Tricorn Group plc
Tricorn Group plc (TCN.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TCN.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCN.L | £4.50 | +0.00% | 0 | N/A | -£9.50 | N/A |
| 0XXV.IL | £130.19 | -3.01% | 696.8B | 24.38 | £5.34 | +2.23% |
| GEC.L | £159.16 | +51.58% | 259.9B | 41.88 | £3.80 | N/A |
| 0Y3K.L | £375.69 | -3.73% | 147B | 67.94 | £5.53 | +1.05% |
| 0R33.L | £141.02 | -3.62% | 79.3B | 29.51 | £4.78 | +1.49% |
| 0A0H.L | £153.00 | +1.28% | 77.6B | N/A | N/A | +0.83% |
| 0Y7S.L | £106.04 | +0.55% | 69.8B | 61.08 | £1.74 | +1.40% |
| 0A0H.IL | £133.70 | +0.00% | 64B | 36.73 | £3.64 | +0.83% |
| 0KXA.L | £339.32 | -4.13% | 39.9B | 64.29 | £5.50 | +1.51% |
| 0NMK.L | £170.46 | +1.46% | 34B | -43.83 | -£3.89 | +0.47% |
Stock Comparison
TCN.L vs 0XXV.IL Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0XXV.IL has a market cap of 696.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while 0XXV.IL trades at £130.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0XXV.IL's P/E ratio is 24.38. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0XXV.IL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to 0XXV.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check 0XXV.IL's competition here
TCN.L vs GEC.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, GEC.L has a market cap of 259.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while GEC.L trades at £159.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEC.L's P/E ratio is 41.88. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GEC.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to GEC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check GEC.L's competition here
TCN.L vs 0Y3K.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0Y3K.L has a market cap of 147B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while 0Y3K.L trades at £375.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0Y3K.L's P/E ratio is 67.94. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0Y3K.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to 0Y3K.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check 0Y3K.L's competition here
TCN.L vs 0R33.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0R33.L has a market cap of 79.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while 0R33.L trades at £141.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0R33.L's P/E ratio is 29.51. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0R33.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to 0R33.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check 0R33.L's competition here
TCN.L vs 0A0H.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0A0H.L has a market cap of 77.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while 0A0H.L trades at £153.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0A0H.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0A0H.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to 0A0H.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check 0A0H.L's competition here
TCN.L vs 0Y7S.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0Y7S.L has a market cap of 69.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while 0Y7S.L trades at £106.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0Y7S.L's P/E ratio is 61.08. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0Y7S.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to 0Y7S.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check 0Y7S.L's competition here
TCN.L vs 0A0H.IL Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0A0H.IL has a market cap of 64B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while 0A0H.IL trades at £133.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0A0H.IL's P/E ratio is 36.73. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0A0H.IL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is less volatile compared to 0A0H.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check 0A0H.IL's competition here
TCN.L vs 0KXA.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0KXA.L has a market cap of 39.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while 0KXA.L trades at £339.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0KXA.L's P/E ratio is 64.29. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0KXA.L's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to 0KXA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check 0KXA.L's competition here
TCN.L vs 0NMK.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0NMK.L has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while 0NMK.L trades at £170.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0NMK.L's P/E ratio is -43.83. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0NMK.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to 0NMK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check 0NMK.L's competition here
TCN.L vs 0QOT.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0QOT.L has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while 0QOT.L trades at £286.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0QOT.L's P/E ratio is 40.96. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0QOT.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to 0QOT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check 0QOT.L's competition here
TCN.L vs 0ICP.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0ICP.L has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while 0ICP.L trades at £175.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0ICP.L's P/E ratio is 23.70. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0ICP.L's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to 0ICP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check 0ICP.L's competition here
TCN.L vs 0HDK.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0HDK.L has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while 0HDK.L trades at £95.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0HDK.L's P/E ratio is 36.18. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0HDK.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to 0HDK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check 0HDK.L's competition here
TCN.L vs 0QO1.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0QO1.L has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while 0QO1.L trades at £176.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0QO1.L's P/E ratio is 25.24. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0QO1.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to 0QO1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check 0QO1.L's competition here
TCN.L vs 0QMR.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0QMR.L has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while 0QMR.L trades at £950.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0QMR.L's P/E ratio is 101.08. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0QMR.L's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to 0QMR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check 0QMR.L's competition here
TCN.L vs 0L7A.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0L7A.L has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while 0L7A.L trades at £70.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0L7A.L's P/E ratio is 22.19. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0L7A.L's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to 0L7A.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check 0L7A.L's competition here
TCN.L vs 0RFL.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0RFL.L has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while 0RFL.L trades at £259.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0RFL.L's P/E ratio is 35.86. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0RFL.L's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to 0RFL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check 0RFL.L's competition here
TCN.L vs SMIN.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, SMIN.L has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while SMIN.L trades at £2,308.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMIN.L's P/E ratio is 25.93. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SMIN.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to SMIN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check SMIN.L's competition here
TCN.L vs MRO.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, MRO.L has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while MRO.L trades at £537.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRO.L's P/E ratio is -134.45. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MRO.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to MRO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check MRO.L's competition here
TCN.L vs WEIR.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, WEIR.L has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while WEIR.L trades at £2,502.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEIR.L's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to WEIR.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to WEIR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check WEIR.L's competition here
TCN.L vs IMI.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, IMI.L has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while IMI.L trades at £2,176.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMI.L's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to IMI.L's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to IMI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check IMI.L's competition here
TCN.L vs 0QP4.IL Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0QP4.IL has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while 0QP4.IL trades at £63.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0QP4.IL's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0QP4.IL's ROE of +3.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to 0QP4.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check 0QP4.IL's competition here
TCN.L vs SPX.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, SPX.L has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while SPX.L trades at £6,235.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPX.L's P/E ratio is 24.07. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SPX.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to SPX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check SPX.L's competition here
TCN.L vs 0NX1.IL Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0NX1.IL has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while 0NX1.IL trades at £28.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0NX1.IL's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0NX1.IL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to 0NX1.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check 0NX1.IL's competition here
TCN.L vs 76ID.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, 76ID.L has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while 76ID.L trades at £120.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 76ID.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 76ID.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is less volatile compared to 76ID.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check 76ID.L's competition here
TCN.L vs ROR.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, ROR.L has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while ROR.L trades at £317.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROR.L's P/E ratio is 26.48. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ROR.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to ROR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check ROR.L's competition here
TCN.L vs 0QQ9.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0QQ9.L has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while 0QQ9.L trades at £61.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0QQ9.L's P/E ratio is 1.49. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0QQ9.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is less volatile compared to 0QQ9.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check 0QQ9.L's competition here
TCN.L vs 0KAN.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0KAN.L has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while 0KAN.L trades at £20.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0KAN.L's P/E ratio is -35.29. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0KAN.L's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to 0KAN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check 0KAN.L's competition here
TCN.L vs 0QO3.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0QO3.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while 0QO3.L trades at £7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0QO3.L's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0QO3.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to 0QO3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check 0QO3.L's competition here
TCN.L vs BOY.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, BOY.L has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while BOY.L trades at £627.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOY.L's P/E ratio is 39.19. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BOY.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to BOY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check BOY.L's competition here
TCN.L vs 0G6W.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0G6W.L has a market cap of 791.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while 0G6W.L trades at £4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0G6W.L's P/E ratio is -10.37. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0G6W.L's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to 0G6W.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check 0G6W.L's competition here
TCN.L vs GDWN.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, GDWN.L has a market cap of 648.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while GDWN.L trades at £8,640.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDWN.L's P/E ratio is 26.42. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GDWN.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to GDWN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check GDWN.L's competition here
TCN.L vs 0Z0F.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0Z0F.L has a market cap of 647.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while 0Z0F.L trades at £18.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0Z0F.L's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0Z0F.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to 0Z0F.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check 0Z0F.L's competition here
TCN.L vs MGAM.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, MGAM.L has a market cap of 624.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while MGAM.L trades at £224.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGAM.L's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MGAM.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to MGAM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check MGAM.L's competition here
TCN.L vs HMSG.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, HMSG.L has a market cap of 604.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while HMSG.L trades at £3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMSG.L's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to HMSG.L's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to HMSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check HMSG.L's competition here
TCN.L vs 0QKP.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0QKP.L has a market cap of 430.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while 0QKP.L trades at £460.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0QKP.L's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0QKP.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to 0QKP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check 0QKP.L's competition here
TCN.L vs 0QKR.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0QKR.L has a market cap of 385.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while 0QKR.L trades at £5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0QKR.L's P/E ratio is 2.77. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0QKR.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to 0QKR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check 0QKR.L's competition here
TCN.L vs 0QQK.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0QQK.L has a market cap of 374.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while 0QQK.L trades at £36.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0QQK.L's P/E ratio is 27.62. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0QQK.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to 0QQK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check 0QQK.L's competition here
TCN.L vs ITM.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, ITM.L has a market cap of 370.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while ITM.L trades at £60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITM.L's P/E ratio is -8.57. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ITM.L's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to ITM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check ITM.L's competition here
TCN.L vs 0QQF.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0QQF.L has a market cap of 306.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while 0QQF.L trades at £18.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0QQF.L's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0QQF.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to 0QQF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check 0QQF.L's competition here
