Tonner-One World Holdings, Inc.
Tonner-One World Holdings, Inc. (TONR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TONR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TONR | $0.00 | +0.00% | 1.2M | 0.01 | $0.02 | N/A |
| ADYYF | $1,123.00 | -5.15% | 37.4B | 31.54 | $37.63 | N/A |
| ADYEY | $11.74 | +0.00% | 37.2B | 31.03 | $0.38 | N/A |
| BSQKZ | $56.28 | +0.00% | 30.8B | 11.32 | $4.97 | N/A |
| KAKZF | $97.10 | +4.97% | 20.7B | 10.86 | $8.94 | N/A |
| NEXPF | $6.05 | +43.36% | 7.1B | 22.41 | $0.27 | +4.84% |
| TOITF | $64.20 | +0.50% | 5.5B | 178.76 | $0.37 | N/A |
| TMICF | $39.93 | +0.00% | 5.3B | 26.80 | $1.49 | +2.57% |
| TMICY | $37.28 | -0.01% | 4.9B | 24.15 | $1.53 | N/A |
| GMYTF | $62.75 | +0.00% | 4.8B | 34.67 | $1.81 | +1.54% |
Stock Comparison
TONR vs ADYYF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ADYYF has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while ADYYF trades at $1,123.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas ADYYF's P/E ratio is 31.54. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to ADYYF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to ADYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check ADYYF's competition here
TONR vs ADYEY Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ADYEY has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while ADYEY trades at $11.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas ADYEY's P/E ratio is 31.03. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to ADYEY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to ADYEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check ADYEY's competition here
TONR vs BSQKZ Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, BSQKZ has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while BSQKZ trades at $56.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas BSQKZ's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to BSQKZ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to BSQKZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check BSQKZ's competition here
TONR vs KAKZF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, KAKZF has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while KAKZF trades at $97.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas KAKZF's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to KAKZF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to KAKZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check KAKZF's competition here
TONR vs NEXPF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, NEXPF has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while NEXPF trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas NEXPF's P/E ratio is 22.41. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to NEXPF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to NEXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check NEXPF's competition here
TONR vs TOITF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, TOITF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while TOITF trades at $64.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas TOITF's P/E ratio is 178.76. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to TOITF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to TOITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check TOITF's competition here
TONR vs TMICF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, TMICF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while TMICF trades at $39.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas TMICF's P/E ratio is 26.80. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to TMICF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to TMICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check TMICF's competition here
TONR vs TMICY Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, TMICY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while TMICY trades at $37.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas TMICY's P/E ratio is 24.15. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to TMICY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to TMICY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check TMICY's competition here
TONR vs GMYTF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, GMYTF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while GMYTF trades at $62.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas GMYTF's P/E ratio is 34.67. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to GMYTF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to GMYTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check GMYTF's competition here
TONR vs DRKTY Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, DRKTY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while DRKTY trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas DRKTY's P/E ratio is 41.47. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to DRKTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to DRKTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check DRKTY's competition here
TONR vs NEXXY Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, NEXXY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while NEXXY trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas NEXXY's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to NEXXY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to NEXXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check NEXXY's competition here
TONR vs SWDAF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SWDAF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while SWDAF trades at $38.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas SWDAF's P/E ratio is 153.80. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to SWDAF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to SWDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check SWDAF's competition here
TONR vs STWRY Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, STWRY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while STWRY trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas STWRY's P/E ratio is -210.25. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to STWRY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to STWRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check STWRY's competition here
TONR vs CIOXY Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, CIOXY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while CIOXY trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas CIOXY's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to CIOXY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to CIOXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check CIOXY's competition here
TONR vs EXNWF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, EXNWF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while EXNWF trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas EXNWF's P/E ratio is 55.00. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to EXNWF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to EXNWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check EXNWF's competition here
TONR vs DRKTF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, DRKTF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while DRKTF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas DRKTF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to DRKTF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to DRKTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check DRKTF's competition here
TONR vs OVHFF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, OVHFF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while OVHFF trades at $11.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas OVHFF's P/E ratio is 126.00. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to OVHFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to OVHFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check OVHFF's competition here
TONR vs SPNUF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SPNUF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while SPNUF trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas SPNUF's P/E ratio is 268.00. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to SPNUF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to SPNUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check SPNUF's competition here
TONR vs SPMYY Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SPMYY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while SPMYY trades at $10.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas SPMYY's P/E ratio is 210.60. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to SPMYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to SPMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check SPMYY's competition here
TONR vs MGPPF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, MGPPF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while MGPPF trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas MGPPF's P/E ratio is 275.00. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to MGPPF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to MGPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check MGPPF's competition here
TONR vs SANP Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SANP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while SANP trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas SANP's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to SANP's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is less volatile compared to SANP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check SANP's competition here
TONR vs FFPP Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, FFPP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while FFPP trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas FFPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to FFPP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to FFPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check FFPP's competition here
TONR vs PHPYF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, PHPYF has a market cap of 992.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while PHPYF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas PHPYF's P/E ratio is 41.00. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to PHPYF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to PHPYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check PHPYF's competition here
