TCL Electronics Holdings Limited
TCL Electronics Holdings Limited (TCLHF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TCLHF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consumer Electronics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCLHF | $1.65 | +0.00% | 4.3B | 15.51 | $0.11 | +2.45% |
| SSNLF | $65.21 | +0.00% | 383.2B | 19.52 | $3.34 | +1.80% |
| XIACF | $4.72 | -0.63% | 124.9B | 22.95 | $0.21 | N/A |
| SNEJF | $22.30 | +0.00% | 124.8B | 15.49 | $1.35 | +0.72% |
| XIACY | $23.44 | +0.00% | 119B | 22.06 | $1.04 | N/A |
| PCRFF | $15.85 | +0.00% | 37.9B | 18.03 | $0.90 | +1.97% |
| KYOCY | $17.05 | +0.00% | 23.3B | 86.38 | $0.20 | +1.97% |
| KYOCF | $16.27 | +0.00% | 22B | 81.34 | $0.20 | +2.05% |
| PCRFY | $9.36 | -1.27% | 21.8B | 6.59 | $1.42 | N/A |
| SHCAF | $4.40 | +0.00% | 2.9B | 7.46 | $0.59 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TCLHF vs SSNLF Comparison February 2026
TCLHF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLHF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SSNLF has a market cap of 383.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLHF is priced at $1.65, while SSNLF trades at $65.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.51, whereas SSNLF's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, TCLHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SSNLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLHF and SSNLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SSNLF's competition here
TCLHF vs XIACF Comparison February 2026
TCLHF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLHF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, XIACF has a market cap of 124.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLHF is priced at $1.65, while XIACF trades at $4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.51, whereas XIACF's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, TCLHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to XIACF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLHF is less volatile compared to XIACF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLHF.Check XIACF's competition here
TCLHF vs SNEJF Comparison February 2026
TCLHF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLHF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SNEJF has a market cap of 124.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLHF is priced at $1.65, while SNEJF trades at $22.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.51, whereas SNEJF's P/E ratio is 15.49. In terms of profitability, TCLHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SNEJF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLHF is less volatile compared to SNEJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLHF.Check SNEJF's competition here
TCLHF vs XIACY Comparison February 2026
TCLHF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLHF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, XIACY has a market cap of 119B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLHF is priced at $1.65, while XIACY trades at $23.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.51, whereas XIACY's P/E ratio is 22.06. In terms of profitability, TCLHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to XIACY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLHF is less volatile compared to XIACY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLHF.Check XIACY's competition here
TCLHF vs PCRFF Comparison February 2026
TCLHF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLHF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, PCRFF has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLHF is priced at $1.65, while PCRFF trades at $15.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.51, whereas PCRFF's P/E ratio is 18.03. In terms of profitability, TCLHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PCRFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLHF and PCRFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PCRFF's competition here
TCLHF vs KYOCY Comparison February 2026
TCLHF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLHF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, KYOCY has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLHF is priced at $1.65, while KYOCY trades at $17.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.51, whereas KYOCY's P/E ratio is 86.38. In terms of profitability, TCLHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KYOCY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLHF is less volatile compared to KYOCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLHF.Check KYOCY's competition here
TCLHF vs KYOCF Comparison February 2026
TCLHF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLHF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, KYOCF has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLHF is priced at $1.65, while KYOCF trades at $16.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.51, whereas KYOCF's P/E ratio is 81.34. In terms of profitability, TCLHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KYOCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLHF and KYOCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KYOCF's competition here
TCLHF vs PCRFY Comparison February 2026
TCLHF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLHF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, PCRFY has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLHF is priced at $1.65, while PCRFY trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.51, whereas PCRFY's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, TCLHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PCRFY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLHF is less volatile compared to PCRFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLHF.Check PCRFY's competition here
TCLHF vs SHCAF Comparison February 2026
TCLHF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLHF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SHCAF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLHF is priced at $1.65, while SHCAF trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.51, whereas SHCAF's P/E ratio is 7.46. In terms of profitability, TCLHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHCAF's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLHF and SHCAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHCAF's competition here
TCLHF vs SHCAY Comparison February 2026
TCLHF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLHF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SHCAY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLHF is priced at $1.65, while SHCAY trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.51, whereas SHCAY's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, TCLHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHCAY's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLHF is less volatile compared to SHCAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLHF.Check SHCAY's competition here
TCLHF vs CSIOY Comparison February 2026
TCLHF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLHF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CSIOY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLHF is priced at $1.65, while CSIOY trades at $98.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.51, whereas CSIOY's P/E ratio is 45.41. In terms of profitability, TCLHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSIOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLHF and CSIOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSIOY's competition here
TCLHF vs CSIOF Comparison February 2026
TCLHF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLHF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CSIOF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLHF is priced at $1.65, while CSIOF trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.51, whereas CSIOF's P/E ratio is 45.68. In terms of profitability, TCLHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSIOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLHF and CSIOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSIOF's competition here
TCLHF vs AITUY Comparison February 2026
TCLHF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLHF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, AITUY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLHF is priced at $1.65, while AITUY trades at $13.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.51, whereas AITUY's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, TCLHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AITUY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLHF and AITUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AITUY's competition here
TCLHF vs JVCZY Comparison February 2026
TCLHF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLHF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, JVCZY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLHF is priced at $1.65, while JVCZY trades at $32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.51, whereas JVCZY's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, TCLHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JVCZY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLHF and JVCZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JVCZY's competition here
TCLHF vs SNCPF Comparison February 2026
TCLHF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLHF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SNCPF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLHF is priced at $1.65, while SNCPF trades at $54.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.51, whereas SNCPF's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, TCLHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SNCPF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLHF and SNCPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SNCPF's competition here
TCLHF vs SWDHF Comparison February 2026
TCLHF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLHF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SWDHF has a market cap of 983.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLHF is priced at $1.65, while SWDHF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.51, whereas SWDHF's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, TCLHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SWDHF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLHF and SWDHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SWDHF's competition here
TCLHF vs SWDHY Comparison February 2026
TCLHF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLHF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SWDHY has a market cap of 779.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLHF is priced at $1.65, while SWDHY trades at $12.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.51, whereas SWDHY's P/E ratio is 20.68. In terms of profitability, TCLHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SWDHY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLHF and SWDHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SWDHY's competition here
TCLHF vs BGOUF Comparison February 2026
TCLHF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLHF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BGOUF has a market cap of 232.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLHF is priced at $1.65, while BGOUF trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.51, whereas BGOUF's P/E ratio is -14.77. In terms of profitability, TCLHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BGOUF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLHF and BGOUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BGOUF's competition here
TCLHF vs DBOXF Comparison February 2026
TCLHF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLHF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, DBOXF has a market cap of 122.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLHF is priced at $1.65, while DBOXF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.51, whereas DBOXF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, TCLHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DBOXF's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLHF is less volatile compared to DBOXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLHF.Check DBOXF's competition here
TCLHF vs ADPXY Comparison February 2026
TCLHF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLHF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ADPXY has a market cap of 119.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLHF is priced at $1.65, while ADPXY trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.51, whereas ADPXY's P/E ratio is -11.10. In terms of profitability, TCLHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ADPXY's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLHF and ADPXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADPXY's competition here
TCLHF vs CHWTF Comparison February 2026
TCLHF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLHF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CHWTF has a market cap of 47.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLHF is priced at $1.65, while CHWTF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.51, whereas CHWTF's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, TCLHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CHWTF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLHF and CHWTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHWTF's competition here
TCLHF vs HLOC Comparison February 2026
TCLHF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLHF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, HLOC has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLHF is priced at $1.65, while HLOC trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.51, whereas HLOC's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, TCLHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HLOC's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLHF is less volatile compared to HLOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLHF.Check HLOC's competition here
TCLHF vs VTEPF Comparison February 2026
TCLHF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLHF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, VTEPF has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLHF is priced at $1.65, while VTEPF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.51, whereas VTEPF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, TCLHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VTEPF's ROE of -2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLHF and VTEPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VTEPF's competition here
TCLHF vs HAPBF Comparison February 2026
TCLHF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLHF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, HAPBF has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLHF is priced at $1.65, while HAPBF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.51, whereas HAPBF's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, TCLHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HAPBF's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLHF and HAPBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HAPBF's competition here
TCLHF vs AMOSF Comparison February 2026
TCLHF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLHF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, AMOSF has a market cap of 120.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TCLHF is priced at $1.65, while AMOSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.51, whereas AMOSF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TCLHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMOSF's ROE of +1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLHF and AMOSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMOSF's competition here
TCLHF vs NUHRF Comparison February 2026
TCLHF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLHF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, NUHRF has a market cap of 54.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TCLHF is priced at $1.65, while NUHRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.51, whereas NUHRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NUHRF's ROE of -3.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLHF is less volatile compared to NUHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLHF.Check NUHRF's competition here
TCLHF vs GAXY Comparison February 2026
TCLHF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLHF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, GAXY has a market cap of 23.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TCLHF is priced at $1.65, while GAXY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.51, whereas GAXY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TCLHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GAXY's ROE of +4.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLHF and GAXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GAXY's competition here
TCLHF vs COLCF Comparison February 2026
TCLHF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLHF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, COLCF has a market cap of 8.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TCLHF is priced at $1.65, while COLCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.51, whereas COLCF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TCLHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to COLCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCLHF is less volatile compared to COLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLHF.Check COLCF's competition here
TCLHF vs ANDR Comparison February 2026
TCLHF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLHF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ANDR has a market cap of 6.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TCLHF is priced at $1.65, while ANDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.51, whereas ANDR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TCLHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ANDR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLHF and ANDR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ANDR's competition here
TCLHF vs BZIC Comparison February 2026
TCLHF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLHF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BZIC has a market cap of 6.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TCLHF is priced at $1.65, while BZIC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.51, whereas BZIC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TCLHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BZIC's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLHF and BZIC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BZIC's competition here
TCLHF vs NGEY Comparison February 2026
TCLHF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLHF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, NGEY has a market cap of 5.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TCLHF is priced at $1.65, while NGEY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.51, whereas NGEY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TCLHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NGEY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCLHF is less volatile compared to NGEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLHF.Check NGEY's competition here
TCLHF vs PUMD Comparison February 2026
TCLHF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLHF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, PUMD has a market cap of 3.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TCLHF is priced at $1.65, while PUMD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.51, whereas PUMD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PUMD's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLHF and PUMD have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PUMD's competition here
TCLHF vs CTXV Comparison February 2026
TCLHF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLHF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CTXV has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TCLHF is priced at $1.65, while CTXV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.51, whereas CTXV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CTXV's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLHF and CTXV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTXV's competition here
TCLHF vs ZVTK Comparison February 2026
TCLHF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLHF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ZVTK has a market cap of 1.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TCLHF is priced at $1.65, while ZVTK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.51, whereas ZVTK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZVTK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLHF is less volatile compared to ZVTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLHF.Check ZVTK's competition here
TCLHF vs GAXYQ Comparison February 2026
TCLHF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLHF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, GAXYQ has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TCLHF is priced at $1.65, while GAXYQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.51, whereas GAXYQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TCLHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GAXYQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCLHF is less volatile compared to GAXYQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLHF.Check GAXYQ's competition here
TCLHF vs LTEC Comparison February 2026
TCLHF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLHF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, LTEC has a market cap of 486. Regarding current trading prices, TCLHF is priced at $1.65, while LTEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.51, whereas LTEC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TCLHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LTEC's ROE of -2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLHF and LTEC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LTEC's competition here
TCLHF vs CYRD Comparison February 2026
TCLHF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLHF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CYRD has a market cap of 348. Regarding current trading prices, TCLHF is priced at $1.65, while CYRD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.51, whereas CYRD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CYRD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCLHF and CYRD have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CYRD's competition here
TCLHF vs NYXO Comparison February 2026
TCLHF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLHF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, NYXO has a market cap of 242. Regarding current trading prices, TCLHF is priced at $1.65, while NYXO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.51, whereas NYXO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLHF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NYXO's ROE of +5.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLHF and NYXO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NYXO's competition here