Technip Energies N.V.
Technip Energies N.V. THNPF Peers
See (THNPF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| THNPF | $37.94 | -5.15% | 6.6B | 15.18 | $2.50 | +2.20% |
| TNRSF | $17.34 | N/A | 18.6B | 10.57 | $1.64 | +4.79% |
| GZPZY | $39.35 | N/A | 7.3B | 18.22 | $2.16 | +2.98% |
| THNPY | $39.39 | +0.82% | 7B | 15.76 | $2.50 | +2.06% |
| CHOLF | $0.77 | N/A | 6.9B | 7.70 | $0.10 | +4.18% |
| SUBCY | $18.78 | -1.78% | 5.6B | 29.34 | $0.64 | +4.61% |
| GZPZF | $147.38 | N/A | 5.5B | 14.06 | $10.48 | +4.86% |
| SAPMF | $2.72 | +3.82% | 5.3B | 16.00 | $0.17 | +7.03% |
| WYGPF | $9.13 | N/A | 4.8B | 19.85 | $0.46 | +3.57% |
| ACGYF | $15.93 | N/A | 4.7B | 24.89 | $0.64 | +4.09% |
Stock Comparison
THNPF vs TNRSF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TNRSF has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while TNRSF trades at $17.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas TNRSF's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TNRSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to TNRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs GZPZY Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GZPZY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while GZPZY trades at $39.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas GZPZY's P/E ratio is 18.22. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GZPZY's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and GZPZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs THNPY Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, THNPY has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while THNPY trades at $39.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas THNPY's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to THNPY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to THNPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs CHOLF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CHOLF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while CHOLF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas CHOLF's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CHOLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to CHOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs SUBCY Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SUBCY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while SUBCY trades at $18.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas SUBCY's P/E ratio is 29.34. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SUBCY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to SUBCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs GZPZF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GZPZF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while GZPZF trades at $147.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas GZPZF's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GZPZF's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to GZPZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs SAPMF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SAPMF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while SAPMF trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas SAPMF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SAPMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and SAPMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs WYGPF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, WYGPF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while WYGPF trades at $9.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas WYGPF's P/E ratio is 19.85. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WYGPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to WYGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs ACGYF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ACGYF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while ACGYF trades at $15.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas ACGYF's P/E ratio is 24.89. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ACGYF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to ACGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs SBFFF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SBFFF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while SBFFF trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas SBFFF's P/E ratio is 30.47. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SBFFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to SBFFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs WYGPY Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, WYGPY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while WYGPY trades at $8.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas WYGPY's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WYGPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to WYGPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs SBFFY Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SBFFY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while SBFFY trades at $19.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas SBFFY's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SBFFY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to SBFFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs TRRVF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TRRVF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while TRRVF trades at $123.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas TRRVF's P/E ratio is 42.56. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TRRVF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and TRRVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs TGSNF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TGSNF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while TGSNF trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas TGSNF's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TGSNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to TGSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs CIMEF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CIMEF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while CIMEF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas CIMEF's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CIMEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to CIMEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs AKRYY Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, AKRYY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while AKRYY trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas AKRYY's P/E ratio is 5.37. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AKRYY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and AKRYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs AKRTF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, AKRTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while AKRTF trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas AKRTF's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AKRTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to AKRTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs MDIKF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, MDIKF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while MDIKF trades at $18.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas MDIKF's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MDIKF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to MDIKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs CESDF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CESDF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while CESDF trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas CESDF's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CESDF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to CESDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs PGEJF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, PGEJF has a market cap of 859M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while PGEJF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas PGEJF's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PGEJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and PGEJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs SAWLF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SAWLF has a market cap of 798M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while SAWLF trades at $11.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas SAWLF's P/E ratio is -19.54. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SAWLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to SAWLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs PSYTF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, PSYTF has a market cap of 747.2M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while PSYTF trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas PSYTF's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PSYTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to PSYTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs ATONF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ATONF has a market cap of 691.2M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while ATONF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas ATONF's P/E ratio is 23.53. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATONF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to ATONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs TOLWF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TOLWF has a market cap of 628.5M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while TOLWF trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas TOLWF's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TOLWF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to TOLWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs HNTIF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, HNTIF has a market cap of 583.7M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while HNTIF trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas HNTIF's P/E ratio is -20.56. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HNTIF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and HNTIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs SBOEF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SBOEF has a market cap of 527.5M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while SBOEF trades at $33.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas SBOEF's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SBOEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to SBOEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs HNTIY Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, HNTIY has a market cap of 481.1M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while HNTIY trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas HNTIY's P/E ratio is -16.94. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HNTIY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to HNTIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs ATONY Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ATONY has a market cap of 363.5M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while ATONY trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas ATONY's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATONY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to ATONY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs AKKVF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, AKKVF has a market cap of 326.6M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while AKKVF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas AKKVF's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AKKVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to AKKVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs CGGYY Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CGGYY has a market cap of 324.6M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while CGGYY trades at $41.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas CGGYY's P/E ratio is 43.44. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CGGYY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to CGGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs TOTZF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TOTZF has a market cap of 317.6M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while TOTZF trades at $8.