The Siam Cement Public Company Limited
The Siam Cement Public Company Limited TCM1.F Peers
See (TCM1.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCM1.F | $4.56 | +2.24% | 5.47B | 32.57 | $0.14 | +1.46% |
| LIN.DE | $407.60 | -0.34% | 191.87B | 33.52 | $12.16 | +1.25% |
| AIL.DE | $182.28 | +0.60% | 105.11B | 31.87 | $5.72 | +1.60% |
| SY1.DE | $100.70 | -0.49% | 14.08B | 29.44 | $3.42 | +1.09% |
| 1COV.F | $59.80 | +0.61% | 11.29B | -42.41 | -$1.41 | N/A |
| 1COV.DE | $59.70 | +0.67% | 11.27B | -42.34 | -$1.41 | N/A |
| EVK.DE | $19.57 | -0.61% | 9.12B | 40.77 | $0.48 | +5.98% |
| BNR.DE | $62.38 | +0.19% | 9.01B | 16.81 | $3.71 | +3.37% |
| FPE.DE | $33.85 | +0.59% | 5.12B | 14.72 | $2.30 | +2.61% |
| FPE3.DE | $44.80 | +0.04% | 5.09B | 19.48 | $2.30 | +2.61% |
Stock Comparison
TCM1.F vs LIN.DE Comparison
TCM1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM1.F stands at 5.47B. In comparison, LIN.DE has a market cap of 191.87B. Regarding current trading prices, TCM1.F is priced at $4.56, while LIN.DE trades at $407.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas LIN.DE's P/E ratio is 33.52. In terms of profitability, TCM1.F's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LIN.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM1.F is more volatile compared to LIN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM1.F.
TCM1.F vs AIL.DE Comparison
TCM1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM1.F stands at 5.47B. In comparison, AIL.DE has a market cap of 105.11B. Regarding current trading prices, TCM1.F is priced at $4.56, while AIL.DE trades at $182.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas AIL.DE's P/E ratio is 31.87. In terms of profitability, TCM1.F's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AIL.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM1.F is more volatile compared to AIL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM1.F.
TCM1.F vs SY1.DE Comparison
TCM1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM1.F stands at 5.47B. In comparison, SY1.DE has a market cap of 14.08B. Regarding current trading prices, TCM1.F is priced at $4.56, while SY1.DE trades at $100.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas SY1.DE's P/E ratio is 29.44. In terms of profitability, TCM1.F's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SY1.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM1.F is more volatile compared to SY1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM1.F.
TCM1.F vs 1COV.F Comparison
TCM1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM1.F stands at 5.47B. In comparison, 1COV.F has a market cap of 11.29B. Regarding current trading prices, TCM1.F is priced at $4.56, while 1COV.F trades at $59.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas 1COV.F's P/E ratio is -42.41. In terms of profitability, TCM1.F's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 1COV.F's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM1.F is more volatile compared to 1COV.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM1.F.
TCM1.F vs 1COV.DE Comparison
TCM1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM1.F stands at 5.47B. In comparison, 1COV.DE has a market cap of 11.27B. Regarding current trading prices, TCM1.F is priced at $4.56, while 1COV.DE trades at $59.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas 1COV.DE's P/E ratio is -42.34. In terms of profitability, TCM1.F's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 1COV.DE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM1.F is more volatile compared to 1COV.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM1.F.
TCM1.F vs EVK.DE Comparison
TCM1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM1.F stands at 5.47B. In comparison, EVK.DE has a market cap of 9.12B. Regarding current trading prices, TCM1.F is priced at $4.56, while EVK.DE trades at $19.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas EVK.DE's P/E ratio is 40.77. In terms of profitability, TCM1.F's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EVK.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM1.F is more volatile compared to EVK.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM1.F.
TCM1.F vs BNR.DE Comparison
TCM1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM1.F stands at 5.47B. In comparison, BNR.DE has a market cap of 9.01B. Regarding current trading prices, TCM1.F is priced at $4.56, while BNR.DE trades at $62.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas BNR.DE's P/E ratio is 16.81. In terms of profitability, TCM1.F's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BNR.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM1.F is more volatile compared to BNR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM1.F.
