Tenaga Nasional Berhad
Tenaga Nasional Berhad TNABY Peers
See (TNABY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Electric Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TNABY | $14.15 | +7.48% | 20.6B | 17.47 | $0.81 | +3.30% |
| NGGTF | $14.70 | +0.68% | 72.1B | 18.15 | $0.81 | +4.18% |
| ELEZY | $15.86 | -0.56% | 33.4B | 13.24 | $1.19 | +3.01% |
| ELEZF | $31.02 | +0.00% | 32.8B | 13.14 | $2.36 | +4.10% |
| NSARO | $78.25 | +2.15% | 28.7B | N/A | N/A | +6.11% |
| NSARP | $70.00 | -1.41% | 25.7B | N/A | N/A | +6.07% |
| HRNNF | $35.55 | +0.00% | 21.3B | 24.02 | $1.48 | +3.09% |
| CLPHY | $8.38 | -1.06% | 21.2B | 14.25 | $0.59 | +4.50% |
| CLPHF | $8.41 | +0.00% | 21.2B | 14.25 | $0.59 | +4.81% |
| TERRF | $10.27 | +0.00% | 20.6B | 17.11 | $0.60 | +4.32% |
Stock Comparison
TNABY vs NGGTF Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, NGGTF has a market cap of 72.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while NGGTF trades at $14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas NGGTF's P/E ratio is 18.15. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NGGTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to NGGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs ELEZY Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, ELEZY has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while ELEZY trades at $15.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas ELEZY's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELEZY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to ELEZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs ELEZF Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, ELEZF has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while ELEZF trades at $31.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas ELEZF's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELEZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to ELEZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs NSARO Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, NSARO has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while NSARO trades at $78.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas NSARO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NSARO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to NSARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs NSARP Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, NSARP has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while NSARP trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas NSARP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NSARP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to NSARP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs HRNNF Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, HRNNF has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while HRNNF trades at $35.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas HRNNF's P/E ratio is 24.02. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HRNNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to HRNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs CLPHY Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, CLPHY has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while CLPHY trades at $8.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas CLPHY's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLPHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to CLPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs CLPHF Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, CLPHF has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while CLPHF trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas CLPHF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLPHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to CLPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs TERRF Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, TERRF has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while TERRF trades at $10.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas TERRF's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TERRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to TERRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs TEZNY Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, TEZNY has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while TEZNY trades at $30.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas TEZNY's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TEZNY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to TEZNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs TNABF Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, TNABF has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while TNABF trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas TNABF's P/E ratio is 17.05. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TNABF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to TNABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs AILIO Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, AILIO has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while AILIO trades at $69.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas AILIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AILIO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to AILIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs CKISF Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, CKISF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while CKISF trades at $6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas CKISF's P/E ratio is 15.49. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CKISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to CKISF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs CKISY Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, CKISY has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while CKISY trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas CKISY's P/E ratio is 15.28. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CKISY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to CKISY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs EMRAF Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, EMRAF has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while EMRAF trades at $45.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas EMRAF's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EMRAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to EMRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs RDEIY Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, RDEIY has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while RDEIY trades at $10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas RDEIY's P/E ratio is 18.91. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RDEIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to RDEIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs ELIAF Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, ELIAF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while ELIAF trades at $104.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas ELIAF's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELIAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to ELIAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs MAEOY Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, MAEOY has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while MAEOY trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas MAEOY's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MAEOY's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to MAEOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs UEPCO Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, UEPCO has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while UEPCO trades at $96.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas UEPCO's P/E ratio is 18.81. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UEPCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to UEPCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs EQUEY Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, EQUEY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while EQUEY trades at $6.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas EQUEY's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EQUEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to EQUEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs FTRSF Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, FTRSF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while FTRSF trades at $16.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas FTRSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FTRSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to FTRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs HPIFF Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, HPIFF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while HPIFF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas HPIFF's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HPIFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to HPIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs UEPCN Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, UEPCN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while UEPCN trades at $76.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas UEPCN's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UEPCN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to UEPCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs HPIFY Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, HPIFY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while HPIFY trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas HPIFY's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HPIFY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to HPIFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs FORFF Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, FORFF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while FORFF trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas FORFF's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FORFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to FORFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs UEPEP Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, UEPEP has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while UEPEP trades at $72.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas UEPEP's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UEPEP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to UEPEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs UEPEO Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, UEPEO has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while UEPEO trades at $72.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas UEPEO's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UEPEO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to UEPEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs UEPCP Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, UEPCP has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while UEPCP trades at $69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas UEPCP's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UEPCP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to UEPCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs EGIEY Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, EGIEY has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while EGIEY trades at $8.