Tokyo Century Corporation
Tokyo Century Corporation (TCNRF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TCNRF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Rental & Leasing Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCNRF | $10.32 | +0.00% | 5B | 8.39 | $1.23 | +4.09% |
| ASHTF | $73.77 | +0.05% | 31.3B | 21.32 | $3.46 | +1.45% |
| ELEEF | $26.02 | -1.59% | 10.5B | 26.04 | $1.00 | +1.40% |
| ASHTY | $294.63 | -0.14% | 8B | 21.15 | $13.84 | +1.46% |
| LZRFY | $6.39 | +0.08% | 6.7B | 15.97 | $0.40 | +4.84% |
| BCVVF | $9.29 | +3.17% | 6.4B | 8.00 | $1.16 | +7.16% |
| SIXGF | $87.36 | +0.00% | 3.8B | 14.02 | $6.23 | +3.62% |
| BRRAY | $5.88 | +0.00% | 1.1B | 11.76 | $0.50 | +2.39% |
| BRRAF | $5.72 | +0.00% | 1.1B | 10.79 | $0.53 | +4.06% |
| AOHLF | $3.63 | +0.00% | 639.7M | 5.26 | $0.69 | +26.68% |
Stock Comparison
TCNRF vs ASHTF Comparison August 2025
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5B. In comparison, ASHTF has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while ASHTF trades at $73.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas ASHTF's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ASHTF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is more volatile compared to ASHTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.Check ASHTF's competition here
TCNRF vs ELEEF Comparison August 2025
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5B. In comparison, ELEEF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while ELEEF trades at $26.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas ELEEF's P/E ratio is 26.04. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELEEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is more volatile compared to ELEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.Check ELEEF's competition here
TCNRF vs ASHTY Comparison August 2025
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5B. In comparison, ASHTY has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while ASHTY trades at $294.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas ASHTY's P/E ratio is 21.15. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ASHTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is less volatile compared to ASHTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.Check ASHTY's competition here
TCNRF vs LZRFY Comparison August 2025
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5B. In comparison, LZRFY has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while LZRFY trades at $6.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas LZRFY's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LZRFY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is more volatile compared to LZRFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.Check LZRFY's competition here
TCNRF vs BCVVF Comparison August 2025
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5B. In comparison, BCVVF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while BCVVF trades at $9.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas BCVVF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BCVVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is more volatile compared to BCVVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.Check BCVVF's competition here
TCNRF vs SIXGF Comparison August 2025
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5B. In comparison, SIXGF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while SIXGF trades at $87.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas SIXGF's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SIXGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is more volatile compared to SIXGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.Check SIXGF's competition here
TCNRF vs BRRAY Comparison August 2025
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5B. In comparison, BRRAY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while BRRAY trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas BRRAY's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BRRAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is more volatile compared to BRRAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.Check BRRAY's competition here
TCNRF vs BRRAF Comparison August 2025
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5B. In comparison, BRRAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while BRRAF trades at $5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas BRRAF's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BRRAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is less volatile compared to BRRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.Check BRRAF's competition here
TCNRF vs AOHLF Comparison August 2025
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5B. In comparison, AOHLF has a market cap of 639.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while AOHLF trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas AOHLF's P/E ratio is 5.26. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AOHLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is more volatile compared to AOHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.Check AOHLF's competition here
TCNRF vs BDIMF Comparison August 2025
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5B. In comparison, BDIMF has a market cap of 582M. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while BDIMF trades at $8.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas BDIMF's P/E ratio is 23.54. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BDIMF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is more volatile compared to BDIMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.Check BDIMF's competition here
TCNRF vs CFRLF Comparison August 2025
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5B. In comparison, CFRLF has a market cap of 346.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while CFRLF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas CFRLF's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CFRLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is less volatile compared to CFRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.Check CFRLF's competition here
TCNRF vs EOHDF Comparison August 2025
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5B. In comparison, EOHDF has a market cap of 278.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while EOHDF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas EOHDF's P/E ratio is 6.01. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EOHDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is less volatile compared to EOHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.Check EOHDF's competition here
TCNRF vs ICHHF Comparison August 2025
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5B. In comparison, ICHHF has a market cap of 205M. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while ICHHF trades at $8.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas ICHHF's P/E ratio is 4.71. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ICHHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is more volatile compared to ICHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.Check ICHHF's competition here
TCNRF vs FSLUF Comparison August 2025
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5B. In comparison, FSLUF has a market cap of 87.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while FSLUF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas FSLUF's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FSLUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is more volatile compared to FSLUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.Check FSLUF's competition here
TCNRF vs CTOSW Comparison August 2025
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5B. In comparison, CTOSW has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while CTOSW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas CTOSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTOSW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is more volatile compared to CTOSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.Check CTOSW's competition here
TCNRF vs SLNFF Comparison August 2025
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5B. In comparison, SLNFF has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while SLNFF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas SLNFF's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SLNFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is more volatile compared to SLNFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.Check SLNFF's competition here
TCNRF vs DWAY Comparison August 2025
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5B. In comparison, DWAY has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while DWAY trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas DWAY's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DWAY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is less volatile compared to DWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.Check DWAY's competition here
TCNRF vs WSHE Comparison August 2025
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5B. In comparison, WSHE has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while WSHE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas WSHE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WSHE's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is more volatile compared to WSHE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.Check WSHE's competition here
TCNRF vs AZNVF Comparison August 2025
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5B. In comparison, AZNVF has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while AZNVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas AZNVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AZNVF's ROE of +8.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is more volatile compared to AZNVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.Check AZNVF's competition here
TCNRF vs AFDG Comparison August 2025
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5B. In comparison, AFDG has a market cap of 392.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while AFDG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas AFDG's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AFDG's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is more volatile compared to AFDG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.Check AFDG's competition here
TCNRF vs LEAS Comparison August 2025
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5B. In comparison, LEAS has a market cap of 211.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while LEAS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas LEAS's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LEAS's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is more volatile compared to LEAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.Check LEAS's competition here
TCNRF vs BRDSQ Comparison August 2025
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5B. In comparison, BRDSQ has a market cap of 15.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while BRDSQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas BRDSQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BRDSQ's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is more volatile compared to BRDSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.Check BRDSQ's competition here
TCNRF vs YAYO Comparison August 2025
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5B. In comparison, YAYO has a market cap of 7.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while YAYO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas YAYO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YAYO's ROE of +7.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is less volatile compared to YAYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.Check YAYO's competition here
TCNRF vs HYREQ Comparison August 2025
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5B. In comparison, HYREQ has a market cap of 31. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while HYREQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas HYREQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HYREQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is more volatile compared to HYREQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.Check HYREQ's competition here