Tingo, Inc.
Tingo, Inc. (TMNA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TMNA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMNA | $0.00 | +0.00% | 122.8K | N/A | -$0.03 | N/A |
| ADYYF | $1,745.69 | -2.53% | 55B | 50.16 | $34.80 | N/A |
| ADYEY | $16.82 | -2.21% | 52.7B | 49.19 | $0.34 | N/A |
| BSQKZ | $72.53 | +0.00% | 47.5B | 17.60 | $4.12 | N/A |
| KAKZF | $97.10 | +4.97% | 20.7B | 10.86 | $8.94 | +4.57% |
| TOITF | $134.34 | -2.20% | 11.2B | 97.12 | $1.38 | N/A |
| TMICF | $65.49 | +0.00% | 8.6B | 39.45 | $1.66 | +3.57% |
| TMICY | $61.47 | -1.77% | 8B | 36.52 | $1.66 | +1.57% |
| NEXPF | $6.09 | +0.00% | 7.5B | 38.03 | $0.16 | +4.76% |
| NEXXY | $6.06 | +0.00% | 7.4B | 37.88 | $0.16 | +4.67% |
Stock Comparison
TMNA vs ADYYF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, ADYYF has a market cap of 55B. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while ADYYF trades at $1,745.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADYYF's P/E ratio is 50.16. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ADYYF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to ADYYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check ADYYF's competition here
TMNA vs ADYEY Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, ADYEY has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while ADYEY trades at $16.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADYEY's P/E ratio is 49.19. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ADYEY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to ADYEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check ADYEY's competition here
TMNA vs BSQKZ Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, BSQKZ has a market cap of 47.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while BSQKZ trades at $72.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSQKZ's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BSQKZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to BSQKZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check BSQKZ's competition here
TMNA vs KAKZF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, KAKZF has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while KAKZF trades at $97.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KAKZF's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KAKZF's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and KAKZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KAKZF's competition here
TMNA vs TOITF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, TOITF has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while TOITF trades at $134.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOITF's P/E ratio is 97.12. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TOITF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to TOITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check TOITF's competition here
TMNA vs TMICF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, TMICF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while TMICF trades at $65.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMICF's P/E ratio is 39.45. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TMICF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and TMICF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TMICF's competition here
TMNA vs TMICY Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, TMICY has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while TMICY trades at $61.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMICY's P/E ratio is 36.52. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TMICY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to TMICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check TMICY's competition here
TMNA vs NEXPF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, NEXPF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while NEXPF trades at $6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEXPF's P/E ratio is 38.03. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NEXPF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to NEXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check NEXPF's competition here
TMNA vs NEXXY Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, NEXXY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while NEXXY trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEXXY's P/E ratio is 37.88. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NEXXY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to NEXXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check NEXXY's competition here
TMNA vs DRKTY Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, DRKTY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while DRKTY trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRKTY's P/E ratio is 41.47. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DRKTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and DRKTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DRKTY's competition here
TMNA vs GMYTF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, GMYTF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while GMYTF trades at $58.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMYTF's P/E ratio is 37.65. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GMYTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to GMYTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check GMYTF's competition here
TMNA vs SWDAF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, SWDAF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while SWDAF trades at $38.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWDAF's P/E ratio is 153.80. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SWDAF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to SWDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check SWDAF's competition here
TMNA vs STWRY Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, STWRY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while STWRY trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STWRY's P/E ratio is -210.25. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STWRY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and STWRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STWRY's competition here
TMNA vs CIOXY Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, CIOXY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while CIOXY trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIOXY's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CIOXY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to CIOXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check CIOXY's competition here
TMNA vs EXNWF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, EXNWF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while EXNWF trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXNWF's P/E ratio is 55.00. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EXNWF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and EXNWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EXNWF's competition here
TMNA vs DRKTF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, DRKTF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while DRKTF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRKTF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DRKTF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and DRKTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DRKTF's competition here
TMNA vs OVHFF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, OVHFF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while OVHFF trades at $11.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OVHFF's P/E ratio is 132.11. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OVHFF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and OVHFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OVHFF's competition here
TMNA vs SPNUF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, SPNUF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while SPNUF trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPNUF's P/E ratio is 133.50. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SPNUF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and SPNUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SPNUF's competition here
TMNA vs WWLNF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, WWLNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while WWLNF trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WWLNF's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WWLNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to WWLNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check WWLNF's competition here
TMNA vs SANP Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, SANP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while SANP trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SANP's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SANP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to SANP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check SANP's competition here
TMNA vs MGPPF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, MGPPF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while MGPPF trades at $7.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGPPF's P/E ratio is 233.67. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MGPPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to MGPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check MGPPF's competition here
TMNA vs PHPYF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, PHPYF has a market cap of 992.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while PHPYF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHPYF's P/E ratio is 41.00. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PHPYF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and PHPYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PHPYF's competition here
TMNA vs WRDLY Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, WRDLY has a market cap of 988.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while WRDLY trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRDLY's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WRDLY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to WRDLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check WRDLY's competition here