TONR vs FNCHF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, FNCHF has a market cap of 731.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while FNCHF trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas FNCHF's P/E ratio is -216.00. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to FNCHF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to FNCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check FNCHF's competition here
TONR vs CPLFF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, CPLFF has a market cap of 700.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while CPLFF trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas CPLFF's P/E ratio is -49.44. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to CPLFF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to CPLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check CPLFF's competition here
TONR vs FMZNF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, FMZNF has a market cap of 641.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while FMZNF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas FMZNF's P/E ratio is -23.75. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to FMZNF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to FMZNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check FMZNF's competition here
TONR vs WWLNF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, WWLNF has a market cap of 516.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while WWLNF trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas WWLNF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to WWLNF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to WWLNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check WWLNF's competition here
TONR vs WRDLY Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, WRDLY has a market cap of 424.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while WRDLY trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas WRDLY's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to WRDLY's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to WRDLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check WRDLY's competition here
TONR vs PYPTF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, PYPTF has a market cap of 412.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while PYPTF trades at $6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas PYPTF's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to PYPTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to PYPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check PYPTF's competition here
TONR vs YHEKF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, YHEKF has a market cap of 403.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while YHEKF trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas YHEKF's P/E ratio is 34.67. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to YHEKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to YHEKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check YHEKF's competition here
TONR vs PRTHU Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, PRTHU has a market cap of 395.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while PRTHU trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas PRTHU's P/E ratio is -12.17. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to PRTHU's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to PRTHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check PRTHU's competition here
TONR vs TDCSF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, TDCSF has a market cap of 376.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while TDCSF trades at $7.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas TDCSF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to TDCSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to TDCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check TDCSF's competition here
TONR vs NFONF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, NFONF has a market cap of 357.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while NFONF trades at $21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas NFONF's P/E ratio is -196.32. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to NFONF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to NFONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check NFONF's competition here
TONR vs CORZQ Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, CORZQ has a market cap of 343.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while CORZQ trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas CORZQ's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to CORZQ's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to CORZQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check CORZQ's competition here
TONR vs TYPMF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, TYPMF has a market cap of 306.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while TYPMF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas TYPMF's P/E ratio is 29.11. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to TYPMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to TYPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check TYPMF's competition here
TONR vs FSOYF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, FSOYF has a market cap of 284.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while FSOYF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas FSOYF's P/E ratio is -23.14. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to FSOYF's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to FSOYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check FSOYF's competition here
TONR vs ABANF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ABANF has a market cap of 272.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while ABANF trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas ABANF's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to ABANF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to ABANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check ABANF's competition here
TONR vs OTPMF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, OTPMF has a market cap of 243.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while OTPMF trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas OTPMF's P/E ratio is 36.83. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to OTPMF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to OTPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check OTPMF's competition here
TONR vs SEEMF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SEEMF has a market cap of 240M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while SEEMF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas SEEMF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to SEEMF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to SEEMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check SEEMF's competition here
TONR vs SERKF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SERKF has a market cap of 235.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while SERKF trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas SERKF's P/E ratio is -14.54. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to SERKF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to SERKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check SERKF's competition here
TONR vs ERDLF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ERDLF has a market cap of 225.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while ERDLF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas ERDLF's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to ERDLF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to ERDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check ERDLF's competition here
TONR vs HAIVF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, HAIVF has a market cap of 196.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while HAIVF trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas HAIVF's P/E ratio is -181.00. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to HAIVF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to HAIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check HAIVF's competition here
TONR vs DYNDF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, DYNDF has a market cap of 182M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while DYNDF trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas DYNDF's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to DYNDF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to DYNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check DYNDF's competition here
TONR vs GIVXF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, GIVXF has a market cap of 137.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while GIVXF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas GIVXF's P/E ratio is -107.45. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to GIVXF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to GIVXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check GIVXF's competition here
TONR vs CGAAY Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, CGAAY has a market cap of 136.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while CGAAY trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas CGAAY's P/E ratio is 2.79. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to CGAAY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to CGAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check CGAAY's competition here
TONR vs PYFRF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, PYFRF has a market cap of 133.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while PYFRF trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas PYFRF's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to PYFRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to PYFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check PYFRF's competition here
TONR vs FCLOF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, FCLOF has a market cap of 102.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while FCLOF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas FCLOF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to FCLOF's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to FCLOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check FCLOF's competition here
TONR vs BGOPF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, BGOPF has a market cap of 93.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while BGOPF trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas BGOPF's P/E ratio is -40.67. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to BGOPF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to BGOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check BGOPF's competition here
