TCS Group Holding PLC
TCS Group Holding PLC TCS.IL Peers
See (TCS.IL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCS.IL | £25.60 | +0.39% | 5.1B | 24.62 | £1.04 | N/A |
| 0O84.L | £186.10 | -0.48% | 276B | N/A | N/A | +9.00% |
| 0KEF.L | £180.20 | +0.17% | 71.3B | 15.26 | £11.81 | +3.55% |
| SBID.L | £63.40 | N/A | 56.6B | 6.28 | £10.09 | +2.91% |
| SANB.L | £152.50 | +0.33% | 47.4B | 0.35 | £4.40 | +0.06% |
| LLOY.L | £75.78 | -1.56% | 45.4B | 12.63 | £0.06 | +0.04% |
| AXB.IL | £71.60 | +1.13% | 44.4B | 29.34 | £2.44 | +0.08% |
| 0JW2.L | £185.77 | +0.27% | 29.8B | 14.19 | £13.09 | +2.91% |
| AXB.L | £44.80 | N/A | 27.8B | 8.48 | £5.28 | N/A |
| AIBG.L | £582.00 | -2.02% | 12.4B | 7.46 | £0.78 | +4.39% |
Stock Comparison
TCS.IL vs 0O84.L Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, 0O84.L has a market cap of 276B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while 0O84.L trades at £186.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas 0O84.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0O84.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL is less volatile compared to 0O84.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.IL.
TCS.IL vs 0KEF.L Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, 0KEF.L has a market cap of 71.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while 0KEF.L trades at £180.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas 0KEF.L's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0KEF.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL is less volatile compared to 0KEF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.IL.
TCS.IL vs SBID.L Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SBID.L has a market cap of 56.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while SBID.L trades at £63.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas SBID.L's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SBID.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL is less volatile compared to SBID.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.IL.
TCS.IL vs SANB.L Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SANB.L has a market cap of 47.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while SANB.L trades at £152.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas SANB.L's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SANB.L's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL is less volatile compared to SANB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.IL.
TCS.IL vs LLOY.L Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, LLOY.L has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while LLOY.L trades at £75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas LLOY.L's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LLOY.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL is less volatile compared to LLOY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.IL.
TCS.IL vs AXB.IL Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, AXB.IL has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while AXB.IL trades at £71.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas AXB.IL's P/E ratio is 29.34. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AXB.IL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL is less volatile compared to AXB.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.IL.
TCS.IL vs 0JW2.L Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, 0JW2.L has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while 0JW2.L trades at £185.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas 0JW2.L's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0JW2.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL is less volatile compared to 0JW2.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.IL.
TCS.IL vs AXB.L Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, AXB.L has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while AXB.L trades at £44.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas AXB.L's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AXB.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL is less volatile compared to AXB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.IL.
TCS.IL vs AIBG.L Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, AIBG.L has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while AIBG.L trades at £582.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas AIBG.L's P/E ratio is 7.46. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AIBG.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL is less volatile compared to AIBG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.IL.
TCS.IL vs BIRG.L Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, BIRG.L has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while BIRG.L trades at £12.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas BIRG.L's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BIRG.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL is less volatile compared to BIRG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.IL.
TCS.IL vs VTBR.L Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, VTBR.L has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while VTBR.L trades at £1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas VTBR.L's P/E ratio is 1.52. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VTBR.L's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL and VTBR.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TCS.IL vs HSBK.IL Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, HSBK.IL has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while HSBK.IL trades at £22.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas HSBK.IL's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HSBK.IL's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL is less volatile compared to HSBK.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.IL.
TCS.IL vs FEDS.L Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, FEDS.L has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while FEDS.L trades at £0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas FEDS.L's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FEDS.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL and FEDS.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TCS.IL vs CBKD.L Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CBKD.L has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while CBKD.L trades at £1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas CBKD.L's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CBKD.L's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL is less volatile compared to CBKD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.IL.
TCS.IL vs CBKD.IL Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CBKD.IL has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while CBKD.IL trades at £1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas CBKD.IL's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CBKD.IL's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL is less volatile compared to CBKD.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.IL.
TCS.IL vs BGEO.L Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, BGEO.L has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while BGEO.L trades at £6,725.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas BGEO.L's P/E ratio is 5.75. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BGEO.L's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL is less volatile compared to BGEO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.IL.
TCS.IL vs NLB.IL Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, NLB.IL has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while NLB.IL trades at £29.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas NLB.IL's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NLB.IL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL is less volatile compared to NLB.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.IL.
TCS.IL vs VMUK.L Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, VMUK.L has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while VMUK.L trades at £217.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas VMUK.L's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VMUK.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL is less volatile compared to VMUK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.IL.
TCS.IL vs 0EFW.L Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, 0EFW.L has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while 0EFW.L trades at £12.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas 0EFW.L's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0EFW.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL is less volatile compared to 0EFW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.IL.
TCS.IL vs XD5D.L Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, XD5D.L has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while XD5D.L trades at £84.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas XD5D.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to XD5D.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL is less volatile compared to XD5D.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.IL.
