Tencent Holdings Limited
Tencent Holdings Limited (TCTZF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TCTZF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCTZF | $68.19 | +0.28% | 616.6B | 21.23 | $3.22 | +0.84% |
| TCEHY | $68.13 | +0.16% | 614.9B | 21.17 | $3.22 | +0.84% |
| PROSY | $10.28 | -1.25% | 115.8B | 9.03 | $1.15 | +0.29% |
| PROSF | $49.30 | +0.00% | 107.8B | 8.54 | $5.77 | +0.47% |
| BAIDF | $16.90 | +1.20% | 45.3B | 11.84 | $1.41 | N/A |
| NAPRF | $56.84 | +0.00% | 41B | 7.91 | $6.75 | +0.55% |
| KUASF | $8.90 | +4.52% | 37.4B | 16.48 | $0.53 | +0.68% |
| KSHTY | $1.75 | +1.30% | 37.1B | 15.77 | $0.11 | +0.55% |
| YAHOF | $2.60 | +0.00% | 17.8B | 14.44 | $0.18 | +1.77% |
| NHNCF | $115.00 | +0.00% | 17.2B | 23.37 | $4.92 | +0.71% |
Stock Comparison
TCTZF vs TCEHY Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, TCEHY has a market cap of 614.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while TCEHY trades at $68.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas TCEHY's P/E ratio is 21.17. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TCEHY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to TCEHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check TCEHY's competition here
TCTZF vs PROSY Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, PROSY has a market cap of 115.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while PROSY trades at $10.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas PROSY's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PROSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to PROSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check PROSY's competition here
TCTZF vs PROSF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, PROSF has a market cap of 107.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while PROSF trades at $49.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas PROSF's P/E ratio is 8.54. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PROSF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to PROSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check PROSF's competition here
TCTZF vs BAIDF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, BAIDF has a market cap of 45.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while BAIDF trades at $16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas BAIDF's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BAIDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to BAIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check BAIDF's competition here
TCTZF vs NAPRF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, NAPRF has a market cap of 41B. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while NAPRF trades at $56.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas NAPRF's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NAPRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to NAPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check NAPRF's competition here
TCTZF vs KUASF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, KUASF has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while KUASF trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas KUASF's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KUASF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to KUASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check KUASF's competition here
TCTZF vs KSHTY Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, KSHTY has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while KSHTY trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas KSHTY's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KSHTY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is less volatile compared to KSHTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check KSHTY's competition here
TCTZF vs YAHOF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, YAHOF has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while YAHOF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas YAHOF's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to YAHOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to YAHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check YAHOF's competition here
TCTZF vs NHNCF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, NHNCF has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while NHNCF trades at $115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas NHNCF's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NHNCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to NHNCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check NHNCF's competition here
TCTZF vs RPGRF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, RPGRF has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while RPGRF trades at $124.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas RPGRF's P/E ratio is 40.54. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RPGRF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to RPGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check RPGRF's competition here
TCTZF vs RPGRY Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, RPGRY has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while RPGRY trades at $29.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas RPGRY's P/E ratio is 36.78. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RPGRY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is less volatile compared to RPGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check RPGRY's competition here
TCTZF vs ADEVF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, ADEVF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while ADEVF trades at $11.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas ADEVF's P/E ratio is -80.57. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ADEVF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to ADEVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check ADEVF's competition here
TCTZF vs ADEVY Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, ADEVY has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while ADEVY trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas ADEVY's P/E ratio is -66.57. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ADEVY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to ADEVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check ADEVY's competition here
TCTZF vs NPSNY Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, NPSNY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while NPSNY trades at $11.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas NPSNY's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NPSNY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to NPSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check NPSNY's competition here
TCTZF vs CSXXY Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, CSXXY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while CSXXY trades at $37.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas CSXXY's P/E ratio is 31.87. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CSXXY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is less volatile compared to CSXXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check CSXXY's competition here
TCTZF vs ATDRY Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, ATDRY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while ATDRY trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas ATDRY's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ATDRY's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to ATDRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check ATDRY's competition here
TCTZF vs ATDRF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, ATDRF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while ATDRF trades at $6.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas ATDRF's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ATDRF's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to ATDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check ATDRF's competition here
TCTZF vs SKLTF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, SKLTF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while SKLTF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas SKLTF's P/E ratio is -93.75. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SKLTF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is less volatile compared to SKLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check SKLTF's competition here
TCTZF vs CHLLF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, CHLLF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while CHLLF trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas CHLLF's P/E ratio is 238.93. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CHLLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is less volatile compared to CHLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check CHLLF's competition here
TCTZF vs RTMVF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, RTMVF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while RTMVF trades at $5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas RTMVF's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RTMVF's ROE of +2.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to RTMVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check RTMVF's competition here
TCTZF vs RTMVY Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, RTMVY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while RTMVY trades at $11.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas RTMVY's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RTMVY's ROE of +1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to RTMVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check RTMVY's competition here
TCTZF vs MEIUF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, MEIUF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while MEIUF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas MEIUF's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MEIUF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is less volatile compared to MEIUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check MEIUF's competition here
TCTZF vs KKKUF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, KKKUF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while KKKUF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas KKKUF's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KKKUF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to KKKUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check KKKUF's competition here
TCTZF vs DHGAF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, DHGAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while DHGAF trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas DHGAF's P/E ratio is 50.80. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DHGAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is less volatile compared to DHGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check DHGAF's competition here
TCTZF vs HMNTY Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, HMNTY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while HMNTY trades at $12.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas HMNTY's P/E ratio is 21.31. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HMNTY's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to HMNTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check HMNTY's competition here
TCTZF vs PRSNF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, PRSNF has a market cap of 914.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while PRSNF trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas PRSNF's P/E ratio is -33.12. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PRSNF's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to PRSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check PRSNF's competition here
TCTZF vs MLRYY Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, MLRYY has a market cap of 524M. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while MLRYY trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas MLRYY's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MLRYY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to MLRYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check MLRYY's competition here
TCTZF vs XINXF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, XINXF has a market cap of 509.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while XINXF trades at $76.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas XINXF's P/E ratio is 30.48. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to XINXF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to XINXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check XINXF's competition here
TCTZF vs ADBMF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, ADBMF has a market cap of 371.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while ADBMF trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas ADBMF's P/E ratio is 56.74. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ADBMF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to ADBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check ADBMF's competition here
TCTZF vs WNWSF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, WNWSF has a market cap of 335M. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while WNWSF trades at $15.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas WNWSF's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WNWSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is less volatile compared to WNWSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check WNWSF's competition here
TCTZF vs ZGXNF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, ZGXNF has a market cap of 304.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while ZGXNF trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas ZGXNF's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ZGXNF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is less volatile compared to ZGXNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check ZGXNF's competition here
TCTZF vs FRRGF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, FRRGF has a market cap of 239.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while FRRGF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas FRRGF's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FRRGF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to FRRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check FRRGF's competition here
TCTZF vs MECVF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, MECVF has a market cap of 186.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while MECVF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas MECVF's P/E ratio is -17.71. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MECVF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to MECVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check MECVF's competition here
TCTZF vs NXCLF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, NXCLF has a market cap of 153.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while NXCLF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas NXCLF's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NXCLF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to NXCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check NXCLF's competition here
TCTZF vs UUMMF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, UUMMF has a market cap of 152.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while UUMMF trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas UUMMF's P/E ratio is 40.52. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to UUMMF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to UUMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check UUMMF's competition here
TCTZF vs TGRVF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, TGRVF has a market cap of 129.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while TGRVF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas TGRVF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TGRVF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to TGRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check TGRVF's competition here
TCTZF vs RSTN Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, RSTN has a market cap of 84.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while RSTN trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas RSTN's P/E ratio is -10.16. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RSTN's ROE of -3.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is less volatile compared to RSTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check RSTN's competition here
TCTZF vs ZMDTF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, ZMDTF has a market cap of 72.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while ZMDTF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas ZMDTF's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ZMDTF's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is less volatile compared to ZMDTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check ZMDTF's competition here
TCTZF vs CPADF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, CPADF has a market cap of 71.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while CPADF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas CPADF's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CPADF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is less volatile compared to CPADF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check CPADF's competition here
TCTZF vs CKPDY Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, CKPDY has a market cap of 67.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while CKPDY trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas CKPDY's P/E ratio is 18.40. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CKPDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to CKPDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check CKPDY's competition here
TCTZF vs OPNDF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, OPNDF has a market cap of 60.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while OPNDF trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas OPNDF's P/E ratio is -48.75. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OPNDF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to OPNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check OPNDF's competition here
TCTZF vs PXSTF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, PXSTF has a market cap of 49.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while PXSTF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas PXSTF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PXSTF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is less volatile compared to PXSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check PXSTF's competition here
TCTZF vs MSEZ Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, MSEZ has a market cap of 45.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while MSEZ trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas MSEZ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MSEZ's ROE of -13.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to MSEZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check MSEZ's competition here
TCTZF vs RDLYF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, RDLYF has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while RDLYF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas RDLYF's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RDLYF's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to RDLYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check RDLYF's competition here
TCTZF vs NIROF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, NIROF has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while NIROF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas NIROF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NIROF's ROE of +2.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is less volatile compared to NIROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check NIROF's competition here
TCTZF vs SABOF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, SABOF has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while SABOF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas SABOF's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SABOF's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to SABOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check SABOF's competition here
TCTZF vs BBUZ Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, BBUZ has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while BBUZ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas BBUZ's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BBUZ's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is less volatile compared to BBUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check BBUZ's competition here
TCTZF vs HYPPF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, HYPPF has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while HYPPF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas HYPPF's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HYPPF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to HYPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check HYPPF's competition here