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas TOTZF's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TOTZF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to TOTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs SHANF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SHANF has a market cap of 277M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while SHANF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas SHANF's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SHANF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to SHANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs DDHLF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, DDHLF has a market cap of 234.3M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while DDHLF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas DDHLF's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DDHLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and DDHLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs BLYFF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, BLYFF has a market cap of 233.7M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while BLYFF trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas BLYFF's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BLYFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and BLYFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs CFWFF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CFWFF has a market cap of 213.9M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while CFWFF trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas CFWFF's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CFWFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and CFWFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs JUTOY Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, JUTOY has a market cap of 207.4M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while JUTOY trades at $24.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas JUTOY's P/E ratio is 7.82. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JUTOY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and JUTOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs SNVVF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SNVVF has a market cap of 205.8M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while SNVVF trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas SNVVF's P/E ratio is -18.89. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SNVVF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to SNVVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs PDER Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, PDER has a market cap of 196.6M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while PDER trades at $300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas PDER's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PDER's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to PDER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs PKDC Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, PKDC has a market cap of 165.5M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while PKDC trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas PKDC's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PKDC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and PKDC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs WFTSF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, WFTSF has a market cap of 154.1M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while WFTSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas WFTSF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WFTSF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to WFTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs QSEP Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, QSEP has a market cap of 142.6M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while QSEP trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas QSEP's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QSEP's ROE of +2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to QSEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs POFCY Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, POFCY has a market cap of 125.3M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while POFCY trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas POFCY's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to POFCY's ROE of +1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to POFCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs SCEYF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SCEYF has a market cap of 123.3M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while SCEYF trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas SCEYF's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SCEYF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to SCEYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs PLSDF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, PLSDF has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while PLSDF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas PLSDF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PLSDF's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and PLSDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs ETOLF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ETOLF has a market cap of 102.1M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while ETOLF trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas ETOLF's P/E ratio is 65.85. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ETOLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to ETOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs PRSEF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, PRSEF has a market cap of 88.4M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while PRSEF trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas PRSEF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PRSEF's ROE of -4.63%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to PRSEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs MCCRF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, MCCRF has a market cap of 80.8M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while MCCRF trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas MCCRF's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MCCRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to MCCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs CAWLF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CAWLF has a market cap of 65.3M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while CAWLF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas CAWLF's P/E ratio is 2.10. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CAWLF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and CAWLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs EEYUF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, EEYUF has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while EEYUF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas EEYUF's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EEYUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to EEYUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs GWTI Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GWTI has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while GWTI trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas GWTI's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GWTI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to GWTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs POFCF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, POFCF has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while POFCF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas POFCF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to POFCF's ROE of +1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to POFCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs NSFDF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, NSFDF has a market cap of 31M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while NSFDF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas NSFDF's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NSFDF's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and NSFDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs ENGT Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ENGT has a market cap of 29M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while ENGT trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas ENGT's P/E ratio is -17.16. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ENGT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and ENGT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs QDRSF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, QDRSF has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while QDRSF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas QDRSF's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QDRSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and QDRSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs BWTX Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, BWTX has a market cap of 21.3M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while BWTX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas BWTX's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BWTX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to BWTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs KLNG Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, KLNG has a market cap of 21.2M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while KLNG trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas KLNG's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KLNG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to KLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs WEIIF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, WEIIF has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while WEIIF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas WEIIF's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WEIIF's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and WEIIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs FOYJ Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, FOYJ has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while FOYJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas FOYJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FOYJ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to FOYJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs TAGP Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TAGP has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while TAGP trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas TAGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TAGP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to TAGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs HGHAF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, HGHAF has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while HGHAF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas HGHAF's P/E ratio is -4.43. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HGHAF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to HGHAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs CGPVF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CGPVF has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while CGPVF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas CGPVF's P/E ratio is 1.03. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CGPVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to CGPVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs OXFCF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, OXFCF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while OXFCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas OXFCF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OXFCF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and OXFCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs BRYFF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, BRYFF has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while BRYFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas BRYFF's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BRYFF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and BRYFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs CTNR Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CTNR has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while CTNR trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas CTNR's P/E ratio is 62.62. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CTNR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to CTNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs TXLZF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TXLZF has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while TXLZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas TXLZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TXLZF's ROE of -4.57%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to TXLZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs NWPIF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, NWPIF has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while NWPIF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas NWPIF's P/E ratio is 1.10. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NWPIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and NWPIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs GLFH Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GLFH has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while GLFH trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas GLFH's P/E ratio is -37.50. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GLFH's ROE of -12.85%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to GLFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs SKPO Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SKPO has a market cap of 690.2K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while SKPO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas SKPO's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SKPO's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and SKPO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs SMGI Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SMGI has a market cap of 615.6K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while SMGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas SMGI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SMGI's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and SMGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs IRIG Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, IRIG has a market cap of 440.5K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while IRIG trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas IRIG's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IRIG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to IRIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs FSEI Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, FSEI has a market cap of 145.1K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while FSEI trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas FSEI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FSEI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to FSEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs SSOF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SSOF has a market cap of 139.9K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while SSOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas SSOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SSOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and SSOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs IESCF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, IESCF has a market cap of 137.3K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while IESCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas IESCF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IESCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and IESCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs PKDCW Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, PKDCW has a market cap of 71.7K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while PKDCW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas PKDCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PKDCW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to PKDCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs GPTC Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GPTC has a market cap of 67.7K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while GPTC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas GPTC's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GPTC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to GPTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs WWNG Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, WWNG has a market cap of 28.6K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while WWNG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas WWNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WWNG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to WWNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs CPYJ Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CPYJ has a market cap of 24.4K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while CPYJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas CPYJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CPYJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to CPYJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs SGUJ Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SGUJ has a market cap of 16K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while SGUJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas SGUJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SGUJ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and SGUJ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs TEGR Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TEGR has a market cap of 12.7K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while TEGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas TEGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TEGR's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and TEGR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs CSSV Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CSSV has a market cap of 10.5K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while CSSV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas CSSV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CSSV's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to CSSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs AURI Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, AURI has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while AURI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas AURI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AURI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to AURI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs RTSO Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, RTSO has a market cap of 6.7K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while RTSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas RTSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RTSO's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and RTSO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs SUBB Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SUBB has a market cap of 6K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while SUBB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas SUBB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SUBB's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to SUBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs LNDT Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, LNDT has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while LNDT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas LNDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LNDT's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and LNDT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs CTBG Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CTBG has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while CTBG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas CTBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CTBG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and CTBG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs BMMCF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, BMMCF has a market cap of 2.9K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while BMMCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas BMMCF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BMMCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to BMMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs USEI Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, USEI has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while USEI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas USEI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to USEI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and USEI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs PTOG Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, PTOG has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while PTOG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas PTOG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PTOG's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to PTOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs AMCF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, AMCF has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while AMCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas AMCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to AMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs CDVIQ Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CDVIQ has a market cap of 986. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while CDVIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas CDVIQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CDVIQ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to CDVIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs POOSF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, POOSF has a market cap of 811. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while POOSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas POOSF's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to POOSF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to POOSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs EHYD Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, EHYD has a market cap of 603. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while EHYD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas EHYD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EHYD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and EHYD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs SYNE Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SYNE has a market cap of 473. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while SYNE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas SYNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SYNE's ROE of -59.70%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and SYNE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs NNYR Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, NNYR has a market cap of 234. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while NNYR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas NNYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NNYR's ROE of +56.80%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and NNYR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs ALRY Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ALRY has a market cap of 116. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while ALRY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas ALRY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALRY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and ALRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs ISYX Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ISYX has a market cap of 102. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while ISYX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas ISYX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ISYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and ISYX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs CHMR Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CHMR has a market cap of 66. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while CHMR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas CHMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CHMR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and CHMR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs TXGE Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TXGE has a market cap of 57. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while TXGE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas TXGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TXGE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and TXGE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs IOGPQ Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, IOGPQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $37.94, while IOGPQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.18, whereas IOGPQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IOGPQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and IOGPQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).