Tele2 AB (publ)

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, DTEGY has a market cap of 178.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while DTEGY trades at $36.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas DTEGY's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DTEGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to DTEGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check DTEGY's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, DTEGF has a market cap of 175.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while DTEGF trades at $35.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas DTEGF's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DTEGF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to DTEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check DTEGF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, SFTBF has a market cap of 108.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while SFTBF trades at $75.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas SFTBF's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SFTBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to SFTBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check SFTBF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, SFTBY has a market cap of 108.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while SFTBY trades at $37.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas SFTBY's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SFTBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to SFTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check SFTBY's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, NTTYY has a market cap of 86.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while NTTYY trades at $26.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas NTTYY's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NTTYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to NTTYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check NTTYY's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, NPPXF has a market cap of 77.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while NPPXF trades at $0.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas NPPXF's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NPPXF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to NPPXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check NPPXF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, AMXVF has a market cap of 73.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while AMXVF trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas AMXVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMXVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to AMXVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check AMXVF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, SFBQF has a market cap of 70B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while SFBQF trades at $1.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas SFBQF's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SFBQF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to SFBQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check SFBQF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, KDDIY has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while KDDIY trades at $16.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas KDDIY's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KDDIY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to KDDIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check KDDIY's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, AMOVF has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while AMOVF trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas AMOVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMOVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to AMOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check AMOVF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, KDDIF has a market cap of 62.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while KDDIF trades at $16.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas KDDIF's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KDDIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to KDDIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check KDDIF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, CLLNY has a market cap of 51.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while CLLNY trades at $18.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas CLLNY's P/E ratio is 82.45. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CLLNY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to CLLNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check CLLNY's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, SGAPY has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while SGAPY trades at $30.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas SGAPY's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SGAPY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to SGAPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check SGAPY's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, SNGNF has a market cap of 47B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while SNGNF trades at $2.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas SNGNF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SNGNF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to SNGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check SNGNF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, FNCTF has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while FNCTF trades at $15.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas FNCTF's P/E ratio is 40.86. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNCTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to FNCTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check FNCTF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, TLGPY has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while TLGPY trades at $15.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas TLGPY's P/E ratio is 33.85. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TLGPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to TLGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check TLGPY's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, SCMWY has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while SCMWY trades at $69.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas SCMWY's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SCMWY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to SCMWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check SCMWY's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, SWZCF has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while SWZCF trades at $696.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas SWZCF's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SWZCF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to SWZCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check SWZCF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, TTRAF has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while TTRAF trades at $3.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas TTRAF's P/E ratio is 34.67. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TTRAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to TTRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check TTRAF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, AVIFY has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while AVIFY trades at $9.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas AVIFY's P/E ratio is 25.41. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AVIFY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to AVIFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check AVIFY's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, TEFOF has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while TEFOF trades at $5.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas TEFOF's P/E ratio is -31.62. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TEFOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to TEFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check TEFOF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, VODPF has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while VODPF trades at $1.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas VODPF's P/E ratio is -6.22. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VODPF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to VODPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check VODPF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, BTGOF has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while BTGOF trades at $2.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas BTGOF's P/E ratio is 19.07. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BTGOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to BTGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check BTGOF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, CTOWY has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while CTOWY trades at $11.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas CTOWY's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CTOWY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to CTOWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check CTOWY's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, TELNY has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while TELNY trades at $15.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas TELNY's P/E ratio is 21.24. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TELNY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to TELNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check TELNY's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, TELNF has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while TELNF trades at $15.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas TELNF's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TELNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to TELNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check TELNF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, CHWRF has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while CHWRF trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas CHWRF's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CHWRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to CHWRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check CHWRF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, RCIAF has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while RCIAF trades at $36.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas RCIAF's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RCIAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to RCIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check RCIAF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, KKPNF has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while KKPNF trades at $4.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas KKPNF's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KKPNF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to KKPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check KKPNF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, KKPNY has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while KKPNY trades at $4.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas KKPNY's P/E ratio is 21.05. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KKPNY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to KKPNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check KKPNY's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, AVIVF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while AVIVF trades at $5.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas AVIVF's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AVIVF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to AVIVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check AVIVF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, ELMUY has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while ELMUY trades at $27.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas ELMUY's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ELMUY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to ELMUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check ELMUY's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, AVIKF has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while AVIKF trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas AVIKF's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AVIKF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to AVIKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check AVIKF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, TLKMF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while TLKMF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas TLKMF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TLKMF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to TLKMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check TLKMF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, MTNOY has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while MTNOY trades at $8.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas MTNOY's P/E ratio is -28.53. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MTNOY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to MTNOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check MTNOY's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, VDMCY has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while VDMCY trades at $7.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas VDMCY's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VDMCY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to VDMCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check VDMCY's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, SJRWF has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while SJRWF trades at $30.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas SJRWF's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SJRWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to SJRWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check SJRWF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, TLSNF has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while TLSNF trades at $3.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas TLSNF's P/E ratio is 26.57. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TLSNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to TLSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check TLSNF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, HLTOY has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while HLTOY trades at $8.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas HLTOY's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HLTOY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to HLTOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check HLTOY's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, TLSNY has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while TLSNY trades at $7.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas TLSNY's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TLSNY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to TLSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check TLSNY's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, MTNOF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while MTNOF trades at $7.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas MTNOF's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MTNOF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to MTNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check MTNOF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, BCEPF has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while BCEPF trades at $13.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas BCEPF's P/E ratio is 5.44. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BCEPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to BCEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check BCEPF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, BECEF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while BECEF trades at $13.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas BECEF's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BECEF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to BECEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check BECEF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, HKTTY has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while HKTTY trades at $15.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas HKTTY's P/E ratio is 18.37. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HKTTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to HKTTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check HKTTY's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, TCPFF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while TCPFF trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas TCPFF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TCPFF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to TCPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check TCPFF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, HKTTF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while HKTTF trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas HKTTF's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HKTTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to HKTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check HKTTF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, VODAF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while VODAF trades at $5.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas VODAF's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VODAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to VODAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check VODAF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, TIAIY has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while TIAIY trades at $5.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas TIAIY's P/E ratio is -25.80. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TIAIY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to TIAIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check TIAIY's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, TIAOF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while TIAOF trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas TIAOF's P/E ratio is -23.50. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TIAOF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to TIAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check TIAOF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, AAFRF has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while AAFRF trades at $2.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas AAFRF's P/E ratio is 31.11. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AAFRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to AAFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check AAFRF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, BCPPF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while BCPPF trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas BCPPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BCPPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to BCPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check BCPPF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, TLTZF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while TLTZF trades at $14.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas TLTZF's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TLTZF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to TLTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check TLTZF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, BCEXF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while BCEXF trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas BCEXF's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BCEXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to BCEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check BCEXF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, DIGBF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while DIGBF trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas DIGBF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DIGBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to DIGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check DIGBF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, ELMUF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while ELMUF trades at $54.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas ELMUF's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ELMUF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to ELMUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check ELMUF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, TIAJF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while TIAJF trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas TIAJF's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TIAJF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to TIAJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check TIAJF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, FRTAY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while FRTAY trades at $18.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas FRTAY's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FRTAY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to FRTAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check FRTAY's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, TELDF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while TELDF trades at $2.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas TELDF's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TELDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to TELDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check TELDF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, SHNUF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while SHNUF trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas SHNUF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SHNUF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to SHNUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check SHNUF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, TELDY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while TELDY trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas TELDY's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TELDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to TELDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check TELDY's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, AARTY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while AARTY trades at $20.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas AARTY's P/E ratio is 33.58. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AARTY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to AARTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check AARTY's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, SOBKY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while SOBKY trades at $15.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas SOBKY's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SOBKY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to SOBKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check SOBKY's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, QBCAF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while QBCAF trades at $29.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas QBCAF's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QBCAF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to QBCAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check QBCAF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, QBCRF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while QBCRF trades at $28.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas QBCRF's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QBCRF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to QBCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check QBCRF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, MYTEF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while MYTEF trades at $1.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas MYTEF's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MYTEF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to MYTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check MYTEF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, HLTOF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while HLTOF trades at $15.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas HLTOF's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HLTOF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to HLTOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check HLTOF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, PCCWY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while PCCWY trades at $7.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas PCCWY's P/E ratio is -150.00. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PCCWY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to PCCWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check PCCWY's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, LBRDB has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while LBRDB trades at $63.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas LBRDB's P/E ratio is 10.06. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LBRDB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to LBRDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check LBRDB's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, MAXSF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while MAXSF trades at $0.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas MAXSF's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MAXSF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to MAXSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check MAXSF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, PCWLF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while PCWLF trades at $0.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas PCWLF's P/E ratio is -71.23. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PCWLF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to PCWLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check PCWLF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, AXXTF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while AXXTF trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas AXXTF's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AXXTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to AXXTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check AXXTF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, BZQIF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while BZQIF trades at $1.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas BZQIF's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BZQIF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to BZQIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check BZQIF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, BZQIY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while BZQIY trades at $9.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas BZQIY's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BZQIY's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to BZQIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check BZQIY's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, PTITF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while PTITF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas PTITF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PTITF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to PTITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check PTITF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, TKAGY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while TKAGY trades at $15.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas TKAGY's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TKAGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to TKAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check TKAGY's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, TRKNY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while TRKNY trades at $2.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas TRKNY's P/E ratio is 20.57. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TRKNY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to TRKNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check TRKNY's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, UDIRF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while UDIRF trades at $27.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas UDIRF's P/E ratio is -75.93. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UDIRF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to UDIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check UDIRF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, GTMEY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while GTMEY trades at $32.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas GTMEY's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GTMEY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to GTMEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check GTMEY's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, PHTCF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while PHTCF trades at $20.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas PHTCF's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PHTCF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to PHTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check PHTCF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, CUCSF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while CUCSF trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas CUCSF's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CUCSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to CUCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check CUCSF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, FRTAF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while FRTAF trades at $33.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas FRTAF's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FRTAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to FRTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check FRTAF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, TCMFF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while TCMFF trades at $1.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas TCMFF's P/E ratio is 92.50. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TCMFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to TCMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check TCMFF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, TFAOF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while TFAOF trades at $12.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas TFAOF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TFAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to TFAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check TFAOF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, IIJIF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while IIJIF trades at $20.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas IIJIF's P/E ratio is 26.85. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IIJIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to IIJIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check IIJIF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, IIJIY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while IIJIY trades at $37.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas IIJIY's P/E ratio is 25.06. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IIJIY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to IIJIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check IIJIY's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, BGAOF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while BGAOF trades at $9.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas BGAOF's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BGAOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to BGAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check BGAOF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, MICCF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while MICCF trades at $18.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas MICCF's P/E ratio is 70.96. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MICCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to MICCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check MICCF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, NZTCF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while NZTCF trades at $1.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas NZTCF's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NZTCF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to NZTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check NZTCF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, TACYY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while TACYY trades at $6.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas TACYY's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TACYY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to TACYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check TACYY's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, CUCSY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while CUCSY trades at $10.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas CUCSY's P/E ratio is 5.94. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CUCSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to CUCSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check CUCSY's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, TRKNF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while TRKNF trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas TRKNF's P/E ratio is 39.93. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TRKNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to TRKNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check TRKNF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, PTXKY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while PTXKY trades at $3.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas PTXKY's P/E ratio is 20.20. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PTXKY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to PTXKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check PTXKY's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, TLGHY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while TLGHY trades at $11.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas TLGHY's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TLGHY's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to TLGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check TLGHY's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, PTTWF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while PTTWF trades at $2.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas PTTWF's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PTTWF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to PTTWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check PTTWF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, SPKKY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while SPKKY trades at $7.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas SPKKY's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SPKKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to SPKKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check SPKKY's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, BGAOY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while BGAOY trades at $1.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas BGAOY's P/E ratio is 3.90. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BGAOY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is more volatile compared to BGAOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check BGAOY's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, GMOYF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while GMOYF trades at $24.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas GMOYF's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GMOYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to GMOYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check GMOYF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, CLCMF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while CLCMF trades at $2.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas CLCMF's P/E ratio is -3.63. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CLCMF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to CLCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check CLCMF's competition here

TLTZY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLTZY stands at 10.7B. In comparison, CHRUF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLTZY is priced at $7.84, while CHRUF trades at $5.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLTZY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas CHRUF's P/E ratio is -535.00. In terms of profitability, TLTZY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CHRUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TLTZY is less volatile compared to CHRUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLTZY.Check CHRUF's competition here