Teijin Limited
Teijin Limited (TINLY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TINLY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TINLY | $8.18 | -5.54% | 1.6B | -3.07 | -$2.66 | +2.32% |
| HTHIF | $30.30 | -1.38% | 147.3B | 37.40 | $0.86 | +0.92% |
| MSBHF | $20.53 | -0.92% | 81.7B | 12.83 | $1.60 | +3.30% |
| MTSUY | $20.53 | -0.77% | 81.6B | 12.83 | $1.60 | +2.67% |
| ITOCF | $53.48 | -4.57% | 75.8B | 12.92 | $4.14 | +2.54% |
| ITOCY | $106.89 | -1.55% | 75.7B | 12.79 | $8.35 | N/A |
| HTHIY | $31.25 | +0.00% | 71.5B | 36.33 | $0.86 | +0.67% |
| MITSF | $21.81 | +2.61% | 62.7B | 10.43 | $2.09 | +3.11% |
| MITSY | $426.40 | -1.48% | 62B | 10.23 | $41.77 | +2.24% |
| CTPCF | $1.38 | +0.00% | 40.1B | 5.11 | $0.27 | +5.57% |
Stock Comparison
TINLY vs HTHIF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HTHIF has a market cap of 147.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while HTHIF trades at $30.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas HTHIF's P/E ratio is 37.40. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HTHIF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is less volatile compared to HTHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check HTHIF's competition here
TINLY vs MSBHF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MSBHF has a market cap of 81.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while MSBHF trades at $20.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas MSBHF's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MSBHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to MSBHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check MSBHF's competition here
TINLY vs MTSUY Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MTSUY has a market cap of 81.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while MTSUY trades at $20.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas MTSUY's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MTSUY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to MTSUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check MTSUY's competition here
TINLY vs ITOCF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ITOCF has a market cap of 75.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while ITOCF trades at $53.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas ITOCF's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ITOCF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to ITOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check ITOCF's competition here
TINLY vs ITOCY Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ITOCY has a market cap of 75.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while ITOCY trades at $106.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas ITOCY's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ITOCY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to ITOCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check ITOCY's competition here
TINLY vs HTHIY Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HTHIY has a market cap of 71.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while HTHIY trades at $31.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas HTHIY's P/E ratio is 36.33. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HTHIY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is less volatile compared to HTHIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check HTHIY's competition here
TINLY vs MITSF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MITSF has a market cap of 62.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while MITSF trades at $21.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas MITSF's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MITSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to MITSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check MITSF's competition here
TINLY vs MITSY Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MITSY has a market cap of 62B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while MITSY trades at $426.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas MITSY's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MITSY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to MITSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check MITSY's competition here
TINLY vs CTPCF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CTPCF has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while CTPCF trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas CTPCF's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CTPCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to CTPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check CTPCF's competition here
TINLY vs CTPCY Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CTPCY has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while CTPCY trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas CTPCY's P/E ratio is 4.77. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CTPCY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to CTPCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check CTPCY's competition here
TINLY vs MARUF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MARUF has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while MARUF trades at $20.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas MARUF's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MARUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is less volatile compared to MARUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check MARUF's competition here
TINLY vs MARUY Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MARUY has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while MARUY trades at $208.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas MARUY's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MARUY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to MARUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check MARUY's competition here
TINLY vs SSUMF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SSUMF has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while SSUMF trades at $26.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas SSUMF's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SSUMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to SSUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check SSUMF's competition here
TINLY vs SSUMY Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SSUMY has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while SSUMY trades at $26.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas SSUMY's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SSUMY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to SSUMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check SSUMY's competition here
TINLY vs PITAF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PITAF has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while PITAF trades at $21.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas PITAF's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PITAF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to PITAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check PITAF's competition here
TINLY vs CKHUY Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CKHUY has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while CKHUY trades at $6.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas CKHUY's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CKHUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to CKHUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check CKHUY's competition here
TINLY vs CKHUF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CKHUF has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while CKHUF trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas CKHUF's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CKHUF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to CKHUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check CKHUF's competition here
TINLY vs TYHOF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TYHOF has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while TYHOF trades at $18.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas TYHOF's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TYHOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to TYHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check TYHOF's competition here
TINLY vs HALMY Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HALMY has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while HALMY trades at $88.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas HALMY's P/E ratio is 41.93. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HALMY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to HALMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check HALMY's competition here
TINLY vs JMHLY Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JMHLY has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while JMHLY trades at $56.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas JMHLY's P/E ratio is -35.02. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JMHLY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to JMHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check JMHLY's competition here
TINLY vs HLMAF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HLMAF has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while HLMAF trades at $43.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas HLMAF's P/E ratio is 41.80. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HLMAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to HLMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check HLMAF's competition here
TINLY vs JARLF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JARLF has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while JARLF trades at $55.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas JARLF's P/E ratio is -34.22. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JARLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to JARLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check JARLF's competition here
TINLY vs GPOVY Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GPOVY has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while GPOVY trades at $14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas GPOVY's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GPOVY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to GPOVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check GPOVY's competition here
TINLY vs GPOVF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GPOVF has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while GPOVF trades at $6.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas GPOVF's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GPOVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to GPOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check GPOVF's competition here
TINLY vs KPELY Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KPELY has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while KPELY trades at $13.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas KPELY's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KPELY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to KPELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check KPELY's competition here
TINLY vs SWRAY Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SWRAY has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while SWRAY trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas SWRAY's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SWRAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to SWRAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check SWRAY's competition here
TINLY vs SWRAF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SWRAF has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while SWRAF trades at $8.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas SWRAF's P/E ratio is 22.54. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SWRAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to SWRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check SWRAF's competition here
TINLY vs KPELF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KPELF has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while KPELF trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas KPELF's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KPELF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to KPELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check KPELF's competition here
TINLY vs KHOLY Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KHOLY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while KHOLY trades at $21.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas KHOLY's P/E ratio is -153.64. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KHOLY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to KHOLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check KHOLY's competition here
TINLY vs SWRBF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SWRBF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while SWRBF trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas SWRBF's P/E ratio is 3.82. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SWRBF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to SWRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check SWRBF's competition here
TINLY vs SCRPF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SCRPF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while SCRPF trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas SCRPF's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SCRPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to SCRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check SCRPF's competition here
TINLY vs SEIBF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SEIBF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while SEIBF trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas SEIBF's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SEIBF's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to SEIBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check SEIBF's competition here
TINLY vs MYTHF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MYTHF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while MYTHF trades at $52.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas MYTHF's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MYTHF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is less volatile compared to MYTHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check MYTHF's competition here
TINLY vs MYTHY Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MYTHY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while MYTHY trades at $53.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas MYTHY's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MYTHY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to MYTHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check MYTHY's competition here
TINLY vs SKSUY Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SKSUY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while SKSUY trades at $85.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas SKSUY's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SKSUY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to SKSUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check SKSUY's competition here
TINLY vs FCODF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FCODF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while FCODF trades at $1,721.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas FCODF's P/E ratio is 116.90. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FCODF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to FCODF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check FCODF's competition here
TINLY vs SCVPF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SCVPF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while SCVPF trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas SCVPF's P/E ratio is 32.60. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SCVPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to SCVPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check SCVPF's competition here
TINLY vs HYUHF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HYUHF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while HYUHF trades at $27.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas HYUHF's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HYUHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to HYUHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check HYUHF's competition here
TINLY vs AYYLF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AYYLF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while AYYLF trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas AYYLF's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AYYLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to AYYLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check AYYLF's competition here
TINLY vs AYALY Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AYALY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while AYALY trades at $9.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas AYALY's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AYALY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to AYALY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check AYALY's competition here
TINLY vs SZHFF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SZHFF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while SZHFF trades at $27.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas SZHFF's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SZHFF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to SZHFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check SZHFF's competition here
TINLY vs FOSUY Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FOSUY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while FOSUY trades at $17.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas FOSUY's P/E ratio is -9.35. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FOSUY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to FOSUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check FOSUY's competition here
TINLY vs BJINF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BJINF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while BJINF trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas BJINF's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BJINF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to BJINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check BJINF's competition here
TINLY vs AKAAF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AKAAF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while AKAAF trades at $67.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas AKAAF's P/E ratio is 40.61. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AKAAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to AKAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check AKAAF's competition here
TINLY vs JGSHF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JGSHF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while JGSHF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas JGSHF's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JGSHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to JGSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check JGSHF's competition here
TINLY vs BDVSY Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BDVSY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while BDVSY trades at $26.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas BDVSY's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BDVSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to BDVSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check BDVSY's competition here
TINLY vs KHEXF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KHEXF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while KHEXF trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas KHEXF's P/E ratio is -22.96. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KHEXF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to KHEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check KHEXF's competition here
TINLY vs BDVSF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BDVSF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while BDVSF trades at $13.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas BDVSF's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BDVSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to BDVSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check BDVSF's competition here
TINLY vs ALFFF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ALFFF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while ALFFF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas ALFFF's P/E ratio is -74.00. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALFFF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is less volatile compared to ALFFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check ALFFF's competition here
TINLY vs KTERF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KTERF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while KTERF trades at $36.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas KTERF's P/E ratio is 48.78. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KTERF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to KTERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check KTERF's competition here
TINLY vs KINUF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KINUF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while KINUF trades at $21.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas KINUF's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KINUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is less volatile compared to KINUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check KINUF's competition here
TINLY vs FOSUF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FOSUF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while FOSUF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas FOSUF's P/E ratio is -6.86. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FOSUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to FOSUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check FOSUF's competition here
TINLY vs KBDCY Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KBDCY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while KBDCY trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas KBDCY's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KBDCY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is less volatile compared to KBDCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check KBDCY's competition here
TINLY vs SMGBF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SMGBF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while SMGBF trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas SMGBF's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMGBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to SMGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check SMGBF's competition here
TINLY vs NARRF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NARRF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while NARRF trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas NARRF's P/E ratio is -29.07. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NARRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to NARRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check NARRF's competition here
TINLY vs GULRF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GULRF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while GULRF trades at $8.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas GULRF's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GULRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to GULRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check GULRF's competition here
TINLY vs KBDCF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KBDCF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while KBDCF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas KBDCF's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KBDCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to KBDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check KBDCF's competition here
TINLY vs BLJZY Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BLJZY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while BLJZY trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas BLJZY's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BLJZY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is less volatile compared to BLJZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check BLJZY's competition here
TINLY vs GULRY Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GULRY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while GULRY trades at $15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas GULRY's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GULRY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to GULRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check GULRY's competition here
TINLY vs IWTNF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, IWTNF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while IWTNF trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas IWTNF's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IWTNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to IWTNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check IWTNF's competition here
TINLY vs SWRBY Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SWRBY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while SWRBY trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas SWRBY's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SWRBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to SWRBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check SWRBY's competition here
TINLY vs MMSMY Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MMSMY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while MMSMY trades at $7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas MMSMY's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MMSMY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to MMSMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check MMSMY's competition here
TINLY vs TINLF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TINLF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while TINLF trades at $9.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas TINLF's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TINLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to TINLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check TINLF's competition here
TINLY vs NLTBF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NLTBF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while NLTBF trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas NLTBF's P/E ratio is 22.34. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NLTBF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is less volatile compared to NLTBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check NLTBF's competition here
TINLY vs SGHIF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SGHIF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while SGHIF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas SGHIF's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SGHIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to SGHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check SGHIF's competition here
TINLY vs SGHIY Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SGHIY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while SGHIY trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas SGHIY's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SGHIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to SGHIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check SGHIY's competition here
TINLY vs CHCLY Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CHCLY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while CHCLY trades at $30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas CHCLY's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHCLY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is less volatile compared to CHCLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check CHCLY's competition here
TINLY vs NICFF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NICFF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while NICFF trades at $22.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas NICFF's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NICFF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to NICFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check NICFF's competition here
TINLY vs MPCFF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MPCFF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while MPCFF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas MPCFF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MPCFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to MPCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check MPCFF's competition here
TINLY vs XZJCF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XZJCF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while XZJCF trades at $22.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas XZJCF's P/E ratio is -18.09. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to XZJCF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to XZJCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check XZJCF's competition here
TINLY vs ALGGY Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ALGGY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while ALGGY trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas ALGGY's P/E ratio is 3.24. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALGGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to ALGGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check ALGGY's competition here
TINLY vs BNHUF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BNHUF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while BNHUF trades at $27.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas BNHUF's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BNHUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to BNHUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check BNHUF's competition here
TINLY vs GRGCF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GRGCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while GRGCF trades at $29.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas GRGCF's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GRGCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to GRGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check GRGCF's competition here
TINLY vs NSHBY Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NSHBY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while NSHBY trades at $13.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas NSHBY's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NSHBY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to NSHBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check NSHBY's competition here
TINLY vs SHMWF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SHMWF has a market cap of 779.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while SHMWF trades at $11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas SHMWF's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHMWF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to SHMWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check SHMWF's competition here
TINLY vs ALGGF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ALGGF has a market cap of 718.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while ALGGF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas ALGGF's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALGGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to ALGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check ALGGF's competition here
TINLY vs MTLZF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MTLZF has a market cap of 684M. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while MTLZF trades at $1,525.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas MTLZF's P/E ratio is 26.38. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MTLZF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to MTLZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check MTLZF's competition here
TINLY vs INDHF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, INDHF has a market cap of 601M. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while INDHF trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas INDHF's P/E ratio is 8.86. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INDHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is less volatile compared to INDHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check INDHF's competition here
TINLY vs KKRAF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KKRAF has a market cap of 544.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while KKRAF trades at $16.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas KKRAF's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KKRAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to KKRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check KKRAF's competition here
TINLY vs SBOX Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SBOX has a market cap of 523.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while SBOX trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas SBOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SBOX's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to SBOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check SBOX's competition here
TINLY vs CVVIF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CVVIF has a market cap of 436.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while CVVIF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas CVVIF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CVVIF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to CVVIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check CVVIF's competition here
TINLY vs BRYAF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BRYAF has a market cap of 402.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while BRYAF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas BRYAF's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRYAF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is less volatile compared to BRYAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check BRYAF's competition here
TINLY vs BEVFF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BEVFF has a market cap of 371.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while BEVFF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas BEVFF's P/E ratio is 19.97. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BEVFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to BEVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check BEVFF's competition here
TINLY vs CEEIF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CEEIF has a market cap of 266.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while CEEIF trades at $23.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas CEEIF's P/E ratio is 26.59. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CEEIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is less volatile compared to CEEIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check CEEIF's competition here
TINLY vs TJSCF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TJSCF has a market cap of 249.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while TJSCF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas TJSCF's P/E ratio is 3.32. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TJSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to TJSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check TJSCF's competition here
TINLY vs HGRVF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HGRVF has a market cap of 241.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while HGRVF trades at $7.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas HGRVF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HGRVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to HGRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check HGRVF's competition here
TINLY vs DMCHY Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DMCHY has a market cap of 203.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while DMCHY trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas DMCHY's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DMCHY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to DMCHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check DMCHY's competition here
TINLY vs YMAIF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, YMAIF has a market cap of 167.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while YMAIF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas YMAIF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YMAIF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is less volatile compared to YMAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check YMAIF's competition here
TINLY vs THAFF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, THAFF has a market cap of 164M. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while THAFF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas THAFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to THAFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to THAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check THAFF's competition here
TINLY vs JGSMY Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JGSMY has a market cap of 122.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while JGSMY trades at $6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas JGSMY's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JGSMY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is less volatile compared to JGSMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check JGSMY's competition here
TINLY vs ICBT Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ICBT has a market cap of 88.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while ICBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas ICBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ICBT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is less volatile compared to ICBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check ICBT's competition here
TINLY vs NOBGF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NOBGF has a market cap of 79.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while NOBGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas NOBGF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NOBGF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to NOBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check NOBGF's competition here
TINLY vs APTL Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, APTL has a market cap of 77.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while APTL trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas APTL's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to APTL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to APTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check APTL's competition here
TINLY vs RSDEF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RSDEF has a market cap of 77.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while RSDEF trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas RSDEF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RSDEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to RSDEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check RSDEF's competition here
TINLY vs ECSL Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ECSL has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while ECSL trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas ECSL's P/E ratio is -44.21. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ECSL's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is less volatile compared to ECSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check ECSL's competition here
TINLY vs GTII Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GTII has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while GTII trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas GTII's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GTII's ROE of -79.89%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is less volatile compared to GTII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check GTII's competition here
TINLY vs BNIGF Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BNIGF has a market cap of 50M. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while BNIGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas BNIGF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BNIGF's ROE of -1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is less volatile compared to BNIGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check BNIGF's competition here
TINLY vs PRTT Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PRTT has a market cap of 48.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while PRTT trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas PRTT's P/E ratio is -85.00. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PRTT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to PRTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check PRTT's competition here
TINLY vs CIBY Comparison July 2025
TINLY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TINLY stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CIBY has a market cap of 45M. Regarding current trading prices, TINLY is priced at $8.18, while CIBY trades at $1,800.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TINLY currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas CIBY's P/E ratio is -122.50. In terms of profitability, TINLY's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CIBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TINLY is more volatile compared to CIBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TINLY.Check CIBY's competition here