Telenet Group Holding NV
Telenet Group Holding NV (TLGHY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TLGHY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TLGHY | $11.70 | +42.86% | 2.7B | 12.45 | $0.94 | N/A |
| DTEGF | $36.92 | -0.46% | 180.9B | 12.35 | $2.99 | +2.73% |
| DTEGY | $36.73 | -0.08% | 180.2B | 12.30 | $2.99 | +2.70% |
| SFTBF | $103.93 | +5.04% | 148.1B | 19.68 | $5.28 | +0.29% |
| SFTBY | $51.83 | +4.73% | 148B | 19.68 | $2.64 | +0.18% |
| NTTYY | $27.65 | +0.30% | 92.5B | 13.79 | $2.02 | +2.26% |
| NPPXF | $0.96 | -12.73% | 81.6B | 12.33 | $0.08 | +3.27% |
| SFBQF | $1.62 | -2.41% | 77.4B | 23.21 | $0.07 | +19.81% |
| AMXVF | $1.05 | +7.14% | 73.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| KDDIY | $18.19 | +1.51% | 72.9B | 15.83 | $1.15 | +0.87% |
Stock Comparison
TLGHY vs DTEGF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DTEGF has a market cap of 180.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while DTEGF trades at $36.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas DTEGF's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to DTEGF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to DTEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check DTEGF's competition here
TLGHY vs DTEGY Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DTEGY has a market cap of 180.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while DTEGY trades at $36.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas DTEGY's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to DTEGY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to DTEGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check DTEGY's competition here
TLGHY vs SFTBF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SFTBF has a market cap of 148.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while SFTBF trades at $103.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas SFTBF's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to SFTBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to SFTBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check SFTBF's competition here
TLGHY vs SFTBY Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SFTBY has a market cap of 148B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while SFTBY trades at $51.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas SFTBY's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to SFTBY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to SFTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check SFTBY's competition here
TLGHY vs NTTYY Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NTTYY has a market cap of 92.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while NTTYY trades at $27.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas NTTYY's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to NTTYY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to NTTYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check NTTYY's competition here
TLGHY vs NPPXF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NPPXF has a market cap of 81.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while NPPXF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas NPPXF's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to NPPXF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to NPPXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check NPPXF's competition here
TLGHY vs SFBQF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SFBQF has a market cap of 77.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while SFBQF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas SFBQF's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to SFBQF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to SFBQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check SFBQF's competition here
TLGHY vs AMXVF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, AMXVF has a market cap of 73.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while AMXVF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas AMXVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to AMXVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to AMXVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check AMXVF's competition here
TLGHY vs KDDIY Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, KDDIY has a market cap of 72.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while KDDIY trades at $18.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas KDDIY's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to KDDIY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to KDDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check KDDIY's competition here
TLGHY vs KDDIF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, KDDIF has a market cap of 71B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while KDDIF trades at $17.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas KDDIF's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to KDDIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to KDDIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check KDDIF's competition here
TLGHY vs AMOVF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, AMOVF has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while AMOVF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas AMOVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to AMOVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY and AMOVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMOVF's competition here
TLGHY vs SGAPY Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SGAPY has a market cap of 54.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while SGAPY trades at $32.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas SGAPY's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to SGAPY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to SGAPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check SGAPY's competition here
TLGHY vs SNGNF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SNGNF has a market cap of 53.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while SNGNF trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas SNGNF's P/E ratio is 16.95. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to SNGNF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY and SNGNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SNGNF's competition here
TLGHY vs CLLNY Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CLLNY has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while CLLNY trades at $18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas CLLNY's P/E ratio is 82.30. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to CLLNY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to CLLNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check CLLNY's competition here
TLGHY vs FNCTF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FNCTF has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while FNCTF trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas FNCTF's P/E ratio is 41.85. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to FNCTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY and FNCTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FNCTF's competition here
TLGHY vs SWZCF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SWZCF has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while SWZCF trades at $740.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas SWZCF's P/E ratio is 23.26. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to SWZCF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY and SWZCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SWZCF's competition here
TLGHY vs SCMWY Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SCMWY has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while SCMWY trades at $73.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas SCMWY's P/E ratio is 23.24. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to SCMWY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to SCMWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check SCMWY's competition here
TLGHY vs TLGPY Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TLGPY has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while TLGPY trades at $16.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas TLGPY's P/E ratio is 27.02. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to TLGPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to TLGPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check TLGPY's competition here
TLGHY vs TTRAF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TTRAF has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while TTRAF trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas TTRAF's P/E ratio is 25.67. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to TTRAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to TTRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check TTRAF's competition here
TLGHY vs TEFOF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TEFOF has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while TEFOF trades at $5.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas TEFOF's P/E ratio is -35.22. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to TEFOF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY and TEFOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TEFOF's competition here
TLGHY vs VODPF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, VODPF has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while VODPF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas VODPF's P/E ratio is -6.56. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to VODPF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY and VODPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VODPF's competition here
TLGHY vs BTGOF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BTGOF has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while BTGOF trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas BTGOF's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to BTGOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY and BTGOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BTGOF's competition here
TLGHY vs CHWRF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CHWRF has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while CHWRF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas CHWRF's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to CHWRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY and CHWRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHWRF's competition here
