The Siam Cement Public Company Limited
The Siam Cement Public Company Limited (TCM1.F) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TCM1.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCM1.F | €5.20 | -0.95% | 6.4B | 48.64 | €0.11 | +2.44% |
| LIN.DE | €405.40 | -0.49% | 192.7B | 34.90 | €11.73 | +1.29% |
| AIL.DE | €172.90 | -1.38% | 100.6B | 29.41 | €5.93 | +1.89% |
| 1COV.F | €60.08 | -0.43% | 11.4B | -29.24 | -€2.07 | N/A |
| 1COV.DE | €60.38 | +0.00% | 11.4B | -29.12 | -€2.07 | N/A |
| SY1.DE | €79.50 | -7.56% | 10.9B | 22.85 | €3.42 | +1.54% |
| EVK.DE | €17.47 | -1.96% | 8.2B | 27.14 | €0.65 | +6.63% |
| BNR.DE | €54.54 | -3.47% | 8B | 15.09 | €3.67 | +3.79% |
| FPE3.DE | €40.24 | -3.32% | 4.8B | 17.74 | €2.30 | +2.87% |
| FPE.DE | €30.95 | -2.06% | 4.8B | 13.54 | €2.30 | +2.87% |
Stock Comparison
TCM1.F vs LIN.DE Comparison July 2025
TCM1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM1.F stands at 6.4B. In comparison, LIN.DE has a market cap of 192.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCM1.F is priced at €5.20, while LIN.DE trades at €405.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 48.64, whereas LIN.DE's P/E ratio is 34.90. In terms of profitability, TCM1.F's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LIN.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM1.F is less volatile compared to LIN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM1.F.Check LIN.DE's competition here
TCM1.F vs AIL.DE Comparison July 2025
TCM1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM1.F stands at 6.4B. In comparison, AIL.DE has a market cap of 100.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCM1.F is priced at €5.20, while AIL.DE trades at €172.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 48.64, whereas AIL.DE's P/E ratio is 29.41. In terms of profitability, TCM1.F's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AIL.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM1.F is less volatile compared to AIL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM1.F.Check AIL.DE's competition here
TCM1.F vs 1COV.F Comparison July 2025
TCM1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM1.F stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 1COV.F has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCM1.F is priced at €5.20, while 1COV.F trades at €60.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 48.64, whereas 1COV.F's P/E ratio is -29.24. In terms of profitability, TCM1.F's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 1COV.F's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM1.F is more volatile compared to 1COV.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM1.F.Check 1COV.F's competition here
TCM1.F vs 1COV.DE Comparison July 2025
TCM1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM1.F stands at 6.4B. In comparison, 1COV.DE has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCM1.F is priced at €5.20, while 1COV.DE trades at €60.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 48.64, whereas 1COV.DE's P/E ratio is -29.12. In terms of profitability, TCM1.F's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 1COV.DE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM1.F is more volatile compared to 1COV.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM1.F.Check 1COV.DE's competition here
TCM1.F vs SY1.DE Comparison July 2025
TCM1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM1.F stands at 6.4B. In comparison, SY1.DE has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCM1.F is priced at €5.20, while SY1.DE trades at €79.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 48.64, whereas SY1.DE's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, TCM1.F's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SY1.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM1.F is less volatile compared to SY1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM1.F.Check SY1.DE's competition here
TCM1.F vs EVK.DE Comparison July 2025
TCM1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM1.F stands at 6.4B. In comparison, EVK.DE has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCM1.F is priced at €5.20, while EVK.DE trades at €17.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 48.64, whereas EVK.DE's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, TCM1.F's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EVK.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM1.F is less volatile compared to EVK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM1.F.Check EVK.DE's competition here
TCM1.F vs BNR.DE Comparison July 2025
TCM1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM1.F stands at 6.4B. In comparison, BNR.DE has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCM1.F is priced at €5.20, while BNR.DE trades at €54.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 48.64, whereas BNR.DE's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, TCM1.F's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BNR.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM1.F is less volatile compared to BNR.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM1.F.Check BNR.DE's competition here
TCM1.F vs FPE3.DE Comparison July 2025
TCM1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM1.F stands at 6.4B. In comparison, FPE3.DE has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCM1.F is priced at €5.20, while FPE3.DE trades at €40.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 48.64, whereas FPE3.DE's P/E ratio is 17.74. In terms of profitability, TCM1.F's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FPE3.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM1.F is less volatile compared to FPE3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM1.F.Check FPE3.DE's competition here
TCM1.F vs FPE.DE Comparison July 2025
TCM1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM1.F stands at 6.4B. In comparison, FPE.DE has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCM1.F is priced at €5.20, while FPE.DE trades at €30.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 48.64, whereas FPE.DE's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, TCM1.F's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FPE.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM1.F is less volatile compared to FPE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM1.F.Check FPE.DE's competition here
TCM1.F vs WCH.DE Comparison July 2025
TCM1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM1.F stands at 6.4B. In comparison, WCH.DE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCM1.F is priced at €5.20, while WCH.DE trades at €65.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 48.64, whereas WCH.DE's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, TCM1.F's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WCH.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM1.F is less volatile compared to WCH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM1.F.Check WCH.DE's competition here
TCM1.F vs LXS.DE Comparison July 2025
TCM1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM1.F stands at 6.4B. In comparison, LXS.DE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCM1.F is priced at €5.20, while LXS.DE trades at €24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 48.64, whereas LXS.DE's P/E ratio is -15.71. In terms of profitability, TCM1.F's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LXS.DE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM1.F is less volatile compared to LXS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM1.F.Check LXS.DE's competition here
TCM1.F vs ACT.DE Comparison July 2025
TCM1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM1.F stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ACT.DE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCM1.F is priced at €5.20, while ACT.DE trades at €149.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 48.64, whereas ACT.DE's P/E ratio is 24.36. In terms of profitability, TCM1.F's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ACT.DE's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM1.F is less volatile compared to ACT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM1.F.Check ACT.DE's competition here
TCM1.F vs CE2.DE Comparison July 2025
TCM1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM1.F stands at 6.4B. In comparison, CE2.DE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCM1.F is priced at €5.20, while CE2.DE trades at €11.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 48.64, whereas CE2.DE's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, TCM1.F's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CE2.DE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM1.F is less volatile compared to CE2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM1.F.Check CE2.DE's competition here
TCM1.F vs VBK.DE Comparison July 2025
TCM1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM1.F stands at 6.4B. In comparison, VBK.DE has a market cap of 748M. Regarding current trading prices, TCM1.F is priced at €5.20, while VBK.DE trades at €11.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 48.64, whereas VBK.DE's P/E ratio is -23.02. In terms of profitability, TCM1.F's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VBK.DE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM1.F is less volatile compared to VBK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM1.F.Check VBK.DE's competition here
TCM1.F vs UZU.DE Comparison July 2025
TCM1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM1.F stands at 6.4B. In comparison, UZU.DE has a market cap of 335.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCM1.F is priced at €5.20, while UZU.DE trades at €69.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 48.64, whereas UZU.DE's P/E ratio is 11.39. In terms of profitability, TCM1.F's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UZU.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM1.F is less volatile compared to UZU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM1.F.Check UZU.DE's competition here
TCM1.F vs NTG.DE Comparison July 2025
TCM1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM1.F stands at 6.4B. In comparison, NTG.DE has a market cap of 125M. Regarding current trading prices, TCM1.F is priced at €5.20, while NTG.DE trades at €14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 48.64, whereas NTG.DE's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, TCM1.F's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NTG.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM1.F is less volatile compared to NTG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM1.F.Check NTG.DE's competition here
TCM1.F vs MZX.DE Comparison July 2025
TCM1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM1.F stands at 6.4B. In comparison, MZX.DE has a market cap of 121.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCM1.F is priced at €5.20, while MZX.DE trades at €12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 48.64, whereas MZX.DE's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, TCM1.F's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MZX.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM1.F is less volatile compared to MZX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM1.F.Check MZX.DE's competition here