TomTom N.V.
TomTom N.V. TOM2.AS Peers
See (TOM2.AS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOM2.AS | €5.26 | -1.41% | 654.5M | -65.75 | -€0.08 | N/A |
| DSY.PA | €32.00 | -0.06% | 42.2B | 35.96 | €0.89 | +1.53% |
| ALTTU.PA | €5.45 | +0.00% | 4.5B | -545.00 | -€0.01 | N/A |
| VU.PA | €247.60 | -0.64% | 4.1B | -91.03 | -€2.72 | +0.36% |
| ALESK.PA | €277.40 | +0.00% | 1.6B | 100.14 | €2.77 | N/A |
| LSS.PA | €24.45 | -2.59% | 924.1M | 30.56 | €0.80 | +3.11% |
| ESI.PA | €154.00 | -0.32% | 879.5M | -700.00 | -€0.22 | N/A |
| AXW.PA | €27.50 | +0.00% | 800.5M | 19.10 | €1.44 | N/A |
| QDT.PA | €15.92 | -0.25% | 537M | 8.16 | €1.95 | +4.08% |
| ALTBG.PA | €3.25 | -7.54% | 424.1M | 162.50 | €0.02 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TOM2.AS vs DSY.PA Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, DSY.PA has a market cap of 42.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while DSY.PA trades at €32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas DSY.PA's P/E ratio is 35.96. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DSY.PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is more volatile compared to DSY.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs ALTTU.PA Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, ALTTU.PA has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while ALTTU.PA trades at €5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas ALTTU.PA's P/E ratio is -545.00. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALTTU.PA's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is more volatile compared to ALTTU.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs VU.PA Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, VU.PA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while VU.PA trades at €247.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas VU.PA's P/E ratio is -91.03. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VU.PA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is more volatile compared to VU.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs ALESK.PA Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, ALESK.PA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while ALESK.PA trades at €277.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas ALESK.PA's P/E ratio is 100.14. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALESK.PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is less volatile compared to ALESK.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs LSS.PA Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, LSS.PA has a market cap of 924.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while LSS.PA trades at €24.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas LSS.PA's P/E ratio is 30.56. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LSS.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is more volatile compared to LSS.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs ESI.PA Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, ESI.PA has a market cap of 879.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while ESI.PA trades at €154.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas ESI.PA's P/E ratio is -700.00. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ESI.PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is more volatile compared to ESI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs AXW.PA Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, AXW.PA has a market cap of 800.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while AXW.PA trades at €27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas AXW.PA's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AXW.PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is more volatile compared to AXW.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs QDT.PA Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, QDT.PA has a market cap of 537M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while QDT.PA trades at €15.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas QDT.PA's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to QDT.PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is more volatile compared to QDT.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs ALTBG.PA Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, ALTBG.PA has a market cap of 424.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while ALTBG.PA trades at €3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas ALTBG.PA's P/E ratio is 162.50. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALTBG.PA's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is less volatile compared to ALTBG.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs LIN.PA Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, LIN.PA has a market cap of 361M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while LIN.PA trades at €73.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas LIN.PA's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LIN.PA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is more volatile compared to LIN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs SWP.PA Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, SWP.PA has a market cap of 351M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while SWP.PA trades at €37.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas SWP.PA's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SWP.PA's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is more volatile compared to SWP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs ALBFR.PA Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, ALBFR.PA has a market cap of 331.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while ALBFR.PA trades at €235.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas ALBFR.PA's P/E ratio is 45.19. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALBFR.PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is less volatile compared to ALBFR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs CMCOM.AS Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, CMCOM.AS has a market cap of 217.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while CMCOM.AS trades at €6.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas CMCOM.AS's P/E ratio is -9.97. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CMCOM.AS's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is more volatile compared to CMCOM.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs MTRK.AS Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, MTRK.AS has a market cap of 184.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while MTRK.AS trades at €3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas MTRK.AS's P/E ratio is -13.34. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MTRK.AS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is less volatile compared to MTRK.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs ALVIV.PA Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, ALVIV.PA has a market cap of 170.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while ALVIV.PA trades at €37.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas ALVIV.PA's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALVIV.PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is more volatile compared to ALVIV.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs ALSTW.PA Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, ALSTW.PA has a market cap of 164.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while ALSTW.PA trades at €62.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas ALSTW.PA's P/E ratio is 37.58. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALSTW.PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is less volatile compared to ALSTW.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs CLA.PA Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, CLA.PA has a market cap of 132.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while CLA.PA trades at €2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas CLA.PA's P/E ratio is -46.30. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CLA.PA's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is more volatile compared to CLA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs UPG.BR Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, UPG.BR has a market cap of 129.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while UPG.BR trades at €3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas UPG.BR's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to UPG.BR's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is more volatile compared to UPG.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs HYSG.BR Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, HYSG.BR has a market cap of 113M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while HYSG.BR trades at €3.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas HYSG.BR's P/E ratio is -43.00. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HYSG.BR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is more volatile compared to HYSG.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs ALPRO.PA Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, ALPRO.PA has a market cap of 88.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while ALPRO.PA trades at €11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas ALPRO.PA's P/E ratio is 3.61. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALPRO.PA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is more volatile compared to ALPRO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs DLE.IR Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, DLE.IR has a market cap of 75.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while DLE.IR trades at €0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas DLE.IR's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DLE.IR's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is more volatile compared to DLE.IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs ALPHI.PA Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, ALPHI.PA has a market cap of 65.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while ALPHI.PA trades at €2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas ALPHI.PA's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALPHI.PA's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is more volatile compared to ALPHI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs TIE.AS Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, TIE.AS has a market cap of 62.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while TIE.AS trades at €31.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas TIE.AS's P/E ratio is -29.72. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TIE.AS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is more volatile compared to TIE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs COH.PA Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, COH.PA has a market cap of 47.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while COH.PA trades at €8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas COH.PA's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to COH.PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is more volatile compared to COH.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs ALTTI.PA Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, ALTTI.PA has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while ALTTI.PA trades at €2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas ALTTI.PA's P/E ratio is -11.40. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALTTI.PA's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is more volatile compared to ALTTI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs ALWED.PA Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, ALWED.PA has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while ALWED.PA trades at €30.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas ALWED.PA's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALWED.PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is more volatile compared to ALWED.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs ALPRG.PA Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, ALPRG.PA has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while ALPRG.PA trades at €0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas ALPRG.PA's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALPRG.PA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is more volatile compared to ALPRG.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs MLMCA.PA Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, MLMCA.PA has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while MLMCA.PA trades at €8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas MLMCA.PA's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MLMCA.PA's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is more volatile compared to MLMCA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs EXR.IR Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, EXR.IR has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while EXR.IR trades at €0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas EXR.IR's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EXR.IR's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is more volatile compared to EXR.IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs ALVGO.PA Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, ALVGO.PA has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while ALVGO.PA trades at €2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas ALVGO.PA's P/E ratio is -9.10. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALVGO.PA's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is more volatile compared to ALVGO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs ALNRG.PA Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, ALNRG.PA has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while ALNRG.PA trades at €0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas ALNRG.PA's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALNRG.PA's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is less volatile compared to ALNRG.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs PROAC.PA Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, PROAC.PA has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while PROAC.PA trades at €0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas PROAC.PA's P/E ratio is -6.35. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PROAC.PA's ROE of -28.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is less volatile compared to PROAC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs NEDSE.AS Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, NEDSE.AS has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while NEDSE.AS trades at €0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas NEDSE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NEDSE.AS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is less volatile compared to NEDSE.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs GOJXN.AS Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, GOJXN.AS has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while GOJXN.AS trades at €1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas GOJXN.AS's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GOJXN.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is more volatile compared to GOJXN.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs MLPAC.PA Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, MLPAC.PA has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while MLPAC.PA trades at €8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas MLPAC.PA's P/E ratio is -26.77. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MLPAC.PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is more volatile compared to MLPAC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs MLTV.BR Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, MLTV.BR has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while MLTV.BR trades at €1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas MLTV.BR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MLTV.BR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is less volatile compared to MLTV.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs EOS.PA Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, EOS.PA has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while EOS.PA trades at €1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas EOS.PA's P/E ratio is -3.03. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EOS.PA's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is less volatile compared to EOS.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs ALSIM.PA Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, ALSIM.PA has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while ALSIM.PA trades at €0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas ALSIM.PA's P/E ratio is -16.13. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALSIM.PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is more volatile compared to ALSIM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs MLIDS.PA Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, MLIDS.PA has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while MLIDS.PA trades at €0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas MLIDS.PA's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MLIDS.PA's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is more volatile compared to MLIDS.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs ALIMR.PA Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, ALIMR.PA has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while ALIMR.PA trades at €1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas ALIMR.PA's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALIMR.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is less volatile compared to ALIMR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs MLDAM.PA Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, MLDAM.PA has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while MLDAM.PA trades at €4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas MLDAM.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MLDAM.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is more volatile compared to MLDAM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs ALNMR.PA Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, ALNMR.PA has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while ALNMR.PA trades at €0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas ALNMR.PA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALNMR.PA's ROE of +5.59%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is more volatile compared to ALNMR.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs MLMGL.PA Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, MLMGL.PA has a market cap of 278.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while MLMGL.PA trades at €2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas MLMGL.PA's P/E ratio is 1.48. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MLMGL.PA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is more volatile compared to MLMGL.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs GENX.PA Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, GENX.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while GENX.PA trades at €9.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas GENX.PA's P/E ratio is 74.62. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GENX.PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is more volatile compared to GENX.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs IGE.PA Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, IGE.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while IGE.PA trades at €210.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas IGE.PA's P/E ratio is 34.57. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IGE.PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is more volatile compared to IGE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs ICT.AS Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, ICT.AS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while ICT.AS trades at €14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas ICT.AS's P/E ratio is 33.14. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ICT.AS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is more volatile compared to ICT.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs 6VR.IR Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, 6VR.IR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while 6VR.IR trades at €0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas 6VR.IR's P/E ratio is -19.09. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 6VR.IR's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is more volatile compared to 6VR.IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs PROL.PA Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, PROL.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while PROL.PA trades at €0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas PROL.PA's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PROL.PA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is more volatile compared to PROL.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.
TOM2.AS vs CAS.PA Comparison
TOM2.AS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM2.AS stands at 654.5M. In comparison, CAS.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TOM2.AS is priced at €5.26, while CAS.PA trades at €7.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM2.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas CAS.PA's P/E ratio is 62.58. In terms of profitability, TOM2.AS's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CAS.PA's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM2.AS is more volatile compared to CAS.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM2.AS.