TransGlobal Assets Inc.
TransGlobal Assets Inc. (TMSH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TMSH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMSH | $0.00 | +0.00% | 181.1K | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MKKGY | $25.25 | -1.37% | 54.9B | 16.40 | $1.54 | +1.95% |
| MKGAF | $125.67 | -1.21% | 54.6B | 16.36 | $7.68 | +1.87% |
| TKPHF | $31.00 | +0.00% | 48.4B | 53.45 | $0.58 | +4.28% |
| IPSEY | $33.16 | -2.73% | 43.9B | 21.26 | $1.56 | +0.76% |
| HLNCF | $4.85 | -0.31% | 43.4B | 22.02 | $0.22 | +2.53% |
| SDZNY | $62.12 | -0.88% | 26.8B | 119.52 | $0.52 | +1.16% |
| ESALY | $61.51 | -2.11% | 17.6B | 20.54 | $3.00 | N/A |
| TEVJF | $14.32 | +0.00% | 16.4B | -95.47 | -$0.15 | N/A |
| SGIOF | $17.96 | +1.47% | 15.3B | 13.21 | $1.36 | +4.60% |
Stock Comparison
TMSH vs MKKGY Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, MKKGY has a market cap of 54.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while MKKGY trades at $25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKKGY's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MKKGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to MKKGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check MKKGY's competition here
TMSH vs MKGAF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, MKGAF has a market cap of 54.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while MKGAF trades at $125.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKGAF's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MKGAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to MKGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check MKGAF's competition here
TMSH vs TKPHF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, TKPHF has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while TKPHF trades at $31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKPHF's P/E ratio is 53.45. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TKPHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH and TKPHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TKPHF's competition here
TMSH vs IPSEY Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, IPSEY has a market cap of 43.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while IPSEY trades at $33.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPSEY's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to IPSEY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH and IPSEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPSEY's competition here
TMSH vs HLNCF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, HLNCF has a market cap of 43.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while HLNCF trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLNCF's P/E ratio is 22.02. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HLNCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to HLNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check HLNCF's competition here
TMSH vs SDZNY Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, SDZNY has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while SDZNY trades at $62.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDZNY's P/E ratio is 119.52. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SDZNY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to SDZNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check SDZNY's competition here
TMSH vs ESALY Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, ESALY has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while ESALY trades at $61.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESALY's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ESALY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to ESALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check ESALY's competition here
TMSH vs TEVJF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, TEVJF has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while TEVJF trades at $14.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEVJF's P/E ratio is -95.47. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TEVJF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to TEVJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check TEVJF's competition here
TMSH vs SGIOF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, SGIOF has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while SGIOF trades at $17.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGIOF's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SGIOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH and SGIOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SGIOF's competition here
TMSH vs SGIOY Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, SGIOY has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while SGIOY trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGIOY's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SGIOY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to SGIOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check SGIOY's competition here
TMSH vs BIOVF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, BIOVF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while BIOVF trades at $30.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIOVF's P/E ratio is 23.47. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BIOVF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to BIOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check BIOVF's competition here
TMSH vs SFOSF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, SFOSF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while SFOSF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFOSF's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SFOSF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH and SFOSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SFOSF's competition here
TMSH vs IPSEF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, IPSEF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while IPSEF trades at $113.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPSEF's P/E ratio is 17.99. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to IPSEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to IPSEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check IPSEF's competition here
TMSH vs ESAIY Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, ESAIY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while ESAIY trades at $7.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESAIY's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ESAIY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to ESAIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check ESAIY's competition here
TMSH vs ESALF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, ESALF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while ESALF trades at $30.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESALF's P/E ratio is 27.70. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ESALF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to ESALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check ESALF's competition here
TMSH vs GZPHF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, GZPHF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while GZPHF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GZPHF's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GZPHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to GZPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check GZPHF's competition here
TMSH vs HKMPF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, HKMPF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while HKMPF trades at $24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKMPF's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HKMPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH and HKMPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HKMPF's competition here
TMSH vs HKMPY Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, HKMPY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while HKMPY trades at $48.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKMPY's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HKMPY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to HKMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check HKMPY's competition here
TMSH vs SGFEF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, SGFEF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while SGFEF trades at $114.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGFEF's P/E ratio is 26.05. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SGFEF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to SGFEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check SGFEF's competition here
TMSH vs WIBFF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, WIBFF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while WIBFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIBFF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WIBFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to WIBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check WIBFF's competition here
TMSH vs HLUBF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, HLUBF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while HLUBF trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLUBF's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HLUBF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to HLUBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check HLUBF's competition here
TMSH vs HLBBF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, HLBBF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while HLBBF trades at $5.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLBBF's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HLBBF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to HLBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check HLBBF's competition here
TMSH vs LVZPF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, LVZPF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while LVZPF trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LVZPF's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LVZPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to LVZPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check LVZPF's competition here
TMSH vs SMDPY Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, SMDPY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while SMDPY trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMDPY's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SMDPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to SMDPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check SMDPY's competition here
TMSH vs DNPUF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, DNPUF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while DNPUF trades at $8.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNPUF's P/E ratio is 22.43. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DNPUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to DNPUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check DNPUF's competition here
TMSH vs CHSYF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, CHSYF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while CHSYF trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHSYF's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CHSYF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to CHSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check CHSYF's competition here
TMSH vs ULIHF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, ULIHF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while ULIHF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ULIHF's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ULIHF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to ULIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check ULIHF's competition here
TMSH vs APNHF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, APNHF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while APNHF trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APNHF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to APNHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to APNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check APNHF's competition here
TMSH vs INVVY Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, INVVY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while INVVY trades at $21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INVVY's P/E ratio is -62.42. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to INVVY's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH and INVVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INVVY's competition here
TMSH vs IZQVF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, IZQVF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while IZQVF trades at $20.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IZQVF's P/E ratio is -56.68. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to IZQVF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH and IZQVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IZQVF's competition here
TMSH vs LBTSF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, LBTSF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while LBTSF trades at $13.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBTSF's P/E ratio is 111.33. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LBTSF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to LBTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check LBTSF's competition here
TMSH vs HMDCF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, HMDCF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while HMDCF trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMDCF's P/E ratio is -64.10. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HMDCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to HMDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check HMDCF's competition here
TMSH vs HYPMY Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, HYPMY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while HYPMY trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYPMY's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HYPMY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to HYPMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check HYPMY's competition here
TMSH vs APNHY Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, APNHY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while APNHY trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APNHY's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to APNHY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to APNHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check APNHY's competition here
TMSH vs CURLF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, CURLF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while CURLF trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CURLF's P/E ratio is -9.06. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CURLF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to CURLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check CURLF's competition here
TMSH vs THCBF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, THCBF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while THCBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THCBF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to THCBF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to THCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check THCBF's competition here
TMSH vs CASBF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, CASBF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while CASBF trades at $6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CASBF's P/E ratio is -69.56. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CASBF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH and CASBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CASBF's competition here
TMSH vs DMPHF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, DMPHF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while DMPHF trades at $39.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMPHF's P/E ratio is 17.90. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DMPHF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to DMPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check DMPHF's competition here
TMSH vs HTSUF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, HTSUF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while HTSUF trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTSUF's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HTSUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH and HTSUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HTSUF's competition here
TMSH vs GTBIF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, GTBIF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while GTBIF trades at $8.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTBIF's P/E ratio is 81.15. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GTBIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to GTBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check GTBIF's competition here
TMSH vs ARSUF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, ARSUF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while ARSUF trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARSUF's P/E ratio is 22.70. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ARSUF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH and ARSUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARSUF's competition here
TMSH vs TSMRF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, TSMRF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while TSMRF trades at $23.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSMRF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TSMRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH and TSMRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TSMRF's competition here
TMSH vs NPNKF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, NPNKF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while NPNKF trades at $25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPNKF's P/E ratio is 7.82. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NPNKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to NPNKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check NPNKF's competition here
TMSH vs TCNNF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, TCNNF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while TCNNF trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCNNF's P/E ratio is -11.07. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TCNNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to TCNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check TCNNF's competition here
TMSH vs MITPF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, MITPF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while MITPF trades at $23.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MITPF's P/E ratio is -10.81. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MITPF's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to MITPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check MITPF's competition here
TMSH vs KARBF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, KARBF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while KARBF trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KARBF's P/E ratio is 262.50. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to KARBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH and KARBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KARBF's competition here
TMSH vs NPPNY Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, NPPNY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while NPPNY trades at $5.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPPNY's P/E ratio is 6.55. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NPPNY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to NPPNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check NPPNY's competition here
TMSH vs SHEZF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, SHEZF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while SHEZF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHEZF's P/E ratio is -23.48. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SHEZF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to SHEZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check SHEZF's competition here
TMSH vs CHIZF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, CHIZF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while CHIZF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHIZF's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CHIZF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH and CHIZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHIZF's competition here
