Technip Energies N.V.
Technip Energies N.V. THNPF Peers
See (THNPF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| THNPF | $38.00 | +3.87% | 6.6B | 15.38 | $2.47 | +2.23% |
| WFTSF | $0.04 | +39700.00% | 60.3B | -3.98 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| TNRSF | $17.44 | +6.47% | 19B | 10.63 | $1.64 | +4.76% |
| CHOLF | $0.85 | N/A | 7.4B | 8.48 | $0.10 | +3.48% |
| THNPY | $38.06 | +0.45% | 6.7B | 15.47 | $2.46 | +2.18% |
| GZPZF | $147.38 | +0.41% | 5.5B | 14.06 | $10.48 | +3.92% |
| WYGPF | $10.20 | N/A | 5.4B | 22.17 | $0.46 | +3.19% |
| ACGYF | $17.35 | N/A | 5.1B | 27.11 | $0.64 | +3.75% |
| SUBCY | $17.02 | +0.15% | 5.1B | 26.59 | $0.64 | +5.06% |
| SAPMF | $2.32 | -4.53% | 4.5B | 13.65 | $0.17 | +8.25% |
Stock Comparison
THNPF vs WFTSF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, WFTSF has a market cap of 60.3B. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while WFTSF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas WFTSF's P/E ratio is -3.98. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WFTSF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to WFTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs TNRSF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TNRSF has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while TNRSF trades at $17.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas TNRSF's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TNRSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and TNRSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs CHOLF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CHOLF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while CHOLF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas CHOLF's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CHOLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and CHOLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs THNPY Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, THNPY has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while THNPY trades at $38.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas THNPY's P/E ratio is 15.47. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to THNPY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to THNPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs GZPZF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GZPZF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while GZPZF trades at $147.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas GZPZF's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GZPZF's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to GZPZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs WYGPF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, WYGPF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while WYGPF trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas WYGPF's P/E ratio is 22.17. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WYGPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and WYGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs ACGYF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ACGYF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while ACGYF trades at $17.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas ACGYF's P/E ratio is 27.11. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ACGYF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and ACGYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs SUBCY Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SUBCY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while SUBCY trades at $17.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas SUBCY's P/E ratio is 26.59. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SUBCY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to SUBCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs SAPMF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SAPMF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while SAPMF trades at $2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas SAPMF's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SAPMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and SAPMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs WYGPY Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, WYGPY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while WYGPY trades at $8.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas WYGPY's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WYGPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to WYGPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs AKRYY Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, AKRYY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while AKRYY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas AKRYY's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AKRYY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to AKRYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs SBFFF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SBFFF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while SBFFF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas SBFFF's P/E ratio is 27.71. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SBFFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and SBFFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs SBFFY Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SBFFY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while SBFFY trades at $18.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas SBFFY's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SBFFY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and SBFFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs TRRVF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TRRVF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while TRRVF trades at $117.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas TRRVF's P/E ratio is 40.78. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TRRVF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to TRRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs CIMEF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CIMEF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while CIMEF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas CIMEF's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CIMEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and CIMEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs TGSNF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TGSNF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while TGSNF trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas TGSNF's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TGSNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and TGSNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs MDIKF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, MDIKF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while MDIKF trades at $22.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas MDIKF's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MDIKF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and MDIKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs AKRTF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, AKRTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while AKRTF trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas AKRTF's P/E ratio is 5.37. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AKRTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and AKRTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs GZPZY Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GZPZY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while GZPZY trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas GZPZY's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GZPZY's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to GZPZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs CESDF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CESDF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while CESDF trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas CESDF's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CESDF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and CESDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs PGEJF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, PGEJF has a market cap of 859M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while PGEJF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas PGEJF's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PGEJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and PGEJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs SAWLF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SAWLF has a market cap of 798M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while SAWLF trades at $11.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas SAWLF's P/E ratio is -19.54. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SAWLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to SAWLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs SHANF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SHANF has a market cap of 775M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while SHANF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas SHANF's P/E ratio is -28.10. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SHANF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to SHANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs PSYTF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, PSYTF has a market cap of 699.2M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while PSYTF trades at $8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas PSYTF's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PSYTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and PSYTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs TOLWF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TOLWF has a market cap of 586.2M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while TOLWF trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas TOLWF's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TOLWF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to TOLWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs HNTIY Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, HNTIY has a market cap of 585.2M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while HNTIY trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas HNTIY's P/E ratio is -20.61. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HNTIY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and HNTIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs HNTIF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, HNTIF has a market cap of 583.7M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while HNTIF trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas HNTIF's P/E ratio is -20.56. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HNTIF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and HNTIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs SBOEF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SBOEF has a market cap of 527.5M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while SBOEF trades at $33.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas SBOEF's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SBOEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to SBOEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs ATONF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ATONF has a market cap of 429.1M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while ATONF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas ATONF's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATONF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and ATONF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs ATONY Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ATONY has a market cap of 354.4M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while ATONY trades at $23.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas ATONY's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATONY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and ATONY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs CGGYY Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CGGYY has a market cap of 324.6M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while CGGYY trades at $41.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas CGGYY's P/E ratio is 43.44. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CGGYY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to CGGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs AKKVF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, AKKVF has a market cap of 296.7M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while AKKVF trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas AKKVF's P/E ratio is 3.63. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AKKVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to AKKVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs TOTZF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TOTZF has a market cap of 279.1M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while TOTZF trades at $7.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas TOTZF's P/E ratio is 6.26. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TOTZF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to TOTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs DDHLF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, DDHLF has a market cap of 234.3M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while DDHLF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas DDHLF's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DDHLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and DDHLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs BLYFF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, BLYFF has a market cap of 233.7M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while BLYFF trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas BLYFF's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BLYFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and BLYFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs SNVVF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SNVVF has a market cap of 200.8M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while SNVVF trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas SNVVF's P/E ratio is -18.60. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SNVVF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and SNVVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs CFWFF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CFWFF has a market cap of 197.5M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while CFWFF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas CFWFF's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CFWFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and CFWFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs PDER Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, PDER has a market cap of 196.6M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while PDER trades at $300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas PDER's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PDER's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and PDER have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs JUTOY Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, JUTOY has a market cap of 172.3M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while JUTOY trades at $20.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas JUTOY's P/E ratio is 3.23. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JUTOY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and JUTOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs PKDC Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, PKDC has a market cap of 165.5M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while PKDC trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas PKDC's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PKDC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and PKDC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs SCEYF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SCEYF has a market cap of 122.7M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while SCEYF trades at $9.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas SCEYF's P/E ratio is 5.43. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SCEYF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to SCEYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs POFCY Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, POFCY has a market cap of 120.2M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while POFCY trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas POFCY's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to POFCY's ROE of +1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to POFCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs QSEP Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, QSEP has a market cap of 102.2M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while QSEP trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas QSEP's P/E ratio is -10.40. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QSEP's ROE of +2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to QSEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs PLSDF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, PLSDF has a market cap of 97M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while PLSDF trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas PLSDF's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PLSDF's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and PLSDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs ETOLF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ETOLF has a market cap of 89.8M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while ETOLF trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas ETOLF's P/E ratio is 57.90. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ETOLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to ETOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs PRSEF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, PRSEF has a market cap of 88.4M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while PRSEF trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas PRSEF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PRSEF's ROE of -4.63%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to PRSEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs MCCRF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, MCCRF has a market cap of 75.8M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while MCCRF trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas MCCRF's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MCCRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to MCCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs CAWLF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CAWLF has a market cap of 65.3M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while CAWLF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas CAWLF's P/E ratio is 2.10. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CAWLF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and CAWLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs POFCF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, POFCF has a market cap of 57.3M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while POFCF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas POFCF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to POFCF's ROE of +1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and POFCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs EEYUF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, EEYUF has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while EEYUF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas EEYUF's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EEYUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to EEYUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs NSFDF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, NSFDF has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while NSFDF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas NSFDF's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NSFDF's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and NSFDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs ENGT Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ENGT has a market cap of 29M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while ENGT trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas ENGT's P/E ratio is -17.18. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ENGT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and ENGT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs GWTI Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GWTI has a market cap of 28.6M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while GWTI trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas GWTI's P/E ratio is -6.30. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GWTI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to GWTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs QDRSF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, QDRSF has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while QDRSF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas QDRSF's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QDRSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and QDRSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs KLNG Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, KLNG has a market cap of 23.4M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while KLNG trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas KLNG's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KLNG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to KLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs BWTX Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, BWTX has a market cap of 21.3M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while BWTX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas BWTX's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BWTX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to BWTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs WEIIF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, WEIIF has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while WEIIF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas WEIIF's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WEIIF's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and WEIIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs HGHAF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, HGHAF has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while HGHAF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas HGHAF's P/E ratio is -4.29. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HGHAF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and HGHAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs CGPVF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CGPVF has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while CGPVF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas CGPVF's P/E ratio is 1.03. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CGPVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to CGPVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs TAGP Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TAGP has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while TAGP trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas TAGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TAGP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to TAGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs OXFCF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, OXFCF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while OXFCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas OXFCF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OXFCF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and OXFCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs BRYFF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, BRYFF has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while BRYFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas BRYFF's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BRYFF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and BRYFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs CTNR Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CTNR has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while CTNR trades at $5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas CTNR's P/E ratio is 64.38. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CTNR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and CTNR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs TXLZF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TXLZF has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while TXLZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas TXLZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TXLZF's ROE of -4.57%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to TXLZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs NWPIF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, NWPIF has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while NWPIF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas NWPIF's P/E ratio is 1.10. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NWPIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and NWPIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs SGUJ Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SGUJ has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while SGUJ trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas SGUJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SGUJ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to SGUJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs FSEI Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, FSEI has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while FSEI trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas FSEI's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FSEI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and FSEI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs GLFH Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GLFH has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while GLFH trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas GLFH's P/E ratio is -37.50. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GLFH's ROE of -12.85%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to GLFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs SKPO Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SKPO has a market cap of 838.1K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while SKPO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas SKPO's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SKPO's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and SKPO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs IRIG Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, IRIG has a market cap of 616.7K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while IRIG trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas IRIG's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IRIG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to IRIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs SMGI Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SMGI has a market cap of 615.6K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while SMGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas SMGI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SMGI's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and SMGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs POOSF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, POOSF has a market cap of 405.5K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while POOSF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas POOSF's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to POOSF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to POOSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs CSSV Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CSSV has a market cap of 210.6K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while CSSV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas CSSV's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CSSV's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and CSSV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs SSOF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SSOF has a market cap of 140K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while SSOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas SSOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SSOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and SSOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs IESCF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, IESCF has a market cap of 137.3K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while IESCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas IESCF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IESCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and IESCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs FOYJ Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, FOYJ has a market cap of 123.1K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while FOYJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas FOYJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FOYJ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and FOYJ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs PKDCW Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, PKDCW has a market cap of 71.7K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while PKDCW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas PKDCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PKDCW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to PKDCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs GPTC Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GPTC has a market cap of 67.7K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while GPTC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas GPTC's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GPTC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to GPTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs WWNG Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, WWNG has a market cap of 28.6K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while WWNG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas WWNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WWNG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to WWNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs PTOG Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, PTOG has a market cap of 25.2K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while PTOG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas PTOG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PTOG's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to PTOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs CPYJ Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CPYJ has a market cap of 24.4K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while CPYJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas CPYJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CPYJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to CPYJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs BMMCF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, BMMCF has a market cap of 10.2K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while BMMCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas BMMCF's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BMMCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to BMMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs CDVIQ Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CDVIQ has a market cap of 9.9K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while CDVIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas CDVIQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CDVIQ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to CDVIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs AURI Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, AURI has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while AURI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas AURI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AURI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and AURI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs RTSO Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, RTSO has a market cap of 6.7K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while RTSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas RTSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RTSO's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and RTSO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs SUBB Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SUBB has a market cap of 6K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while SUBB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas SUBB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SUBB's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to SUBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs TXGE Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TXGE has a market cap of 5.7K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while TXGE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas TXGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TXGE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and TXGE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs LNDT Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, LNDT has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while LNDT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas LNDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LNDT's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and LNDT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs CTBG Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CTBG has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while CTBG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas CTBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CTBG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and CTBG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs USEI Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, USEI has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while USEI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas USEI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to USEI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and USEI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs AMCF Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, AMCF has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while AMCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas AMCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to AMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.
THNPF vs EHYD Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, EHYD has a market cap of 603. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while EHYD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas EHYD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EHYD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and EHYD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs SYNE Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SYNE has a market cap of 315. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while SYNE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas SYNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SYNE's ROE of -59.70%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and SYNE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs NNYR Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, NNYR has a market cap of 234. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while NNYR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas NNYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NNYR's ROE of +56.80%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and NNYR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs TEGR Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TEGR has a market cap of 127. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while TEGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas TEGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TEGR's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and TEGR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs ALRY Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ALRY has a market cap of 116. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while ALRY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas ALRY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALRY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and ALRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs ISYX Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ISYX has a market cap of 102. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while ISYX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas ISYX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ISYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and ISYX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs CHMR Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CHMR has a market cap of 66. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while CHMR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas CHMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CHMR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF and CHMR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
THNPF vs SAPMD Comparison
THNPF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THNPF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SAPMD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, THNPF is priced at $38.00, while SAPMD trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THNPF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.38, whereas SAPMD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, THNPF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SAPMD's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, THNPF is less volatile compared to SAPMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THNPF.