TCTZF vs APMLF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, APMLF has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while APMLF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas APMLF's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to APMLF's ROE of +36.79%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to APMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check APMLF's competition here
TCTZF vs DGTHF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, DGTHF has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while DGTHF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas DGTHF's P/E ratio is -4.63. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DGTHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to DGTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check DGTHF's competition here
TCTZF vs BBTVF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, BBTVF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while BBTVF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas BBTVF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BBTVF's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to BBTVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check BBTVF's competition here
TCTZF vs EGLXF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, EGLXF has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while EGLXF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas EGLXF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EGLXF's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to EGLXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check EGLXF's competition here
TCTZF vs QQQFF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, QQQFF has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while QQQFF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas QQQFF's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QQQFF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is less volatile compared to QQQFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check QQQFF's competition here
TCTZF vs GIFX Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, GIFX has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while GIFX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas GIFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GIFX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is less volatile compared to GIFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check GIFX's competition here
TCTZF vs FMHS Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, FMHS has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while FMHS trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas FMHS's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FMHS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is less volatile compared to FMHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check FMHS's competition here
TCTZF vs SEEK Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, SEEK has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while SEEK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas SEEK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SEEK's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to SEEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check SEEK's competition here
TCTZF vs NUGL Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, NUGL has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while NUGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas NUGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NUGL's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is less volatile compared to NUGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check NUGL's competition here
TCTZF vs GOGY Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, GOGY has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while GOGY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas GOGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GOGY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is less volatile compared to GOGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check GOGY's competition here
TCTZF vs LTCP Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, LTCP has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while LTCP trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas LTCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LTCP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to LTCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check LTCP's competition here
TCTZF vs YOOIF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, YOOIF has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while YOOIF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas YOOIF's P/E ratio is 2.02. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to YOOIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to YOOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check YOOIF's competition here
TCTZF vs LBUY Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, LBUY has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while LBUY trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas LBUY's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LBUY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is less volatile compared to LBUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check LBUY's competition here
TCTZF vs BMTM Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, BMTM has a market cap of 892.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while BMTM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas BMTM's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BMTM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to BMTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check BMTM's competition here
TCTZF vs MRPT Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, MRPT has a market cap of 826.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while MRPT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas MRPT's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MRPT's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is less volatile compared to MRPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check MRPT's competition here
TCTZF vs MRNJ Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, MRNJ has a market cap of 762.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while MRNJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas MRNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MRNJ's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is less volatile compared to MRNJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check MRNJ's competition here
TCTZF vs SFUNY Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, SFUNY has a market cap of 722.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while SFUNY trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas SFUNY's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SFUNY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is less volatile compared to SFUNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check SFUNY's competition here
TCTZF vs SPFYF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, SPFYF has a market cap of 722.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while SPFYF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas SPFYF's P/E ratio is 1.59. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SPFYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is less volatile compared to SPFYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check SPFYF's competition here
TCTZF vs ILIM Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, ILIM has a market cap of 684.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while ILIM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas ILIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ILIM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is less volatile compared to ILIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check ILIM's competition here
TCTZF vs OOOOF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, OOOOF has a market cap of 599.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while OOOOF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas OOOOF's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OOOOF's ROE of +12.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is less volatile compared to OOOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check OOOOF's competition here
TCTZF vs CYAP Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, CYAP has a market cap of 598.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while CYAP trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas CYAP's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CYAP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to CYAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check CYAP's competition here
TCTZF vs VMSI Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, VMSI has a market cap of 578.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while VMSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas VMSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VMSI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to VMSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check VMSI's competition here
TCTZF vs LHGI Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, LHGI has a market cap of 576.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while LHGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas LHGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LHGI's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to LHGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check LHGI's competition here
TCTZF vs RBDC Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, RBDC has a market cap of 505.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while RBDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas RBDC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RBDC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is less volatile compared to RBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check RBDC's competition here
TCTZF vs LKST Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, LKST has a market cap of 243.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while LKST trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas LKST's P/E ratio is -7.47. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LKST's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is less volatile compared to LKST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check LKST's competition here
TCTZF vs KIWB Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, KIWB has a market cap of 137.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while KIWB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas KIWB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KIWB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is less volatile compared to KIWB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check KIWB's competition here
