
TOT.TO vs NOA.TO Comparison April 2026
TOT.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOT.TO stands at 781.2M. In comparison, NOA.TO has a market cap of 538.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TOT.TO is priced at CA$22.16, while NOA.TO trades at CA$18.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas NOA.TO's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, TOT.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NOA.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TOT.TO is more volatile compared to NOA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOT.TO.Check NOA.TO's competition here
TOT.TO vs CFW.TO Comparison April 2026
TOT.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOT.TO stands at 781.2M. In comparison, CFW.TO has a market cap of 535.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TOT.TO is priced at CA$22.16, while CFW.TO trades at CA$6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas CFW.TO's P/E ratio is 13.48. In terms of profitability, TOT.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CFW.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TOT.TO is less volatile compared to CFW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOT.TO.Check CFW.TO's competition here
TOT.TO vs STEP.TO Comparison April 2026
TOT.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOT.TO stands at 781.2M. In comparison, STEP.TO has a market cap of 400.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TOT.TO is priced at CA$22.16, while STEP.TO trades at CA$5.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas STEP.TO's P/E ratio is -49.91. In terms of profitability, TOT.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to STEP.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TOT.TO is more volatile compared to STEP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOT.TO.Check STEP.TO's competition here
TOT.TO vs PSD.TO Comparison April 2026
TOT.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOT.TO stands at 781.2M. In comparison, PSD.TO has a market cap of 204.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TOT.TO is priced at CA$22.16, while PSD.TO trades at CA$4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas PSD.TO's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, TOT.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSD.TO's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TOT.TO is less volatile compared to PSD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOT.TO.Check PSD.TO's competition here
TOT.TO vs SHLE.TO Comparison April 2026
TOT.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOT.TO stands at 781.2M. In comparison, SHLE.TO has a market cap of 189M. Regarding current trading prices, TOT.TO is priced at CA$22.16, while SHLE.TO trades at CA$14.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas SHLE.TO's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, TOT.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHLE.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TOT.TO is more volatile compared to SHLE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOT.TO.Check SHLE.TO's competition here
TOT.TO vs FLNT.TO Comparison April 2026
TOT.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOT.TO stands at 781.2M. In comparison, FLNT.TO has a market cap of 171.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TOT.TO is priced at CA$22.16, while FLNT.TO trades at CA$1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas FLNT.TO's P/E ratio is 1.68. In terms of profitability, TOT.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FLNT.TO's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TOT.TO is less volatile compared to FLNT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOT.TO.Check FLNT.TO's competition here
TOT.TO vs E.TO Comparison April 2026
TOT.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOT.TO stands at 781.2M. In comparison, E.TO has a market cap of 98.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TOT.TO is priced at CA$22.16, while E.TO trades at CA$1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas E.TO's P/E ratio is 30.25. In terms of profitability, TOT.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to E.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TOT.TO is less volatile compared to E.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOT.TO.Check E.TO's competition here
TOT.TO vs MCB.TO Comparison April 2026
TOT.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOT.TO stands at 781.2M. In comparison, MCB.TO has a market cap of 63.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TOT.TO is priced at CA$22.16, while MCB.TO trades at CA$2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas MCB.TO's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, TOT.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MCB.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TOT.TO is less volatile compared to MCB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOT.TO.Check MCB.TO's competition here
TOT.TO vs ESN.TO Comparison April 2026
TOT.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOT.TO stands at 781.2M. In comparison, ESN.TO has a market cap of 49.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TOT.TO is priced at CA$22.16, while ESN.TO trades at CA$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas ESN.TO's P/E ratio is 39.50. In terms of profitability, TOT.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ESN.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TOT.TO is more volatile compared to ESN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOT.TO.Check ESN.TO's competition here
TOT.TO vs SFD.TO Comparison April 2026
TOT.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOT.TO stands at 781.2M. In comparison, SFD.TO has a market cap of 41.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TOT.TO is priced at CA$22.16, while SFD.TO trades at CA$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas SFD.TO's P/E ratio is -7.10. In terms of profitability, TOT.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SFD.TO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TOT.TO is less volatile compared to SFD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOT.TO.Check SFD.TO's competition here
TOT.TO vs HWO.TO Comparison April 2026
TOT.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOT.TO stands at 781.2M. In comparison, HWO.TO has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TOT.TO is priced at CA$22.16, while HWO.TO trades at CA$0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas HWO.TO's P/E ratio is -45.50. In terms of profitability, TOT.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HWO.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TOT.TO is more volatile compared to HWO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOT.TO.Check HWO.TO's competition here
TOT.TO vs BRY.TO Comparison April 2026
TOT.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOT.TO stands at 781.2M. In comparison, BRY.TO has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TOT.TO is priced at CA$22.16, while BRY.TO trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas BRY.TO's P/E ratio is 6.13. In terms of profitability, TOT.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BRY.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TOT.TO is more volatile compared to BRY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOT.TO.Check BRY.TO's competition here
TOT.TO vs HE.TO Comparison April 2026
TOT.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOT.TO stands at 781.2M. In comparison, HE.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TOT.TO is priced at CA$22.16, while HE.TO trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas HE.TO's P/E ratio is 0.18. In terms of profitability, TOT.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HE.TO's ROE of -102.61%. Regarding short-term risk, TOT.TO is more volatile compared to HE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOT.TO.Check HE.TO's competition here
TOT.TO vs CSM.TO Comparison April 2026
TOT.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOT.TO stands at 781.2M. In comparison, CSM.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TOT.TO is priced at CA$22.16, while CSM.TO trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas CSM.TO's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, TOT.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSM.TO's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TOT.TO is less volatile compared to CSM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOT.TO.Check CSM.TO's competition here