Turaco Gold Limited
Turaco Gold Limited (TCG.AX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TCG.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCG.AX | A$0.65 | -7.14% | 684.3M | -32.50 | -A$0.02 | N/A |
| NEM.AX | A$161.70 | +0.47% | 175.9B | 17.87 | A$9.05 | +0.94% |
| NST.AX | A$21.75 | -18.75% | 31.1B | 18.59 | A$1.17 | +2.53% |
| EVN.AX | A$13.51 | -3.22% | 27.4B | 20.47 | A$0.66 | +2.44% |
| NCM.AX | A$23.35 | -1.27% | 20.9B | 17.56 | A$1.33 | +10.00% |
| AGG.AX | A$6.51 | -3.27% | 13.9B | 50.08 | A$0.13 | +1.95% |
| DPM.AX | A$53.70 | -1.67% | 11.9B | 19.18 | A$2.80 | +0.22% |
| RMS.AX | A$4.07 | -3.33% | 7.8B | 16.28 | A$0.25 | +1.97% |
| GGP.AX | A$11.54 | -2.70% | 7.8B | 6.52 | A$1.77 | N/A |
| GMD.AX | A$6.26 | -6.01% | 7.2B | 17.89 | A$0.35 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TCG.AX vs NEM.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, NEM.AX has a market cap of 175.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while NEM.AX trades at A$161.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas NEM.AX's P/E ratio is 17.87. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NEM.AX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to NEM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check NEM.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs NST.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, NST.AX has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while NST.AX trades at A$21.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas NST.AX's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NST.AX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to NST.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check NST.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs EVN.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, EVN.AX has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while EVN.AX trades at A$13.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas EVN.AX's P/E ratio is 20.47. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to EVN.AX's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to EVN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check EVN.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs NCM.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, NCM.AX has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while NCM.AX trades at A$23.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas NCM.AX's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NCM.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to NCM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check NCM.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs AGG.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, AGG.AX has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while AGG.AX trades at A$6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas AGG.AX's P/E ratio is 50.08. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AGG.AX's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to AGG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check AGG.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs DPM.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, DPM.AX has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while DPM.AX trades at A$53.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas DPM.AX's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DPM.AX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to DPM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check DPM.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs RMS.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, RMS.AX has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while RMS.AX trades at A$4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas RMS.AX's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RMS.AX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to RMS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check RMS.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs GGP.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, GGP.AX has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while GGP.AX trades at A$11.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas GGP.AX's P/E ratio is 6.52. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GGP.AX's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to GGP.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check GGP.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs GMD.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, GMD.AX has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while GMD.AX trades at A$6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas GMD.AX's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GMD.AX's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to GMD.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check GMD.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs PRU.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, PRU.AX has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while PRU.AX trades at A$5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas PRU.AX's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PRU.AX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to PRU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check PRU.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs DEG.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, DEG.AX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while DEG.AX trades at A$2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas DEG.AX's P/E ratio is -246.00. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DEG.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to DEG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check DEG.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs WGX.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, WGX.AX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while WGX.AX trades at A$6.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas WGX.AX's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to WGX.AX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to WGX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check WGX.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs RRL.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, RRL.AX has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while RRL.AX trades at A$7.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas RRL.AX's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RRL.AX's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to RRL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check RRL.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs CMM.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, CMM.AX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while CMM.AX trades at A$11.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas CMM.AX's P/E ratio is 22.04. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CMM.AX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to CMM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check CMM.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs VAU.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, VAU.AX has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while VAU.AX trades at A$4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas VAU.AX's P/E ratio is 61.75. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to VAU.AX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to VAU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check VAU.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs EMR.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, EMR.AX has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while EMR.AX trades at A$5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas EMR.AX's P/E ratio is 38.73. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to EMR.AX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to EMR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check EMR.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs GOR.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, GOR.AX has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while GOR.AX trades at A$3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas GOR.AX's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GOR.AX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to GOR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check GOR.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs WAF.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, WAF.AX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while WAF.AX trades at A$2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas WAF.AX's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to WAF.AX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to WAF.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check WAF.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs SSR.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, SSR.AX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while SSR.AX trades at A$15.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas SSR.AX's P/E ratio is -7.30. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SSR.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to SSR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check SSR.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs RSG.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, RSG.AX has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while RSG.AX trades at A$1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas RSG.AX's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RSG.AX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to RSG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check RSG.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs SPR.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, SPR.AX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while SPR.AX trades at A$2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas SPR.AX's P/E ratio is -35.50. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SPR.AX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to SPR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check SPR.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs OBM.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, OBM.AX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while OBM.AX trades at A$1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas OBM.AX's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to OBM.AX's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to OBM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check OBM.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs BGL.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, BGL.AX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while BGL.AX trades at A$1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas BGL.AX's P/E ratio is -41.00. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BGL.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to BGL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check BGL.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs RED.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, RED.AX has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while RED.AX trades at A$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas RED.AX's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RED.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to RED.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check RED.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs PDI.