Thomas Cook (India) Limited
Thomas Cook (India) Limited (THOMASCOOK.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (THOMASCOOK.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| THOMASCOOK.NS | ₹106.86 | +4.64% | 49.8B | 20.39 | ₹5.24 | +0.42% |
| TBOTEK.NS | ₹1,180.30 | +1.69% | 125.7B | 52.34 | ₹22.55 | N/A |
| THOMASCOOK.BO | ₹106.90 | +4.45% | 49.8B | 19.72 | ₹5.42 | +0.42% |
| EASEMYTRIP.BO | ₹8.01 | +0.50% | 29.1B | -29.67 | -₹0.27 | N/A |
| EASEMYTRIP.NS | ₹8.01 | +0.63% | 29.1B | -29.67 | -₹0.27 | N/A |
| YATRA.NS | ₹102.66 | +0.23% | 16.1B | 30.46 | ₹3.37 | N/A |
| YATRA.BO | ₹102.54 | +0.00% | 16.1B | 29.90 | ₹3.43 | N/A |
| BENARAS.BO | ₹9,645.10 | +1.47% | 12.5B | 28.57 | ₹337.59 | +0.26% |
| UPHOT.BO | ₹1,399.95 | +2.04% | 7.6B | 25.13 | ₹55.70 | N/A |
| SAYAJIHOTL.BO | ₹284.00 | +2.05% | 5B | -29.83 | -₹9.52 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
THOMASCOOK.NS vs TBOTEK.NS Comparison April 2026
THOMASCOOK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THOMASCOOK.NS stands at 49.8B. In comparison, TBOTEK.NS has a market cap of 125.7B. Regarding current trading prices, THOMASCOOK.NS is priced at ₹106.86, while TBOTEK.NS trades at ₹1,180.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THOMASCOOK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.39, whereas TBOTEK.NS's P/E ratio is 52.34. In terms of profitability, THOMASCOOK.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TBOTEK.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, THOMASCOOK.NS is more volatile compared to TBOTEK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THOMASCOOK.NS.Check TBOTEK.NS's competition here
THOMASCOOK.NS vs THOMASCOOK.BO Comparison April 2026
THOMASCOOK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THOMASCOOK.NS stands at 49.8B. In comparison, THOMASCOOK.BO has a market cap of 49.8B. Regarding current trading prices, THOMASCOOK.NS is priced at ₹106.86, while THOMASCOOK.BO trades at ₹106.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THOMASCOOK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.39, whereas THOMASCOOK.BO's P/E ratio is 19.72. In terms of profitability, THOMASCOOK.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to THOMASCOOK.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, THOMASCOOK.NS is more volatile compared to THOMASCOOK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THOMASCOOK.NS.Check THOMASCOOK.BO's competition here
THOMASCOOK.NS vs EASEMYTRIP.BO Comparison April 2026
THOMASCOOK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THOMASCOOK.NS stands at 49.8B. In comparison, EASEMYTRIP.BO has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, THOMASCOOK.NS is priced at ₹106.86, while EASEMYTRIP.BO trades at ₹8.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THOMASCOOK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.39, whereas EASEMYTRIP.BO's P/E ratio is -29.67. In terms of profitability, THOMASCOOK.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EASEMYTRIP.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, THOMASCOOK.NS is more volatile compared to EASEMYTRIP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THOMASCOOK.NS.Check EASEMYTRIP.BO's competition here
THOMASCOOK.NS vs EASEMYTRIP.NS Comparison April 2026
THOMASCOOK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THOMASCOOK.NS stands at 49.8B. In comparison, EASEMYTRIP.NS has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, THOMASCOOK.NS is priced at ₹106.86, while EASEMYTRIP.NS trades at ₹8.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THOMASCOOK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.39, whereas EASEMYTRIP.NS's P/E ratio is -29.67. In terms of profitability, THOMASCOOK.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EASEMYTRIP.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, THOMASCOOK.NS is more volatile compared to EASEMYTRIP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THOMASCOOK.NS.Check EASEMYTRIP.NS's competition here
THOMASCOOK.NS vs YATRA.NS Comparison April 2026
THOMASCOOK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THOMASCOOK.NS stands at 49.8B. In comparison, YATRA.NS has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, THOMASCOOK.NS is priced at ₹106.86, while YATRA.NS trades at ₹102.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THOMASCOOK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.39, whereas YATRA.NS's P/E ratio is 30.46. In terms of profitability, THOMASCOOK.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to YATRA.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, THOMASCOOK.NS is more volatile compared to YATRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THOMASCOOK.NS.Check YATRA.NS's competition here
THOMASCOOK.NS vs YATRA.BO Comparison April 2026
THOMASCOOK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THOMASCOOK.NS stands at 49.8B. In comparison, YATRA.BO has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, THOMASCOOK.NS is priced at ₹106.86, while YATRA.BO trades at ₹102.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THOMASCOOK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.39, whereas YATRA.BO's P/E ratio is 29.90. In terms of profitability, THOMASCOOK.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to YATRA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, THOMASCOOK.NS is more volatile compared to YATRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THOMASCOOK.NS.Check YATRA.BO's competition here
THOMASCOOK.NS vs BENARAS.BO Comparison April 2026
THOMASCOOK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THOMASCOOK.NS stands at 49.8B. In comparison, BENARAS.BO has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, THOMASCOOK.NS is priced at ₹106.86, while BENARAS.BO trades at ₹9,645.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THOMASCOOK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.39, whereas BENARAS.BO's P/E ratio is 28.57. In terms of profitability, THOMASCOOK.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BENARAS.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, THOMASCOOK.NS is more volatile compared to BENARAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THOMASCOOK.NS.Check BENARAS.BO's competition here
THOMASCOOK.NS vs UPHOT.BO Comparison April 2026
THOMASCOOK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THOMASCOOK.NS stands at 49.8B. In comparison, UPHOT.BO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, THOMASCOOK.NS is priced at ₹106.86, while UPHOT.BO trades at ₹1,399.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THOMASCOOK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.39, whereas UPHOT.BO's P/E ratio is 25.13. In terms of profitability, THOMASCOOK.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UPHOT.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, THOMASCOOK.NS is more volatile compared to UPHOT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THOMASCOOK.NS.Check UPHOT.BO's competition here
THOMASCOOK.NS vs SAYAJIHOTL.BO Comparison April 2026
THOMASCOOK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THOMASCOOK.NS stands at 49.8B. In comparison, SAYAJIHOTL.BO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, THOMASCOOK.NS is priced at ₹106.86, while SAYAJIHOTL.BO trades at ₹284.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THOMASCOOK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.39, whereas SAYAJIHOTL.BO's P/E ratio is -29.83. In terms of profitability, THOMASCOOK.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SAYAJIHOTL.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, THOMASCOOK.NS is more volatile compared to SAYAJIHOTL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THOMASCOOK.NS.Check SAYAJIHOTL.BO's competition here
THOMASCOOK.NS vs SINCLAIR.BO Comparison April 2026
THOMASCOOK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THOMASCOOK.NS stands at 49.8B. In comparison, SINCLAIR.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, THOMASCOOK.NS is priced at ₹106.86, while SINCLAIR.BO trades at ₹81.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THOMASCOOK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.39, whereas SINCLAIR.BO's P/E ratio is 30.14. In terms of profitability, THOMASCOOK.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SINCLAIR.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, THOMASCOOK.NS is more volatile compared to SINCLAIR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THOMASCOOK.NS.Check SINCLAIR.BO's competition here
THOMASCOOK.NS vs ESPIRE.BO Comparison April 2026
THOMASCOOK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THOMASCOOK.NS stands at 49.8B. In comparison, ESPIRE.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, THOMASCOOK.NS is priced at ₹106.86, while ESPIRE.BO trades at ₹279.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THOMASCOOK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.39, whereas ESPIRE.BO's P/E ratio is 43.73. In terms of profitability, THOMASCOOK.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ESPIRE.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, THOMASCOOK.NS is less volatile compared to ESPIRE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THOMASCOOK.NS.Check ESPIRE.BO's competition here
THOMASCOOK.NS vs EMERALL.BO Comparison April 2026
THOMASCOOK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THOMASCOOK.NS stands at 49.8B. In comparison, EMERALL.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, THOMASCOOK.NS is priced at ₹106.86, while EMERALL.BO trades at ₹192.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THOMASCOOK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.39, whereas EMERALL.BO's P/E ratio is -28.14. In terms of profitability, THOMASCOOK.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EMERALL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, THOMASCOOK.NS is less volatile compared to EMERALL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THOMASCOOK.NS.Check EMERALL.BO's competition here
THOMASCOOK.NS vs GRAVISSHO.BO Comparison April 2026
THOMASCOOK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THOMASCOOK.NS stands at 49.8B. In comparison, GRAVISSHO.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, THOMASCOOK.NS is priced at ₹106.86, while GRAVISSHO.BO trades at ₹31.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THOMASCOOK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.39, whereas GRAVISSHO.BO's P/E ratio is -313.20. In terms of profitability, THOMASCOOK.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GRAVISSHO.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, THOMASCOOK.NS is less volatile compared to GRAVISSHO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THOMASCOOK.NS.Check GRAVISSHO.BO's competition here
THOMASCOOK.NS vs SAVERA.BO Comparison April 2026
THOMASCOOK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THOMASCOOK.NS stands at 49.8B. In comparison, SAVERA.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, THOMASCOOK.NS is priced at ₹106.86, while SAVERA.BO trades at ₹166.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THOMASCOOK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.39, whereas SAVERA.BO's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, THOMASCOOK.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SAVERA.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, THOMASCOOK.NS is more volatile compared to SAVERA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THOMASCOOK.NS.Check SAVERA.BO's competition here
THOMASCOOK.NS vs PHOENIXTN.BO Comparison April 2026
THOMASCOOK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THOMASCOOK.NS stands at 49.8B. In comparison, PHOENIXTN.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, THOMASCOOK.NS is priced at ₹106.86, while PHOENIXTN.BO trades at ₹88.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THOMASCOOK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.39, whereas PHOENIXTN.BO's P/E ratio is 2.52. In terms of profitability, THOMASCOOK.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PHOENIXTN.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, THOMASCOOK.NS is less volatile compared to PHOENIXTN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THOMASCOOK.NS.Check PHOENIXTN.BO's competition here
THOMASCOOK.NS vs CHLLTD.BO Comparison April 2026
THOMASCOOK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THOMASCOOK.NS stands at 49.8B. In comparison, CHLLTD.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, THOMASCOOK.NS is priced at ₹106.86, while CHLLTD.BO trades at ₹31.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THOMASCOOK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.39, whereas CHLLTD.BO's P/E ratio is -7.25. In terms of profitability, THOMASCOOK.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHLLTD.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, THOMASCOOK.NS is less volatile compared to CHLLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THOMASCOOK.NS.Check CHLLTD.BO's competition here
THOMASCOOK.NS vs HBESD.BO Comparison April 2026
THOMASCOOK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THOMASCOOK.NS stands at 49.8B. In comparison, HBESD.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, THOMASCOOK.NS is priced at ₹106.86, while HBESD.BO trades at ₹69.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THOMASCOOK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.39, whereas HBESD.BO's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, THOMASCOOK.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBESD.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, THOMASCOOK.NS is less volatile compared to HBESD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THOMASCOOK.NS.Check HBESD.BO's competition here
THOMASCOOK.NS vs GUJHOTE.BO Comparison April 2026
THOMASCOOK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THOMASCOOK.NS stands at 49.8B. In comparison, GUJHOTE.BO has a market cap of 699M. Regarding current trading prices, THOMASCOOK.NS is priced at ₹106.86, while GUJHOTE.BO trades at ₹184.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THOMASCOOK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.39, whereas GUJHOTE.BO's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, THOMASCOOK.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GUJHOTE.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, THOMASCOOK.NS is more volatile compared to GUJHOTE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THOMASCOOK.NS.Check GUJHOTE.BO's competition here
THOMASCOOK.NS vs RAYALEMA.BO Comparison April 2026
THOMASCOOK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THOMASCOOK.NS stands at 49.8B. In comparison, RAYALEMA.BO has a market cap of 595M. Regarding current trading prices, THOMASCOOK.NS is priced at ₹106.86, while RAYALEMA.BO trades at ₹30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THOMASCOOK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.39, whereas RAYALEMA.BO's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, THOMASCOOK.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RAYALEMA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, THOMASCOOK.NS is less volatile compared to RAYALEMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THOMASCOOK.NS.Check RAYALEMA.BO's competition here
THOMASCOOK.NS vs JINDHOT.BO Comparison April 2026
THOMASCOOK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THOMASCOOK.NS stands at 49.8B. In comparison, JINDHOT.BO has a market cap of 441M. Regarding current trading prices, THOMASCOOK.NS is priced at ₹106.86, while JINDHOT.BO trades at ₹63.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THOMASCOOK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.39, whereas JINDHOT.BO's P/E ratio is 62.38. In terms of profitability, THOMASCOOK.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JINDHOT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, THOMASCOOK.NS is more volatile compared to JINDHOT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THOMASCOOK.NS.Check JINDHOT.BO's competition here
THOMASCOOK.NS vs PGCRL.BO Comparison April 2026
THOMASCOOK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THOMASCOOK.NS stands at 49.8B. In comparison, PGCRL.BO has a market cap of 340M. Regarding current trading prices, THOMASCOOK.NS is priced at ₹106.86, while PGCRL.BO trades at ₹127.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THOMASCOOK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.39, whereas PGCRL.BO's P/E ratio is -141.11. In terms of profitability, THOMASCOOK.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PGCRL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, THOMASCOOK.NS is less volatile compared to PGCRL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THOMASCOOK.NS.Check PGCRL.BO's competition here
THOMASCOOK.NS vs PECOS.BO Comparison April 2026
THOMASCOOK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THOMASCOOK.NS stands at 49.8B. In comparison, PECOS.BO has a market cap of 328.8M. Regarding current trading prices, THOMASCOOK.NS is priced at ₹106.86, while PECOS.BO trades at ₹251.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THOMASCOOK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.39, whereas PECOS.BO's P/E ratio is 24.61. In terms of profitability, THOMASCOOK.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PECOS.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, THOMASCOOK.NS is more volatile compared to PECOS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THOMASCOOK.NS.Check PECOS.BO's competition here
THOMASCOOK.NS vs COX&KINGS.NS Comparison April 2026
THOMASCOOK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THOMASCOOK.NS stands at 49.8B. In comparison, COX&KINGS.NS has a market cap of 309M. Regarding current trading prices, THOMASCOOK.NS is priced at ₹106.86, while COX&KINGS.NS trades at ₹1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THOMASCOOK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.39, whereas COX&KINGS.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THOMASCOOK.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to COX&KINGS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, THOMASCOOK.NS is more volatile compared to COX&KINGS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THOMASCOOK.NS.Check COX&KINGS.NS's competition here
THOMASCOOK.NS vs ARUNAHTEL.BO Comparison April 2026
THOMASCOOK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THOMASCOOK.NS stands at 49.8B. In comparison, ARUNAHTEL.BO has a market cap of 271.5M. Regarding current trading prices, THOMASCOOK.NS is priced at ₹106.86, while ARUNAHTEL.BO trades at ₹8.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THOMASCOOK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.39, whereas ARUNAHTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 6.02. In terms of profitability, THOMASCOOK.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARUNAHTEL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, THOMASCOOK.NS is less volatile compared to ARUNAHTEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THOMASCOOK.NS.Check ARUNAHTEL.BO's competition here
THOMASCOOK.NS vs RELIABVEN.BO Comparison April 2026
THOMASCOOK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THOMASCOOK.NS stands at 49.8B. In comparison, RELIABVEN.BO has a market cap of 253.5M. Regarding current trading prices, THOMASCOOK.NS is priced at ₹106.86, while RELIABVEN.BO trades at ₹23.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THOMASCOOK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.39, whereas RELIABVEN.BO's P/E ratio is 164.43. In terms of profitability, THOMASCOOK.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RELIABVEN.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, THOMASCOOK.NS is less volatile compared to RELIABVEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THOMASCOOK.NS.Check RELIABVEN.BO's competition here
THOMASCOOK.NS vs HOWARHO.BO Comparison April 2026
THOMASCOOK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THOMASCOOK.NS stands at 49.8B. In comparison, HOWARHO.BO has a market cap of 226.8M. Regarding current trading prices, THOMASCOOK.NS is priced at ₹106.86, while HOWARHO.BO trades at ₹24.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THOMASCOOK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.39, whereas HOWARHO.BO's P/E ratio is 50.80. In terms of profitability, THOMASCOOK.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HOWARHO.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, THOMASCOOK.NS is less volatile compared to HOWARHO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THOMASCOOK.NS.Check HOWARHO.BO's competition here
THOMASCOOK.NS vs VELHO.BO Comparison April 2026
THOMASCOOK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THOMASCOOK.NS stands at 49.8B. In comparison, VELHO.BO has a market cap of 207.1M. Regarding current trading prices, THOMASCOOK.NS is priced at ₹106.86, while VELHO.BO trades at ₹6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THOMASCOOK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.39, whereas VELHO.BO's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, THOMASCOOK.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VELHO.BO's ROE of +2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, THOMASCOOK.NS is less volatile compared to VELHO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THOMASCOOK.NS.Check VELHO.BO's competition here
THOMASCOOK.NS vs BESTEAST.BO Comparison April 2026
THOMASCOOK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THOMASCOOK.NS stands at 49.8B. In comparison, BESTEAST.BO has a market cap of 206.2M. Regarding current trading prices, THOMASCOOK.NS is priced at ₹106.86, while BESTEAST.BO trades at ₹12.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THOMASCOOK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.39, whereas BESTEAST.BO's P/E ratio is -244.80. In terms of profitability, THOMASCOOK.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BESTEAST.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, THOMASCOOK.NS is less volatile compared to BESTEAST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THOMASCOOK.NS.Check BESTEAST.BO's competition here
THOMASCOOK.NS vs POLOHOT.BO Comparison April 2026
THOMASCOOK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THOMASCOOK.NS stands at 49.8B. In comparison, POLOHOT.BO has a market cap of 204.7M. Regarding current trading prices, THOMASCOOK.NS is priced at ₹106.86, while POLOHOT.BO trades at ₹9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THOMASCOOK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.39, whereas POLOHOT.BO's P/E ratio is -27.73. In terms of profitability, THOMASCOOK.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to POLOHOT.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, THOMASCOOK.NS is more volatile compared to POLOHOT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THOMASCOOK.NS.Check POLOHOT.BO's competition here
THOMASCOOK.NS vs CINDHO.BO Comparison April 2026
THOMASCOOK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THOMASCOOK.NS stands at 49.8B. In comparison, CINDHO.BO has a market cap of 198M. Regarding current trading prices, THOMASCOOK.NS is priced at ₹106.86, while CINDHO.BO trades at ₹55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THOMASCOOK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.39, whereas CINDHO.BO's P/E ratio is 73.33. In terms of profitability, THOMASCOOK.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CINDHO.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, THOMASCOOK.NS is more volatile compared to CINDHO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THOMASCOOK.NS.Check CINDHO.BO's competition here
THOMASCOOK.NS vs HOTLSILV.BO Comparison April 2026
THOMASCOOK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THOMASCOOK.NS stands at 49.8B. In comparison, HOTLSILV.BO has a market cap of 176.8M. Regarding current trading prices, THOMASCOOK.NS is priced at ₹106.86, while HOTLSILV.BO trades at ₹10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THOMASCOOK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.39, whereas HOTLSILV.BO's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, THOMASCOOK.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HOTLSILV.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, THOMASCOOK.NS is less volatile compared to HOTLSILV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THOMASCOOK.NS.Check HOTLSILV.BO's competition here
THOMASCOOK.NS vs RASRESOR.BO Comparison April 2026
THOMASCOOK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THOMASCOOK.NS stands at 49.8B. In comparison, RASRESOR.BO has a market cap of 154.8M. Regarding current trading prices, THOMASCOOK.NS is priced at ₹106.86, while RASRESOR.BO trades at ₹39.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THOMASCOOK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.39, whereas RASRESOR.BO's P/E ratio is 32.77. In terms of profitability, THOMASCOOK.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RASRESOR.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, THOMASCOOK.NS is less volatile compared to RASRESOR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THOMASCOOK.NS.Check RASRESOR.BO's competition here
THOMASCOOK.NS vs LORDSHOTL.BO Comparison April 2026
THOMASCOOK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THOMASCOOK.NS stands at 49.8B. In comparison, LORDSHOTL.BO has a market cap of 107.4M. Regarding current trading prices, THOMASCOOK.NS is priced at ₹106.86, while LORDSHOTL.BO trades at ₹14.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THOMASCOOK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.39, whereas LORDSHOTL.BO's P/E ratio is 46.39. In terms of profitability, THOMASCOOK.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LORDSHOTL.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, THOMASCOOK.NS is less volatile compared to LORDSHOTL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THOMASCOOK.NS.Check LORDSHOTL.BO's competition here
THOMASCOOK.NS vs SAILANI.BO Comparison April 2026
THOMASCOOK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THOMASCOOK.NS stands at 49.8B. In comparison, SAILANI.BO has a market cap of 80.4M. Regarding current trading prices, THOMASCOOK.NS is priced at ₹106.86, while SAILANI.BO trades at ₹17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THOMASCOOK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.39, whereas SAILANI.BO's P/E ratio is 32.88. In terms of profitability, THOMASCOOK.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SAILANI.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, THOMASCOOK.NS is more volatile compared to SAILANI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THOMASCOOK.NS.Check SAILANI.BO's competition here
THOMASCOOK.NS vs WOODSVILA.BO Comparison April 2026
THOMASCOOK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THOMASCOOK.NS stands at 49.8B. In comparison, WOODSVILA.BO has a market cap of 79.7M. Regarding current trading prices, THOMASCOOK.NS is priced at ₹106.86, while WOODSVILA.BO trades at ₹13.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THOMASCOOK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.39, whereas WOODSVILA.BO's P/E ratio is -23.66. In terms of profitability, THOMASCOOK.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WOODSVILA.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, THOMASCOOK.NS is more volatile compared to WOODSVILA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THOMASCOOK.NS.Check WOODSVILA.BO's competition here
THOMASCOOK.NS vs SILVERPRL.BO Comparison April 2026
THOMASCOOK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THOMASCOOK.NS stands at 49.8B. In comparison, SILVERPRL.BO has a market cap of 57.1M. Regarding current trading prices, THOMASCOOK.NS is priced at ₹106.86, while SILVERPRL.BO trades at ₹7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THOMASCOOK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.39, whereas SILVERPRL.BO's P/E ratio is -181.75. In terms of profitability, THOMASCOOK.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SILVERPRL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, THOMASCOOK.NS is less volatile compared to SILVERPRL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THOMASCOOK.NS.Check SILVERPRL.BO's competition here