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas EGIEY's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EGIEY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to EGIEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs UEPEM Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, UEPEM has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while UEPEM trades at $65.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas UEPEM's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UEPEM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to UEPEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs ABZPF Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, ABZPF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while ABZPF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas ABZPF's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABZPF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to ABZPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs UEPEN Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, UEPEN has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while UEPEN trades at $59.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas UEPEN's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UEPEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to UEPEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs HKVTY Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, HKVTY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while HKVTY trades at $6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas HKVTY's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HKVTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to HKVTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs HKCVF Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, HKCVF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while HKCVF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas HKCVF's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HKCVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to HKCVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs CPWIF Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, CPWIF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while CPWIF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas CPWIF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CPWIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to CPWIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs IESFY Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, IESFY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while IESFY trades at $116.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas IESFY's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IESFY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to IESFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs WELPM Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, WELPM has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while WELPM trades at $108.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas WELPM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WELPM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to WELPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs ABOIF Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, ABOIF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while ABOIF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas ABOIF's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABOIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to ABOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs PGPKY Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, PGPKY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while PGPKY trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas PGPKY's P/E ratio is -15.35. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PGPKY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to PGPKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs WELPP Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, WELPP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while WELPP trades at $64.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas WELPP's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WELPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to WELPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs AILLN Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, AILLN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while AILLN trades at $78.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas AILLN's P/E ratio is 4.47. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AILLN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to AILLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs AILLM Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, AILLM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while AILLM trades at $78.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas AILLM's P/E ratio is 4.47. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AILLM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to AILLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs AILIN Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, AILIN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while AILIN trades at $72.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas AILIN's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AILIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to AILIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs AILLP Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, AILLP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while AILLP trades at $65.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas AILLP's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AILLP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to AILLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs RGPCF Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, RGPCF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while RGPCF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas RGPCF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RGPCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to RGPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs FPHHF Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, FPHHF has a market cap of 648.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while FPHHF trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas FPHHF's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FPHHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to FPHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs CUPUF Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, CUPUF has a market cap of 549.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while CUPUF trades at $13.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas CUPUF's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CUPUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to CUPUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs RELFF Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, RELFF has a market cap of 461.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while RELFF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas RELFF's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RELFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to RELFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs ABTZY Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, ABTZY has a market cap of 339.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while ABTZY trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas ABTZY's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABTZY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to ABTZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs CNTHP Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, CNTHP has a market cap of 314.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while CNTHP trades at $52.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas CNTHP's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNTHP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to CNTHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs CNLPL Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, CNLPL has a market cap of 314.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while CNLPL trades at $52.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas CNLPL's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNLPL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to CNLPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs CNTHO Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, CNTHO has a market cap of 259.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while CNTHO trades at $42.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas CNTHO's P/E ratio is 0.58. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNTHO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to CNTHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs ABZPY Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, ABZPY has a market cap of 245.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while ABZPY trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas ABZPY's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABZPY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to ABZPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs CNTHN Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, CNTHN has a market cap of 241.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while CNTHN trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas CNTHN's P/E ratio is 0.54. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNTHN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to CNTHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs CNLTP Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, CNLTP has a market cap of 218.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while CNLTP trades at $36.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas CNLTP's P/E ratio is 0.48. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNLTP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to CNLTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs CNLHP Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, CNLHP has a market cap of 217.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while CNLHP trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas CNLHP's P/E ratio is 0.48. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNLHP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to CNLHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs CNLHO Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, CNLHO has a market cap of 215.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while CNLHO trades at $35.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas CNLHO's P/E ratio is 0.48. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNLHO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to CNLHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs CNLPM Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, CNLPM has a market cap of 207M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while CNLPM trades at $33.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas CNLPM's P/E ratio is 0.46. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNLPM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to CNLPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs CNLTN Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, CNLTN has a market cap of 191.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while CNLTN trades at $31.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas CNLTN's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNLTN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to CNLTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs CNLHN Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, CNLHN has a market cap of 190.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while CNLHN trades at $31.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas CNLHN's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNLHN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to CNLHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs CNLTL Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, CNLTL has a market cap of 182.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while CNLTL trades at $30.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas CNLTL's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNLTL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to CNLTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs EDCFF Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, EDCFF has a market cap of 140.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while EDCFF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas EDCFF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EDCFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to EDCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs NZWFF Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, NZWFF has a market cap of 46.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while NZWFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas NZWFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NZWFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to NZWFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs SUME Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, SUME has a market cap of 36.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while SUME trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas SUME's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUME's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to SUME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs EUSP Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, EUSP has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while EUSP trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas EUSP's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EUSP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to EUSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs MCPB Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, MCPB has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while MCPB trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas MCPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MCPB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to MCPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs HAWEL Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, HAWEL has a market cap of 774.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while HAWEL trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas HAWEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HAWEL's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to HAWEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs HAWLN Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, HAWLN has a market cap of 757K. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while HAWLN trades at $15.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas HAWLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HAWLN's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to HAWLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs HAWLI Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, HAWLI has a market cap of 737.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while HAWLI trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas HAWLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HAWLI's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to HAWLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs HAWEN Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, HAWEN has a market cap of 737.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while HAWEN trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas HAWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HAWEN's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to HAWEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs HAWLL Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, HAWLL has a market cap of 735.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while HAWLL trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas HAWLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HAWLL's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to HAWLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs HAWLM Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, HAWLM has a market cap of 725K. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while HAWLM trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas HAWLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HAWLM's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to HAWLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs HAWEM Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, HAWEM has a market cap of 724.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while HAWEM trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas HAWEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HAWEM's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to HAWEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs RIGH Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, RIGH has a market cap of 158.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while RIGH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas RIGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RIGH's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to RIGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs USWF Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, USWF has a market cap of 47.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while USWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas USWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to USWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to USWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs EPGRQ Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, EPGRQ has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while EPGRQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas EPGRQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EPGRQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to EPGRQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs RENU Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, RENU has a market cap of 300. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while RENU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas RENU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RENU's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to RENU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs PNMXO Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, PNMXO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while PNMXO trades at $75.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas PNMXO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PNMXO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to PNMXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs NEWEN Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, NEWEN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while NEWEN trades at $96.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas NEWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NEWEN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to NEWEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs EVSO Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, EVSO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while EVSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas EVSO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EVSO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to EVSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs ENIAY Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, ENIAY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while ENIAY trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas ENIAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENIAY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to ENIAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs IPWLO Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, IPWLO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while IPWLO trades at $79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas IPWLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IPWLO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to IPWLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs AILIP Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, AILIP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while AILIP trades at $67.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas AILIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AILIP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to AILIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs BANGN Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, BANGN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while BANGN trades at $98.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas BANGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BANGN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to BANGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs IPWLN Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, IPWLN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while IPWLN trades at $85.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas IPWLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IPWLN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to IPWLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs IPWLG Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, IPWLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while IPWLG trades at $84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas IPWLG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IPWLG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to IPWLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs IPWLP Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, IPWLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while IPWLP trades at $118.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas IPWLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IPWLP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to IPWLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.
TNABY vs NMPWP Comparison
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 20.6B. In comparison, NMPWP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.15, while NMPWP trades at $55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas NMPWP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NMPWP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is more volatile compared to NMPWP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.