Tenaga Nasional Berhad
Tenaga Nasional Berhad (TNABY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TNABY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Electric Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TNABY | $14.19 | +0.00% | 18.2B | 15.23 | $0.82 | +3.74% |
| NGGTF | $14.65 | +1.88% | 72.7B | 18.08 | $0.81 | +4.20% |
| ELEZF | $29.71 | -1.13% | 31.4B | 12.33 | $2.41 | +4.28% |
| ELEZY | $14.51 | -3.08% | 31.3B | 12.24 | $1.21 | +3.86% |
| NSARO | $78.00 | +1.30% | 28.7B | N/A | N/A | +6.13% |
| AILIO | $69.98 | +0.00% | 27.7B | N/A | N/A | +2.81% |
| AILIP | $69.00 | +0.00% | 27.7B | N/A | N/A | +2.81% |
| NSARP | $70.00 | +0.00% | 25.7B | N/A | N/A | +6.13% |
| CLPHY | $8.62 | +1.41% | 21.6B | 14.47 | $0.59 | +4.39% |
| HRNNF | $35.34 | -0.53% | 21.2B | 23.72 | $1.49 | +2.58% |
Stock Comparison
TNABY vs NGGTF Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, NGGTF has a market cap of 72.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while NGGTF trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas NGGTF's P/E ratio is 18.08. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NGGTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to NGGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.Check NGGTF's competition here
TNABY vs ELEZF Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, ELEZF has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while ELEZF trades at $29.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas ELEZF's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELEZF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to ELEZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.Check ELEZF's competition here
TNABY vs ELEZY Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, ELEZY has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while ELEZY trades at $14.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas ELEZY's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELEZY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to ELEZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.Check ELEZY's competition here
TNABY vs NSARO Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, NSARO has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while NSARO trades at $78.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas NSARO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NSARO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and NSARO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NSARO's competition here
TNABY vs AILIO Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, AILIO has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while AILIO trades at $69.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas AILIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AILIO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and AILIO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AILIO's competition here
TNABY vs AILIP Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, AILIP has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while AILIP trades at $69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas AILIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AILIP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to AILIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.Check AILIP's competition here
TNABY vs NSARP Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, NSARP has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while NSARP trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas NSARP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NSARP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and NSARP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NSARP's competition here
TNABY vs CLPHY Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, CLPHY has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while CLPHY trades at $8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas CLPHY's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLPHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to CLPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.Check CLPHY's competition here
TNABY vs HRNNF Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, HRNNF has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while HRNNF trades at $35.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas HRNNF's P/E ratio is 23.72. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HRNNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and HRNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HRNNF's competition here
TNABY vs CLPHF Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, CLPHF has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while CLPHF trades at $7.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas CLPHF's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLPHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and CLPHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLPHF's competition here
TNABY vs TNABF Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, TNABF has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while TNABF trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas TNABF's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TNABF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to TNABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.Check TNABF's competition here
TNABY vs TEZNY Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, TEZNY has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while TEZNY trades at $29.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas TEZNY's P/E ratio is 15.99. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TEZNY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and TEZNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TEZNY's competition here
TNABY vs TERRF Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, TERRF has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while TERRF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas TERRF's P/E ratio is 15.25. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TERRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and TERRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TERRF's competition here
TNABY vs CKISF Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, CKISF has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while CKISF trades at $6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas CKISF's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CKISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to CKISF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.Check CKISF's competition here
TNABY vs CKISY Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, CKISY has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while CKISY trades at $32.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas CKISY's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CKISY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to CKISY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.Check CKISY's competition here
TNABY vs EMRAF Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, EMRAF has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while EMRAF trades at $45.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas EMRAF's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EMRAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to EMRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.Check EMRAF's competition here
TNABY vs ELIAF Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, ELIAF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while ELIAF trades at $121.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas ELIAF's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELIAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to ELIAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.Check ELIAF's competition here
TNABY vs RDEIY Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, RDEIY has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while RDEIY trades at $9.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas RDEIY's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RDEIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to RDEIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.Check RDEIY's competition here
TNABY vs MAEOY Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, MAEOY has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while MAEOY trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas MAEOY's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MAEOY's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to MAEOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.Check MAEOY's competition here
TNABY vs UEPCO Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, UEPCO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while UEPCO trades at $97.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas UEPCO's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UEPCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to UEPCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.Check UEPCO's competition here
TNABY vs FTRSF Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, FTRSF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while FTRSF trades at $17.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas FTRSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FTRSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to FTRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.Check FTRSF's competition here
TNABY vs EQUEY Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, EQUEY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while EQUEY trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas EQUEY's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EQUEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and EQUEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EQUEY's competition here
TNABY vs HPIFF Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, HPIFF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while HPIFF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas HPIFF's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HPIFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and HPIFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HPIFF's competition here
TNABY vs FORFF Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, FORFF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while FORFF trades at $16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas FORFF's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FORFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and FORFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FORFF's competition here
TNABY vs UEPCN Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, UEPCN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while UEPCN trades at $76.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas UEPCN's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UEPCN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and UEPCN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UEPCN's competition here
TNABY vs UEPEO Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, UEPEO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while UEPEO trades at $73.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas UEPEO's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UEPEO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to UEPEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.Check UEPEO's competition here
TNABY vs UEPEP Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, UEPEP has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while UEPEP trades at $73.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas UEPEP's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UEPEP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and UEPEP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UEPEP's competition here
TNABY vs UEPCP Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, UEPCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while UEPCP trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas UEPCP's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UEPCP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and UEPCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UEPCP's competition here
TNABY vs HPIFY Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, HPIFY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while HPIFY trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas HPIFY's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HPIFY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to HPIFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.Check HPIFY's competition here
TNABY vs UEPEM Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, UEPEM has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while UEPEM trades at $64.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas UEPEM's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UEPEM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and UEPEM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UEPEM's competition here
TNABY vs EGIEY Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, EGIEY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while EGIEY trades at $7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas EGIEY's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EGIEY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to EGIEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.Check EGIEY's competition here
TNABY vs UEPEN Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, UEPEN has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while UEPEN trades at $58.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas UEPEN's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UEPEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and UEPEN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UEPEN's competition here
TNABY vs HKCVF Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, HKCVF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while HKCVF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas HKCVF's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HKCVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and HKCVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HKCVF's competition here
TNABY vs HKVTY Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, HKVTY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while HKVTY trades at $7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas HKVTY's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HKVTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to HKVTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.Check HKVTY's competition here
TNABY vs CPWIF Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, CPWIF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while CPWIF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas CPWIF's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CPWIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to CPWIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.Check CPWIF's competition here
TNABY vs IESFY Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, IESFY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while IESFY trades at $118.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas IESFY's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IESFY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and IESFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IESFY's competition here
TNABY vs ABZPF Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, ABZPF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while ABZPF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas ABZPF's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABZPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to ABZPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.Check ABZPF's competition here
TNABY vs ABOIF Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, ABOIF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while ABOIF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas ABOIF's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABOIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to ABOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.Check ABOIF's competition here
TNABY vs WELPM Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, WELPM has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while WELPM trades at $108.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas WELPM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WELPM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and WELPM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WELPM's competition here
TNABY vs PGPKY Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, PGPKY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while PGPKY trades at $6.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas PGPKY's P/E ratio is -14.75. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PGPKY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and PGPKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PGPKY's competition here
TNABY vs WELPP Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, WELPP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while WELPP trades at $65.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas WELPP's P/E ratio is 6.42. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WELPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to WELPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.Check WELPP's competition here
TNABY vs AILLM Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, AILLM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while AILLM trades at $79.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas AILLM's P/E ratio is 4.56. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AILLM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and AILLM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AILLM's competition here
TNABY vs AILLN Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, AILLN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while AILLN trades at $77.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas AILLN's P/E ratio is 4.46. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AILLN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and AILLN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AILLN's competition here
TNABY vs AILIN Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, AILIN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while AILIN trades at $71.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas AILIN's P/E ratio is 4.07. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AILIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and AILIN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AILIN's competition here
