Takung Art Co., Ltd.
Takung Art Co., Ltd. TKAT Peers
See (TKAT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TKAT | $0.20 | +3.20% | 7M | -4.99 | -$0.04 | N/A |
| AMZN | $212.07 | -0.33% | 2.3T | 34.48 | $6.15 | N/A |
| BABA | $114.56 | -2.09% | 273.3B | 12.63 | $9.07 | +1.73% |
| PDD | $107.14 | -0.02% | 148.8B | 11.50 | $9.32 | N/A |
| MELI | $2,546.17 | +0.68% | 129.1B | 62.53 | $40.72 | N/A |
| SE | $155.82 | -1.56% | 92.2B | 108.97 | $1.43 | N/A |
| ORLY | $87.84 | -1.50% | 75.1B | 32.53 | $2.70 | N/A |
| CVNA | $315.50 | -2.31% | 67.6B | 109.55 | $2.88 | N/A |
| AZO | $3,488.59 | -2.49% | 58.4B | 23.63 | $147.64 | N/A |
| CPNG | $28.84 | -0.40% | 52.4B | 205.96 | $0.14 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TKAT vs AMZN Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while AMZN trades at $212.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 34.48. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs BABA Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 273.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while BABA trades at $114.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs PDD Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 148.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while PDD trades at $107.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to PDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs MELI Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 129.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while MELI trades at $2,546.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 62.53. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to MELI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs SE Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 92.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while SE trades at $155.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 108.97. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs ORLY Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 75.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while ORLY trades at $87.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 32.53. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs CVNA Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 67.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while CVNA trades at $315.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 109.55. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs AZO Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 58.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while AZO trades at $3,488.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs CPNG Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 52.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while CPNG trades at $28.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is 205.96. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CPNG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs JD Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 47.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while JD trades at $32.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs VIPS Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while VIPS trades at $14.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 7.72. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs EBAY Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while EBAY trades at $74.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs TSCO Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while TSCO trades at $52.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 26.27. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs ULTA Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while ULTA trades at $459.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 17.94. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs WSM Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while WSM trades at $158.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 18.35. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs CASY Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while CASY trades at $505.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 34.59. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs CHWY Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while CHWY trades at $42.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 46.85. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs GPC Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while GPC trades at $119.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs DKS Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while DKS trades at $185.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs BBY Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while BBY trades at $68.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs CART Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while CART trades at $43.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 28.51. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs GME Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while GME trades at $23.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 44.40. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs MUSA Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while MUSA trades at $406.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs FIVE Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while FIVE trades at $128.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 26.81. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs W Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, W has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while W trades at $50.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas W's P/E ratio is -17.67. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to W's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs BBWI Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while BBWI trades at $28.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs ETSY Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while ETSY trades at $53.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 38.44. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs GLBE Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while GLBE trades at $32.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is -86.76. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to GLBE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs RH Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while RH trades at $186.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 44.39. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to RH's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs ASO Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while ASO trades at $44.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs AAP Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while AAP trades at $46.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to AAP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs OZON Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while OZON trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to OZON's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is less volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs EYE Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while EYE trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is -72.03. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to EYE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs SVV Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while SVV trades at $10.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 73.36. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs RVLV Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while RVLV trades at $20.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 28.80. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs MNSO Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while MNSO trades at $17.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs WINA Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while WINA trades at $381.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 34.16. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to WINA's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs TA Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while TA trades at $86.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs EVGO Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while EVGO trades at $3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -9.20. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs RERE Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while RERE trades at $3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 35.44. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to RERE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs EVGOW Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, EVGOW has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while EVGOW trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas EVGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to EVGOW's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is less volatile compared to EVGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs OLPX Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while OLPX trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 76.00. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to OLPX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs YSG Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while YSG trades at $10.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -13.49. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is less volatile compared to YSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs TANNI Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while TANNI trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs TDUP Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 920M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while TDUP trades at $7.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -26.83. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs SBH Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 888.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while SBH trades at $8.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs HEPS Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 885.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while HEPS trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -19.68. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs WOOF Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 770M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while WOOF trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to WOOF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs OSTK Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while OSTK trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs LQDT Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 723.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while LQDT trades at $23.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 29.32. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs BBW Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 693.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while BBW trades at $52.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs HZO Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 540.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while HZO trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to HZO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs ODP Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 537.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while ODP trades at $17.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to ODP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs HNST Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 530.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while HNST trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is -240.75. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to HNST's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs ARKO Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 507.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while ARKO trades at $4.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 148.50. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs ZKH Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 501.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while ZKH trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -16.66. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs BNED Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 400M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while BNED trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to BNED's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs BYON Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 364.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while BYON trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to BYON's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs CHPT Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 332.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while CHPT trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs BWMX Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 329.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while BWMX trades at $8.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is -42.10. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs LE Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 321.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while LE trades at $10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 81.08. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to LE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs FLWS Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 312.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while FLWS trades at $4.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs FTCH Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while FTCH trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs NEGG Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 237.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while NEGG trades at $12.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -5.44. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to NEGG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is less volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs QRTEA Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs JMIA Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 199.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while JMIA trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs LOGC Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, LOGC has a market cap of 187.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while LOGC trades at $7.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas LOGC's P/E ratio is -9.26. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to LOGC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to LOGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs BZUN Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 153M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while BZUN trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is -6.02. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs VLTA Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while VLTA trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs BARK Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 144.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while BARK trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -4.49. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs AKA Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 132.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while AKA trades at $12.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -5.19. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs QRTEP Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs GOED Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while GOED trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs DADA Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 126.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while DADA trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs SPWH Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 125.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while SPWH trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs OCG Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, OCG has a market cap of 121.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while OCG trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas OCG's P/E ratio is -34.59. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to OCG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is less volatile compared to OCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs BARK-WT Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, BARK-WT has a market cap of 120.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while BARK-WT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas BARK-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to BARK-WT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to BARK-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs APRN Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while APRN trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs DIBS Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 97.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while DIBS trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -4.95. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs GRWG Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 60.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while GRWG trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs QVCGP Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 57.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while QVCGP trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs QRTEB Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is less volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs HOUR Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 50.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while HOUR trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 143.00. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs NHTC Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 49.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while NHTC trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is 108.19. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to NHTC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs CTIB Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while CTIB trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs PRTS Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 43.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while PRTS trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs BBBY Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while BBBY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to BBBY's ROE of +2.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is less volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs SSU Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while SSU trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs QVCGB Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, QVCGB has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while QVCGB trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas QVCGB's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to QVCGB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to QVCGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs BGFV Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 28.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while BGFV trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs CGTL Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while CGTL trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CGTL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is less volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs TLF Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while TLF trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is 2.05. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to TLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to TLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs KIRK Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 24M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while KIRK trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs QVCGA Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, QVCGA has a market cap of 21.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while QVCGA trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas QVCGA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to QVCGA's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to QVCGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs IPW Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, IPW has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while IPW trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas IPW's P/E ratio is -12.58. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to IPW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to IPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs JBDI Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while JBDI trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to JBDI's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs BOXD Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while BOXD trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is less volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs NVVEW Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, NVVEW has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while NVVEW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas NVVEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to NVVEW's ROE of -33.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is less volatile compared to NVVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.
TKAT vs MI Comparison
TKAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKAT stands at 7M. In comparison, MI has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TKAT is priced at $0.20, while MI trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.99, whereas MI's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, TKAT's ROE is -0.38%, compared to MI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TKAT is more volatile compared to MI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKAT.