Thinkink Picturez Ltd.
Thinkink Picturez Ltd. (THINKINK.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (THINKINK.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Media & Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| THINKINK.BO | ₹0.20 | +17.65% | 284.4M | -20.00 | -₹0.01 | N/A |
| CPML.BO | ₹2,337.15 | +2.54% | 24.9B | 1284.15 | ₹1.82 | N/A |
| CINERAD.BO | ₹164.65 | +0.00% | 5.4B | -228.68 | -₹0.72 | N/A |
| BASILIC.NS | ₹210.25 | +8.01% | 4.9B | 13.06 | ₹16.10 | N/A |
| POOJAENT.BO | ₹53.09 | +9.99% | 2.9B | 46.57 | ₹1.14 | N/A |
| PHANTOMFX.NS | ₹184.90 | +8.16% | 2.5B | 8.92 | ₹20.73 | N/A |
| DIKSAT.BO | ₹109.00 | +0.00% | 1.9B | 330.30 | ₹0.33 | N/A |
| DIGIKORE.NS | ₹70.20 | +1.01% | 1.2B | -22.72 | -₹3.09 | N/A |
| VELS.NS | ₹57.40 | +4.94% | 740.9M | 1.55 | ₹36.95 | N/A |
| BABA.BO | ₹12.29 | -1.99% | 645.2M | 64.68 | ₹0.19 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
THINKINK.BO vs CPML.BO Comparison April 2026
THINKINK.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THINKINK.BO stands at 284.4M. In comparison, CPML.BO has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, THINKINK.BO is priced at ₹0.20, while CPML.BO trades at ₹2,337.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THINKINK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.00, whereas CPML.BO's P/E ratio is 1284.15. In terms of profitability, THINKINK.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CPML.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, THINKINK.BO is more volatile compared to CPML.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THINKINK.BO.Check CPML.BO's competition here
THINKINK.BO vs CINERAD.BO Comparison April 2026
THINKINK.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THINKINK.BO stands at 284.4M. In comparison, CINERAD.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, THINKINK.BO is priced at ₹0.20, while CINERAD.BO trades at ₹164.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THINKINK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.00, whereas CINERAD.BO's P/E ratio is -228.68. In terms of profitability, THINKINK.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CINERAD.BO's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, THINKINK.BO is more volatile compared to CINERAD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THINKINK.BO.Check CINERAD.BO's competition here
THINKINK.BO vs BASILIC.NS Comparison April 2026
THINKINK.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THINKINK.BO stands at 284.4M. In comparison, BASILIC.NS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, THINKINK.BO is priced at ₹0.20, while BASILIC.NS trades at ₹210.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THINKINK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.00, whereas BASILIC.NS's P/E ratio is 13.06. In terms of profitability, THINKINK.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BASILIC.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, THINKINK.BO is more volatile compared to BASILIC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THINKINK.BO.Check BASILIC.NS's competition here
THINKINK.BO vs POOJAENT.BO Comparison April 2026
THINKINK.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THINKINK.BO stands at 284.4M. In comparison, POOJAENT.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, THINKINK.BO is priced at ₹0.20, while POOJAENT.BO trades at ₹53.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THINKINK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.00, whereas POOJAENT.BO's P/E ratio is 46.57. In terms of profitability, THINKINK.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to POOJAENT.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, THINKINK.BO is more volatile compared to POOJAENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THINKINK.BO.Check POOJAENT.BO's competition here
THINKINK.BO vs PHANTOMFX.NS Comparison April 2026
THINKINK.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THINKINK.BO stands at 284.4M. In comparison, PHANTOMFX.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, THINKINK.BO is priced at ₹0.20, while PHANTOMFX.NS trades at ₹184.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THINKINK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.00, whereas PHANTOMFX.NS's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, THINKINK.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PHANTOMFX.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, THINKINK.BO is more volatile compared to PHANTOMFX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THINKINK.BO.Check PHANTOMFX.NS's competition here
THINKINK.BO vs DIKSAT.BO Comparison April 2026
THINKINK.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THINKINK.BO stands at 284.4M. In comparison, DIKSAT.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, THINKINK.BO is priced at ₹0.20, while DIKSAT.BO trades at ₹109.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THINKINK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.00, whereas DIKSAT.BO's P/E ratio is 330.30. In terms of profitability, THINKINK.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DIKSAT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, THINKINK.BO is more volatile compared to DIKSAT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THINKINK.BO.Check DIKSAT.BO's competition here
THINKINK.BO vs DIGIKORE.NS Comparison April 2026
THINKINK.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THINKINK.BO stands at 284.4M. In comparison, DIGIKORE.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, THINKINK.BO is priced at ₹0.20, while DIGIKORE.NS trades at ₹70.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THINKINK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.00, whereas DIGIKORE.NS's P/E ratio is -22.72. In terms of profitability, THINKINK.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DIGIKORE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, THINKINK.BO is more volatile compared to DIGIKORE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THINKINK.BO.Check DIGIKORE.NS's competition here