TCS.IL vs TBCG.L Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, TBCG.L has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while TBCG.L trades at £4,480.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas TBCG.L's P/E ratio is 7.26. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TBCG.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL is less volatile compared to TBCG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.IL.
TCS.IL vs HSBK.L Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, HSBK.L has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while HSBK.L trades at £8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas HSBK.L's P/E ratio is 1.22. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HSBK.L's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL is less volatile compared to HSBK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.IL.
TCS.IL vs 0RE6.L Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, 0RE6.L has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while 0RE6.L trades at £125.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas 0RE6.L's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0RE6.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL and 0RE6.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TCS.IL vs 0RMP.L Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, 0RMP.L has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while 0RMP.L trades at £246.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas 0RMP.L's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0RMP.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL is less volatile compared to 0RMP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.IL.
TCS.IL vs BOCH.L Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, BOCH.L has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while BOCH.L trades at £375.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas BOCH.L's P/E ratio is 26.79. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BOCH.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL and BOCH.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TCS.IL vs NBS.L Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, NBS.L has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while NBS.L trades at £130.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas NBS.L's P/E ratio is 0.52. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NBS.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL is less volatile compared to NBS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.IL.
TCS.IL vs 0QLT.L Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, 0QLT.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while 0QLT.L trades at £1,760.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas 0QLT.L's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0QLT.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL and 0QLT.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TCS.IL vs IL0A.L Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, IL0A.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while IL0A.L trades at £2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas IL0A.L's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IL0A.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL and IL0A.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TCS.IL vs NLB.L Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, NLB.L has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while NLB.L trades at £11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas NLB.L's P/E ratio is 2.24. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NLB.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL and NLB.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TCS.IL vs PTSB.L Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, PTSB.L has a market cap of 956.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while PTSB.L trades at £1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas PTSB.L's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PTSB.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL is less volatile compared to PTSB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.IL.
TCS.IL vs MTRO.L Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MTRO.L has a market cap of 772.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while MTRO.L trades at £114.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas MTRO.L's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTRO.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL is less volatile compared to MTRO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.IL.
TCS.IL vs 0QS4.L Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, 0QS4.L has a market cap of 612M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while 0QS4.L trades at £153.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas 0QS4.L's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0QS4.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL is less volatile compared to 0QS4.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.IL.
TCS.IL vs 0QQ4.L Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, 0QQ4.L has a market cap of 532.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while 0QQ4.L trades at £946.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas 0QQ4.L's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0QQ4.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL is less volatile compared to 0QQ4.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.IL.
TCS.IL vs 0QLU.L Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, 0QLU.L has a market cap of 385.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while 0QLU.L trades at £75.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas 0QLU.L's P/E ratio is 26.02. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0QLU.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL is less volatile compared to 0QLU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.IL.
TCS.IL vs 0QKG.L Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, 0QKG.L has a market cap of 335M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while 0QKG.L trades at £3,350.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas 0QKG.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0QKG.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL is less volatile compared to 0QKG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.IL.
TCS.IL vs 0QLK.L Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, 0QLK.L has a market cap of 296M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while 0QLK.L trades at £4,120.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas 0QLK.L's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0QLK.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL and 0QLK.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TCS.IL vs 0QV3.L Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, 0QV3.L has a market cap of 290.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while 0QV3.L trades at £21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas 0QV3.L's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0QV3.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL is less volatile compared to 0QV3.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.IL.
TCS.IL vs 0ROV.L Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, 0ROV.L has a market cap of 166.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while 0ROV.L trades at £55.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas 0ROV.L's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0ROV.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL and 0ROV.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TCS.IL vs ARBB.L Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ARBB.L has a market cap of 153.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while ARBB.L trades at £947.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas ARBB.L's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARBB.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL is less volatile compared to ARBB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.IL.
TCS.IL vs STB.L Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, STB.L has a market cap of 139.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while STB.L trades at £750.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas STB.L's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STB.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL is less volatile compared to STB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.IL.
TCS.IL vs MFX.L Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MFX.L has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while MFX.L trades at £20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas MFX.L's P/E ratio is 5.13. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MFX.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL is less volatile compared to MFX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.IL.
TCS.IL vs SBER.IL Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SBER.IL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while SBER.IL trades at £0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas SBER.IL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SBER.IL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL and SBER.IL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
TCS.IL vs VTBR.IL Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, VTBR.IL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while VTBR.IL trades at £1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas VTBR.IL's P/E ratio is 1.33. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VTBR.IL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TCS.IL has daily volatility of 0.00 and VTBR.IL has daily volatility of N/A.
TCS.IL vs ATMA.L Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ATMA.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while ATMA.L trades at £0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas ATMA.L's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATMA.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL is less volatile compared to ATMA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.IL.
TCS.IL vs CIHL.L Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CIHL.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while CIHL.L trades at £26.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas CIHL.L's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIHL.L's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL is less volatile compared to CIHL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.IL.
TCS.IL vs JEO.L Comparison
TCS.IL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS.IL stands at 5.1B. In comparison, JEO.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TCS.IL is priced at £25.60, while JEO.L trades at £843.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.62, whereas JEO.L's P/E ratio is 2.11. In terms of profitability, TCS.IL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JEO.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS.IL is less volatile compared to JEO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.IL.