TMSH vs SWGHF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, SWGHF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while SWGHF trades at $11.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWGHF's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SWGHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH and SWGHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SWGHF's competition here
TMSH vs LJUIF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, LJUIF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while LJUIF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LJUIF's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LJUIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to LJUIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check LJUIF's competition here
TMSH vs KSPHF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, KSPHF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while KSPHF trades at $30.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KSPHF's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to KSPHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH and KSPHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KSPHF's competition here
TMSH vs EVOTF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, EVOTF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while EVOTF trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVOTF's P/E ratio is -6.84. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to EVOTF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH and EVOTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EVOTF's competition here
TMSH vs GNMLF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, GNMLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while GNMLF trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNMLF's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GNMLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH and GNMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GNMLF's competition here
TMSH vs KKPCF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, KKPCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while KKPCF trades at $28.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KKPCF's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to KKPCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to KKPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check KKPCF's competition here
TMSH vs BIOGY Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, BIOGY has a market cap of 961M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while BIOGY trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIOGY's P/E ratio is 32.76. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BIOGY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to BIOGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check BIOGY's competition here
TMSH vs SHPHF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, SHPHF has a market cap of 924.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while SHPHF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHPHF's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SHPHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to SHPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check SHPHF's competition here
TMSH vs LVTTF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, LVTTF has a market cap of 891.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while LVTTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LVTTF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LVTTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to LVTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check LVTTF's competition here
TMSH vs EVRRF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, EVRRF has a market cap of 887.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while EVRRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVRRF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to EVRRF's ROE of +2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH and EVRRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EVRRF's competition here
TMSH vs NRXCF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, NRXCF has a market cap of 842.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while NRXCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRXCF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NRXCF's ROE of +2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH and NRXCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NRXCF's competition here
TMSH vs TWAPF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, TWAPF has a market cap of 828.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while TWAPF trades at $16.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWAPF's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TWAPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to TWAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check TWAPF's competition here
TMSH vs CSWYF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, CSWYF has a market cap of 758.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while CSWYF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSWYF's P/E ratio is 4.78. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CSWYF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to CSWYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check CSWYF's competition here
TMSH vs TRXPF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, TRXPF has a market cap of 690.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while TRXPF trades at $24.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRXPF's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TRXPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH and TRXPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TRXPF's competition here
TMSH vs SWDCF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, SWDCF has a market cap of 671.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while SWDCF trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWDCF's P/E ratio is 105.00. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SWDCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH and SWDCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SWDCF's competition here
TMSH vs YIHCF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, YIHCF has a market cap of 643.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while YIHCF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YIHCF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to YIHCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH and YIHCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YIHCF's competition here
TMSH vs TRSSF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, TRSSF has a market cap of 601.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while TRSSF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRSSF's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TRSSF's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to TRSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check TRSSF's competition here
TMSH vs AIHLF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, AIHLF has a market cap of 594.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while AIHLF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIHLF's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AIHLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH and AIHLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AIHLF's competition here
TMSH vs VRNOF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, VRNOF has a market cap of 591.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while VRNOF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRNOF's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to VRNOF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to VRNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check VRNOF's competition here
TMSH vs ELTP Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, ELTP has a market cap of 588.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while ELTP trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELTP's P/E ratio is -54.99. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ELTP's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to ELTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check ELTP's competition here
TMSH vs GLASF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, GLASF has a market cap of 587M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while GLASF trades at $8.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLASF's P/E ratio is -69.29. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GLASF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to GLASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check GLASF's competition here
TMSH vs PKBFF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, PKBFF has a market cap of 544.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while PKBFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PKBFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PKBFF's ROE of +7.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH and PKBFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PKBFF's competition here
TMSH vs CCHWF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, CCHWF has a market cap of 521.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while CCHWF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCHWF's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CCHWF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to CCHWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check CCHWF's competition here
TMSH vs KHTRF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, KHTRF has a market cap of 470.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while KHTRF trades at $4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KHTRF's P/E ratio is 67.43. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to KHTRF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH and KHTRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KHTRF's competition here
TMSH vs CRLBF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, CRLBF has a market cap of 463.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while CRLBF trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRLBF's P/E ratio is -9.79. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CRLBF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to CRLBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check CRLBF's competition here
TMSH vs PEXXF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, PEXXF has a market cap of 463.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while PEXXF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEXXF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PEXXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH and PEXXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PEXXF's competition here
