Tritent International Corp.
Tritent International Corp. (TICJ) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TICJ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TICJ | $0.05 | +0.00% | 1.9M | -0.05 | -$0.96 | N/A |
| HTHIF | $29.53 | +3.43% | 132.8B | 33.81 | $0.86 | +1.01% |
| MSBHF | $21.00 | +0.10% | 82.4B | 13.42 | $1.60 | +3.13% |
| MTSUY | $20.97 | +0.14% | 81.7B | 13.29 | $1.60 | +2.57% |
| ITOCY | $107.92 | +0.48% | 77.2B | 13.03 | $8.39 | N/A |
| ITOCF | $53.87 | -0.21% | 76.7B | 13.08 | $4.15 | +2.50% |
| HTHIY | $28.37 | -1.15% | 66.3B | 33.77 | $0.86 | +0.74% |
| MITSF | $21.50 | +1.18% | 64.3B | 10.71 | $2.09 | +3.03% |
| MITSY | $427.96 | -0.32% | 63.4B | 10.55 | $41.77 | +2.16% |
| CTPCF | $1.51 | +0.00% | 43.9B | 5.59 | $0.27 | +5.09% |
Stock Comparison
TICJ vs HTHIF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, HTHIF has a market cap of 132.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while HTHIF trades at $29.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HTHIF's P/E ratio is 33.81. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to HTHIF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ is less volatile compared to HTHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TICJ.Check HTHIF's competition here
TICJ vs MSBHF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, MSBHF has a market cap of 82.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while MSBHF trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MSBHF's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to MSBHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ is less volatile compared to MSBHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TICJ.Check MSBHF's competition here
TICJ vs MTSUY Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, MTSUY has a market cap of 81.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while MTSUY trades at $20.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MTSUY's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to MTSUY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ is less volatile compared to MTSUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TICJ.Check MTSUY's competition here
TICJ vs ITOCY Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ITOCY has a market cap of 77.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while ITOCY trades at $107.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ITOCY's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to ITOCY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ is less volatile compared to ITOCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TICJ.Check ITOCY's competition here
TICJ vs ITOCF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ITOCF has a market cap of 76.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while ITOCF trades at $53.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ITOCF's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to ITOCF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ is less volatile compared to ITOCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TICJ.Check ITOCF's competition here
TICJ vs HTHIY Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, HTHIY has a market cap of 66.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while HTHIY trades at $28.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HTHIY's P/E ratio is 33.77. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to HTHIY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ is less volatile compared to HTHIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TICJ.Check HTHIY's competition here
TICJ vs MITSF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, MITSF has a market cap of 64.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while MITSF trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MITSF's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to MITSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ is less volatile compared to MITSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TICJ.Check MITSF's competition here
TICJ vs MITSY Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, MITSY has a market cap of 63.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while MITSY trades at $427.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MITSY's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to MITSY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ is less volatile compared to MITSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TICJ.Check MITSY's competition here
TICJ vs CTPCF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CTPCF has a market cap of 43.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while CTPCF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CTPCF's P/E ratio is 5.59. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to CTPCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and CTPCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTPCF's competition here
TICJ vs CTPCY Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CTPCY has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while CTPCY trades at $7.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CTPCY's P/E ratio is 5.20. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to CTPCY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and CTPCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTPCY's competition here
TICJ vs MARUF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, MARUF has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while MARUF trades at $21.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MARUF's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to MARUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ is less volatile compared to MARUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TICJ.Check MARUF's competition here
TICJ vs MARUY Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, MARUY has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while MARUY trades at $213.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MARUY's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to MARUY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ is less volatile compared to MARUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TICJ.Check MARUY's competition here
TICJ vs SSUMY Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, SSUMY has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while SSUMY trades at $27.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SSUMY's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to SSUMY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ is less volatile compared to SSUMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TICJ.Check SSUMY's competition here
TICJ vs SSUMF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, SSUMF has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while SSUMF trades at $27.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SSUMF's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to SSUMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and SSUMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SSUMF's competition here
TICJ vs PITAF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, PITAF has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while PITAF trades at $21.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas PITAF's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to PITAF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and PITAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PITAF's competition here
TICJ vs CKHUY Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CKHUY has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while CKHUY trades at $6.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CKHUY's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to CKHUY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ is less volatile compared to CKHUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TICJ.Check CKHUY's competition here
TICJ vs CKHUF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CKHUF has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while CKHUF trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CKHUF's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to CKHUF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and CKHUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CKHUF's competition here
TICJ vs TYHOF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, TYHOF has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while TYHOF trades at $18.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TYHOF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to TYHOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and TYHOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TYHOF's competition here
TICJ vs HLMAF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, HLMAF has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while HLMAF trades at $43.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HLMAF's P/E ratio is 42.30. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to HLMAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ is less volatile compared to HLMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TICJ.Check HLMAF's competition here
TICJ vs HALMY Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, HALMY has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while HALMY trades at $88.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HALMY's P/E ratio is 43.01. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to HALMY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ is less volatile compared to HALMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TICJ.Check HALMY's competition here
TICJ vs JARLF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, JARLF has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while JARLF trades at $55.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas JARLF's P/E ratio is 168.18. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to JARLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and JARLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JARLF's competition here
TICJ vs JMHLY Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, JMHLY has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while JMHLY trades at $56.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas JMHLY's P/E ratio is 165.27. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to JMHLY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ is less volatile compared to JMHLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TICJ.Check JMHLY's competition here
TICJ vs GPOVY Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, GPOVY has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while GPOVY trades at $14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GPOVY's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to GPOVY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ is less volatile compared to GPOVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TICJ.Check GPOVY's competition here
TICJ vs GPOVF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, GPOVF has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while GPOVF trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GPOVF's P/E ratio is 24.63. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to GPOVF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and GPOVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GPOVF's competition here
TICJ vs KPELY Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, KPELY has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while KPELY trades at $13.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas KPELY's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to KPELY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ is less volatile compared to KPELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TICJ.Check KPELY's competition here
TICJ vs SWRAF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, SWRAF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while SWRAF trades at $8.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SWRAF's P/E ratio is 79.91. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to SWRAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and SWRAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SWRAF's competition here
TICJ vs SWRAY Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, SWRAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while SWRAY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SWRAY's P/E ratio is 79.55. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to SWRAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ is less volatile compared to SWRAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TICJ.Check SWRAY's competition here
TICJ vs KHOLY Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, KHOLY has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while KHOLY trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas KHOLY's P/E ratio is 729.63. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to KHOLY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ is less volatile compared to KHOLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TICJ.Check KHOLY's competition here
TICJ vs KPELF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, KPELF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while KPELF trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas KPELF's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to KPELF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and KPELF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KPELF's competition here
TICJ vs SWRBF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, SWRBF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while SWRBF trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SWRBF's P/E ratio is 3.85. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to SWRBF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and SWRBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SWRBF's competition here
TICJ vs SCRPF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, SCRPF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while SCRPF trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SCRPF's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to SCRPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and SCRPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCRPF's competition here
TICJ vs SEIBF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, SEIBF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while SEIBF trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SEIBF's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to SEIBF's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and SEIBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SEIBF's competition here
TICJ vs MYTHY Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, MYTHY has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while MYTHY trades at $56.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MYTHY's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to MYTHY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and MYTHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MYTHY's competition here
TICJ vs MYTHF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, MYTHF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while MYTHF trades at $52.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MYTHF's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to MYTHF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ is less volatile compared to MYTHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TICJ.Check MYTHF's competition here
TICJ vs SCVPF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, SCVPF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while SCVPF trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SCVPF's P/E ratio is 32.60. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to SCVPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and SCVPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCVPF's competition here
TICJ vs FCODF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, FCODF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while FCODF trades at $1,721.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas FCODF's P/E ratio is 117.62. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to FCODF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and FCODF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FCODF's competition here
TICJ vs SKSUY Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, SKSUY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while SKSUY trades at $85.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SKSUY's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to SKSUY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and SKSUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SKSUY's competition here
TICJ vs AYALY Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, AYALY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while AYALY trades at $11.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AYALY's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to AYALY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and AYALY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AYALY's competition here
TICJ vs HYUHF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, HYUHF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while HYUHF trades at $27.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HYUHF's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to HYUHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and HYUHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HYUHF's competition here
TICJ vs AYYLF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, AYYLF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while AYYLF trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AYYLF's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to AYYLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and AYYLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AYYLF's competition here
TICJ vs FOSUY Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, FOSUY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while FOSUY trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas FOSUY's P/E ratio is -9.46. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to FOSUY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and FOSUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FOSUY's competition here
TICJ vs AKAAF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, AKAAF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while AKAAF trades at $68.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AKAAF's P/E ratio is 41.72. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to AKAAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and AKAAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AKAAF's competition here
TICJ vs BJINF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BJINF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while BJINF trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BJINF's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to BJINF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and BJINF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BJINF's competition here
TICJ vs JGSHF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, JGSHF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while JGSHF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas JGSHF's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to JGSHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and JGSHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JGSHF's competition here
TICJ vs BDVSY Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BDVSY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while BDVSY trades at $25.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BDVSY's P/E ratio is 12.82. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to BDVSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ is less volatile compared to BDVSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TICJ.Check BDVSY's competition here
TICJ vs SZHFF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, SZHFF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while SZHFF trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SZHFF's P/E ratio is 6.16. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to SZHFF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and SZHFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SZHFF's competition here
TICJ vs BDVSF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BDVSF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while BDVSF trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BDVSF's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to BDVSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and BDVSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BDVSF's competition here
TICJ vs KHEXF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, KHEXF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while KHEXF trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas KHEXF's P/E ratio is -22.96. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to KHEXF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and KHEXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KHEXF's competition here