THINKINK.BO vs VELS.NS Comparison April 2026
THINKINK.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THINKINK.BO stands at 284.4M. In comparison, VELS.NS has a market cap of 740.9M. Regarding current trading prices, THINKINK.BO is priced at ₹0.20, while VELS.NS trades at ₹57.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THINKINK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.00, whereas VELS.NS's P/E ratio is 1.55. In terms of profitability, THINKINK.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VELS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, THINKINK.BO is more volatile compared to VELS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THINKINK.BO.Check VELS.NS's competition here
THINKINK.BO vs BABA.BO Comparison April 2026
THINKINK.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THINKINK.BO stands at 284.4M. In comparison, BABA.BO has a market cap of 645.2M. Regarding current trading prices, THINKINK.BO is priced at ₹0.20, while BABA.BO trades at ₹12.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THINKINK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.00, whereas BABA.BO's P/E ratio is 64.68. In terms of profitability, THINKINK.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BABA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, THINKINK.BO is more volatile compared to BABA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THINKINK.BO.Check BABA.BO's competition here
THINKINK.BO vs GVFILM.BO Comparison April 2026
THINKINK.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THINKINK.BO stands at 284.4M. In comparison, GVFILM.BO has a market cap of 615.3M. Regarding current trading prices, THINKINK.BO is priced at ₹0.20, while GVFILM.BO trades at ₹0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THINKINK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.00, whereas GVFILM.BO's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, THINKINK.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GVFILM.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, THINKINK.BO is more volatile compared to GVFILM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THINKINK.BO.Check GVFILM.BO's competition here
THINKINK.BO vs ODYCORP.BO Comparison April 2026
THINKINK.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THINKINK.BO stands at 284.4M. In comparison, ODYCORP.BO has a market cap of 586.9M. Regarding current trading prices, THINKINK.BO is priced at ₹0.20, while ODYCORP.BO trades at ₹7.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THINKINK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.00, whereas ODYCORP.BO's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, THINKINK.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ODYCORP.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, THINKINK.BO is more volatile compared to ODYCORP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THINKINK.BO.Check ODYCORP.BO's competition here
THINKINK.BO vs SHALPRO.BO Comparison April 2026
THINKINK.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THINKINK.BO stands at 284.4M. In comparison, SHALPRO.BO has a market cap of 482.3M. Regarding current trading prices, THINKINK.BO is priced at ₹0.20, while SHALPRO.BO trades at ₹0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THINKINK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.00, whereas SHALPRO.BO's P/E ratio is -49.00. In terms of profitability, THINKINK.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SHALPRO.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, THINKINK.BO is more volatile compared to SHALPRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THINKINK.BO.Check SHALPRO.BO's competition here
THINKINK.BO vs BAWEJA.NS Comparison April 2026
THINKINK.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THINKINK.BO stands at 284.4M. In comparison, BAWEJA.NS has a market cap of 455.1M. Regarding current trading prices, THINKINK.BO is priced at ₹0.20, while BAWEJA.NS trades at ₹24.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THINKINK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.00, whereas BAWEJA.NS's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, THINKINK.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BAWEJA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, THINKINK.BO is more volatile compared to BAWEJA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THINKINK.BO.Check BAWEJA.NS's competition here
THINKINK.BO vs PICTUREHS.BO Comparison April 2026
THINKINK.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THINKINK.BO stands at 284.4M. In comparison, PICTUREHS.BO has a market cap of 385.1M. Regarding current trading prices, THINKINK.BO is priced at ₹0.20, while PICTUREHS.BO trades at ₹7.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THINKINK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.00, whereas PICTUREHS.BO's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, THINKINK.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PICTUREHS.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, THINKINK.BO is more volatile compared to PICTUREHS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THINKINK.BO.Check PICTUREHS.BO's competition here
THINKINK.BO vs AJWAFUN.BO Comparison April 2026
