Tomra Systems ASA
Tomra Systems ASA TMRAF Peers
See (TMRAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Waste Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMRAF | $14.96 | -4.83% | 4.4B | 38.36 | $0.39 | +1.57% |
| VEOEF | $34.43 | +1.37% | 25.1B | 19.90 | $1.73 | +4.54% |
| VEOEY | $17.16 | -2.17% | 25.1B | 19.72 | $0.87 | +5.19% |
| FMOCF | $10.30 | N/A | 4.7B | 13.92 | $0.74 | +6.32% |
| TMRAY | $14.78 | -1.73% | 4.4B | 37.90 | $0.39 | +1.60% |
| TSPCF | $1.52 | -20.00% | 3.4B | 30.40 | $0.05 | +1.88% |
| CHFFF | $0.47 | +0.15% | 2.9B | 6.72 | $0.07 | +1.08% |
| SECYF | $11.18 | +1.64% | 2.5B | 16.44 | $0.68 | +2.56% |
| DSKIF | $26.60 | +7.13% | 1.3B | 20.00 | $1.33 | +0.85% |
| BFSAF | $25.35 | N/A | 1.2B | 17.73 | $1.43 | +3.28% |
Stock Comparison
TMRAF vs VEOEF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, VEOEF has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while VEOEF trades at $34.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas VEOEF's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VEOEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and VEOEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs VEOEY Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, VEOEY has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while VEOEY trades at $17.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas VEOEY's P/E ratio is 19.72. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VEOEY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to VEOEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs FMOCF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FMOCF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while FMOCF trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas FMOCF's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FMOCF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and FMOCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs TMRAY Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TMRAY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while TMRAY trades at $14.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas TMRAY's P/E ratio is 37.90. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TMRAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to TMRAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs TSPCF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TSPCF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while TSPCF trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas TSPCF's P/E ratio is 30.40. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TSPCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and TSPCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs CHFFF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CHFFF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while CHFFF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas CHFFF's P/E ratio is 6.72. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CHFFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and CHFFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs SECYF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SECYF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while SECYF trades at $11.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas SECYF's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SECYF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to SECYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs DSKIF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, DSKIF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while DSKIF trades at $26.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas DSKIF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DSKIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and DSKIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs BFSAF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BFSAF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while BFSAF trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas BFSAF's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BFSAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to BFSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs SZDEF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SZDEF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while SZDEF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas SZDEF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SZDEF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and SZDEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs TNJIF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TNJIF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while TNJIF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas TNJIF's P/E ratio is 4.94. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TNJIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to TNJIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs FMOCY Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FMOCY has a market cap of 909.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while FMOCY trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas FMOCY's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FMOCY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to FMOCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs SECVY Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SECVY has a market cap of 809.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while SECVY trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas SECVY's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SECVY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and SECVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs SHMCF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SHMCF has a market cap of 620M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while SHMCF trades at $7.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas SHMCF's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHMCF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to SHMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs AGXXF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AGXXF has a market cap of 307.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while AGXXF trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas AGXXF's P/E ratio is -12.64. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AGXXF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and AGXXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs CHFFY Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CHFFY has a market cap of 298.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while CHFFY trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas CHFFY's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CHFFY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and CHFFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs SCPJ Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SCPJ has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while SCPJ trades at $303.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas SCPJ's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SCPJ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and SCPJ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs MBRFF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MBRFF has a market cap of 263.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while MBRFF trades at $75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas MBRFF's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MBRFF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and MBRFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs QNTFF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, QNTFF has a market cap of 175.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while QNTFF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas QNTFF's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to QNTFF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to QNTFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs ANRGF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ANRGF has a market cap of 167.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while ANRGF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas ANRGF's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ANRGF's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and ANRGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs LEIC Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LEIC has a market cap of 49.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while LEIC trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas LEIC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LEIC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to LEIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs BTQNF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BTQNF has a market cap of 43.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while BTQNF trades at $33.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas BTQNF's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BTQNF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and BTQNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs GCEI Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, GCEI has a market cap of 35.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while GCEI trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas GCEI's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GCEI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to GCEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs ROOOF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ROOOF has a market cap of 35.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while ROOOF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas ROOOF's P/E ratio is -5.26. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ROOOF's ROE of -4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to ROOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs OCLN Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, OCLN has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while OCLN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas OCLN's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OCLN's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to OCLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs VCIGF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, VCIGF has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while VCIGF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas VCIGF's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VCIGF's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and VCIGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs SEPOF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SEPOF has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while SEPOF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas SEPOF's P/E ratio is 18.41. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SEPOF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to SEPOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs CTRNF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CTRNF has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while CTRNF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas CTRNF's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CTRNF's ROE of -3.91%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to CTRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs CIWT Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CIWT has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while CIWT trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas CIWT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CIWT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to CIWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs ECLMF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ECLMF has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while ECLMF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas ECLMF's P/E ratio is -5.85. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ECLMF's ROE of -4.86%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to ECLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs TESI Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TESI has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while TESI trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas TESI's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TESI's ROE of -13.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to TESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs BCCEF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BCCEF has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while BCCEF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas BCCEF's P/E ratio is -4.05. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BCCEF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and BCCEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs HNRC Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, HNRC has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while HNRC trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas HNRC's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HNRC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and HNRC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs NWLXF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NWLXF has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while NWLXF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas NWLXF's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NWLXF's ROE of -8.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and NWLXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs GARB Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, GARB has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while GARB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas GARB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GARB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to GARB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs HUIPF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, HUIPF has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while HUIPF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas HUIPF's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HUIPF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and HUIPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs SNRG Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SNRG has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while SNRG trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas SNRG's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SNRG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and SNRG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs CWSFF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CWSFF has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while CWSFF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas CWSFF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CWSFF's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to CWSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs EAATF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, EAATF has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while EAATF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas EAATF's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EAATF's ROE of -4.