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, PDI.AX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while PDI.AX trades at A$0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas PDI.AX's P/E ratio is -82.00. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PDI.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to PDI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check PDI.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs ALK.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, ALK.AX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while ALK.AX trades at A$1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas ALK.AX's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ALK.AX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to ALK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check ALK.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs CYL.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, CYL.AX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while CYL.AX trades at A$6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas CYL.AX's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CYL.AX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to CYL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check CYL.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs KCN.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, KCN.AX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while KCN.AX trades at A$6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas KCN.AX's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KCN.AX's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to KCN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check KCN.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs DTR.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, DTR.AX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while DTR.AX trades at A$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas DTR.AX's P/E ratio is -10.37. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DTR.AX's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to DTR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check DTR.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs SLR.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, SLR.AX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while SLR.AX trades at A$1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas SLR.AX's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SLR.AX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to SLR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check SLR.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs ORE.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, ORE.AX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while ORE.AX trades at A$2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas ORE.AX's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ORE.AX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to ORE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check ORE.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs PNR.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, PNR.AX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while PNR.AX trades at A$3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas PNR.AX's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PNR.AX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to PNR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check PNR.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs BC8.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, BC8.AX has a market cap of 859.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while BC8.AX trades at A$1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas BC8.AX's P/E ratio is 59.00. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BC8.AX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to BC8.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check BC8.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs SBM.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, SBM.AX has a market cap of 822.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while SBM.AX trades at A$0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas SBM.AX's P/E ratio is -11.33. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SBM.AX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to SBM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check SBM.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs FML.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, FML.AX has a market cap of 808.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while FML.AX trades at A$2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas FML.AX's P/E ratio is 18.80. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FML.AX's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to FML.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check FML.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs TIE.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, TIE.AX has a market cap of 776.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while TIE.AX trades at A$0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas TIE.AX's P/E ratio is -9.67. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TIE.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to TIE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check TIE.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs SXG.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, SXG.AX has a market cap of 764.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while SXG.AX trades at A$3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas SXG.AX's P/E ratio is -86.25. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SXG.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to SXG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check SXG.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs WIA.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, WIA.AX has a market cap of 745.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while WIA.AX trades at A$0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas WIA.AX's P/E ratio is -50.50. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to WIA.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to WIA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check WIA.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs MEK.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, MEK.AX has a market cap of 500.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while MEK.AX trades at A$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas MEK.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MEK.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to MEK.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check MEK.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs WC8.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, WC8.AX has a market cap of 495.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while WC8.AX trades at A$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas WC8.AX's P/E ratio is -36.50. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to WC8.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to WC8.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check WC8.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs AUC.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, AUC.AX has a market cap of 489.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while AUC.AX trades at A$1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas AUC.AX's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AUC.AX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to AUC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check AUC.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs BCN.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, BCN.AX has a market cap of 388.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while BCN.AX trades at A$3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas BCN.AX's P/E ratio is 43.63. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BCN.AX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to BCN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check BCN.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs RXL.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, RXL.AX has a market cap of 380.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while RXL.AX trades at A$0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas RXL.AX's P/E ratio is -16.83. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RXL.AX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to RXL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check RXL.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs DCN.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, DCN.AX has a market cap of 346.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while DCN.AX trades at A$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas DCN.AX's P/E ratio is -5.70. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DCN.AX's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to DCN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check DCN.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs WWI.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, WWI.AX has a market cap of 320.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while WWI.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas WWI.AX's P/E ratio is -7.40. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to WWI.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to WWI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check WWI.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs AAR.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, AAR.AX has a market cap of 314.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while AAR.AX trades at A$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas AAR.AX's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AAR.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to AAR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check AAR.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs TBR.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, TBR.AX has a market cap of 308.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while TBR.AX trades at A$5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas TBR.AX's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TBR.AX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to TBR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check TBR.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs TTM.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, TTM.AX has a market cap of 278.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while TTM.AX trades at A$0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas TTM.AX's P/E ratio is -19.40. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TTM.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to TTM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check TTM.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs GG8.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, GG8.AX has a market cap of 278.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while GG8.AX trades at A$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas GG8.AX's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GG8.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to GG8.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check GG8.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs ASL.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, ASL.AX has a market cap of 277.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while ASL.AX trades at A$1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas ASL.AX's P/E ratio is -16.42. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ASL.AX's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to ASL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check ASL.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs ORR.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, ORR.AX has a market cap of 267.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while ORR.AX trades at A$0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas ORR.AX's P/E ratio is -5.65. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ORR.AX's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to ORR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check ORR.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs TGM.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, TGM.AX has a market cap of 266.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while TGM.AX trades at A$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas TGM.AX's P/E ratio is -23.00. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TGM.AX's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to TGM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check TGM.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs HRN.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, HRN.AX has a market cap of 261M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while HRN.AX trades at A$1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas HRN.AX's P/E ratio is -153.00. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HRN.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to HRN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check HRN.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs ERM.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, ERM.AX has a market cap of 258.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while ERM.AX trades at A$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas ERM.AX's P/E ratio is -39.50. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ERM.AX's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to ERM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check ERM.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs TOR.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, TOR.AX has a market cap of 249.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while TOR.AX trades at A$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas TOR.AX's P/E ratio is -16.50. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TOR.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to TOR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check TOR.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs GCY.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, GCY.AX has a market cap of 245.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while GCY.AX trades at A$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas GCY.AX's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GCY.AX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to GCY.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check GCY.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs FFX.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, FFX.AX has a market cap of 236.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while FFX.AX trades at A$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas FFX.AX's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FFX.AX's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to FFX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check FFX.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs BTR.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, BTR.AX has a market cap of 230.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while BTR.AX trades at A$0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas BTR.AX's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BTR.AX's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to BTR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check BTR.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs MGV.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, MGV.AX has a market cap of 227.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while MGV.AX trades at A$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas MGV.AX's P/E ratio is -38.50. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MGV.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to MGV.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check MGV.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs HAV.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, HAV.AX has a market cap of 226.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while HAV.AX trades at A$0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas HAV.AX's P/E ratio is -64.00. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HAV.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to HAV.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check HAV.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs AS1.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, AS1.AX has a market cap of 224.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while AS1.AX trades at A$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas AS1.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AS1.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX and AS1.AX have similar daily volatility (7.41).Check AS1.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs BGD.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, BGD.AX has a market cap of 223.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while BGD.AX trades at A$0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas BGD.AX's P/E ratio is -93.50. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BGD.AX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to BGD.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check BGD.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs STN.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, STN.AX has a market cap of 216.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while STN.AX trades at A$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas STN.AX's P/E ratio is -47.00. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to STN.AX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to STN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check STN.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs POL.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, POL.AX has a market cap of 209.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while POL.AX trades at A$0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas POL.AX's P/E ratio is -2.68. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to POL.AX's ROE of -2.88%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to POL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check POL.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs HRZ.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, HRZ.AX has a market cap of 197M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while HRZ.AX trades at A$1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas HRZ.AX's P/E ratio is -4.55. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HRZ.AX's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to HRZ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check HRZ.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs KAU.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, KAU.AX has a market cap of 191.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while KAU.AX trades at A$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas KAU.AX's P/E ratio is -10.67. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KAU.AX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to KAU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check KAU.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs CY5.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, CY5.AX has a market cap of 170.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while CY5.AX trades at A$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas CY5.AX's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CY5.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to CY5.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check CY5.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs LLO.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, LLO.AX has a market cap of 162.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while LLO.AX trades at A$0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas LLO.AX's P/E ratio is -10.33. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LLO.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to LLO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check LLO.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs GPR.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, GPR.AX has a market cap of 160.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while GPR.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas GPR.AX's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GPR.AX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to GPR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check GPR.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs BRB.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, BRB.AX has a market cap of 158.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while BRB.AX trades at A$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas BRB.AX's P/E ratio is 3.65. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BRB.AX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to BRB.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check BRB.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs DLI.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, DLI.AX has a market cap of 154.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while DLI.AX trades at A$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas DLI.AX's P/E ratio is -21.50. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DLI.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to DLI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check DLI.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs VTM.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, VTM.AX has a market cap of 146.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while VTM.AX trades at A$1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas VTM.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to VTM.AX's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to VTM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check VTM.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs FXG.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, FXG.AX has a market cap of 142.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while FXG.AX trades at A$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas FXG.AX's P/E ratio is -29.00. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FXG.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to FXG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check FXG.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs GBM.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, GBM.AX has a market cap of 141.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while GBM.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas GBM.AX's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GBM.AX's ROE of +4.59%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to GBM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check GBM.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs SKY.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, SKY.AX has a market cap of 141M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while SKY.AX trades at A$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas SKY.AX's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SKY.AX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to SKY.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check SKY.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs TAM.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, TAM.AX has a market cap of 141M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while TAM.AX trades at A$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas TAM.AX's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TAM.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to TAM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check TAM.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs RND.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, RND.AX has a market cap of 139.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while RND.AX trades at A$2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas RND.AX's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RND.AX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to RND.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check RND.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs LSX.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, LSX.AX has a market cap of 138.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while LSX.AX trades at A$0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas LSX.AX's P/E ratio is 3.59. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LSX.AX's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to LSX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check LSX.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs GBZ.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, GBZ.AX has a market cap of 131M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while GBZ.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas GBZ.AX's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GBZ.AX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to GBZ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check GBZ.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs X64.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, X64.AX has a market cap of 129.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while X64.AX trades at A$0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas X64.AX's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to X64.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to X64.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check X64.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs LRL.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, LRL.AX has a market cap of 125.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while LRL.AX trades at A$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas LRL.AX's P/E ratio is -11.25. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LRL.AX's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to LRL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check LRL.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs TSO.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, TSO.AX has a market cap of 124M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while TSO.AX trades at A$0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas TSO.AX's P/E ratio is -91.50. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TSO.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to TSO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check TSO.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs GHM.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, GHM.AX has a market cap of 119.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while GHM.AX trades at A$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas GHM.AX's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GHM.AX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to GHM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check GHM.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs TUL.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, TUL.AX has a market cap of 116.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while TUL.AX trades at A$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas TUL.AX's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TUL.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to TUL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check TUL.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs MMC.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, MMC.AX has a market cap of 115.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while MMC.AX trades at A$0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas MMC.AX's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MMC.AX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to MMC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check MMC.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs AQI.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, AQI.AX has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while AQI.AX trades at A$1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas AQI.AX's P/E ratio is -19.31. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AQI.AX's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to AQI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check AQI.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs FAL.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, FAL.AX has a market cap of 108.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while FAL.AX trades at A$0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas FAL.AX's P/E ratio is -20.33. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FAL.AX's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to FAL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check FAL.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs PTN.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, PTN.AX has a market cap of 103.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while PTN.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas PTN.AX's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PTN.AX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to PTN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check PTN.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs KGD.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, KGD.AX has a market cap of 96M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while KGD.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas KGD.AX's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KGD.AX's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to KGD.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check KGD.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs KAI.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, KAI.AX has a market cap of 94.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while KAI.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas KAI.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KAI.AX's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to KAI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check KAI.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs CAI.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, CAI.AX has a market cap of 93.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while CAI.AX trades at A$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas CAI.AX's P/E ratio is -3.83. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CAI.AX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to CAI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check CAI.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs EM3.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, EM3.AX has a market cap of 82.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while EM3.AX trades at A$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas EM3.AX's P/E ratio is -28.00. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to EM3.AX's ROE of +2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to EM3.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check EM3.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs KSN.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, KSN.AX has a market cap of 81.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while KSN.AX trades at A$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas KSN.AX's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KSN.AX's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to KSN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check KSN.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs TRY.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, TRY.AX has a market cap of 78.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while TRY.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas TRY.AX's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TRY.AX's ROE of +4.97%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to TRY.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check TRY.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs IXR.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, IXR.AX has a market cap of 76.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while IXR.AX trades at A$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas IXR.AX's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IXR.AX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to IXR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check IXR.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs MDX.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, MDX.AX has a market cap of 73.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while MDX.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas MDX.AX's P/E ratio is 3.10. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MDX.AX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to MDX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check MDX.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs WMC.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, WMC.AX has a market cap of 72.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while WMC.AX trades at A$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas WMC.AX's P/E ratio is -6.83. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to WMC.AX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to WMC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check WMC.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs MAT.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, MAT.AX has a market cap of 71.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while MAT.AX trades at A$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas MAT.AX's P/E ratio is -9.30. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MAT.AX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to MAT.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check MAT.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs AME.AX Comparison March 2026
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 684.3M. In comparison, AME.AX has a market cap of 69.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.65, while AME.AX trades at A$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -32.50, whereas AME.AX's P/E ratio is -9.40. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AME.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to AME.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check AME.AX's competition here