TMNA vs YHEKF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, YHEKF has a market cap of 896.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while YHEKF trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YHEKF's P/E ratio is 64.67. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to YHEKF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to YHEKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check YHEKF's competition here
TMNA vs CPLFF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, CPLFF has a market cap of 700.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while CPLFF trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPLFF's P/E ratio is -49.44. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CPLFF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and CPLFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CPLFF's competition here
TMNA vs PYPTF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, PYPTF has a market cap of 656.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while PYPTF trades at $9.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PYPTF's P/E ratio is 26.08. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PYPTF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and PYPTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PYPTF's competition here
TMNA vs FNCHF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, FNCHF has a market cap of 626.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while FNCHF trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNCHF's P/E ratio is -92.50. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FNCHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to FNCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check FNCHF's competition here
TMNA vs PRTHU Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, PRTHU has a market cap of 588.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while PRTHU trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRTHU's P/E ratio is -18.37. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRTHU's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to PRTHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check PRTHU's competition here
TMNA vs DYNDF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, DYNDF has a market cap of 528.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while DYNDF trades at $7.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DYNDF's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DYNDF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to DYNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check DYNDF's competition here
TMNA vs FMZNF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, FMZNF has a market cap of 489.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while FMZNF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMZNF's P/E ratio is -18.49. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FMZNF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and FMZNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FMZNF's competition here
TMNA vs TDCSF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, TDCSF has a market cap of 424.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while TDCSF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDCSF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TDCSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to TDCSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check TDCSF's competition here
TMNA vs SPMYY Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, SPMYY has a market cap of 363.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while SPMYY trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPMYY's P/E ratio is 111.67. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SPMYY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to SPMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check SPMYY's competition here
TMNA vs NFONF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, NFONF has a market cap of 357.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while NFONF trades at $21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NFONF's P/E ratio is -196.32. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NFONF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and NFONF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NFONF's competition here
TMNA vs CORZQ Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, CORZQ has a market cap of 343.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while CORZQ trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORZQ's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CORZQ's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to CORZQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check CORZQ's competition here
TMNA vs TYPMF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, TYPMF has a market cap of 305.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while TYPMF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TYPMF's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TYPMF's ROE of +2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to TYPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check TYPMF's competition here
TMNA vs FFPP Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, FFPP has a market cap of 247.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while FFPP trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FFPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to FFPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check FFPP's competition here
TMNA vs OTPMF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, OTPMF has a market cap of 243.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while OTPMF trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OTPMF's P/E ratio is 36.83. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OTPMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and OTPMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OTPMF's competition here
TMNA vs ABANF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, ABANF has a market cap of 240M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while ABANF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABANF's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABANF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to ABANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check ABANF's competition here
TMNA vs SERKF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, SERKF has a market cap of 215.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while SERKF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SERKF's P/E ratio is -15.91. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SERKF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and SERKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SERKF's competition here
TMNA vs HISNF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, HISNF has a market cap of 183.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while HISNF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HISNF's P/E ratio is 3.34. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HISNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to HISNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check HISNF's competition here
TMNA vs FSOYF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, FSOYF has a market cap of 170.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while FSOYF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSOYF's P/E ratio is -16.31. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FSOYF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to FSOYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check FSOYF's competition here
TMNA vs ERDLF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, ERDLF has a market cap of 165.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while ERDLF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERDLF's P/E ratio is -44.29. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ERDLF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and ERDLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ERDLF's competition here
TMNA vs SEEMF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, SEEMF has a market cap of 162M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while SEEMF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEEMF's P/E ratio is -3.31. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SEEMF's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to SEEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check SEEMF's competition here
TMNA vs GIVXF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, GIVXF has a market cap of 137.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while GIVXF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIVXF's P/E ratio is -107.45. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GIVXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and GIVXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GIVXF's competition here
TMNA vs CGAAY Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, CGAAY has a market cap of 136.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while CGAAY trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGAAY's P/E ratio is 2.79. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CGAAY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and CGAAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CGAAY's competition here
TMNA vs PYFRF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, PYFRF has a market cap of 133.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while PYFRF trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PYFRF's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PYFRF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and PYFRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PYFRF's competition here
TMNA vs WHEN Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, WHEN has a market cap of 110.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while WHEN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WHEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WHEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to WHEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check WHEN's competition here
TMNA vs FCLOF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, FCLOF has a market cap of 102.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while FCLOF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCLOF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FCLOF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and FCLOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FCLOF's competition here
TMNA vs HAIVF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, HAIVF has a market cap of 95.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while HAIVF trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAIVF's P/E ratio is -115.67. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HAIVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and HAIVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HAIVF's competition here
TMNA vs BGOPF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, BGOPF has a market cap of 83M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while BGOPF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGOPF's P/E ratio is -21.60. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BGOPF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and BGOPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BGOPF's competition here
TMNA vs DGGXF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, DGGXF has a market cap of 70.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while DGGXF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGGXF's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DGGXF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to DGGXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check DGGXF's competition here
TMNA vs CROTF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, CROTF has a market cap of 55.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while CROTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CROTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CROTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and CROTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CROTF's competition here
TMNA vs JGHG Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, JGHG has a market cap of 55.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while JGHG trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JGHG's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JGHG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and JGHG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JGHG's competition here
TMNA vs VRSSF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, VRSSF has a market cap of 55.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while VRSSF trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRSSF's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VRSSF's ROE of +3.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to VRSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check VRSSF's competition here
TMNA vs QBITF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, QBITF has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while QBITF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QBITF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QBITF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and QBITF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QBITF's competition here
TMNA vs NTTCF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, NTTCF has a market cap of 44.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while NTTCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTTCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NTTCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to NTTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check NTTCF's competition here
TMNA vs APGT Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, APGT has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while APGT trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APGT's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to APGT's ROE of +2.88%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to APGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check APGT's competition here
TMNA vs NOWVF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, NOWVF has a market cap of 37M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while NOWVF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOWVF's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NOWVF's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to NOWVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check NOWVF's competition here
TMNA vs SKKY Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, SKKY has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while SKKY trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKKY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SKKY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to SKKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check SKKY's competition here
TMNA vs CORZR Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, CORZR has a market cap of 34.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while CORZR trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORZR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CORZR's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and CORZR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CORZR's competition here
TMNA vs ISDCF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, ISDCF has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while ISDCF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISDCF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ISDCF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to ISDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check ISDCF's competition here
TMNA vs SDCH Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, SDCH has a market cap of 24M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while SDCH trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDCH's P/E ratio is -3.46. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SDCH's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to SDCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check SDCH's competition here
TMNA vs TFLM Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, TFLM has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while TFLM trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TFLM's P/E ratio is -200.00. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TFLM's ROE of +23.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to TFLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check TFLM's competition here
TMNA vs CLOQ Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, CLOQ has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while CLOQ trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLOQ's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CLOQ's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and CLOQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLOQ's competition here
TMNA vs POTTF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, POTTF has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while POTTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POTTF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to POTTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and POTTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check POTTF's competition here
TMNA vs CLPMF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, CLPMF has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while CLPMF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLPMF's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CLPMF's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to CLPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check CLPMF's competition here
TMNA vs SFIIF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, SFIIF has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while SFIIF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFIIF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SFIIF's ROE of -5.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to SFIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check SFIIF's competition here
TMNA vs CYBNY Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, CYBNY has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while CYBNY trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYBNY's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CYBNY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and CYBNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CYBNY's competition here
TMNA vs PLCKF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, PLCKF has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while PLCKF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLCKF's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PLCKF's ROE of +10.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to PLCKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check PLCKF's competition here
TMNA vs QFEEF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, QFEEF has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while QFEEF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QFEEF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QFEEF's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and QFEEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QFEEF's competition here
TMNA vs EPXGF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, EPXGF has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while EPXGF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPXGF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EPXGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and EPXGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EPXGF's competition here
TMNA vs DLTXF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, DLTXF has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while DLTXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLTXF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DLTXF's ROE of -21.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and DLTXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DLTXF's competition here
TMNA vs DSAIF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, DSAIF has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while DSAIF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSAIF's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DSAIF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and DSAIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DSAIF's competition here