TLGHY vs AVIFY Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, AVIFY has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while AVIFY trades at $7.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas AVIFY's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to AVIFY's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY and AVIFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AVIFY's competition here
TLGHY vs TELNY Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TELNY has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while TELNY trades at $16.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas TELNY's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to TELNY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to TELNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check TELNY's competition here
TLGHY vs TELNF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TELNF has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while TELNF trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas TELNF's P/E ratio is 22.33. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to TELNF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to TELNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check TELNF's competition here
TLGHY vs CTOWY Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CTOWY has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while CTOWY trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas CTOWY's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to CTOWY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to CTOWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check CTOWY's competition here
TLGHY vs KKPNY Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, KKPNY has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while KKPNY trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas KKPNY's P/E ratio is 21.45. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to KKPNY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to KKPNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check KKPNY's competition here
TLGHY vs RCIAF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, RCIAF has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while RCIAF trades at $36.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas RCIAF's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to RCIAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY and RCIAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RCIAF's competition here
TLGHY vs KKPNF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, KKPNF has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while KKPNF trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas KKPNF's P/E ratio is 22.04. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to KKPNF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to KKPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check KKPNF's competition here
TLGHY vs AVIVF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, AVIVF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while AVIVF trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas AVIVF's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to AVIVF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to AVIVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check AVIVF's competition here
TLGHY vs ELMUY Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ELMUY has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while ELMUY trades at $27.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas ELMUY's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to ELMUY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to ELMUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check ELMUY's competition here
TLGHY vs AVIKF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, AVIKF has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while AVIKF trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas AVIKF's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to AVIKF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to AVIKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check AVIKF's competition here
TLGHY vs TLKMF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TLKMF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while TLKMF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas TLKMF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to TLKMF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to TLKMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check TLKMF's competition here
TLGHY vs MTNOF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MTNOF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while MTNOF trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas MTNOF's P/E ratio is 40.43. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to MTNOF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY and MTNOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MTNOF's competition here
TLGHY vs VDMCY Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, VDMCY has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while VDMCY trades at $8.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas VDMCY's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to VDMCY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to VDMCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check VDMCY's competition here
TLGHY vs MTNOY Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MTNOY has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while MTNOY trades at $8.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas MTNOY's P/E ratio is 38.99. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to MTNOY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to MTNOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check MTNOY's competition here
TLGHY vs HLTOY Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, HLTOY has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while HLTOY trades at $9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas HLTOY's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to HLTOY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to HLTOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check HLTOY's competition here
TLGHY vs TLSNY Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TLSNY has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while TLSNY trades at $7.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas TLSNY's P/E ratio is 26.79. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to TLSNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to TLSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check TLSNY's competition here
TLGHY vs SJRWF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SJRWF has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while SJRWF trades at $30.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas SJRWF's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to SJRWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY and SJRWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SJRWF's competition here
TLGHY vs TLSNF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TLSNF has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while TLSNF trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas TLSNF's P/E ratio is 26.57. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to TLSNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY and TLSNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TLSNF's competition here
TLGHY vs TIAIY Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TIAIY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while TIAIY trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas TIAIY's P/E ratio is -12.83. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to TIAIY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to TIAIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check TIAIY's competition here
TLGHY vs BCEPF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BCEPF has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while BCEPF trades at $13.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas BCEPF's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to BCEPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to BCEPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check BCEPF's competition here
TLGHY vs BECEF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BECEF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while BECEF trades at $13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas BECEF's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to BECEF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to BECEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check BECEF's competition here
TLGHY vs TIAJF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TIAJF has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while TIAJF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas TIAJF's P/E ratio is -11.72. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to TIAJF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to TIAJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check TIAJF's competition here
TLGHY vs TCPFF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TCPFF has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while TCPFF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas TCPFF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to TCPFF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to TCPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check TCPFF's competition here
TLGHY vs TLTZY Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TLTZY has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while TLTZY trades at $8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas TLTZY's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to TLTZY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to TLTZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check TLTZY's competition here
TLGHY vs TLTZF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TLTZF has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while TLTZF trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas TLTZF's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to TLTZF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY and TLTZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TLTZF's competition here
