Tomra Systems ASA
Tomra Systems ASA TMRAF Peers
See (TMRAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Waste Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMRAF | $15.66 | +0.00% | 4.6B | 39.15 | $0.40 | +1.32% |
| VEOEF | $35.98 | +1.17% | 26.3B | 20.33 | $1.77 | +4.35% |
| VEOEY | $17.93 | +0.73% | 26.1B | 20.34 | $0.88 | +4.38% |
| FMOCF | $10.30 | +0.00% | 4.7B | 13.92 | $0.74 | +5.69% |
| TMRAY | $15.36 | +0.72% | 4.6B | 38.40 | $0.40 | +1.35% |
| FMOCY | $1.92 | -3.85% | 4.4B | 13.74 | $0.14 | +40.61% |
| TSPCF | $1.81 | +0.00% | 4B | 36.20 | $0.05 | +1.58% |
| CHFFF | $0.47 | +0.00% | 2.9B | 6.71 | $0.07 | +6.29% |
| SECYF | $11.19 | -0.78% | 2.5B | 16.17 | $0.69 | +2.57% |
| BFFBF | $11.12 | +8.51155029622032e+40% | 2.1B | -113.47 | -$0.10 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TMRAF vs VEOEF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, VEOEF has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while VEOEF trades at $35.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas VEOEF's P/E ratio is 20.33. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VEOEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to VEOEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs VEOEY Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, VEOEY has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while VEOEY trades at $17.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas VEOEY's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VEOEY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to VEOEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs FMOCF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, FMOCF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while FMOCF trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas FMOCF's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FMOCF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to FMOCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs TMRAY Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TMRAY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while TMRAY trades at $15.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas TMRAY's P/E ratio is 38.40. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TMRAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to TMRAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs FMOCY Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, FMOCY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while FMOCY trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas FMOCY's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FMOCY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to FMOCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs TSPCF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TSPCF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while TSPCF trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas TSPCF's P/E ratio is 36.20. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TSPCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to TSPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs CHFFF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CHFFF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while CHFFF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas CHFFF's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CHFFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to CHFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs SECYF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SECYF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while SECYF trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas SECYF's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SECYF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to SECYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs BFFBF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BFFBF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while BFFBF trades at $11.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas BFFBF's P/E ratio is -113.47. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BFFBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to BFFBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs BFSAF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BFSAF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while BFSAF trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas BFSAF's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BFSAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to BFSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs DSKIF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, DSKIF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while DSKIF trades at $24.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas DSKIF's P/E ratio is 18.53. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DSKIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to DSKIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs SZDEF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SZDEF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while SZDEF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas SZDEF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SZDEF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to SZDEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs TNJIF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TNJIF has a market cap of 896.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while TNJIF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas TNJIF's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TNJIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to TNJIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs SECVY Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SECVY has a market cap of 809.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while SECVY trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas SECVY's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SECVY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to SECVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs SHMCF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SHMCF has a market cap of 601.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while SHMCF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas SHMCF's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHMCF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to SHMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs SCPJ Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SCPJ has a market cap of 297.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while SCPJ trades at $325.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas SCPJ's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SCPJ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to SCPJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs AGXXF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, AGXXF has a market cap of 274M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while AGXXF trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas AGXXF's P/E ratio is -11.27. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AGXXF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to AGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs CHFFY Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CHFFY has a market cap of 254.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while CHFFY trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas CHFFY's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CHFFY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to CHFFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs MBRFF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MBRFF has a market cap of 243.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while MBRFF trades at $69.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas MBRFF's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MBRFF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to MBRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs QNTFF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, QNTFF has a market cap of 172.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while QNTFF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas QNTFF's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to QNTFF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to QNTFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs ANRGF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ANRGF has a market cap of 169.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while ANRGF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas ANRGF's P/E ratio is -5.88. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ANRGF's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to ANRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs BTQNF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BTQNF has a market cap of 50.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while BTQNF trades at $39.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas BTQNF's P/E ratio is 9.82. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BTQNF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to BTQNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs GCEI Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GCEI has a market cap of 41.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while GCEI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas GCEI's P/E ratio is -7.30. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GCEI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to GCEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs ROOOF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ROOOF has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while ROOOF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas ROOOF's P/E ratio is -4.09. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ROOOF's ROE of -4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to ROOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs ECLMF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ECLMF has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while ECLMF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas ECLMF's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ECLMF's ROE of -4.86%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to ECLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs OCLN Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, OCLN has a market cap of 27.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while OCLN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas OCLN's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OCLN's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to OCLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs VCIGF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, VCIGF has a market cap of 22.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while VCIGF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas VCIGF's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VCIGF's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to VCIGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs LEIC Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, LEIC has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while LEIC trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas LEIC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LEIC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to LEIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs SEPOF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SEPOF has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while SEPOF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas SEPOF's P/E ratio is 18.41. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SEPOF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to SEPOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs CTRNF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CTRNF has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while CTRNF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas CTRNF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CTRNF's ROE of -3.91%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to CTRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs HUIPF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, HUIPF has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while HUIPF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas HUIPF's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HUIPF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to HUIPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs TESI Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TESI has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while TESI trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas TESI's P/E ratio is -3.69. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TESI's ROE of -13.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to TESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs BCCEF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BCCEF has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while BCCEF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas BCCEF's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BCCEF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to BCCEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs HNRC Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, HNRC has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while HNRC trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas HNRC's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HNRC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to HNRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs NWLXF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, NWLXF has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while NWLXF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas NWLXF's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NWLXF's ROE of -8.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to NWLXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs EAATF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, EAATF has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while EAATF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas EAATF's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EAATF's ROE of -4.