TCM1.F vs FPE.DE Comparison
TCM1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM1.F stands at 5.47B. In comparison, FPE.DE has a market cap of 5.12B. Regarding current trading prices, TCM1.F is priced at $4.56, while FPE.DE trades at $33.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas FPE.DE's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, TCM1.F's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FPE.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM1.F is more volatile compared to FPE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM1.F.
TCM1.F vs FPE3.DE Comparison
TCM1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM1.F stands at 5.47B. In comparison, FPE3.DE has a market cap of 5.09B. Regarding current trading prices, TCM1.F is priced at $4.56, while FPE3.DE trades at $44.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas FPE3.DE's P/E ratio is 19.48. In terms of profitability, TCM1.F's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FPE3.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM1.F is more volatile compared to FPE3.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM1.F.
TCM1.F vs WCH.DE Comparison
TCM1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM1.F stands at 5.47B. In comparison, WCH.DE has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, TCM1.F is priced at $4.56, while WCH.DE trades at $67.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas WCH.DE's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, TCM1.F's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WCH.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM1.F is less volatile compared to WCH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM1.F.
TCM1.F vs LXS.DE Comparison
TCM1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM1.F stands at 5.47B. In comparison, LXS.DE has a market cap of 2.45B. Regarding current trading prices, TCM1.F is priced at $4.56, while LXS.DE trades at $28.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas LXS.DE's P/E ratio is -13.82. In terms of profitability, TCM1.F's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LXS.DE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM1.F is more volatile compared to LXS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM1.F.
TCM1.F vs ACT.DE Comparison
TCM1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM1.F stands at 5.47B. In comparison, ACT.DE has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, TCM1.F is priced at $4.56, while ACT.DE trades at $122.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas ACT.DE's P/E ratio is 22.98. In terms of profitability, TCM1.F's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ACT.DE's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM1.F is less volatile compared to ACT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM1.F.
TCM1.F vs CE2.DE Comparison
TCM1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM1.F stands at 5.47B. In comparison, CE2.DE has a market cap of 1.00B. Regarding current trading prices, TCM1.F is priced at $4.56, while CE2.DE trades at $11.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas CE2.DE's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, TCM1.F's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CE2.DE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM1.F is more volatile compared to CE2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM1.F.
TCM1.F vs VBK.DE Comparison
TCM1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM1.F stands at 5.47B. In comparison, VBK.DE has a market cap of 623.77M. Regarding current trading prices, TCM1.F is priced at $4.56, while VBK.DE trades at $9.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas VBK.DE's P/E ratio is -20.83. In terms of profitability, TCM1.F's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VBK.DE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM1.F is less volatile compared to VBK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM1.F.
TCM1.F vs UZU.DE Comparison
TCM1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM1.F stands at 5.47B. In comparison, UZU.DE has a market cap of 310.23M. Regarding current trading prices, TCM1.F is priced at $4.56, while UZU.DE trades at $61.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas UZU.DE's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, TCM1.F's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UZU.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM1.F is more volatile compared to UZU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM1.F.
TCM1.F vs NTG.DE Comparison
TCM1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM1.F stands at 5.47B. In comparison, NTG.DE has a market cap of 135.08M. Regarding current trading prices, TCM1.F is priced at $4.56, while NTG.DE trades at $15.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas NTG.DE's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, TCM1.F's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NTG.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM1.F is less volatile compared to NTG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM1.F.
TCM1.F vs MZX.DE Comparison
TCM1.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM1.F stands at 5.47B. In comparison, MZX.DE has a market cap of 107.73M. Regarding current trading prices, TCM1.F is priced at $4.56, while MZX.DE trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM1.F currently has a P/E ratio of 32.57, whereas MZX.DE's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, TCM1.F's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MZX.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM1.F is less volatile compared to MZX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM1.F.