TLGHY vs HKTTF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, HKTTF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while HKTTF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas HKTTF's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to HKTTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to HKTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check HKTTF's competition here
TLGHY vs TIAOF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TIAOF has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while TIAOF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas TIAOF's P/E ratio is -10.60. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to TIAOF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to TIAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check TIAOF's competition here
TLGHY vs VODAF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, VODAF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while VODAF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas VODAF's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to VODAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to VODAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check VODAF's competition here
TLGHY vs AAFRF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, AAFRF has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while AAFRF trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas AAFRF's P/E ratio is 33.50. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to AAFRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to AAFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check AAFRF's competition here
TLGHY vs HKTTY Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, HKTTY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while HKTTY trades at $13.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas HKTTY's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to HKTTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY and HKTTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HKTTY's competition here
TLGHY vs BCPPF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BCPPF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while BCPPF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas BCPPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to BCPPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY and BCPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCPPF's competition here
TLGHY vs BCEXF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BCEXF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while BCEXF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas BCEXF's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to BCEXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY and BCEXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCEXF's competition here
TLGHY vs LBRDB Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, LBRDB has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while LBRDB trades at $63.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas LBRDB's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to LBRDB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to LBRDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check LBRDB's competition here
TLGHY vs DIGBF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DIGBF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while DIGBF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas DIGBF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to DIGBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY and DIGBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DIGBF's competition here
TLGHY vs ELMUF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ELMUF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while ELMUF trades at $54.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas ELMUF's P/E ratio is 20.55. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to ELMUF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to ELMUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check ELMUF's competition here
TLGHY vs TELDF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TELDF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while TELDF trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas TELDF's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to TELDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to TELDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check TELDF's competition here
TLGHY vs SOBKY Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SOBKY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while SOBKY trades at $16.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas SOBKY's P/E ratio is 22.58. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to SOBKY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to SOBKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check SOBKY's competition here
TLGHY vs SHNUF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SHNUF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while SHNUF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas SHNUF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to SHNUF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to SHNUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check SHNUF's competition here
TLGHY vs TELDY Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TELDY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while TELDY trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas TELDY's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to TELDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to TELDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check TELDY's competition here
TLGHY vs AARTY Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, AARTY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while AARTY trades at $20.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas AARTY's P/E ratio is 33.58. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to AARTY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to AARTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check AARTY's competition here
TLGHY vs FRTAY Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FRTAY has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while FRTAY trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas FRTAY's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to FRTAY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to FRTAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check FRTAY's competition here
TLGHY vs QBCRF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, QBCRF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while QBCRF trades at $29.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas QBCRF's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to QBCRF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY and QBCRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QBCRF's competition here
TLGHY vs MYTEF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MYTEF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while MYTEF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas MYTEF's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to MYTEF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to MYTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check MYTEF's competition here
TLGHY vs QBCAF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, QBCAF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while QBCAF trades at $27.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas QBCAF's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to QBCAF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY and QBCAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QBCAF's competition here
TLGHY vs HLTOF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, HLTOF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while HLTOF trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas HLTOF's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to HLTOF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to HLTOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check HLTOF's competition here
TLGHY vs MAXSF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MAXSF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while MAXSF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas MAXSF's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to MAXSF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY and MAXSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MAXSF's competition here
TLGHY vs AXXTF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, AXXTF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while AXXTF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas AXXTF's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to AXXTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY and AXXTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AXXTF's competition here
TLGHY vs PCCWY Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PCCWY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while PCCWY trades at $6.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas PCCWY's P/E ratio is -134.80. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to PCCWY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to PCCWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check PCCWY's competition here
TLGHY vs PCWLF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PCWLF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while PCWLF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas PCWLF's P/E ratio is -68.13. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to PCWLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to PCWLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check PCWLF's competition here
TLGHY vs BZQIF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BZQIF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while BZQIF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas BZQIF's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to BZQIF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY and BZQIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BZQIF's competition here
TLGHY vs BZQIY Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BZQIY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while BZQIY trades at $9.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas BZQIY's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to BZQIY's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to BZQIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check BZQIY's competition here
TLGHY vs PTITF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PTITF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while PTITF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas PTITF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to PTITF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to PTITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check PTITF's competition here
TLGHY vs TRKNY Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TRKNY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while TRKNY trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas TRKNY's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to TRKNY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY and TRKNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TRKNY's competition here
TLGHY vs TKAGY Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TKAGY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while TKAGY trades at $15.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas TKAGY's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to TKAGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY and TKAGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TKAGY's competition here
TLGHY vs UDIRF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, UDIRF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while UDIRF trades at $27.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas UDIRF's P/E ratio is 33.75. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to UDIRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to UDIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check UDIRF's competition here
TLGHY vs GTMEY Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GTMEY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while GTMEY trades at $32.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas GTMEY's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to GTMEY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY and GTMEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GTMEY's competition here
TLGHY vs PHTCF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PHTCF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while PHTCF trades at $20.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas PHTCF's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to PHTCF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to PHTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check PHTCF's competition here
TLGHY vs CUCSY Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CUCSY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while CUCSY trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas CUCSY's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to CUCSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to CUCSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check CUCSY's competition here
TLGHY vs FRTAF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FRTAF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while FRTAF trades at $33.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas FRTAF's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to FRTAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to FRTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check FRTAF's competition here
TLGHY vs CUCSF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CUCSF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while CUCSF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas CUCSF's P/E ratio is 8.03. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to CUCSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY and CUCSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CUCSF's competition here
TLGHY vs TCMFF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TCMFF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while TCMFF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas TCMFF's P/E ratio is -19.44. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to TCMFF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY and TCMFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TCMFF's competition here
TLGHY vs TFAOF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TFAOF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while TFAOF trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas TFAOF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to TFAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY and TFAOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TFAOF's competition here
TLGHY vs IIJIF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, IIJIF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while IIJIF trades at $19.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas IIJIF's P/E ratio is 25.46. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to IIJIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY and IIJIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IIJIF's competition here
TLGHY vs IIJIY Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, IIJIY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while IIJIY trades at $37.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas IIJIY's P/E ratio is 24.45. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to IIJIY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY and IIJIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IIJIY's competition here
TLGHY vs BGAOF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BGAOF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while BGAOF trades at $9.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas BGAOF's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to BGAOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to BGAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check BGAOF's competition here
TLGHY vs PTXKY Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PTXKY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while PTXKY trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas PTXKY's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to PTXKY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY and PTXKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTXKY's competition here
TLGHY vs MICCF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MICCF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while MICCF trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas MICCF's P/E ratio is 70.96. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to MICCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY and MICCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MICCF's competition here
TLGHY vs TACYY Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TACYY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while TACYY trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas TACYY's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to TACYY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY and TACYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TACYY's competition here
TLGHY vs TRKNF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TRKNF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while TRKNF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas TRKNF's P/E ratio is 39.93. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to TRKNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to TRKNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check TRKNF's competition here
TLGHY vs BGAOY Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BGAOY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while BGAOY trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas BGAOY's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to BGAOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY and BGAOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BGAOY's competition here
TLGHY vs SPKKY Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SPKKY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while SPKKY trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas SPKKY's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to SPKKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to SPKKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check SPKKY's competition here
TLGHY vs PTTWF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PTTWF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while PTTWF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas PTTWF's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to PTTWF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to PTTWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check PTTWF's competition here
TLGHY vs GMOYF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GMOYF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while GMOYF trades at $24.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas GMOYF's P/E ratio is 23.29. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to GMOYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to GMOYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check GMOYF's competition here
TLGHY vs NZTCF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NZTCF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while NZTCF trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas NZTCF's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to NZTCF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY and NZTCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NZTCF's competition here
TLGHY vs CHRYY Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CHRYY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while CHRYY trades at $27.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas CHRYY's P/E ratio is -452.17. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to CHRYY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to CHRYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check CHRYY's competition here
TLGHY vs CHRUF Comparison August 2025
TLGHY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLGHY stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CHRUF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLGHY is priced at $11.70, while CHRUF trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLGHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas CHRUF's P/E ratio is -535.00. In terms of profitability, TLGHY's ROE is -1.05%, compared to CHRUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TLGHY is less volatile compared to CHRUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLGHY.Check CHRUF's competition here