Talon Capital Corp. Warrants

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, VITSX has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while VITSX trades at $165.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VITSX's P/E ratio is 26.79. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VITSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to VITSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check VITSX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, VTSAX has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while VTSAX trades at $165.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTSAX's P/E ratio is 26.79. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTSAX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to VTSAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check VTSAX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, PMFLX has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while PMFLX trades at $10.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMFLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PMFLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to PMFLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check PMFLX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, OAKI has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while OAKI trades at $26.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OAKI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OAKI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to OAKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check OAKI's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, VOO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while VOO trades at $629.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOO's P/E ratio is 27.79. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VOO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to VOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check VOO's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, VFFSX has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while VFFSX trades at $338.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFFSX's P/E ratio is 27.60. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFFSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to VFFSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check VFFSX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, VFINX has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while VFINX trades at $638.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFINX's P/E ratio is 27.60. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFINX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to VFINX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check VFINX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, BCTK has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while BCTK trades at $24.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCTK's P/E ratio is 43.31. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BCTK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to BCTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check BCTK's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, IVV has a market cap of 756.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while IVV trades at $687.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVV's P/E ratio is 27.76. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IVV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to IVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check IVV's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, FXAIX has a market cap of 755.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while FXAIX trades at $240.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FXAIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FXAIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to FXAIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check FXAIX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, SPY has a market cap of 704.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while SPY trades at $684.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPY's P/E ratio is 27.76. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to SPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check SPY's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, VXUS has a market cap of 613.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while VXUS trades at $82.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VXUS's P/E ratio is 19.02. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VXUS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to VXUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check VXUS's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, VTIAX has a market cap of 607.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while VTIAX trades at $44.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTIAX's P/E ratio is 18.80. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTIAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to VTIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check VTIAX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, VTSNX has a market cap of 607.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while VTSNX trades at $179.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTSNX's P/E ratio is 18.80. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTSNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to VTSNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check VTSNX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, VTPSX has a market cap of 607.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while VTPSX trades at $179.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTPSX's P/E ratio is 18.80. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTPSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to VTPSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check VTPSX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, VTI has a market cap of 582.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while VTI trades at $338.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTI's P/E ratio is 26.95. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to VTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check VTI's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, BMOP has a market cap of 441.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while BMOP trades at $25.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BMOP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BMOP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to BMOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check BMOP's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, QQQ has a market cap of 415.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while QQQ trades at $603.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QQQ's P/E ratio is 32.73. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QQQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to QQQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check QQQ's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, VUG has a market cap of 355.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while VUG trades at $461.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUG's P/E ratio is 35.30. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to VUG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check VUG's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, VIGAX has a market cap of 351.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while VIGAX trades at $239.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIGAX's P/E ratio is 35.01. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIGAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to VIGAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check VIGAX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, VIIIX has a market cap of 338.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while VIIIX trades at $558.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIIIX's P/E ratio is 27.60. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIIIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to VIIIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check VIIIX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, VINIX has a market cap of 337.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while VINIX trades at $558.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VINIX's P/E ratio is 27.60. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VINIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to VINIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check VINIX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, VEA has a market cap of 291.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while VEA trades at $68.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEA's P/E ratio is 19.62. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to VEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check VEA's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, LACG has a market cap of 290.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while LACG trades at $10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LACG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LACG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to LACG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check LACG's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, VTMNX has a market cap of 288.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while VTMNX trades at $22.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTMNX's P/E ratio is 19.40. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTMNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to VTMNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check VTMNX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, VDIPX has a market cap of 288B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while VDIPX trades at $34.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDIPX's P/E ratio is 19.40. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDIPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to VDIPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check VDIPX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, VTMGX has a market cap of 287.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while VTMGX trades at $22.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTMGX's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTMGX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to VTMGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check VTMGX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, RGAGX has a market cap of 279.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while RGAGX trades at $79.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGAGX's P/E ratio is 29.22. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGAGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to RGAGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check RGAGX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, GAFFX has a market cap of 279.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while GAFFX trades at $79.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GAFFX's P/E ratio is 29.21. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GAFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to GAFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check GAFFX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, AGTHX has a market cap of 279.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while AGTHX trades at $79.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGTHX's P/E ratio is 29.20. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGTHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to AGTHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check AGTHX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, GFFFX has a market cap of 278.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while GFFFX trades at $79.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFFFX's P/E ratio is 29.21. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GFFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to GFFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check GFFFX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, GFAFX has a market cap of 276.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while GFAFX trades at $78.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFAFX's P/E ratio is 29.20. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GFAFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to GFAFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check GFAFX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, AFMBX has a market cap of 275.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while AFMBX trades at $38.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFMBX's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AFMBX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to AFMBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check AFMBX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, RLBGX has a market cap of 274.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while RLBGX trades at $39.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLBGX's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RLBGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to RLBGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check RLBGX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, ABALX has a market cap of 274.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while ABALX trades at $38.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABALX's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABALX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to ABALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check ABALX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, AMBFX has a market cap of 274.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while AMBFX trades at $38.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMBFX's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMBFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to AMBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check AMBFX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, BALFX has a market cap of 274.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while BALFX trades at $38.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BALFX's P/E ratio is 27.23. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BALFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to BALFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check BALFX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, RGABX has a market cap of 244.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while RGABX trades at $69.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGABX's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGABX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to RGABX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check RGABX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, RGAAX has a market cap of 239.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while RGAAX trades at $68.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGAAX's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGAAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to RGAAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check RGAAX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, GFACX has a market cap of 233.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while GFACX trades at $66.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFACX's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GFACX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to GFACX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check GFACX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, VTV has a market cap of 227.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while VTV trades at $206.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTV's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to VTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check VTV's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, ODIDX has a market cap of 217B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while ODIDX trades at $9.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ODIDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ODIDX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to ODIDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check ODIDX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, GRAG has a market cap of 216.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while GRAG trades at $10.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRAG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GRAG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to GRAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check GRAG's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, FCTDX has a market cap of 214B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while FCTDX trades at $20.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCTDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCTDX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to FCTDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check FCTDX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, VMCIX has a market cap of 203.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while VMCIX trades at $83.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMCIX's P/E ratio is 23.68. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VMCIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to VMCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check VMCIX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, VMCPX has a market cap of 203.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while VMCPX trades at $410.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMCPX's P/E ratio is 23.68. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VMCPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to VMCPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check VMCPX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, VIMAX has a market cap of 203.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while VIMAX trades at $376.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIMAX's P/E ratio is 23.68. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to VIMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check VIMAX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, VO has a market cap of 203.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while VO trades at $303.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VO's P/E ratio is 23.78. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to VO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check VO's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, MER-PK has a market cap of 196.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while MER-PK trades at $25.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MER-PK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MER-PK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to MER-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check MER-PK's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, AICCX has a market cap of 178.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while AICCX trades at $62.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AICCX's P/E ratio is 27.68. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AICCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to AICCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check AICCX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, AIVSX has a market cap of 178.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while AIVSX trades at $63.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIVSX's P/E ratio is 27.71. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AIVSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to AIVSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check AIVSX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, AICFX has a market cap of 178.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while AICFX trades at $63.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AICFX's P/E ratio is 27.70. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AICFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to AICFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check AICFX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, RICBX has a market cap of 178.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while RICBX trades at $62.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RICBX's P/E ratio is 27.68. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RICBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to RICBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check RICBX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, RICAX has a market cap of 178.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while RICAX trades at $62.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RICAX's P/E ratio is 27.68. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RICAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to RICAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check RICAX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, GLD has a market cap of 176.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while GLD trades at $459.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLD's P/E ratio is -49.87. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to GLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check GLD's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, FCNTX has a market cap of 175.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while FCNTX trades at $24.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCNTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCNTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to FCNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check FCNTX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, FCNKX has a market cap of 175.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while FCNKX trades at $24.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCNKX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCNKX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to FCNKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check FCNKX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, IEFA has a market cap of 174.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while IEFA trades at $97.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEFA's P/E ratio is 19.46. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEFA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to IEFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check IEFA's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, C-PN has a market cap of 173.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while C-PN trades at $29.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas C-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C-PN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to C-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check C-PN's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, VB has a market cap of 171.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while VB trades at $278.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VB's P/E ratio is 21.66. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to VB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check VB's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, VSCIX has a market cap of 170.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while VSCIX trades at $133.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSCIX's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSCIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to VSCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check VSCIX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, BLK has a market cap of 169.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while BLK trades at $1,081.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLK's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to BLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check BLK's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, ANWPX has a market cap of 166.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while ANWPX trades at $72.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANWPX's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANWPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to ANWPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check ANWPX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, CFNAX has a market cap of 166.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while CFNAX trades at $95.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFNAX's P/E ratio is 27.62. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFNAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to CFNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check CFNAX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, FINFX has a market cap of 166.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while FINFX trades at $95.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FINFX's P/E ratio is 27.63. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FINFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to FINFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check FINFX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, RFNCX has a market cap of 166.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while RFNCX trades at $95.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RFNCX's P/E ratio is 27.61. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RFNCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to RFNCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check RFNCX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, ANCFX has a market cap of 166.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while ANCFX trades at $95.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANCFX's P/E ratio is 27.62. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANCFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to ANCFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check ANCFX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, AFIFX has a market cap of 166.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while AFIFX trades at $95.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFIFX's P/E ratio is 27.62. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AFIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to AFIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check AFIFX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, RNPCX has a market cap of 165.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while RNPCX trades at $69.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNPCX's P/E ratio is 26.70. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RNPCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to RNPCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check RNPCX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, FNPFX has a market cap of 165.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while FNPFX trades at $72.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNPFX's P/E ratio is 26.72. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to FNPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check FNPFX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, RNPGX has a market cap of 165.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while RNPGX trades at $72.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNPGX's P/E ratio is 26.72. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RNPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to RNPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check RNPGX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, NPFFX has a market cap of 165.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while NPFFX trades at $71.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPFFX's P/E ratio is 26.70. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NPFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to NPFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check NPFFX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, FPMAX has a market cap of 155.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while FPMAX trades at $10.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FPMAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FPMAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to FPMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check FPMAX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, VWO has a market cap of 154.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while VWO trades at $57.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWO's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to VWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check VWO's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, VEMAX has a market cap of 151.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while VEMAX trades at $48.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEMAX's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to VEMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check VEMAX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, AWSHX has a market cap of 150.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while AWSHX trades at $67.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AWSHX's P/E ratio is 26.27. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AWSHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to AWSHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check AWSHX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, RWMFX has a market cap of 150.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while RWMFX trades at $67.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWMFX's P/E ratio is 26.28. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWMFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to RWMFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check RWMFX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, FWMIX has a market cap of 150.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while FWMIX trades at $67.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FWMIX's P/E ratio is 26.28. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FWMIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to FWMIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check FWMIX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, CWMAX has a market cap of 149.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while CWMAX trades at $67.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWMAX's P/E ratio is 26.27. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CWMAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to CWMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check CWMAX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, WSHFX has a market cap of 149.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while WSHFX trades at $66.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WSHFX's P/E ratio is 26.27. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSHFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to WSHFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check WSHFX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, WGIFX has a market cap of 148B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while WGIFX trades at $75.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WGIFX's P/E ratio is 24.49. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WGIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to WGIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check WGIFX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, WSHCX has a market cap of 147B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while WSHCX trades at $65.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WSHCX's P/E ratio is 26.24. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSHCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to WSHCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check WSHCX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, RWMBX has a market cap of 146.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while RWMBX trades at $65.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWMBX's P/E ratio is 26.25. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWMBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to RWMBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check RWMBX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, BX has a market cap of 145.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while BX trades at $125.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BX's P/E ratio is 31.25. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BX's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is less volatile compared to BX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check BX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, IEMG has a market cap of 141.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while IEMG trades at $74.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEMG's P/E ratio is 18.07. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEMG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to IEMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check IEMG's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, AGG has a market cap of 140.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while AGG trades at $100.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGG's P/E ratio is 128.71. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to AGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check AGG's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, AEPFX has a market cap of 140.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while AEPFX trades at $64.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEPFX's P/E ratio is 20.64. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to AEPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check AEPFX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, AEGFX has a market cap of 140.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while AEGFX trades at $64.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEGFX's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to AEGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check AEGFX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, RERHX has a market cap of 140.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while RERHX trades at $64.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RERHX's P/E ratio is 20.64. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RERHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to RERHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check RERHX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, RERGX has a market cap of 139.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while RERGX trades at $65.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RERGX's P/E ratio is 20.64. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RERGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to RERGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check RERGX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, AEPGX has a market cap of 139.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while AEPGX trades at $65.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEPGX's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to AEPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check AEPGX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, SWPPX has a market cap of 133.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while SWPPX trades at $17.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWPPX's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SWPPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to SWPPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check SWPPX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, VITAX has a market cap of 131B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while VITAX trades at $378.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VITAX's P/E ratio is 34.23. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VITAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to VITAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check VITAX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, VGT has a market cap of 130.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while VGT trades at $734.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGT's P/E ratio is 34.38. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to VGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check VGT's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, IWF has a market cap of 128.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while IWF trades at $450.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWF's P/E ratio is 35.19. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to IWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check IWF's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, NAESX has a market cap of 128.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while NAESX trades at $133.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAESX's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NAESX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to NAESX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check NAESX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, FSKAX has a market cap of 125.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while FSKAX trades at $189.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSKAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSKAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to FSKAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check FSKAX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, VTTHX has a market cap of 122.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while VTTHX trades at $28.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTTHX's P/E ratio is 22.68. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTTHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to VTTHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check VTTHX's competition here

TLNCW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLNCW stands at 11.8M. In comparison, VIG has a market cap of 121.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLNCW is priced at $0.46, while VIG trades at $227.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLNCW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIG's P/E ratio is 26.18. In terms of profitability, TLNCW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLNCW is more volatile compared to VIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLNCW.Check VIG's competition here