TONR vs EXLGF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, EXLGF has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while EXLGF trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas EXLGF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to EXLGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to EXLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check EXLGF's competition here
TONR vs HISNF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, HISNF has a market cap of 64.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while HISNF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas HISNF's P/E ratio is 1.17. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to HISNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to HISNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check HISNF's competition here
TONR vs JGHG Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, JGHG has a market cap of 55.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while JGHG trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas JGHG's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to JGHG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to JGHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check JGHG's competition here
TONR vs WHEN Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, WHEN has a market cap of 53.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while WHEN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas WHEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to WHEN's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to WHEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check WHEN's competition here
TONR vs QBITF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, QBITF has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while QBITF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas QBITF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to QBITF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to QBITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check QBITF's competition here
TONR vs APGT Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, APGT has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while APGT trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas APGT's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to APGT's ROE of +2.88%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to APGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check APGT's competition here
TONR vs ISDCF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ISDCF has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while ISDCF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas ISDCF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to ISDCF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to ISDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check ISDCF's competition here
TONR vs CLOQ Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, CLOQ has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while CLOQ trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas CLOQ's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to CLOQ's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to CLOQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check CLOQ's competition here
TONR vs DGGXF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, DGGXF has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while DGGXF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas DGGXF's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to DGGXF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to DGGXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check DGGXF's competition here
TONR vs POTTF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, POTTF has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while POTTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas POTTF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to POTTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to POTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check POTTF's competition here
TONR vs NOWVF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, NOWVF has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while NOWVF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas NOWVF's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to NOWVF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to NOWVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check NOWVF's competition here
TONR vs CLPMF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, CLPMF has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while CLPMF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas CLPMF's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to CLPMF's ROE of +1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to CLPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check CLPMF's competition here
TONR vs SKKY Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SKKY has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while SKKY trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas SKKY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to SKKY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to SKKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check SKKY's competition here
TONR vs CYBNY Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, CYBNY has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while CYBNY trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas CYBNY's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to CYBNY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to CYBNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check CYBNY's competition here
TONR vs PLCKF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, PLCKF has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while PLCKF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas PLCKF's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to PLCKF's ROE of +2.87%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to PLCKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check PLCKF's competition here
TONR vs CORZR Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, CORZR has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while CORZR trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas CORZR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to CORZR's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to CORZR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check CORZR's competition here
TONR vs QFEEF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, QFEEF has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while QFEEF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas QFEEF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to QFEEF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to QFEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check QFEEF's competition here
TONR vs SDCH Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SDCH has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while SDCH trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas SDCH's P/E ratio is -76.67. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to SDCH's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to SDCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check SDCH's competition here
TONR vs EPXGF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, EPXGF has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while EPXGF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas EPXGF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to EPXGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to EPXGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check EPXGF's competition here
TONR vs FOBIF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, FOBIF has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while FOBIF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas FOBIF's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to FOBIF's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to FOBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check FOBIF's competition here
TONR vs KSIH Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, KSIH has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while KSIH trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas KSIH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to KSIH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to KSIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check KSIH's competition here
TONR vs NBVAF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, NBVAF has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while NBVAF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas NBVAF's P/E ratio is -5.80. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to NBVAF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to NBVAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check NBVAF's competition here
TONR vs VRSSF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, VRSSF has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while VRSSF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas VRSSF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to VRSSF's ROE of +3.73%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to VRSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check VRSSF's competition here
TONR vs DSAIF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, DSAIF has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while DSAIF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas DSAIF's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to DSAIF's ROE of -2.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to DSAIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check DSAIF's competition here
TONR vs TGCB Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, TGCB has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while TGCB trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas TGCB's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to TGCB's ROE of +1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to TGCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check TGCB's competition here
TONR vs DLTXF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, DLTXF has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while DLTXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas DLTXF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to DLTXF's ROE of -21.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to DLTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check DLTXF's competition here
TONR vs FUAPF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, FUAPF has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while FUAPF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas FUAPF's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to FUAPF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to FUAPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check FUAPF's competition here
TONR vs ZVLO Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ZVLO has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while ZVLO trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas ZVLO's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to ZVLO's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to ZVLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check ZVLO's competition here
TONR vs VENZF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, VENZF has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while VENZF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas VENZF's P/E ratio is -10.18. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to VENZF's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to VENZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check VENZF's competition here
TONR vs DVPNF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, DVPNF has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while DVPNF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas DVPNF's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to DVPNF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to DVPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check DVPNF's competition here
TONR vs MKTDF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, MKTDF has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while MKTDF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas MKTDF's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to MKTDF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to MKTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check MKTDF's competition here
TONR vs PKKFF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, PKKFF has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while PKKFF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas PKKFF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to PKKFF's ROE of +2.91%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to PKKFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check PKKFF's competition here
TONR vs SFIIF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SFIIF has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while SFIIF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas SFIIF's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to SFIIF's ROE of -2.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to SFIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check SFIIF's competition here
TONR vs MODGF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, MODGF has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while MODGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas MODGF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to MODGF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to MODGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check MODGF's competition here
TONR vs KCRD Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, KCRD has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while KCRD trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas KCRD's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to KCRD's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to KCRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check KCRD's competition here
TONR vs DRKOF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, DRKOF has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while DRKOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas DRKOF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to DRKOF's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to DRKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check DRKOF's competition here
TONR vs OVTZ Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, OVTZ has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while OVTZ trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas OVTZ's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to OVTZ's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to OVTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check OVTZ's competition here
TONR vs SMKG Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SMKG has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while SMKG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas SMKG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to SMKG's ROE of +16.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to SMKG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check SMKG's competition here
TONR vs SCYRF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SCYRF has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while SCYRF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas SCYRF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to SCYRF's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to SCYRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check SCYRF's competition here
TONR vs RIHT Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, RIHT has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while RIHT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas RIHT's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to RIHT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to RIHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check RIHT's competition here
TONR vs IPNFF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, IPNFF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while IPNFF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas IPNFF's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to IPNFF's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to IPNFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check IPNFF's competition here
TONR vs VISM Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, VISM has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while VISM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas VISM's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to VISM's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to VISM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check VISM's competition here
TONR vs ITNF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ITNF has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while ITNF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas ITNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to ITNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to ITNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check ITNF's competition here
TONR vs RCWDF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, RCWDF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while RCWDF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas RCWDF's P/E ratio is 0.54. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to RCWDF's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to RCWDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check RCWDF's competition here
TONR vs INOTF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, INOTF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while INOTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas INOTF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to INOTF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to INOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check INOTF's competition here
TONR vs GMTH Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, GMTH has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while GMTH trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas GMTH's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to GMTH's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to GMTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check GMTH's competition here
TONR vs RKNEF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, RKNEF has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while RKNEF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas RKNEF's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to RKNEF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to RKNEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check RKNEF's competition here
TONR vs SLXXF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SLXXF has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while SLXXF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas SLXXF's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to SLXXF's ROE of -12.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to SLXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check SLXXF's competition here
TONR vs TFLM Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, TFLM has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while TFLM trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas TFLM's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to TFLM's ROE of +18.92%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to TFLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check TFLM's competition here
TONR vs CROTF Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, CROTF has a market cap of 875.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while CROTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas CROTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to CROTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to CROTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check CROTF's competition here
TONR vs ATCHW Comparison February 2026
TONR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TONR stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ATCHW has a market cap of 838.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TONR is priced at $0.00, while ATCHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TONR currently has a P/E ratio of 0.01, whereas ATCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TONR's ROE is +1.13%, compared to ATCHW's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, TONR is more volatile compared to ATCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TONR.Check ATCHW's competition here