TICJ vs KTERF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, KTERF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while KTERF trades at $36.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas KTERF's P/E ratio is 48.78. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to KTERF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and KTERF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KTERF's competition here
TICJ vs ALFFF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ALFFF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while ALFFF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ALFFF's P/E ratio is -74.00. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to ALFFF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and ALFFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALFFF's competition here
TICJ vs FOSUF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, FOSUF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while FOSUF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas FOSUF's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to FOSUF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and FOSUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FOSUF's competition here
TICJ vs KINUF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, KINUF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while KINUF trades at $21.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas KINUF's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to KINUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and KINUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KINUF's competition here
TICJ vs KBDCY Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, KBDCY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while KBDCY trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas KBDCY's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to KBDCY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and KBDCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KBDCY's competition here
TICJ vs NARRF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, NARRF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while NARRF trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NARRF's P/E ratio is -29.07. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to NARRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and NARRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NARRF's competition here
TICJ vs SMGBF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, SMGBF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while SMGBF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SMGBF's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to SMGBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and SMGBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SMGBF's competition here
TICJ vs GULRF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, GULRF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while GULRF trades at $8.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GULRF's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to GULRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and GULRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GULRF's competition here
TICJ vs KBDCF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, KBDCF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while KBDCF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas KBDCF's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to KBDCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and KBDCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KBDCF's competition here
TICJ vs BLJZY Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BLJZY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while BLJZY trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BLJZY's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to BLJZY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and BLJZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BLJZY's competition here
TICJ vs MMSMY Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, MMSMY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while MMSMY trades at $9.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MMSMY's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to MMSMY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and MMSMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MMSMY's competition here
TICJ vs GULRY Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, GULRY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while GULRY trades at $15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GULRY's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to GULRY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and GULRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GULRY's competition here
TICJ vs IWTNF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, IWTNF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while IWTNF trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas IWTNF's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to IWTNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and IWTNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IWTNF's competition here
TICJ vs SWRBY Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, SWRBY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while SWRBY trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SWRBY's P/E ratio is 4.08. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to SWRBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and SWRBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SWRBY's competition here
TICJ vs SGHIF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, SGHIF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while SGHIF trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SGHIF's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to SGHIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and SGHIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SGHIF's competition here
TICJ vs TINLF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, TINLF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while TINLF trades at $9.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TINLF's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to TINLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and TINLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TINLF's competition here
TICJ vs TINLY Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, TINLY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while TINLY trades at $8.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TINLY's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to TINLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and TINLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TINLY's competition here
TICJ vs SGHIY Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, SGHIY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while SGHIY trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SGHIY's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to SGHIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and SGHIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SGHIY's competition here
TICJ vs NLTBF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, NLTBF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while NLTBF trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NLTBF's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to NLTBF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and NLTBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NLTBF's competition here
TICJ vs NICFF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, NICFF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while NICFF trades at $22.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NICFF's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to NICFF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and NICFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NICFF's competition here
TICJ vs MPCFF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, MPCFF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while MPCFF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MPCFF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to MPCFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and MPCFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MPCFF's competition here
TICJ vs CHCLY Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CHCLY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while CHCLY trades at $27.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CHCLY's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to CHCLY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and CHCLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHCLY's competition here
TICJ vs XZJCF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, XZJCF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while XZJCF trades at $22.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas XZJCF's P/E ratio is -18.09. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to XZJCF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and XZJCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XZJCF's competition here
TICJ vs GRGCF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, GRGCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while GRGCF trades at $31.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GRGCF's P/E ratio is 2.05. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to GRGCF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and GRGCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GRGCF's competition here
TICJ vs ALGGY Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ALGGY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while ALGGY trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ALGGY's P/E ratio is 3.08. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to ALGGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and ALGGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALGGY's competition here
TICJ vs BNHUF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BNHUF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while BNHUF trades at $27.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BNHUF's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to BNHUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and BNHUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BNHUF's competition here
TICJ vs NSHBY Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, NSHBY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while NSHBY trades at $13.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NSHBY's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to NSHBY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and NSHBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NSHBY's competition here
TICJ vs ALGGF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ALGGF has a market cap of 956.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while ALGGF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ALGGF's P/E ratio is 2.75. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to ALGGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and ALGGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALGGF's competition here
TICJ vs SHMWF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, SHMWF has a market cap of 758.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while SHMWF trades at $11.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SHMWF's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to SHMWF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and SHMWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHMWF's competition here
TICJ vs MTLZF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, MTLZF has a market cap of 684M. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while MTLZF trades at $1,525.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MTLZF's P/E ratio is 26.38. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to MTLZF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and MTLZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MTLZF's competition here
TICJ vs INDHF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, INDHF has a market cap of 601M. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while INDHF trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas INDHF's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to INDHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and INDHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INDHF's competition here
TICJ vs KKRAF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, KKRAF has a market cap of 544.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while KKRAF trades at $16.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas KKRAF's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to KKRAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and KKRAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KKRAF's competition here
TICJ vs SBOX Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, SBOX has a market cap of 523.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while SBOX trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SBOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to SBOX's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ is less volatile compared to SBOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TICJ.Check SBOX's competition here
TICJ vs CVVIF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CVVIF has a market cap of 436.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while CVVIF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CVVIF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to CVVIF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and CVVIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CVVIF's competition here
TICJ vs BRYAF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BRYAF has a market cap of 400M. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while BRYAF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BRYAF's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to BRYAF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and BRYAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BRYAF's competition here
TICJ vs BEVFF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BEVFF has a market cap of 382.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while BEVFF trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BEVFF's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to BEVFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and BEVFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BEVFF's competition here
TICJ vs THAFF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, THAFF has a market cap of 291.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while THAFF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas THAFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to THAFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and THAFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check THAFF's competition here
TICJ vs CEEIF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CEEIF has a market cap of 266.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while CEEIF trades at $23.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CEEIF's P/E ratio is 26.59. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to CEEIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and CEEIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CEEIF's competition here
TICJ vs TJSCF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, TJSCF has a market cap of 249.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while TJSCF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TJSCF's P/E ratio is 3.32. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to TJSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and TJSCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TJSCF's competition here
TICJ vs HGRVF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, HGRVF has a market cap of 241.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while HGRVF trades at $7.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HGRVF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to HGRVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and HGRVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HGRVF's competition here
TICJ vs DMCHY Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, DMCHY has a market cap of 203.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while DMCHY trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas DMCHY's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to DMCHY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and DMCHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DMCHY's competition here
TICJ vs YMAIF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, YMAIF has a market cap of 147.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while YMAIF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas YMAIF's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to YMAIF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and YMAIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YMAIF's competition here
TICJ vs JGSMY Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, JGSMY has a market cap of 122.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while JGSMY trades at $6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas JGSMY's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to JGSMY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and JGSMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JGSMY's competition here
TICJ vs ICBT Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ICBT has a market cap of 88.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while ICBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ICBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to ICBT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and ICBT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ICBT's competition here
TICJ vs NOBGF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, NOBGF has a market cap of 79.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while NOBGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NOBGF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to NOBGF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and NOBGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NOBGF's competition here
TICJ vs RSDEF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, RSDEF has a market cap of 77.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while RSDEF trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas RSDEF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to RSDEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and RSDEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RSDEF's competition here
TICJ vs APTL Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, APTL has a market cap of 73.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while APTL trades at $57.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas APTL's P/E ratio is 5.58. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to APTL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and APTL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check APTL's competition here
TICJ vs ECSL Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ECSL has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while ECSL trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ECSL's P/E ratio is -44.21. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to ECSL's ROE of +2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ is less volatile compared to ECSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TICJ.Check ECSL's competition here
TICJ vs GTII Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, GTII has a market cap of 57.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while GTII trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GTII's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to GTII's ROE of -79.89%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ is less volatile compared to GTII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TICJ.Check GTII's competition here
TICJ vs BNIGF Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BNIGF has a market cap of 49.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while BNIGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BNIGF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to BNIGF's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ and BNIGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BNIGF's competition here
TICJ vs CIBY Comparison August 2025
TICJ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TICJ stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CIBY has a market cap of 43.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TICJ is priced at $0.05, while CIBY trades at $1,750.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TICJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CIBY's P/E ratio is -119.10. In terms of profitability, TICJ's ROE is N/A, compared to CIBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TICJ is less volatile compared to CIBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TICJ.Check CIBY's competition here