TNABY vs RGPCF Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, RGPCF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while RGPCF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas RGPCF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RGPCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and RGPCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RGPCF's competition here
TNABY vs AILLP Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, AILLP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while AILLP trades at $68.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas AILLP's P/E ratio is 5.70. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AILLP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to AILLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.Check AILLP's competition here
TNABY vs FPHHF Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, FPHHF has a market cap of 648.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while FPHHF trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas FPHHF's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FPHHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and FPHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FPHHF's competition here
TNABY vs CUPUF Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, CUPUF has a market cap of 552.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while CUPUF trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas CUPUF's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CUPUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and CUPUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CUPUF's competition here
TNABY vs RELFF Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, RELFF has a market cap of 461.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while RELFF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas RELFF's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RELFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and RELFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RELFF's competition here
TNABY vs ABTZY Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, ABTZY has a market cap of 325.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while ABTZY trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas ABTZY's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABTZY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and ABTZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABTZY's competition here
TNABY vs CNLPL Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, CNLPL has a market cap of 313.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while CNLPL trades at $52.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas CNLPL's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNLPL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and CNLPL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNLPL's competition here
TNABY vs CNTHP Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, CNTHP has a market cap of 312.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while CNTHP trades at $51.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas CNTHP's P/E ratio is 0.69. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNTHP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and CNTHP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNTHP's competition here
TNABY vs CNTHO Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, CNTHO has a market cap of 259.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while CNTHO trades at $43.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas CNTHO's P/E ratio is 0.58. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNTHO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and CNTHO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNTHO's competition here
TNABY vs CNTHN Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, CNTHN has a market cap of 247.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while CNTHN trades at $41.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas CNTHN's P/E ratio is 0.55. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNTHN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to CNTHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.Check CNTHN's competition here
TNABY vs ABZPY Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, ABZPY has a market cap of 233.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while ABZPY trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas ABZPY's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABZPY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to ABZPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.Check ABZPY's competition here
TNABY vs CNLHO Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, CNLHO has a market cap of 220.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while CNLHO trades at $36.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas CNLHO's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNLHO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to CNLHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.Check CNLHO's competition here
TNABY vs CNLHP Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, CNLHP has a market cap of 219M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while CNLHP trades at $37.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas CNLHP's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNLHP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and CNLHP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNLHP's competition here
TNABY vs CNLTP Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, CNLTP has a market cap of 218.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while CNLTP trades at $36.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas CNLTP's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNLTP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to CNLTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.Check CNLTP's competition here
TNABY vs CNLPM Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, CNLPM has a market cap of 208.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while CNLPM trades at $34.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas CNLPM's P/E ratio is 0.46. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNLPM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and CNLPM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNLPM's competition here
TNABY vs CNLHN Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, CNLHN has a market cap of 197.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while CNLHN trades at $33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas CNLHN's P/E ratio is 0.44. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNLHN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to CNLHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.Check CNLHN's competition here
TNABY vs CNLTN Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, CNLTN has a market cap of 196.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while CNLTN trades at $32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas CNLTN's P/E ratio is 0.44. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNLTN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and CNLTN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNLTN's competition here
TNABY vs CNLTL Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, CNLTL has a market cap of 186.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while CNLTL trades at $30.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas CNLTL's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNLTL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and CNLTL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNLTL's competition here
TNABY vs EDCFF Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, EDCFF has a market cap of 106.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while EDCFF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas EDCFF's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EDCFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and EDCFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EDCFF's competition here
TNABY vs NZWFF Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, NZWFF has a market cap of 46.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while NZWFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas NZWFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NZWFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and NZWFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NZWFF's competition here
TNABY vs SUME Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, SUME has a market cap of 36M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while SUME trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas SUME's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUME's ROE of -4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and SUME have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SUME's competition here
TNABY vs MCPB Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, MCPB has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while MCPB trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas MCPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MCPB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to MCPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.Check MCPB's competition here
TNABY vs EUSP Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, EUSP has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while EUSP trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas EUSP's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EUSP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to EUSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.Check EUSP's competition here
TNABY vs HAWLL Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, HAWLL has a market cap of 768.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while HAWLL trades at $13.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas HAWLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HAWLL's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to HAWLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.Check HAWLL's competition here
TNABY vs HAWEN Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, HAWEN has a market cap of 758.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while HAWEN trades at $12.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas HAWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HAWEN's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to HAWEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.Check HAWEN's competition here
TNABY vs HAWEM Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, HAWEM has a market cap of 755.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while HAWEM trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas HAWEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HAWEM's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to HAWEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.Check HAWEM's competition here
TNABY vs HAWLN Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, HAWLN has a market cap of 755.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while HAWLN trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas HAWLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HAWLN's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and HAWLN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HAWLN's competition here
TNABY vs HAWLI Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, HAWLI has a market cap of 755.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while HAWLI trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas HAWLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HAWLI's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to HAWLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.Check HAWLI's competition here
TNABY vs HAWLM Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, HAWLM has a market cap of 744K. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while HAWLM trades at $14.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas HAWLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HAWLM's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and HAWLM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HAWLM's competition here
TNABY vs HAWEL Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, HAWEL has a market cap of 739.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while HAWEL trades at $14.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas HAWEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HAWEL's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to HAWEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.Check HAWEL's competition here
TNABY vs RIGH Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, RIGH has a market cap of 158.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while RIGH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas RIGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RIGH's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to RIGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.Check RIGH's competition here
TNABY vs USWF Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, USWF has a market cap of 47.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while USWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas USWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to USWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and USWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check USWF's competition here
TNABY vs RENU Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, RENU has a market cap of 27K. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while RENU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas RENU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RENU's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to RENU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.Check RENU's competition here
TNABY vs EPGRQ Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, EPGRQ has a market cap of 16. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while EPGRQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas EPGRQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EPGRQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and EPGRQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EPGRQ's competition here
TNABY vs IPWLO Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, IPWLO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while IPWLO trades at $79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas IPWLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IPWLO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and IPWLO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPWLO's competition here
TNABY vs IPWLG Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, IPWLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while IPWLG trades at $84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas IPWLG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IPWLG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and IPWLG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPWLG's competition here
TNABY vs IPWLP Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, IPWLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while IPWLP trades at $118.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas IPWLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IPWLP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and IPWLP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPWLP's competition here
TNABY vs EVSO Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, EVSO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while EVSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas EVSO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EVSO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to EVSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.Check EVSO's competition here
TNABY vs PNMXO Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, PNMXO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while PNMXO trades at $75.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas PNMXO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PNMXO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and PNMXO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PNMXO's competition here
TNABY vs IPWLN Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, IPWLN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while IPWLN trades at $85.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas IPWLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IPWLN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and IPWLN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPWLN's competition here
TNABY vs BANGN Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, BANGN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while BANGN trades at $98.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas BANGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BANGN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and BANGN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BANGN's competition here
TNABY vs ENIAY Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, ENIAY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while ENIAY trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas ENIAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENIAY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY is less volatile compared to ENIAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNABY.Check ENIAY's competition here
TNABY vs NMPWP Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, NMPWP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while NMPWP trades at $55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas NMPWP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NMPWP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and NMPWP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NMPWP's competition here
TNABY vs NEWEN Comparison July 2025
TNABY plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNABY stands at 18.2B. In comparison, NEWEN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TNABY is priced at $14.19, while NEWEN trades at $98.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNABY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas NEWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNABY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NEWEN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TNABY and NEWEN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NEWEN's competition here