Takuma Co., Ltd.
Takuma Co., Ltd. TKUMF Peers
See (TKUMF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TKUMF | $9.18 | N/A | 701.5M | 12.41 | $0.74 | +2.16% |
| KTWIF | $38.25 | N/A | 4.3B | 30.60 | $1.25 | +1.63% |
| KTWIY | $74.30 | -2.37% | 4.2B | 30.96 | $2.40 | N/A |
| UMICF | $13.42 | N/A | 3.2B | -1.62 | -$8.28 | +4.83% |
| UMICY | $3.22 | -3.95% | 3.1B | -1.57 | -$2.05 | +5.24% |
| MMNNF | $14.16 | N/A | 2.6B | 26.22 | $0.54 | +0.52% |
| ORGJF | $53.03 | N/A | 2.4B | 16.78 | $3.16 | +1.86% |
| CCVTF | $1.17 | N/A | 2.1B | 7.31 | $0.16 | +3.29% |
| HIZOF | $6.59 | -0.90% | 1.1B | 7.16 | $0.92 | +0.02% |
| MTWTF | $12.32 | N/A | 537.4M | 13.68 | $0.90 | +1.37% |
Stock Comparison
TKUMF vs KTWIF Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, KTWIF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while KTWIF trades at $38.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas KTWIF's P/E ratio is 30.60. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KTWIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF is less volatile compared to KTWIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKUMF.
TKUMF vs KTWIY Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, KTWIY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while KTWIY trades at $74.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas KTWIY's P/E ratio is 30.96. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KTWIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF is less volatile compared to KTWIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKUMF.
TKUMF vs UMICF Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, UMICF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while UMICF trades at $13.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas UMICF's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UMICF's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF is less volatile compared to UMICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKUMF.
TKUMF vs UMICY Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, UMICY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while UMICY trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas UMICY's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UMICY's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF is less volatile compared to UMICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKUMF.
TKUMF vs MMNNF Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, MMNNF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while MMNNF trades at $14.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas MMNNF's P/E ratio is 26.22. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MMNNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF and MMNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TKUMF vs ORGJF Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, ORGJF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while ORGJF trades at $53.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas ORGJF's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ORGJF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF is less volatile compared to ORGJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKUMF.
TKUMF vs CCVTF Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, CCVTF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while CCVTF trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas CCVTF's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CCVTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF and CCVTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TKUMF vs HIZOF Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, HIZOF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while HIZOF trades at $6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas HIZOF's P/E ratio is 7.16. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HIZOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF is less volatile compared to HIZOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKUMF.
TKUMF vs MTWTF Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, MTWTF has a market cap of 537.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while MTWTF trades at $12.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas MTWTF's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MTWTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF and MTWTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TKUMF vs PVARF Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, PVARF has a market cap of 423.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while PVARF trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas PVARF's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PVARF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF is less volatile compared to PVARF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKUMF.
TKUMF vs GRPRF Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, GRPRF has a market cap of 373.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while GRPRF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas GRPRF's P/E ratio is 38.38. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GRPRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF and GRPRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TKUMF vs ACTHF Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, ACTHF has a market cap of 148.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while ACTHF trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas ACTHF's P/E ratio is -6.34. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ACTHF's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF and ACTHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TKUMF vs MEEC Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, MEEC has a market cap of 72.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while MEEC trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas MEEC's P/E ratio is -75.00. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MEEC's ROE of -36.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF is less volatile compared to MEEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKUMF.
TKUMF vs SSHPF Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, SSHPF has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while SSHPF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas SSHPF's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SSHPF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF is less volatile compared to SSHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKUMF.
TKUMF vs EMFGF Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, EMFGF has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while EMFGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas EMFGF's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EMFGF's ROE of +385.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF is less volatile compared to EMFGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKUMF.
TKUMF vs SREMF Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, SREMF has a market cap of 28M. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while SREMF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas SREMF's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SREMF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF is less volatile compared to SREMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKUMF.
TKUMF vs BIRMF Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, BIRMF has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while BIRMF trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas BIRMF's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BIRMF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF and BIRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TKUMF vs PGTK Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, PGTK has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while PGTK trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas PGTK's P/E ratio is 3.77. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PGTK's ROE of -2.79%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF and PGTK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TKUMF vs SCAXF Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, SCAXF has a market cap of 25.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while SCAXF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas SCAXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SCAXF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF is less volatile compared to SCAXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKUMF.
TKUMF vs YEWTF Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, YEWTF has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while YEWTF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas YEWTF's P/E ratio is -7.60. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YEWTF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF is less volatile compared to YEWTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKUMF.
TKUMF vs TMGEF Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, TMGEF has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while TMGEF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas TMGEF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TMGEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF and TMGEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TKUMF vs INTWF Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, INTWF has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while INTWF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas INTWF's P/E ratio is -4.15. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INTWF's ROE of -3.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF and INTWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TKUMF vs AKCCF Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, AKCCF has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while AKCCF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas AKCCF's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AKCCF's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF is less volatile compared to AKCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKUMF.
TKUMF vs BNET Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, BNET has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while BNET trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas BNET's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BNET's ROE of +1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF and BNET have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TKUMF vs GRNWF Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, GRNWF has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while GRNWF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas GRNWF's P/E ratio is -7.03. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GRNWF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF and GRNWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TKUMF vs DOCKF Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, DOCKF has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while DOCKF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas DOCKF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DOCKF's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF is less volatile compared to DOCKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKUMF.
TKUMF vs ATGVF Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, ATGVF has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while ATGVF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas ATGVF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ATGVF's ROE of -9.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF is less volatile compared to ATGVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKUMF.
TKUMF vs DNDDF Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, DNDDF has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while DNDDF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas DNDDF's P/E ratio is -5.03. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DNDDF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF is less volatile compared to DNDDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKUMF.
TKUMF vs QUTIF Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, QUTIF has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while QUTIF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas QUTIF's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QUTIF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF and QUTIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TKUMF vs AETLF Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, AETLF has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while AETLF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas AETLF's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AETLF's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF and AETLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TKUMF vs COSLF Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, COSLF has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while COSLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas COSLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COSLF's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF is less volatile compared to COSLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKUMF.
TKUMF vs DCTIF Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, DCTIF has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while DCTIF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas DCTIF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DCTIF's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF and DCTIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TKUMF vs QWTR Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, QWTR has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while QWTR trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas QWTR's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QWTR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF and QWTR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TKUMF vs DRFS Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, DRFS has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while DRFS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas DRFS's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DRFS's ROE of -4.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF and DRFS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TKUMF vs GOGR Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, GOGR has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while GOGR trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas GOGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GOGR's ROE of +1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF is less volatile compared to GOGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKUMF.
TKUMF vs KNOS Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, KNOS has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while KNOS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas KNOS's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KNOS's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF is less volatile compared to KNOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKUMF.
TKUMF vs ENPRF Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, ENPRF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while ENPRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas ENPRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENPRF's ROE of -3.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF and ENPRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TKUMF vs MGON Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, MGON has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while MGON trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas MGON's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MGON's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF is less volatile compared to MGON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKUMF.
TKUMF vs OWUV Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, OWUV has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while OWUV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas OWUV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OWUV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF is less volatile compared to OWUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKUMF.
TKUMF vs RAKR Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, RAKR has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while RAKR trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas RAKR's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RAKR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF is less volatile compared to RAKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKUMF.
TKUMF vs EAWD Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, EAWD has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while EAWD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas EAWD's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EAWD's ROE of +3.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF and EAWD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TKUMF vs ATMFF Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, ATMFF has a market cap of 528K. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while ATMFF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas ATMFF's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ATMFF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF is less volatile compared to ATMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKUMF.
TKUMF vs LQWC Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, LQWC has a market cap of 480.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while LQWC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas LQWC's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LQWC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF is less volatile compared to LQWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKUMF.
TKUMF vs TGTMF Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, TGTMF has a market cap of 467.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while TGTMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas TGTMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TGTMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF is less volatile compared to TGTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKUMF.
TKUMF vs SFBE Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, SFBE has a market cap of 427.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while SFBE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas SFBE's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SFBE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF and SFBE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TKUMF vs GWTR Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, GWTR has a market cap of 343.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while GWTR trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas GWTR's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GWTR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF and GWTR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TKUMF vs TNKE Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, TNKE has a market cap of 265.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while TNKE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas TNKE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TNKE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF and TNKE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TKUMF vs EESH Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, EESH has a market cap of 110.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while EESH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas EESH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EESH's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF is less volatile compared to EESH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKUMF.
TKUMF vs PCTL Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, PCTL has a market cap of 80.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while PCTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas PCTL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PCTL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF and PCTL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TKUMF vs WTII Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, WTII has a market cap of 77K. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while WTII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas WTII's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WTII's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF and WTII have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TKUMF vs ESFS Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, ESFS has a market cap of 75.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while ESFS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas ESFS's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ESFS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF is less volatile compared to ESFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKUMF.
TKUMF vs MSBN Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, MSBN has a market cap of 53.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while MSBN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas MSBN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MSBN's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF is less volatile compared to MSBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKUMF.
TKUMF vs GLEC Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, GLEC has a market cap of 50K. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while GLEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas GLEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GLEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF and GLEC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TKUMF vs AKMYF Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, AKMYF has a market cap of 35.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while AKMYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas AKMYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AKMYF's ROE of +9.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF is less volatile compared to AKMYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKUMF.
TKUMF vs XLPI Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, XLPI has a market cap of 31.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while XLPI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas XLPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XLPI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF and XLPI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TKUMF vs ETII Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, ETII has a market cap of 26.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while ETII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas ETII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ETII's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF and ETII have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TKUMF vs WTNW Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, WTNW has a market cap of 24.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while WTNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas WTNW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WTNW's ROE of +2.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF and WTNW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TKUMF vs SINX Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, SINX has a market cap of 19K. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while SINX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas SINX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SINX's ROE of +2.98%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF is less volatile compared to SINX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKUMF.
TKUMF vs GCHK Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, GCHK has a market cap of 16.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while GCHK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas GCHK's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GCHK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF and GCHK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TKUMF vs UVFT Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, UVFT has a market cap of 13.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while UVFT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas UVFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UVFT's ROE of +1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF and UVFT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TKUMF vs PURA Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, PURA has a market cap of 11.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while PURA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas PURA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PURA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF is less volatile compared to PURA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKUMF.
TKUMF vs SMVS Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, SMVS has a market cap of 8.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while SMVS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas SMVS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SMVS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF and SMVS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TKUMF vs GRCO Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, GRCO has a market cap of 8.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while GRCO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas GRCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GRCO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF and GRCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TKUMF vs SYEV Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, SYEV has a market cap of 8K. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while SYEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas SYEV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SYEV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF and SYEV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TKUMF vs CGYV Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, CGYV has a market cap of 6.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while CGYV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas CGYV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CGYV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF and CGYV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TKUMF vs ROBXF Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, ROBXF has a market cap of 5.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while ROBXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas ROBXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ROBXF's ROE of +12.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF is less volatile compared to ROBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKUMF.
TKUMF vs GMEV Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, GMEV has a market cap of 5.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while GMEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas GMEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GMEV's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF and GMEV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TKUMF vs EMHI Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, EMHI has a market cap of 4K. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while EMHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas EMHI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EMHI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF and EMHI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TKUMF vs RENO Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, RENO has a market cap of 3.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while RENO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas RENO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RENO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF and RENO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TKUMF vs EAUI Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, EAUI has a market cap of 2.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while EAUI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas EAUI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EAUI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF and EAUI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TKUMF vs MPML Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, MPML has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while MPML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas MPML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MPML's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF and MPML have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TKUMF vs HTHL Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, HTHL has a market cap of 229. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while HTHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas HTHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HTHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF is less volatile compared to HTHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKUMF.
TKUMF vs FQCC Comparison
TKUMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKUMF stands at 701.5M. In comparison, FQCC has a market cap of 4. Regarding current trading prices, TKUMF is priced at $9.18, while FQCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas FQCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKUMF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FQCC's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TKUMF is less volatile compared to FQCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKUMF.