Telit Communications PLC
Telit Communications PLC TCM.L Peers
See (TCM.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Communication Equipment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCM.L | $229.00 | +0.22% | N/A | 0.69 | $3.30 | N/A |
| 0K3H.L | $413.53 | +0.18% | 69.02B | 56.65 | $7.30 | +0.99% |
| 0RPZ.L | $463.42 | +0.66% | 23.26B | 57.58 | $8.05 | N/A |
| 0LI9.L | $363.60 | -8.92% | 21.99B | 51.38 | $7.08 | +0.66% |
| 0JPH.L | $36.28 | -0.60% | 12.13B | 35.43 | $1.02 | +2.43% |
| 0HYA.L | $80.51 | -0.64% | 11.44B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 0RDH.L | $26.70 | -1.32% | 5.33B | 15.85 | $1.69 | N/A |
| 0JVV.L | $75.61 | +1.39% | 5.05B | 30.76 | $2.46 | N/A |
| 0IJW.L | $16.16 | +1.04% | 2.15B | 43.80 | $0.37 | N/A |
| ETL.L | $3.62 | -15.22% | 1.72B | -1.76 | -$2.05 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TCM.L vs 0K3H.L Comparison
TCM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0K3H.L has a market cap of 69.02B. Regarding current trading prices, TCM.L is priced at $229.00, while 0K3H.L trades at $413.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas 0K3H.L's P/E ratio is 56.65. In terms of profitability, TCM.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0K3H.L's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM.L is less volatile compared to 0K3H.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM.L.
TCM.L vs 0RPZ.L Comparison
TCM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0RPZ.L has a market cap of 23.26B. Regarding current trading prices, TCM.L is priced at $229.00, while 0RPZ.L trades at $463.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas 0RPZ.L's P/E ratio is 57.58. In terms of profitability, TCM.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0RPZ.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM.L is less volatile compared to 0RPZ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM.L.
TCM.L vs 0LI9.L Comparison
TCM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0LI9.L has a market cap of 21.99B. Regarding current trading prices, TCM.L is priced at $229.00, while 0LI9.L trades at $363.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas 0LI9.L's P/E ratio is 51.38. In terms of profitability, TCM.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0LI9.L's ROE of +2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM.L is more volatile compared to 0LI9.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM.L.
TCM.L vs 0JPH.L Comparison
TCM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0JPH.L has a market cap of 12.13B. Regarding current trading prices, TCM.L is priced at $229.00, while 0JPH.L trades at $36.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas 0JPH.L's P/E ratio is 35.43. In terms of profitability, TCM.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0JPH.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM.L is less volatile compared to 0JPH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM.L.
TCM.L vs 0HYA.L Comparison
TCM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0HYA.L has a market cap of 11.44B. Regarding current trading prices, TCM.L is priced at $229.00, while 0HYA.L trades at $80.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas 0HYA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCM.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0HYA.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM.L is less volatile compared to 0HYA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM.L.
TCM.L vs 0RDH.L Comparison
TCM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0RDH.L has a market cap of 5.33B. Regarding current trading prices, TCM.L is priced at $229.00, while 0RDH.L trades at $26.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas 0RDH.L's P/E ratio is 15.85. In terms of profitability, TCM.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0RDH.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM.L is less volatile compared to 0RDH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM.L.
TCM.L vs 0JVV.L Comparison
TCM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0JVV.L has a market cap of 5.05B. Regarding current trading prices, TCM.L is priced at $229.00, while 0JVV.L trades at $75.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas 0JVV.L's P/E ratio is 30.76. In terms of profitability, TCM.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0JVV.L's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM.L is less volatile compared to 0JVV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM.L.
TCM.L vs 0IJW.L Comparison
TCM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0IJW.L has a market cap of 2.15B. Regarding current trading prices, TCM.L is priced at $229.00, while 0IJW.L trades at $16.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas 0IJW.L's P/E ratio is 43.80. In terms of profitability, TCM.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0IJW.L's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM.L is more volatile compared to 0IJW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM.L.
TCM.L vs ETL.L Comparison
TCM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, ETL.L has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, TCM.L is priced at $229.00, while ETL.L trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas ETL.L's P/E ratio is -1.76. In terms of profitability, TCM.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ETL.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCM.L is less volatile compared to ETL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM.L.
TCM.L vs 0QNH.L Comparison
TCM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0QNH.L has a market cap of 1.43B. Regarding current trading prices, TCM.L is priced at $229.00, while 0QNH.L trades at $77.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas 0QNH.L's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, TCM.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0QNH.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM.L is less volatile compared to 0QNH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM.L.
TCM.L vs 0LPE.L Comparison
TCM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0LPE.L has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, TCM.L is priced at $229.00, while 0LPE.L trades at $10.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas 0LPE.L's P/E ratio is -49.20. In terms of profitability, TCM.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0LPE.L's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM.L is less volatile compared to 0LPE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM.L.
TCM.L vs 0J38.L Comparison
TCM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0J38.L has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, TCM.L is priced at $229.00, while 0J38.L trades at $9.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas 0J38.L's P/E ratio is 59.48. In terms of profitability, TCM.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0J38.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM.L is more volatile compared to 0J38.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM.L.
TCM.L vs 0H14.L Comparison
TCM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0H14.L has a market cap of 996.40M. Regarding current trading prices, TCM.L is priced at $229.00, while 0H14.L trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas 0H14.L's P/E ratio is 41.71. In terms of profitability, TCM.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0H14.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM.L is more volatile compared to 0H14.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM.L.
TCM.L vs 0QNI.L Comparison
TCM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0QNI.L has a market cap of 620.15M. Regarding current trading prices, TCM.L is priced at $229.00, while 0QNI.L trades at $115.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas 0QNI.L's P/E ratio is 52.40. In terms of profitability, TCM.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0QNI.L's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM.L is more volatile compared to 0QNI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM.L.
TCM.L vs 0NQJ.L Comparison
TCM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0NQJ.L has a market cap of 534.56M. Regarding current trading prices, TCM.L is priced at $229.00, while 0NQJ.L trades at $67.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas 0NQJ.L's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, TCM.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0NQJ.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM.L is more volatile compared to 0NQJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM.L.
TCM.L vs FTC.L Comparison
TCM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, FTC.L has a market cap of 258.42M. Regarding current trading prices, TCM.L is priced at $229.00, while FTC.L trades at $118.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas FTC.L's P/E ratio is 23.60. In terms of profitability, TCM.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FTC.L's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM.L is less volatile compared to FTC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM.L.
TCM.L vs 0OPY.L Comparison
TCM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0OPY.L has a market cap of 206.94M. Regarding current trading prices, TCM.L is priced at $229.00, while 0OPY.L trades at $6.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas 0OPY.L's P/E ratio is -105.31. In terms of profitability, TCM.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0OPY.L's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM.L is less volatile compared to 0OPY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM.L.
TCM.L vs 0A52.L Comparison
TCM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0A52.L has a market cap of 116.42M. Regarding current trading prices, TCM.L is priced at $229.00, while 0A52.L trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas 0A52.L's P/E ratio is -13.44. In terms of profitability, TCM.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0A52.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM.L is less volatile compared to 0A52.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM.L.
TCM.L vs 0QSV.L Comparison
TCM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0QSV.L has a market cap of 88.66M. Regarding current trading prices, TCM.L is priced at $229.00, while 0QSV.L trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas 0QSV.L's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, TCM.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0QSV.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM.L is more volatile compared to 0QSV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM.L.
TCM.L vs 0QVW.L Comparison
TCM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0QVW.L has a market cap of 48.23M. Regarding current trading prices, TCM.L is priced at $229.00, while 0QVW.L trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas 0QVW.L's P/E ratio is 45.00. In terms of profitability, TCM.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0QVW.L's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM.L is more volatile compared to 0QVW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM.L.
TCM.L vs CLX.L Comparison
TCM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, CLX.L has a market cap of 43.95M. Regarding current trading prices, TCM.L is priced at $229.00, while CLX.L trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas CLX.L's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, TCM.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CLX.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM.L is less volatile compared to CLX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM.L.
TCM.L vs MWE.L Comparison
TCM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, MWE.L has a market cap of 41.37M. Regarding current trading prices, TCM.L is priced at $229.00, while MWE.L trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas MWE.L's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, TCM.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MWE.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM.L is less volatile compared to MWE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM.L.
TCM.L vs CYAN.L Comparison
TCM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, CYAN.L has a market cap of 29.02M. Regarding current trading prices, TCM.L is priced at $229.00, while CYAN.L trades at $8.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas CYAN.L's P/E ratio is -8.35. In terms of profitability, TCM.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CYAN.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM.L is less volatile compared to CYAN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM.L.
TCM.L vs PEB.L Comparison
TCM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, PEB.L has a market cap of 9.34M. Regarding current trading prices, TCM.L is priced at $229.00, while PEB.L trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas PEB.L's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, TCM.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PEB.L's ROE of -4.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM.L is less volatile compared to PEB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM.L.
TCM.L vs GINV.L Comparison
TCM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GINV.L has a market cap of 7.60M. Regarding current trading prices, TCM.L is priced at $229.00, while GINV.L trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas GINV.L's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, TCM.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GINV.L's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM.L is more volatile compared to GINV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM.L.
TCM.L vs 0DO7.L Comparison
TCM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCM.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0DO7.L has a market cap of 2.85M. Regarding current trading prices, TCM.L is priced at $229.00, while 0DO7.L trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.69, whereas 0DO7.L's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, TCM.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0DO7.L's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TCM.L is more volatile compared to 0DO7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCM.L.