THINKINK.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THINKINK.BO stands at 284.4M. In comparison, AJWAFUN.BO has a market cap of 303.6M. Regarding current trading prices, THINKINK.BO is priced at ₹0.20, while AJWAFUN.BO trades at ₹47.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THINKINK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.00, whereas AJWAFUN.BO's P/E ratio is 101.09. In terms of profitability, THINKINK.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AJWAFUN.BO's ROE of +4.54%. Regarding short-term risk, THINKINK.BO is more volatile compared to AJWAFUN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THINKINK.BO.Check AJWAFUN.BO's competition here
THINKINK.BO vs MEDIAONE.BO Comparison April 2026
THINKINK.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THINKINK.BO stands at 284.4M. In comparison, MEDIAONE.BO has a market cap of 238.5M. Regarding current trading prices, THINKINK.BO is priced at ₹0.20, while MEDIAONE.BO trades at ₹16.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THINKINK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.00, whereas MEDIAONE.BO's P/E ratio is -9.31. In terms of profitability, THINKINK.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MEDIAONE.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, THINKINK.BO is more volatile compared to MEDIAONE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THINKINK.BO.Check MEDIAONE.BO's competition here
THINKINK.BO vs COLORCHIPS.BO Comparison April 2026
THINKINK.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THINKINK.BO stands at 284.4M. In comparison, COLORCHIPS.BO has a market cap of 227.3M. Regarding current trading prices, THINKINK.BO is priced at ₹0.20, while COLORCHIPS.BO trades at ₹13.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THINKINK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.00, whereas COLORCHIPS.BO's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, THINKINK.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to COLORCHIPS.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, THINKINK.BO is more volatile compared to COLORCHIPS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THINKINK.BO.Check COLORCHIPS.BO's competition here
THINKINK.BO vs ORIENTTR.BO Comparison April 2026
THINKINK.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THINKINK.BO stands at 284.4M. In comparison, ORIENTTR.BO has a market cap of 212M. Regarding current trading prices, THINKINK.BO is priced at ₹0.20, while ORIENTTR.BO trades at ₹14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THINKINK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.00, whereas ORIENTTR.BO's P/E ratio is 198.59. In terms of profitability, THINKINK.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ORIENTTR.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, THINKINK.BO is less volatile compared to ORIENTTR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THINKINK.BO.Check ORIENTTR.BO's competition here
THINKINK.BO vs VRFILMS.BO Comparison April 2026
THINKINK.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THINKINK.BO stands at 284.4M. In comparison, VRFILMS.BO has a market cap of 124.8M. Regarding current trading prices, THINKINK.BO is priced at ₹0.20, while VRFILMS.BO trades at ₹11.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THINKINK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.00, whereas VRFILMS.BO's P/E ratio is -6.65. In terms of profitability, THINKINK.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VRFILMS.BO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, THINKINK.BO is more volatile compared to VRFILMS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THINKINK.BO.Check VRFILMS.BO's competition here
THINKINK.BO vs SDC.BO Comparison April 2026
THINKINK.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THINKINK.BO stands at 284.4M. In comparison, SDC.BO has a market cap of 122.7M. Regarding current trading prices, THINKINK.BO is priced at ₹0.20, while SDC.BO trades at ₹18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THINKINK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.00, whereas SDC.BO's P/E ratio is -126.00. In terms of profitability, THINKINK.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SDC.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, THINKINK.BO is more volatile compared to SDC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THINKINK.BO.Check SDC.BO's competition here
THINKINK.BO vs INSPIRE.NS Comparison April 2026
THINKINK.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THINKINK.BO stands at 284.4M. In comparison, INSPIRE.NS has a market cap of 106.8M. Regarding current trading prices, THINKINK.BO is priced at ₹0.20, while INSPIRE.NS trades at ₹7.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THINKINK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.00, whereas INSPIRE.NS's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, THINKINK.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to INSPIRE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, THINKINK.BO is more volatile compared to INSPIRE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THINKINK.BO.Check INSPIRE.NS's competition here
THINKINK.BO vs BGIL.BO Comparison April 2026
THINKINK.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THINKINK.BO stands at 284.4M. In comparison, BGIL.BO has a market cap of 105.6M. Regarding current trading prices, THINKINK.BO is priced at ₹0.20, while BGIL.BO trades at ₹9.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THINKINK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.00, whereas BGIL.BO's P/E ratio is -84.73. In terms of profitability, THINKINK.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BGIL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, THINKINK.BO is more volatile compared to BGIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THINKINK.BO.Check BGIL.BO's competition here
THINKINK.BO vs UNISTRMU.BO Comparison April 2026