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and EAATF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs EXPL Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, EXPL has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while EXPL trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas EXPL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EXPL's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to EXPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs EQTE Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, EQTE has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while EQTE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas EQTE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EQTE's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to EQTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs AFBG Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AFBG has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while AFBG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas AFBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AFBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to AFBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs SENR Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SENR has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while SENR trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas SENR's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SENR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to SENR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs MCIM Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MCIM has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while MCIM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas MCIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MCIM's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to MCIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs EXSO Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, EXSO has a market cap of 877.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while EXSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas EXSO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EXSO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and EXSO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs IPWG Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, IPWG has a market cap of 818.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while IPWG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas IPWG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IPWG's ROE of -7.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to IPWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs BWPC Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BWPC has a market cap of 639.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while BWPC trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas BWPC's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BWPC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and BWPC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs CRVYF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CRVYF has a market cap of 631.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while CRVYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas CRVYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CRVYF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and CRVYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs GERS Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, GERS has a market cap of 565.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while GERS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas GERS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GERS's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and GERS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs ECPL Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ECPL has a market cap of 403.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while ECPL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas ECPL's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ECPL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and ECPL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs DGWR Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, DGWR has a market cap of 214.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while DGWR trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas DGWR's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DGWR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to DGWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs JPEX Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, JPEX has a market cap of 167.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while JPEX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas JPEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JPEX's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and JPEX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs SUNC Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SUNC has a market cap of 138.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while SUNC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas SUNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SUNC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to SUNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs PTOI Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, PTOI has a market cap of 99.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while PTOI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas PTOI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PTOI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and PTOI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs RGDEF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, RGDEF has a market cap of 69.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while RGDEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas RGDEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RGDEF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and RGDEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs BEHL Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BEHL has a market cap of 65.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while BEHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas BEHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BEHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to BEHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs MJWL Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MJWL has a market cap of 65.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while MJWL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas MJWL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MJWL's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and MJWL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs BEEN Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BEEN has a market cap of 30.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while BEEN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas BEEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BEEN's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and BEEN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs UVSS Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, UVSS has a market cap of 28.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while UVSS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas UVSS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UVSS's ROE of +1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and UVSS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs EVSP Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, EVSP has a market cap of 28.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while EVSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas EVSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EVSP's ROE of +1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to EVSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs CLIRF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CLIRF has a market cap of 25.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while CLIRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas CLIRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CLIRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to CLIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs ECEZ Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ECEZ has a market cap of 25.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while ECEZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas ECEZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ECEZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and ECEZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs NXSI Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NXSI has a market cap of 20K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while NXSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas NXSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NXSI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to NXSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs GMND Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, GMND has a market cap of 19.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while GMND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas GMND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GMND's ROE of -8.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and GMND have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs TMEN Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TMEN has a market cap of 13.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while TMEN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas TMEN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TMEN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and TMEN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs GNCC Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, GNCC has a market cap of 9.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while GNCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas GNCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GNCC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to GNCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs USLQ Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, USLQ has a market cap of 8.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while USLQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas USLQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to USLQ's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to USLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs NWMH Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NWMH has a market cap of 6.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while NWMH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas NWMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NWMH's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to NWMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs ECCI Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ECCI has a market cap of 5.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while ECCI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas ECCI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ECCI's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to ECCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs CESX Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CESX has a market cap of 4.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while CESX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas CESX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CESX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and CESX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs TRITF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TRITF has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while TRITF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas TRITF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TRITF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to TRITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs GETH Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, GETH has a market cap of 314. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while GETH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas GETH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GETH's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and GETH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs TRTI Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TRTI has a market cap of 298. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while TRTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas TRTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TRTI's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and TRTI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs SRPX Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SRPX has a market cap of 206. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while SRPX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas SRPX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SRPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and SRPX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs GRNO Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, GRNO has a market cap of 92. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while GRNO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas GRNO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GRNO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and GRNO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs MPHD Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MPHD has a market cap of 33. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while MPHD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas MPHD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MPHD's ROE of -70.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and MPHD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs ALAN Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ALAN has a market cap of 4. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while ALAN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas ALAN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALAN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and ALAN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs BFFBF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BFFBF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while BFFBF trades at $9.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas BFFBF's P/E ratio is -92.96. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BFFBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and BFFBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TMRAF vs ZWTYF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ZWTYF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $14.96, while ZWTYF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.36, whereas ZWTYF's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZWTYF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF and ZWTYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).