TCTZF vs ZONX Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, ZONX has a market cap of 60.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while ZONX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas ZONX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ZONX's ROE of +28.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is less volatile compared to ZONX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check ZONX's competition here
TCTZF vs OTTV Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, OTTV has a market cap of 47.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while OTTV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas OTTV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OTTV's ROE of +1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to OTTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check OTTV's competition here
TCTZF vs QTTOY Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, QTTOY has a market cap of 42.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while QTTOY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas QTTOY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QTTOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to QTTOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check QTTOY's competition here
TCTZF vs SLNM Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, SLNM has a market cap of 31.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while SLNM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas SLNM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SLNM's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is less volatile compared to SLNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check SLNM's competition here
TCTZF vs RWRDP Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, RWRDP has a market cap of 30K. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while RWRDP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas RWRDP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RWRDP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is less volatile compared to RWRDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check RWRDP's competition here
TCTZF vs HUTN Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, HUTN has a market cap of 25.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while HUTN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas HUTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HUTN's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to HUTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check HUTN's competition here
TCTZF vs DELCF Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, DELCF has a market cap of 17.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while DELCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas DELCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DELCF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to DELCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check DELCF's competition here
TCTZF vs MDAW Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, MDAW has a market cap of 14.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while MDAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas MDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MDAW's ROE of +7.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is less volatile compared to MDAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check MDAW's competition here
TCTZF vs BTIM Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, BTIM has a market cap of 12.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while BTIM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas BTIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BTIM's ROE of +2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is less volatile compared to BTIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check BTIM's competition here
TCTZF vs REDFY Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, REDFY has a market cap of 11.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while REDFY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas REDFY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to REDFY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to REDFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check REDFY's competition here
TCTZF vs CRTDW Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, CRTDW has a market cap of 6K. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while CRTDW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas CRTDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CRTDW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to CRTDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check CRTDW's competition here
TCTZF vs PIKL Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, PIKL has a market cap of 5.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while PIKL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas PIKL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PIKL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to PIKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check PIKL's competition here
TCTZF vs ISHM Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, ISHM has a market cap of 5.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while ISHM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas ISHM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ISHM's ROE of -9.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to ISHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check ISHM's competition here
TCTZF vs SHGY Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, SHGY has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while SHGY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas SHGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SHGY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to SHGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check SHGY's competition here
TCTZF vs LOCM Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, LOCM has a market cap of 4.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while LOCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas LOCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LOCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to LOCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check LOCM's competition here
TCTZF vs ROII Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, ROII has a market cap of 3.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while ROII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas ROII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ROII's ROE of +2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to ROII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check ROII's competition here
TCTZF vs LOVLQ Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, LOVLQ has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while LOVLQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas LOVLQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LOVLQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is less volatile compared to LOVLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check LOVLQ's competition here
TCTZF vs ZZLL Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, ZZLL has a market cap of 2K. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while ZZLL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas ZZLL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ZZLL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is less volatile compared to ZZLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check ZZLL's competition here
TCTZF vs FRFR Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, FRFR has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while FRFR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas FRFR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FRFR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to FRFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check FRFR's competition here
TCTZF vs INTH Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, INTH has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while INTH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas INTH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to INTH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to INTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check INTH's competition here
TCTZF vs DATI Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, DATI has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while DATI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas DATI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DATI's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to DATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check DATI's competition here
TCTZF vs ABBY Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, ABBY has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while ABBY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas ABBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ABBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is less volatile compared to ABBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check ABBY's competition here
TCTZF vs RAIO Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, RAIO has a market cap of 891. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while RAIO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas RAIO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RAIO's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is less volatile compared to RAIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check RAIO's competition here
TCTZF vs YITD Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, YITD has a market cap of 800. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while YITD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas YITD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to YITD's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to YITD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check YITD's competition here
TCTZF vs CYZN Comparison February 2026
TCTZF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCTZF stands at 616.6B. In comparison, CYZN has a market cap of 279. Regarding current trading prices, TCTZF is priced at $68.19, while CYZN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCTZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas CYZN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TCTZF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CYZN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCTZF is more volatile compared to CYZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCTZF.Check CYZN's competition here