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to EAATF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs SNRG Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SNRG has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while SNRG trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas SNRG's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SNRG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to SNRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs CWSFF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CWSFF has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while CWSFF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas CWSFF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CWSFF's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to CWSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs EQTE Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, EQTE has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while EQTE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas EQTE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EQTE's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to EQTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs SENR Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SENR has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while SENR trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas SENR's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SENR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to SENR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs AFBG Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, AFBG has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while AFBG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas AFBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AFBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to AFBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs ECEZ Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ECEZ has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while ECEZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas ECEZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ECEZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to ECEZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs EXSO Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, EXSO has a market cap of 877.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while EXSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas EXSO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EXSO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to EXSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs IPWG Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, IPWG has a market cap of 818.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while IPWG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas IPWG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IPWG's ROE of -7.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to IPWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs CRVYF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CRVYF has a market cap of 631.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while CRVYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas CRVYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CRVYF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to CRVYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs GERS Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GERS has a market cap of 565.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while GERS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas GERS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GERS's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to GERS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs MCIM Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MCIM has a market cap of 505.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while MCIM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas MCIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MCIM's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to MCIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs DGWR Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, DGWR has a market cap of 214.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while DGWR trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas DGWR's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DGWR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to DGWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs BWPC Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BWPC has a market cap of 211.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while BWPC trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas BWPC's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BWPC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to BWPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs ECPL Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ECPL has a market cap of 187.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while ECPL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas ECPL's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ECPL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to ECPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs JPEX Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, JPEX has a market cap of 167.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while JPEX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas JPEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JPEX's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to JPEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs USLQ Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, USLQ has a market cap of 146.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while USLQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas USLQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to USLQ's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to USLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs SUNC Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SUNC has a market cap of 138.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while SUNC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas SUNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SUNC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to SUNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs TRTI Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TRTI has a market cap of 137K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while TRTI trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas TRTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TRTI's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to TRTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs PTOI Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PTOI has a market cap of 74.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while PTOI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas PTOI's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PTOI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to PTOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs RGDEF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, RGDEF has a market cap of 69.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while RGDEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas RGDEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RGDEF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to RGDEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs MJWL Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MJWL has a market cap of 65.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while MJWL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas MJWL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MJWL's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to MJWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs GARB Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GARB has a market cap of 47.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while GARB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas GARB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GARB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to GARB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs BEEN Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BEEN has a market cap of 30.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while BEEN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas BEEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BEEN's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to BEEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs UVSS Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, UVSS has a market cap of 28.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while UVSS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas UVSS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UVSS's ROE of +1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to UVSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs EVSP Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, EVSP has a market cap of 28.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while EVSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas EVSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EVSP's ROE of +1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to EVSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs CLIRF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CLIRF has a market cap of 25.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while CLIRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas CLIRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CLIRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to CLIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs SRPX Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SRPX has a market cap of 20.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while SRPX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas SRPX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SRPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to SRPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs NXSI Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, NXSI has a market cap of 20K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while NXSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas NXSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NXSI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to NXSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs GMND Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GMND has a market cap of 19.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while GMND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas GMND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GMND's ROE of -8.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to GMND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs EXPL Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, EXPL has a market cap of 16.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while EXPL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas EXPL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EXPL's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to EXPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs TMEN Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TMEN has a market cap of 13.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while TMEN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas TMEN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TMEN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to TMEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs GNCC Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GNCC has a market cap of 9.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while GNCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas GNCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GNCC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to GNCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs NWMH Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, NWMH has a market cap of 6.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while NWMH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas NWMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NWMH's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to NWMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs BEHL Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BEHL has a market cap of 6.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while BEHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas BEHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BEHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to BEHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs CESX Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CESX has a market cap of 4.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while CESX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas CESX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CESX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to CESX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs CIWT Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CIWT has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while CIWT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas CIWT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CIWT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to CIWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs ECCI Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ECCI has a market cap of 581. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while ECCI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas ECCI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ECCI's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to ECCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs GETH Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GETH has a market cap of 314. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while GETH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas GETH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GETH's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to GETH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs GRNO Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GRNO has a market cap of 92. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while GRNO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas GRNO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GRNO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to GRNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs TRITF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TRITF has a market cap of 85. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while TRITF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas TRITF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TRITF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is less volatile compared to TRITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs MPHD Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MPHD has a market cap of 33. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while MPHD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas MPHD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MPHD's ROE of -70.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to MPHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs ALAN Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ALAN has a market cap of 4. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while ALAN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas ALAN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALAN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to ALAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.
TMRAF vs ZWTYF Comparison
TMRAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRAF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ZWTYF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMRAF is priced at $15.66, while ZWTYF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRAF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.15, whereas ZWTYF's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, TMRAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZWTYF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TMRAF is more volatile compared to ZWTYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRAF.