Tracsis plc
Tracsis plc (TCIIF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TCIIF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCIIF | $5.00 | +0.00% | 148.7M | 250.00 | $0.02 | +0.64% |
| SAPGF | $287.36 | -0.57% | 336.9B | 50.58 | $5.72 | +0.91% |
| CNSWF | $3,579.00 | +0.82% | 76.1B | 102.90 | $34.90 | +0.11% |
| INVUP | $25.98 | +0.00% | 48.3B | -1732.00 | -$0.02 | +12.51% |
| DASTY | $35.08 | +2.04% | 46.1B | 35.08 | $1.00 | +0.84% |
| DASTF | $35.00 | +0.84% | 46.1B | 33.98 | $1.03 | +0.81% |
| WIGBY | $79.45 | +4.05% | 26.4B | 132.42 | $0.60 | +0.16% |
| WTCHF | $79.22 | +5.08% | 26.3B | 132.03 | $0.60 | +0.17% |
| DIDIY | $5.47 | -1.62% | 25.5B | 68.38 | $0.08 | N/A |
| XROLF | $119.99 | +5.96% | 19.8B | 137.92 | $0.87 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TCIIF vs SAPGF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, SAPGF has a market cap of 336.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while SAPGF trades at $287.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas SAPGF's P/E ratio is 50.58. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SAPGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to SAPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check SAPGF's competition here
TCIIF vs CNSWF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, CNSWF has a market cap of 76.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while CNSWF trades at $3,579.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas CNSWF's P/E ratio is 102.90. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CNSWF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to CNSWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check CNSWF's competition here
TCIIF vs INVUP Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, INVUP has a market cap of 48.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while INVUP trades at $25.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas INVUP's P/E ratio is -1732.00. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INVUP's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to INVUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check INVUP's competition here
TCIIF vs DASTY Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, DASTY has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while DASTY trades at $35.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas DASTY's P/E ratio is 35.08. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DASTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to DASTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check DASTY's competition here
TCIIF vs DASTF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, DASTF has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while DASTF trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas DASTF's P/E ratio is 33.98. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DASTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to DASTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check DASTF's competition here
TCIIF vs WIGBY Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, WIGBY has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while WIGBY trades at $79.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas WIGBY's P/E ratio is 132.42. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WIGBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to WIGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check WIGBY's competition here
TCIIF vs WTCHF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, WTCHF has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while WTCHF trades at $79.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas WTCHF's P/E ratio is 132.03. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WTCHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF and WTCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WTCHF's competition here
TCIIF vs DIDIY Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, DIDIY has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while DIDIY trades at $5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas DIDIY's P/E ratio is 68.38. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DIDIY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to DIDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check DIDIY's competition here
TCIIF vs XROLF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, XROLF has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while XROLF trades at $119.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas XROLF's P/E ratio is 137.92. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to XROLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to XROLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check XROLF's competition here
TCIIF vs OBIIF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, OBIIF has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while OBIIF trades at $40.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas OBIIF's P/E ratio is 40.09. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OBIIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF and OBIIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OBIIF's competition here
TCIIF vs NEMKY Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, NEMKY has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while NEMKY trades at $29.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas NEMKY's P/E ratio is 83.28. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NEMKY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to NEMKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check NEMKY's competition here
TCIIF vs SGPYY Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, SGPYY has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while SGPYY trades at $68.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas SGPYY's P/E ratio is 36.77. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SGPYY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to SGPYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check SGPYY's competition here
TCIIF vs SGGEF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, SGGEF has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while SGGEF trades at $16.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas SGGEF's P/E ratio is 35.63. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SGGEF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to SGGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check SGGEF's competition here
TCIIF vs OCLCF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, OCLCF has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while OCLCF trades at $114.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas OCLCF's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OCLCF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF and OCLCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OCLCF's competition here
TCIIF vs NEMTF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, NEMTF has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while NEMTF trades at $125.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas NEMTF's P/E ratio is 70.23. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NEMTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to NEMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check NEMTF's competition here
TCIIF vs NCSYF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, NCSYF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while NCSYF trades at $160.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas NCSYF's P/E ratio is 22.32. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NCSYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to NCSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check NCSYF's competition here
TCIIF vs KGDEY Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, KGDEY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while KGDEY trades at $218.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas KGDEY's P/E ratio is -390.89. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KGDEY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF and KGDEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KGDEY's competition here
TCIIF vs TMSNY Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, TMSNY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while TMSNY trades at $90.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas TMSNY's P/E ratio is 37.66. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TMSNY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to TMSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check TMSNY's competition here
TCIIF vs ALMFF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, ALMFF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while ALMFF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas ALMFF's P/E ratio is 92.31. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ALMFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to ALMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check ALMFF's competition here
TCIIF vs TMNSF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, TMNSF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while TMNSF trades at $91.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas TMNSF's P/E ratio is 38.46. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TMNSF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF and TMNSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TMNSF's competition here
TCIIF vs LIFX Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, LIFX has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while LIFX trades at $21.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas LIFX's P/E ratio is 544.25. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LIFX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to LIFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check LIFX's competition here
TCIIF vs HOILF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, HOILF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while HOILF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas HOILF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HOILF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to HOILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check HOILF's competition here
TCIIF vs FNOXF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, FNOXF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while FNOXF trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas FNOXF's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FNOXF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF and FNOXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FNOXF's competition here
TCIIF vs THNOF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, THNOF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while THNOF trades at $14.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas THNOF's P/E ratio is 55.44. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to THNOF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to THNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check THNOF's competition here
TCIIF vs SRBEF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, SRBEF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while SRBEF trades at $274.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas SRBEF's P/E ratio is -85.36. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SRBEF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to SRBEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check SRBEF's competition here
TCIIF vs ASOZF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, ASOZF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while ASOZF trades at $63.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas ASOZF's P/E ratio is 29.58. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ASOZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF and ASOZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASOZF's competition here
TCIIF vs KXSCF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, KXSCF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while KXSCF trades at $150.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas KXSCF's P/E ratio is 441.18. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KXSCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to KXSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check KXSCF's competition here
TCIIF vs SMCYY Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, SMCYY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while SMCYY trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas SMCYY's P/E ratio is 39.44. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SMCYY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF and SMCYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SMCYY's competition here
TCIIF vs SICRF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, SICRF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while SICRF trades at $103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas SICRF's P/E ratio is 37.59. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SICRF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF and SICRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SICRF's competition here
TCIIF vs ASOZY Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, ASOZY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while ASOZY trades at $52.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas ASOZY's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ASOZY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF and ASOZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASOZY's competition here
TCIIF vs TMVWF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, TMVWF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while TMVWF trades at $14.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas TMVWF's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TMVWF's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to TMVWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check TMVWF's competition here
TCIIF vs SWONF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, SWONF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while SWONF trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas SWONF's P/E ratio is -899.00. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SWONF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF and SWONF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SWONF's competition here
TCIIF vs UBMRF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, UBMRF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while UBMRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas UBMRF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UBMRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to UBMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check UBMRF's competition here
TCIIF vs KHOTF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, KHOTF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while KHOTF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas KHOTF's P/E ratio is 360.00. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KHOTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to KHOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check KHOTF's competition here
TCIIF vs TMVWY Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, TMVWY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while TMVWY trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas TMVWY's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TMVWY's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to TMVWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check TMVWY's competition here
TCIIF vs QTGPF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, QTGPF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while QTGPF trades at $65.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas QTGPF's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to QTGPF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF and QTGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QTGPF's competition here
TCIIF vs ESKEF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, ESKEF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while ESKEF trades at $280.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas ESKEF's P/E ratio is 97.01. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ESKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF and ESKEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ESKEF's competition here
TCIIF vs FREKF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, FREKF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while FREKF trades at $27.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas FREKF's P/E ratio is -23.22. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FREKF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF and FREKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FREKF's competition here
TCIIF vs IPEU Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, IPEU has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while IPEU trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas IPEU's P/E ratio is 0.92. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IPEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to IPEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check IPEU's competition here
TCIIF vs TMOAY Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, TMOAY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while TMOAY trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas TMOAY's P/E ratio is -20.53. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TMOAY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to TMOAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check TMOAY's competition here
TCIIF vs WEMXF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, WEMXF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while WEMXF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas WEMXF's P/E ratio is -5.01. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WEMXF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to WEMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check WEMXF's competition here
TCIIF vs BCTCF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, BCTCF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while BCTCF trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas BCTCF's P/E ratio is 228.00. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BCTCF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to BCTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check BCTCF's competition here
TCIIF vs MAGTF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, MAGTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while MAGTF trades at $31.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas MAGTF's P/E ratio is 354.22. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MAGTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF and MAGTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MAGTF's competition here
TCIIF vs VOBIF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, VOBIF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while VOBIF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas VOBIF's P/E ratio is 49.50. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VOBIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF and VOBIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VOBIF's competition here
TCIIF vs KNNNF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, KNNNF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while KNNNF trades at $9.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas KNNNF's P/E ratio is 25.96. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KNNNF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to KNNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check KNNNF's competition here
TCIIF vs ZEUCF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, ZEUCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while ZEUCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas ZEUCF's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ZEUCF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to ZEUCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check ZEUCF's competition here
TCIIF vs LTTHF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, LTTHF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while LTTHF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas LTTHF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LTTHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF and LTTHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LTTHF's competition here
TCIIF vs EGHSF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, EGHSF has a market cap of 956.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while EGHSF trades at $17.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas EGHSF's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EGHSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to EGHSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check EGHSF's competition here
TCIIF vs GBGPF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, GBGPF has a market cap of 955M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while GBGPF trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas GBGPF's P/E ratio is 77.00. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GBGPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF and GBGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GBGPF's competition here
TCIIF vs ESIGF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, ESIGF has a market cap of 952.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while ESIGF trades at $166.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas ESIGF's P/E ratio is -725.00. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ESIGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to ESIGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check ESIGF's competition here
TCIIF vs BHPA Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, BHPA has a market cap of 820.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while BHPA trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas BHPA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BHPA's ROE of -3.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to BHPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check BHPA's competition here
TCIIF vs BTRCF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, BTRCF has a market cap of 787M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while BTRCF trades at $12.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas BTRCF's P/E ratio is 23.52. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BTRCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to BTRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check BTRCF's competition here
TCIIF vs NPACY Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, NPACY has a market cap of 763M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while NPACY trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas NPACY's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NPACY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to NPACY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check NPACY's competition here
TCIIF vs TMOAF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, TMOAF has a market cap of 759M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while TMOAF trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas TMOAF's P/E ratio is -21.03. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TMOAF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF and TMOAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TMOAF's competition here
TCIIF vs SLVFF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, SLVFF has a market cap of 723.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while SLVFF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas SLVFF's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SLVFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to SLVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check SLVFF's competition here
TCIIF vs TTMZF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, TTMZF has a market cap of 657.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while TTMZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas TTMZF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TTMZF's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to TTMZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check TTMZF's competition here
TCIIF vs XMMRF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, XMMRF has a market cap of 631.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while XMMRF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas XMMRF's P/E ratio is -68.00. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to XMMRF's ROE of -4.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to XMMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check XMMRF's competition here
TCIIF vs NPACF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, NPACF has a market cap of 610.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while NPACF trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas NPACF's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NPACF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to NPACF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check NPACF's competition here
TCIIF vs PXPHF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, PXPHF has a market cap of 572.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while PXPHF trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas PXPHF's P/E ratio is 43.23. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PXPHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF and PXPHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PXPHF's competition here
TCIIF vs NXLLF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, NXLLF has a market cap of 545.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while NXLLF trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas NXLLF's P/E ratio is 165.00. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NXLLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to NXLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check NXLLF's competition here
TCIIF vs RWWI Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, RWWI has a market cap of 491.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while RWWI trades at $14.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas RWWI's P/E ratio is 33.28. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RWWI's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF and RWWI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RWWI's competition here
TCIIF vs CMDXF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, CMDXF has a market cap of 481.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while CMDXF trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas CMDXF's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CMDXF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to CMDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check CMDXF's competition here
TCIIF vs NSWEF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, NSWEF has a market cap of 480.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while NSWEF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas NSWEF's P/E ratio is -12.53. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NSWEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF and NSWEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NSWEF's competition here
TCIIF vs KWIK Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, KWIK has a market cap of 466.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while KWIK trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas KWIK's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KWIK's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF and KWIK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KWIK's competition here
TCIIF vs BRDLF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, BRDLF has a market cap of 456.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while BRDLF trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas BRDLF's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BRDLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF and BRDLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BRDLF's competition here
TCIIF vs BVSFF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, BVSFF has a market cap of 436.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while BVSFF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas BVSFF's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BVSFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF and BVSFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BVSFF's competition here
TCIIF vs IQGLF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, IQGLF has a market cap of 415.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while IQGLF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas IQGLF's P/E ratio is -300.00. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IQGLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to IQGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check IQGLF's competition here
TCIIF vs CHNVF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, CHNVF has a market cap of 406.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while CHNVF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas CHNVF's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CHNVF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to CHNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check CHNVF's competition here
TCIIF vs TCYSF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, TCYSF has a market cap of 400.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while TCYSF trades at $27.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas TCYSF's P/E ratio is 122.77. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TCYSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF and TCYSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TCYSF's competition here
TCIIF vs BLKLF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, BLKLF has a market cap of 399.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while BLKLF trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas BLKLF's P/E ratio is -67.71. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BLKLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to BLKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check BLKLF's competition here
TCIIF vs RPGHF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, RPGHF has a market cap of 373M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while RPGHF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas RPGHF's P/E ratio is 56.33. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RPGHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to RPGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check RPGHF's competition here
TCIIF vs PSSWF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, PSSWF has a market cap of 368.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while PSSWF trades at $23.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas PSSWF's P/E ratio is -475.85. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSSWF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to PSSWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check PSSWF's competition here
TCIIF vs LCHTF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, LCHTF has a market cap of 365.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while LCHTF trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas LCHTF's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LCHTF's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to LCHTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check LCHTF's competition here
TCIIF vs RTME Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, RTME has a market cap of 363.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while RTME trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas RTME's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RTME's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF and RTME have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTME's competition here
TCIIF vs ELMFF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, ELMFF has a market cap of 335.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while ELMFF trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas ELMFF's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ELMFF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF and ELMFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELMFF's competition here
TCIIF vs JAPPF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, JAPPF has a market cap of 317.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while JAPPF trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas JAPPF's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JAPPF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to JAPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check JAPPF's competition here
TCIIF vs DOTDF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, DOTDF has a market cap of 316.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while DOTDF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas DOTDF's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DOTDF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to DOTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check DOTDF's competition here
TCIIF vs PLDIF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, PLDIF has a market cap of 306.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while PLDIF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas PLDIF's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PLDIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to PLDIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check PLDIF's competition here
TCIIF vs RLLMF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, RLLMF has a market cap of 298.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while RLLMF trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas RLLMF's P/E ratio is 201.50. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RLLMF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF and RLLMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RLLMF's competition here
TCIIF vs IVUFF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, IVUFF has a market cap of 296M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while IVUFF trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas IVUFF's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IVUFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to IVUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check IVUFF's competition here
TCIIF vs CIGMF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, CIGMF has a market cap of 295.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while CIGMF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas CIGMF's P/E ratio is -155.00. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CIGMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF and CIGMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CIGMF's competition here
TCIIF vs ABXXF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, ABXXF has a market cap of 294M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while ABXXF trades at $8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas ABXXF's P/E ratio is -7.81. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ABXXF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to ABXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check ABXXF's competition here
TCIIF vs BAINF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, BAINF has a market cap of 276.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while BAINF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas BAINF's P/E ratio is 120.00. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BAINF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF and BAINF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BAINF's competition here
TCIIF vs EXMXF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, EXMXF has a market cap of 272.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while EXMXF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas EXMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EXMXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF and EXMXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EXMXF's competition here
TCIIF vs LOQPF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, LOQPF has a market cap of 267.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while LOQPF trades at $6.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas LOQPF's P/E ratio is 30.77. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LOQPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to LOQPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check LOQPF's competition here
TCIIF vs MCAP Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, MCAP has a market cap of 241.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while MCAP trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas MCAP's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MCAP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF and MCAP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MCAP's competition here
TCIIF vs SMTEF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, SMTEF has a market cap of 239.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while SMTEF trades at $6.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas SMTEF's P/E ratio is -9.82. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SMTEF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to SMTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check SMTEF's competition here
TCIIF vs DAHLF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, DAHLF has a market cap of 216.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while DAHLF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas DAHLF's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DAHLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF and DAHLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DAHLF's competition here
TCIIF vs FXSRF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, FXSRF has a market cap of 204.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while FXSRF trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas FXSRF's P/E ratio is 33.42. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FXSRF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF and FXSRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FXSRF's competition here
TCIIF vs FBSFF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, FBSFF has a market cap of 194M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while FBSFF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas FBSFF's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FBSFF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF and FBSFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FBSFF's competition here
TCIIF vs EXSPF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, EXSPF has a market cap of 180.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while EXSPF trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas EXSPF's P/E ratio is -11.56. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EXSPF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF and EXSPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EXSPF's competition here
TCIIF vs SYZLF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, SYZLF has a market cap of 167.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while SYZLF trades at $7.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas SYZLF's P/E ratio is -179.50. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SYZLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to SYZLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check SYZLF's competition here
TCIIF vs WONDF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, WONDF has a market cap of 167.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while WONDF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas WONDF's P/E ratio is -12.59. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WONDF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to WONDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check WONDF's competition here
TCIIF vs NEOJF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, NEOJF has a market cap of 161.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while NEOJF trades at $11.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas NEOJF's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NEOJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF and NEOJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NEOJF's competition here
TCIIF vs CBSZF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, CBSZF has a market cap of 152.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while CBSZF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas CBSZF's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CBSZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to CBSZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check CBSZF's competition here
TCIIF vs GBUX Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, GBUX has a market cap of 146.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while GBUX trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas GBUX's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GBUX's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to GBUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check GBUX's competition here
TCIIF vs IARGF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, IARGF has a market cap of 146.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while IARGF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas IARGF's P/E ratio is -11.43. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IARGF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF is less volatile compared to IARGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCIIF.Check IARGF's competition here
TCIIF vs DFORF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, DFORF has a market cap of 142.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while DFORF trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas DFORF's P/E ratio is 27.77. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DFORF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF and DFORF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DFORF's competition here
TCIIF vs WECMF Comparison July 2025
TCIIF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCIIF stands at 148.7M. In comparison, WECMF has a market cap of 137.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCIIF is priced at $5.00, while WECMF trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCIIF currently has a P/E ratio of 250.00, whereas WECMF's P/E ratio is -7.80. In terms of profitability, TCIIF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WECMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCIIF and WECMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WECMF's competition here