TCN.L vs 0G15.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0G15.L has a market cap of 235.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while 0G15.L trades at £14.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0G15.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0G15.L's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to 0G15.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check 0G15.L's competition here
TCN.L vs BA29.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, BA29.L has a market cap of 199.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while BA29.L trades at £0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BA29.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BA29.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to BA29.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check BA29.L's competition here
TCN.L vs 0ND2.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0ND2.L has a market cap of 198.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while 0ND2.L trades at £9.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0ND2.L's P/E ratio is 61.37. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0ND2.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to 0ND2.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check 0ND2.L's competition here
TCN.L vs 0QQA.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0QQA.L has a market cap of 185.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while 0QQA.L trades at £34.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0QQA.L's P/E ratio is -21.24. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0QQA.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to 0QQA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check 0QQA.L's competition here
TCN.L vs 32ID.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, 32ID.L has a market cap of 181.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while 32ID.L trades at £105.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 32ID.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 32ID.L's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to 32ID.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check 32ID.L's competition here
TCN.L vs RNO.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, RNO.L has a market cap of 160.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while RNO.L trades at £80.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNO.L's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RNO.L's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to RNO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check RNO.L's competition here
TCN.L vs AVG.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, AVG.L has a market cap of 139M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while AVG.L trades at £420.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVG.L's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AVG.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to AVG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check AVG.L's competition here
TCN.L vs CGS.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, CGS.L has a market cap of 123.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while CGS.L trades at £284.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGS.L's P/E ratio is 28.45. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CGS.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to CGS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check CGS.L's competition here
TCN.L vs LOAD.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, LOAD.L has a market cap of 114.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while LOAD.L trades at £399.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOAD.L's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LOAD.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to LOAD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check LOAD.L's competition here
TCN.L vs MPAC.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, MPAC.L has a market cap of 102.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while MPAC.L trades at £340.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPAC.L's P/E ratio is 56.67. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MPAC.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to MPAC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check MPAC.L's competition here
TCN.L vs 0QK0.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0QK0.L has a market cap of 99.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while 0QK0.L trades at £5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0QK0.L's P/E ratio is 5.05. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0QK0.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TCN.L has daily volatility of 10.15 and 0QK0.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check 0QK0.L's competition here
TCN.L vs XSG.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, XSG.L has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while XSG.L trades at £1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSG.L's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to XSG.L's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to XSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check XSG.L's competition here
TCN.L vs 0R3Q.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0R3Q.L has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while 0R3Q.L trades at £55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0R3Q.L's P/E ratio is -5.69. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0R3Q.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to 0R3Q.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check 0R3Q.L's competition here
TCN.L vs GPL.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, GPL.L has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while GPL.L trades at £0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPL.L's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GPL.L's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to GPL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check GPL.L's competition here
TCN.L vs SIXH.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, SIXH.L has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while SIXH.L trades at £2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIXH.L's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SIXH.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is less volatile compared to SIXH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check SIXH.L's competition here
TCN.L vs CMH.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, CMH.L has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while CMH.L trades at £1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMH.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CMH.L's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to CMH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check CMH.L's competition here
TCN.L vs SNT.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, SNT.L has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while SNT.L trades at £7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNT.L's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SNT.L's ROE of -8.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to SNT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check SNT.L's competition here
TCN.L vs LIB.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, LIB.L has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while LIB.L trades at £1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIB.L's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LIB.L's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is less volatile compared to LIB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check LIB.L's competition here
TCN.L vs INSP.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, INSP.L has a market cap of 156.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while INSP.L trades at £0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to INSP.L's ROE of -3.89%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to INSP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check INSP.L's competition here
TCN.L vs BA05.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, BA05.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while BA05.L trades at £78.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BA05.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BA05.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to BA05.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check BA05.L's competition here
TCN.L vs NBI.L Comparison August 2025
TCN.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCN.L stands at 0. In comparison, NBI.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TCN.L is priced at £4.50, while NBI.L trades at £198.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCN.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NBI.L's P/E ratio is 28.29. In terms of profitability, TCN.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NBI.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCN.L is more volatile compared to NBI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCN.L.Check NBI.L's competition here