Just Eat Takeaway.com N.V.
Just Eat Takeaway.com N.V. (TKWY.AS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TKWY.AS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TKWY.AS | €20.22 | +0.00% | 4B | -10.76 | -€1.88 | N/A |
| BLV.PA | €17.20 | +0.00% | 1.7B | -573.33 | -€0.03 | N/A |
| FNAC.PA | €35.25 | +0.14% | 1B | -15.86 | -€2.22 | +2.84% |
| FAST.AS | €21.55 | +0.00% | 419.5M | -12.54 | -€1.73 | N/A |
| TRACT.PA | €3.12 | -0.32% | 217.9M | -4.52 | -€0.69 | N/A |
| BBED.AS | €5.98 | -0.33% | 162.6M | 22.15 | €0.27 | +2.51% |
| ALVU.PA | €15.20 | -0.33% | 149.6M | 18.73 | €0.83 | +2.44% |
| CAFO.PA | €7.92 | +0.00% | 72.8M | 4.92 | €1.61 | N/A |
| SRP.PA | €0.59 | -6.94% | 69.8M | -4.05 | -€0.15 | N/A |
| CNV.PA | €0.09 | +0.00% | 32.2M | -0.35 | -€0.27 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TKWY.AS vs BLV.PA Comparison March 2026
TKWY.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKWY.AS stands at 4B. In comparison, BLV.PA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TKWY.AS is priced at €20.22, while BLV.PA trades at €17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKWY.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.76, whereas BLV.PA's P/E ratio is -573.33. In terms of profitability, TKWY.AS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BLV.PA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TKWY.AS is more volatile compared to BLV.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKWY.AS.Check BLV.PA's competition here
TKWY.AS vs FNAC.PA Comparison March 2026
TKWY.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKWY.AS stands at 4B. In comparison, FNAC.PA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TKWY.AS is priced at €20.22, while FNAC.PA trades at €35.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKWY.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.76, whereas FNAC.PA's P/E ratio is -15.86. In terms of profitability, TKWY.AS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to FNAC.PA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TKWY.AS is more volatile compared to FNAC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKWY.AS.Check FNAC.PA's competition here
TKWY.AS vs FAST.AS Comparison March 2026
TKWY.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKWY.AS stands at 4B. In comparison, FAST.AS has a market cap of 419.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TKWY.AS is priced at €20.22, while FAST.AS trades at €21.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKWY.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.76, whereas FAST.AS's P/E ratio is -12.54. In terms of profitability, TKWY.AS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to FAST.AS's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TKWY.AS is less volatile compared to FAST.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKWY.AS.Check FAST.AS's competition here
TKWY.AS vs TRACT.PA Comparison March 2026
TKWY.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKWY.AS stands at 4B. In comparison, TRACT.PA has a market cap of 217.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TKWY.AS is priced at €20.22, while TRACT.PA trades at €3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKWY.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.76, whereas TRACT.PA's P/E ratio is -4.52. In terms of profitability, TKWY.AS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TRACT.PA's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TKWY.AS is more volatile compared to TRACT.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKWY.AS.Check TRACT.PA's competition here
TKWY.AS vs BBED.AS Comparison March 2026
TKWY.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKWY.AS stands at 4B. In comparison, BBED.AS has a market cap of 162.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TKWY.AS is priced at €20.22, while BBED.AS trades at €5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKWY.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.76, whereas BBED.AS's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, TKWY.AS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BBED.AS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TKWY.AS is less volatile compared to BBED.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKWY.AS.Check BBED.AS's competition here
TKWY.AS vs ALVU.PA Comparison March 2026
TKWY.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKWY.AS stands at 4B. In comparison, ALVU.PA has a market cap of 149.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TKWY.AS is priced at €20.22, while ALVU.PA trades at €15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKWY.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.76, whereas ALVU.PA's P/E ratio is 18.73. In terms of profitability, TKWY.AS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ALVU.PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TKWY.AS is less volatile compared to ALVU.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKWY.AS.Check ALVU.PA's competition here
TKWY.AS vs CAFO.PA Comparison March 2026
TKWY.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKWY.AS stands at 4B. In comparison, CAFO.PA has a market cap of 72.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TKWY.AS is priced at €20.22, while CAFO.PA trades at €7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKWY.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.76, whereas CAFO.PA's P/E ratio is 4.92. In terms of profitability, TKWY.AS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CAFO.PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TKWY.AS is less volatile compared to CAFO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKWY.AS.Check CAFO.PA's competition here
TKWY.AS vs SRP.PA Comparison March 2026
TKWY.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKWY.AS stands at 4B. In comparison, SRP.PA has a market cap of 69.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TKWY.AS is priced at €20.22, while SRP.PA trades at €0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKWY.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.76, whereas SRP.PA's P/E ratio is -4.05. In terms of profitability, TKWY.AS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SRP.PA's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TKWY.AS is less volatile compared to SRP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKWY.AS.Check SRP.PA's competition here
TKWY.AS vs CNV.PA Comparison March 2026
TKWY.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKWY.AS stands at 4B. In comparison, CNV.PA has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TKWY.AS is priced at €20.22, while CNV.PA trades at €0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKWY.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.76, whereas CNV.PA's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, TKWY.AS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CNV.PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKWY.AS is less volatile compared to CNV.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKWY.AS.Check CNV.PA's competition here
TKWY.AS vs ALHUN.PA Comparison March 2026
TKWY.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKWY.AS stands at 4B. In comparison, ALHUN.PA has a market cap of 26.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TKWY.AS is priced at €20.22, while ALHUN.PA trades at €6.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKWY.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.76, whereas ALHUN.PA's P/E ratio is -36.32. In terms of profitability, TKWY.AS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ALHUN.PA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TKWY.AS is more volatile compared to ALHUN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKWY.AS.Check ALHUN.PA's competition here
TKWY.AS vs ALHRS.PA Comparison March 2026
TKWY.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKWY.AS stands at 4B. In comparison, ALHRS.PA has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TKWY.AS is priced at €20.22, while ALHRS.PA trades at €1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKWY.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.76, whereas ALHRS.PA's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, TKWY.AS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ALHRS.PA's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TKWY.AS is less volatile compared to ALHRS.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKWY.AS.Check ALHRS.PA's competition here
TKWY.AS vs PSAT.PA Comparison March 2026
TKWY.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKWY.AS stands at 4B. In comparison, PSAT.PA has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TKWY.AS is priced at €20.22, while PSAT.PA trades at €4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKWY.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.76, whereas PSAT.PA's P/E ratio is 15.03. In terms of profitability, TKWY.AS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to PSAT.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TKWY.AS is more volatile compared to PSAT.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKWY.AS.Check PSAT.PA's competition here
TKWY.AS vs ALX.AS Comparison March 2026
TKWY.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKWY.AS stands at 4B. In comparison, ALX.AS has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TKWY.AS is priced at €20.22, while ALX.AS trades at €1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKWY.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.76, whereas ALX.AS's P/E ratio is -38.25. In terms of profitability, TKWY.AS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ALX.AS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TKWY.AS is less volatile compared to ALX.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKWY.AS.Check ALX.AS's competition here
TKWY.AS vs ALVAP.PA Comparison March 2026
TKWY.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKWY.AS stands at 4B. In comparison, ALVAP.PA has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TKWY.AS is priced at €20.22, while ALVAP.PA trades at €3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKWY.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.76, whereas ALVAP.PA's P/E ratio is 4.73. In terms of profitability, TKWY.AS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ALVAP.PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TKWY.AS is less volatile compared to ALVAP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKWY.AS.Check ALVAP.PA's competition here
TKWY.AS vs ALUPG.PA Comparison March 2026
TKWY.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKWY.AS stands at 4B. In comparison, ALUPG.PA has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TKWY.AS is priced at €20.22, while ALUPG.PA trades at €1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKWY.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.76, whereas ALUPG.PA's P/E ratio is -7.92. In terms of profitability, TKWY.AS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ALUPG.PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TKWY.AS is more volatile compared to ALUPG.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKWY.AS.Check ALUPG.PA's competition here
TKWY.AS vs ALEMV.PA Comparison March 2026
TKWY.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKWY.AS stands at 4B. In comparison, ALEMV.PA has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, TKWY.AS is priced at €20.22, while ALEMV.PA trades at €0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKWY.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.76, whereas ALEMV.PA's P/E ratio is 4.54. In terms of profitability, TKWY.AS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ALEMV.PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TKWY.AS is less volatile compared to ALEMV.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKWY.AS.Check ALEMV.PA's competition here
TKWY.AS vs MLBBO.PA Comparison March 2026
TKWY.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKWY.AS stands at 4B. In comparison, MLBBO.PA has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TKWY.AS is priced at €20.22, while MLBBO.PA trades at €2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKWY.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.76, whereas MLBBO.PA's P/E ratio is 244.00. In terms of profitability, TKWY.AS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MLBBO.PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TKWY.AS is less volatile compared to MLBBO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKWY.AS.Check MLBBO.PA's competition here
TKWY.AS vs ALVIA.PA Comparison March 2026
TKWY.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKWY.AS stands at 4B. In comparison, ALVIA.PA has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TKWY.AS is priced at €20.22, while ALVIA.PA trades at €12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKWY.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.76, whereas ALVIA.PA's P/E ratio is 42.41. In terms of profitability, TKWY.AS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ALVIA.PA's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TKWY.AS is more volatile compared to ALVIA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKWY.AS.Check ALVIA.PA's competition here
TKWY.AS vs ALSPT.PA Comparison March 2026
TKWY.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKWY.AS stands at 4B. In comparison, ALSPT.PA has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TKWY.AS is priced at €20.22, while ALSPT.PA trades at €0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKWY.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.76, whereas ALSPT.PA's P/E ratio is -3.49. In terms of profitability, TKWY.AS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ALSPT.PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TKWY.AS is more volatile compared to ALSPT.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKWY.AS.Check ALSPT.PA's competition here
TKWY.AS vs MLCLP.PA Comparison March 2026
TKWY.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKWY.AS stands at 4B. In comparison, MLCLP.PA has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TKWY.AS is priced at €20.22, while MLCLP.PA trades at €2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKWY.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.76, whereas MLCLP.PA's P/E ratio is -68.67. In terms of profitability, TKWY.AS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MLCLP.PA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TKWY.AS is more volatile compared to MLCLP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKWY.AS.Check MLCLP.PA's competition here
TKWY.AS vs MLTRO.PA Comparison March 2026
TKWY.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKWY.AS stands at 4B. In comparison, MLTRO.PA has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TKWY.AS is priced at €20.22, while MLTRO.PA trades at €2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKWY.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.76, whereas MLTRO.PA's P/E ratio is -49.60. In terms of profitability, TKWY.AS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MLTRO.PA's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TKWY.AS is more volatile compared to MLTRO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKWY.AS.Check MLTRO.PA's competition here
TKWY.AS vs ALPHS.PA Comparison March 2026
TKWY.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKWY.AS stands at 4B. In comparison, ALPHS.PA has a market cap of 2K. Regarding current trading prices, TKWY.AS is priced at €20.22, while ALPHS.PA trades at €0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKWY.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.76, whereas ALPHS.PA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TKWY.AS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ALPHS.PA's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TKWY.AS is less volatile compared to ALPHS.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKWY.AS.Check ALPHS.PA's competition here
TKWY.AS vs GVNV.AS Comparison March 2026
TKWY.AS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKWY.AS stands at 4B. In comparison, GVNV.AS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TKWY.AS is priced at €20.22, while GVNV.AS trades at €28.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKWY.AS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.76, whereas GVNV.AS's P/E ratio is 20.09. In terms of profitability, TKWY.AS's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GVNV.AS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKWY.AS is less volatile compared to GVNV.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKWY.AS.Check GVNV.AS's competition here