TMSH vs BOIRF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, BOIRF has a market cap of 421.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while BOIRF trades at $24.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOIRF's P/E ratio is 31.97. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BOIRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to BOIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check BOIRF's competition here
TMSH vs AGYTF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, AGYTF has a market cap of 405.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while AGYTF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGYTF's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AGYTF's ROE of -13.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to AGYTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check AGYTF's competition here
TMSH vs HUMDF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, HUMDF has a market cap of 404.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while HUMDF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUMDF's P/E ratio is -13.69. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HUMDF's ROE of +2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH and HUMDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HUMDF's competition here
TMSH vs NIKA Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, NIKA has a market cap of 361.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while NIKA trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NIKA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NIKA's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH and NIKA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NIKA's competition here
TMSH vs CPHRF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, CPHRF has a market cap of 276.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while CPHRF trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPHRF's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CPHRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to CPHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check CPHRF's competition here
TMSH vs BHCCF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, BHCCF has a market cap of 225.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while BHCCF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHCCF's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BHCCF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to BHCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check BHCCF's competition here
TMSH vs BIOIF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, BIOIF has a market cap of 204.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while BIOIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIOIF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BIOIF's ROE of -10.85%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH and BIOIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BIOIF's competition here
TMSH vs PLNHF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, PLNHF has a market cap of 202M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while PLNHF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLNHF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PLNHF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to PLNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check PLNHF's competition here
TMSH vs PHCUF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, PHCUF has a market cap of 156.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while PHCUF trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHCUF's P/E ratio is -293.74. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PHCUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to PHCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check PHCUF's competition here
TMSH vs CBWTF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, CBWTF has a market cap of 154.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while CBWTF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBWTF's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CBWTF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to CBWTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check CBWTF's competition here
TMSH vs AAWH Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, AAWH has a market cap of 148.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while AAWH trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAWH's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AAWH's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to AAWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check AAWH's competition here
TMSH vs JUSHF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, JUSHF has a market cap of 147.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while JUSHF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JUSHF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to JUSHF's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to JUSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check JUSHF's competition here
TMSH vs COPHF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, COPHF has a market cap of 131.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while COPHF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COPHF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to COPHF's ROE of -5.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to COPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check COPHF's competition here
TMSH vs STMH Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, STMH has a market cap of 125.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while STMH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to STMH's ROE of -2.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to STMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check STMH's competition here
TMSH vs NWPN Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, NWPN has a market cap of 123.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while NWPN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWPN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NWPN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to NWPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check NWPN's competition here
TMSH vs LOVFF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, LOVFF has a market cap of 121.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while LOVFF trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOVFF's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LOVFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to LOVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check LOVFF's competition here
TMSH vs HLTRF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, HLTRF has a market cap of 119.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while HLTRF trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLTRF's P/E ratio is -7.92. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HLTRF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to HLTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check HLTRF's competition here
TMSH vs SHIEF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, SHIEF has a market cap of 115M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while SHIEF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHIEF's P/E ratio is -5.52. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SHIEF's ROE of -3.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to SHIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check SHIEF's competition here
TMSH vs GRUSF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, GRUSF has a market cap of 111.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while GRUSF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRUSF's P/E ratio is 22.40. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GRUSF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to GRUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check GRUSF's competition here
TMSH vs LPCUF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, LPCUF has a market cap of 110.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while LPCUF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LPCUF's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LPCUF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to LPCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check LPCUF's competition here
TMSH vs CNVCF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, CNVCF has a market cap of 109.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while CNVCF trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNVCF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CNVCF's ROE of -3.90%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH and CNVCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNVCF's competition here
TMSH vs BIOYF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, BIOYF has a market cap of 99.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while BIOYF trades at $8.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIOYF's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BIOYF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH and BIOYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BIOYF's competition here
TMSH vs PLNH Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, PLNH has a market cap of 94.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while PLNH trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLNH's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PLNH's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to PLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check PLNH's competition here
TMSH vs LRDSF Comparison August 2025
TMSH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMSH stands at 181.1K. In comparison, LRDSF has a market cap of 83.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMSH is priced at $0.00, while LRDSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMSH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LRDSF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TMSH's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LRDSF's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, TMSH is less volatile compared to LRDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMSH.Check LRDSF's competition here