TMNA vs DRKOF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, DRKOF has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while DRKOF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRKOF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DRKOF's ROE of +5.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and DRKOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DRKOF's competition here
TMNA vs IPNFF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, IPNFF has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while IPNFF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPNFF's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IPNFF's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to IPNFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check IPNFF's competition here
TMNA vs PKKFF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, PKKFF has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while PKKFF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PKKFF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PKKFF's ROE of -2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to PKKFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check PKKFF's competition here
TMNA vs ATCHW Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, ATCHW has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while ATCHW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATCHW's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and ATCHW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATCHW's competition here
TMNA vs DVPNF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, DVPNF has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while DVPNF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DVPNF's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DVPNF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and DVPNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DVPNF's competition here
TMNA vs NBVAF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, NBVAF has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while NBVAF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NBVAF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NBVAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to NBVAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check NBVAF's competition here
TMNA vs TGCB Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, TGCB has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while TGCB trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGCB's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TGCB's ROE of +3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to TGCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check TGCB's competition here
TMNA vs VENZF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, VENZF has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while VENZF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VENZF's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VENZF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to VENZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check VENZF's competition here
TMNA vs RKNEF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, RKNEF has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while RKNEF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RKNEF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RKNEF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to RKNEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check RKNEF's competition here
TMNA vs PKLBF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, PKLBF has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while PKLBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PKLBF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PKLBF's ROE of -2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and PKLBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PKLBF's competition here
TMNA vs OVTZ Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, OVTZ has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while OVTZ trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OVTZ's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OVTZ's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to OVTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check OVTZ's competition here
TMNA vs MODGF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, MODGF has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while MODGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MODGF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MODGF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and MODGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MODGF's competition here
TMNA vs SCYRF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, SCYRF has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while SCYRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCYRF's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SCYRF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and SCYRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCYRF's competition here
TMNA vs FOBIF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, FOBIF has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while FOBIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOBIF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FOBIF's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to FOBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check FOBIF's competition here
TMNA vs RIHT Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, RIHT has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while RIHT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIHT's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RIHT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to RIHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check RIHT's competition here
TMNA vs VISM Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, VISM has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while VISM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VISM's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VISM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to VISM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check VISM's competition here
TMNA vs MBLMF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, MBLMF has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while MBLMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBLMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MBLMF's ROE of +17.61%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and MBLMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MBLMF's competition here
TMNA vs KCRD Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, KCRD has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while KCRD trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KCRD's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KCRD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to KCRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check KCRD's competition here
TMNA vs TONR Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, TONR has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while TONR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TONR's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TONR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to TONR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check TONR's competition here
TMNA vs RCWDF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, RCWDF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while RCWDF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCWDF's P/E ratio is 0.54. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RCWDF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and RCWDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RCWDF's competition here
TMNA vs INOTF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, INOTF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while INOTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INOTF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INOTF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to INOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check INOTF's competition here
TMNA vs INAR Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, INAR has a market cap of 769.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while INAR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INAR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INAR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and INAR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INAR's competition here
TMNA vs MKTDF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, MKTDF has a market cap of 728.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while MKTDF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKTDF's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MKTDF's ROE of +220.95%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to MKTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check MKTDF's competition here
TMNA vs FUAPF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, FUAPF has a market cap of 712.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while FUAPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUAPF's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FUAPF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and FUAPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FUAPF's competition here
TMNA vs ITNF Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, ITNF has a market cap of 693.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while ITNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ITNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA is less volatile compared to ITNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMNA.Check ITNF's competition here
TMNA vs FSRDQ Comparison August 2025
TMNA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMNA stands at 122.8K. In comparison, FSRDQ has a market cap of 683.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TMNA is priced at $0.00, while FSRDQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSRDQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TMNA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FSRDQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TMNA and FSRDQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FSRDQ's competition here