THINKINK.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THINKINK.BO stands at 284.4M. In comparison, UNISTRMU.BO has a market cap of 83.3M. Regarding current trading prices, THINKINK.BO is priced at ₹0.20, while UNISTRMU.BO trades at ₹3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THINKINK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.00, whereas UNISTRMU.BO's P/E ratio is -333.00. In terms of profitability, THINKINK.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to UNISTRMU.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, THINKINK.BO is more volatile compared to UNISTRMU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THINKINK.BO.Check UNISTRMU.BO's competition here
THINKINK.BO vs VISIONCINE.BO Comparison April 2026
THINKINK.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THINKINK.BO stands at 284.4M. In comparison, VISIONCINE.BO has a market cap of 82.9M. Regarding current trading prices, THINKINK.BO is priced at ₹0.20, while VISIONCINE.BO trades at ₹1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THINKINK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.00, whereas VISIONCINE.BO's P/E ratio is -29.25. In terms of profitability, THINKINK.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VISIONCINE.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, THINKINK.BO is more volatile compared to VISIONCINE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THINKINK.BO.Check VISIONCINE.BO's competition here
THINKINK.BO vs PADMALAYAT.BO Comparison April 2026
THINKINK.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THINKINK.BO stands at 284.4M. In comparison, PADMALAYAT.BO has a market cap of 68.5M. Regarding current trading prices, THINKINK.BO is priced at ₹0.20, while PADMALAYAT.BO trades at ₹4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THINKINK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.00, whereas PADMALAYAT.BO's P/E ratio is -17.52. In terms of profitability, THINKINK.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PADMALAYAT.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, THINKINK.BO is more volatile compared to PADMALAYAT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THINKINK.BO.Check PADMALAYAT.BO's competition here
THINKINK.BO vs VISIONCO.BO Comparison April 2026
THINKINK.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THINKINK.BO stands at 284.4M. In comparison, VISIONCO.BO has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, THINKINK.BO is priced at ₹0.20, while VISIONCO.BO trades at ₹2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THINKINK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.00, whereas VISIONCO.BO's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, THINKINK.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VISIONCO.BO's ROE of -1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, THINKINK.BO is more volatile compared to VISIONCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THINKINK.BO.Check VISIONCO.BO's competition here
THINKINK.BO vs UNIVARTS.BO Comparison April 2026
THINKINK.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THINKINK.BO stands at 284.4M. In comparison, UNIVARTS.BO has a market cap of 49.8M. Regarding current trading prices, THINKINK.BO is priced at ₹0.20, while UNIVARTS.BO trades at ₹5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THINKINK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.00, whereas UNIVARTS.BO's P/E ratio is 38.46. In terms of profitability, THINKINK.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to UNIVARTS.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, THINKINK.BO is more volatile compared to UNIVARTS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THINKINK.BO.Check UNIVARTS.BO's competition here
THINKINK.BO vs SOFTBPO.BO Comparison April 2026
THINKINK.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THINKINK.BO stands at 284.4M. In comparison, SOFTBPO.BO has a market cap of 44.5M. Regarding current trading prices, THINKINK.BO is priced at ₹0.20, while SOFTBPO.BO trades at ₹296.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THINKINK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.00, whereas SOFTBPO.BO's P/E ratio is 1.91. In terms of profitability, THINKINK.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SOFTBPO.BO's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, THINKINK.BO is more volatile compared to SOFTBPO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THINKINK.BO.Check SOFTBPO.BO's competition here
THINKINK.BO vs PURPLE.BO Comparison April 2026
THINKINK.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THINKINK.BO stands at 284.4M. In comparison, PURPLE.BO has a market cap of 37.1M. Regarding current trading prices, THINKINK.BO is priced at ₹0.20, while PURPLE.BO trades at ₹4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THINKINK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.00, whereas PURPLE.BO's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, THINKINK.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PURPLE.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, THINKINK.BO is more volatile compared to PURPLE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THINKINK.BO.Check PURPLE.BO's competition here
THINKINK.BO vs KOCL.BO Comparison April 2026
THINKINK.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THINKINK.BO stands at 284.4M. In comparison, KOCL.BO has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, THINKINK.BO is priced at ₹0.20, while KOCL.BO trades at ₹1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THINKINK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.00, whereas KOCL.BO's P/E ratio is -2.66. In terms of profitability, THINKINK.BO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KOCL.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, THINKINK.BO is more volatile compared to KOCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THINKINK.BO.Check KOCL.BO's competition here