Tokyo Century Corporation
Tokyo Century Corporation TCNRF Peers
See (TCNRF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Rental & Leasing Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCNRF | $10.32 | N/A | 5.03B | 8.39 | $1.23 | +1.98% |
| ASHTF | $58.12 | -0.39% | 25.07B | 16.70 | $3.48 | +2.15% |
| ELEEF | $23.18 | +0.30% | 9.34B | 23.41 | $0.99 | +1.54% |
| LZRFY | $7.46 | +2.75% | 7.86B | 23.31 | $0.32 | +0.52% |
| ASHTY | $236.03 | +0.17% | 6.36B | 16.98 | $13.90 | +2.13% |
| BCVVF | $7.30 | -2.85% | 5.06B | 5.49 | $1.33 | +6.45% |
| SIXGF | $81.70 | N/A | 3.43B | 15.50 | $5.27 | +5.02% |
| BRRAF | $6.13 | +29.53% | 1.14B | 11.57 | $0.53 | +2.05% |
| AOHLF | $6.00 | +65.29% | 1.02B | 8.70 | $0.69 | +15.84% |
| BRRAY | $5.28 | -11.85% | 984.54M | 9.60 | $0.55 | +4.06% |
Stock Comparison
TCNRF vs ASHTF Comparison
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5.03B. In comparison, ASHTF has a market cap of 25.07B. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while ASHTF trades at $58.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas ASHTF's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASHTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is more volatile compared to ASHTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.
TCNRF vs ELEEF Comparison
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5.03B. In comparison, ELEEF has a market cap of 9.34B. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while ELEEF trades at $23.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas ELEEF's P/E ratio is 23.41. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ELEEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is more volatile compared to ELEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.
TCNRF vs LZRFY Comparison
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5.03B. In comparison, LZRFY has a market cap of 7.86B. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while LZRFY trades at $7.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas LZRFY's P/E ratio is 23.31. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LZRFY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is more volatile compared to LZRFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.
TCNRF vs ASHTY Comparison
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5.03B. In comparison, ASHTY has a market cap of 6.36B. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while ASHTY trades at $236.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas ASHTY's P/E ratio is 16.98. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASHTY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is more volatile compared to ASHTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.
TCNRF vs BCVVF Comparison
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5.03B. In comparison, BCVVF has a market cap of 5.06B. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while BCVVF trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas BCVVF's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BCVVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is more volatile compared to BCVVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.
TCNRF vs SIXGF Comparison
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5.03B. In comparison, SIXGF has a market cap of 3.43B. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while SIXGF trades at $81.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas SIXGF's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SIXGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is more volatile compared to SIXGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.
TCNRF vs BRRAF Comparison
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5.03B. In comparison, BRRAF has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while BRRAF trades at $6.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas BRRAF's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRRAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is more volatile compared to BRRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.
TCNRF vs AOHLF Comparison
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5.03B. In comparison, AOHLF has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while AOHLF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas AOHLF's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AOHLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is less volatile compared to AOHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.
TCNRF vs BRRAY Comparison
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5.03B. In comparison, BRRAY has a market cap of 984.54M. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while BRRAY trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas BRRAY's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRRAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is less volatile compared to BRRAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.
TCNRF vs CFRLF Comparison
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5.03B. In comparison, CFRLF has a market cap of 417.00M. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while CFRLF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas CFRLF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CFRLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is less volatile compared to CFRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.
TCNRF vs BDIMF Comparison
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5.03B. In comparison, BDIMF has a market cap of 414.60M. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while BDIMF trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas BDIMF's P/E ratio is 19.62. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BDIMF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is more volatile compared to BDIMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.
TCNRF vs ICHHF Comparison
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5.03B. In comparison, ICHHF has a market cap of 284.51M. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while ICHHF trades at $12.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas ICHHF's P/E ratio is 6.57. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ICHHF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is more volatile compared to ICHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.
TCNRF vs EOHDF Comparison
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5.03B. In comparison, EOHDF has a market cap of 272.60M. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while EOHDF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas EOHDF's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EOHDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is less volatile compared to EOHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.
TCNRF vs FSLUF Comparison
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5.03B. In comparison, FSLUF has a market cap of 87.23M. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while FSLUF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas FSLUF's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FSLUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is more volatile compared to FSLUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.
TCNRF vs CTOSW Comparison
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5.03B. In comparison, CTOSW has a market cap of 18.18M. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while CTOSW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas CTOSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CTOSW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is more volatile compared to CTOSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.
TCNRF vs SLNFF Comparison
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5.03B. In comparison, SLNFF has a market cap of 17.26M. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while SLNFF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas SLNFF's P/E ratio is 20.15. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SLNFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is more volatile compared to SLNFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.
TCNRF vs DWAY Comparison
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5.03B. In comparison, DWAY has a market cap of 10.14M. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while DWAY trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas DWAY's P/E ratio is -8.90. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DWAY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is more volatile compared to DWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.
TCNRF vs WSHE Comparison
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5.03B. In comparison, WSHE has a market cap of 4.10M. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while WSHE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas WSHE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WSHE's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is more volatile compared to WSHE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.
TCNRF vs AZNVF Comparison
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5.03B. In comparison, AZNVF has a market cap of 4.06M. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while AZNVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas AZNVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AZNVF's ROE of +8.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is more volatile compared to AZNVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.
TCNRF vs AFDG Comparison
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5.03B. In comparison, AFDG has a market cap of 898000.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while AFDG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas AFDG's P/E ratio is 0.80. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AFDG's ROE of +3.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is less volatile compared to AFDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.
TCNRF vs LEAS Comparison
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5.03B. In comparison, LEAS has a market cap of 211458.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while LEAS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas LEAS's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LEAS's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is more volatile compared to LEAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.
TCNRF vs BRDSQ Comparison
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5.03B. In comparison, BRDSQ has a market cap of 15815.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while BRDSQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas BRDSQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRDSQ's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is more volatile compared to BRDSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.
TCNRF vs YAYO Comparison
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5.03B. In comparison, YAYO has a market cap of 7130.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while YAYO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas YAYO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YAYO's ROE of +7.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is more volatile compared to YAYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.
TCNRF vs HYREQ Comparison
TCNRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCNRF stands at 5.03B. In comparison, HYREQ has a market cap of 321.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCNRF is priced at $10.32, while HYREQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCNRF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.39, whereas HYREQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TCNRF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HYREQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCNRF is less volatile compared to HYREQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCNRF.