Turaco Gold Limited
Turaco Gold Limited (TCG.AX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TCG.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCG.AX | A$0.50 | +0.00% | 551.5M | -26.25 | -A$0.02 | N/A |
| NEM.AX | A$106.25 | +0.00% | 116.3B | 12.51 | A$8.47 | +1.44% |
| NST.AX | A$17.58 | +0.00% | 25.4B | 21.68 | A$0.82 | +2.81% |
| NCM.AX | A$23.35 | -1.27% | 20.9B | 17.56 | A$1.33 | N/A |
| EVN.AX | A$7.69 | +0.00% | 16.3B | 22.83 | A$0.35 | +1.50% |
| AGG.AX | A$6.51 | -3.27% | 13.9B | 50.08 | A$0.13 | N/A |
| DEG.AX | A$2.46 | -8.21% | 5.9B | -246.00 | -A$0.01 | N/A |
| RMS.AX | A$2.76 | +0.00% | 5.4B | 9.33 | A$0.30 | +2.86% |
| PRU.AX | A$3.53 | +0.00% | 4.8B | 8.95 | A$0.40 | +1.75% |
| GMD.AX | A$4.05 | +0.00% | 4.7B | 38.00 | A$0.11 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TCG.AX vs NEM.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, NEM.AX has a market cap of 116.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while NEM.AX trades at A$106.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas NEM.AX's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NEM.AX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to NEM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check NEM.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs NST.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, NST.AX has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while NST.AX trades at A$17.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas NST.AX's P/E ratio is 21.68. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NST.AX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to NST.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check NST.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs NCM.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, NCM.AX has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while NCM.AX trades at A$23.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas NCM.AX's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NCM.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to NCM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check NCM.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs EVN.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, EVN.AX has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while EVN.AX trades at A$7.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas EVN.AX's P/E ratio is 22.83. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to EVN.AX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to EVN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check EVN.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs AGG.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, AGG.AX has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while AGG.AX trades at A$6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas AGG.AX's P/E ratio is 50.08. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AGG.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to AGG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check AGG.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs DEG.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, DEG.AX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while DEG.AX trades at A$2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas DEG.AX's P/E ratio is -246.00. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DEG.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to DEG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check DEG.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs RMS.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, RMS.AX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while RMS.AX trades at A$2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas RMS.AX's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RMS.AX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to RMS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check RMS.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs PRU.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, PRU.AX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while PRU.AX trades at A$3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas PRU.AX's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PRU.AX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to PRU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check PRU.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs GMD.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, GMD.AX has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while GMD.AX trades at A$4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas GMD.AX's P/E ratio is 38.00. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GMD.AX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to GMD.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check GMD.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs CMM.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, CMM.AX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while CMM.AX trades at A$9.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas CMM.AX's P/E ratio is 48.15. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CMM.AX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to CMM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check CMM.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs GOR.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, GOR.AX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while GOR.AX trades at A$3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas GOR.AX's P/E ratio is 25.31. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GOR.AX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to GOR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check GOR.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs RRL.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, RRL.AX has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while RRL.AX trades at A$4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas RRL.AX's P/E ratio is -435.00. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RRL.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to RRL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check RRL.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs SSR.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, SSR.AX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while SSR.AX trades at A$15.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas SSR.AX's P/E ratio is -7.30. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SSR.AX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to SSR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check SSR.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs WAF.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, WAF.AX has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while WAF.AX trades at A$2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas WAF.AX's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WAF.AX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to WAF.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check WAF.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs VAU.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, VAU.AX has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while VAU.AX trades at A$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas VAU.AX's P/E ratio is 42.50. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to VAU.AX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to VAU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check VAU.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs SPR.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, SPR.AX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while SPR.AX trades at A$2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas SPR.AX's P/E ratio is -35.50. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SPR.AX's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to SPR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check SPR.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs WGX.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, WGX.AX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while WGX.AX trades at A$2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas WGX.AX's P/E ratio is 37.13. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WGX.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to WGX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check WGX.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs EMR.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, EMR.AX has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while EMR.AX trades at A$3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas EMR.AX's P/E ratio is 23.53. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to EMR.AX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to EMR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check EMR.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs RED.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, RED.AX has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while RED.AX trades at A$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas RED.AX's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RED.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to RED.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check RED.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs PNR.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, PNR.AX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while PNR.AX trades at A$4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas PNR.AX's P/E ratio is -47.67. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PNR.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to PNR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check PNR.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs CYL.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, CYL.AX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while CYL.AX trades at A$6.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas CYL.AX's P/E ratio is 20.38. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CYL.AX's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to CYL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check CYL.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs SLR.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, SLR.AX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while SLR.AX trades at A$1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas SLR.AX's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SLR.AX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to SLR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check SLR.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs RSG.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, RSG.AX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while RSG.AX trades at A$0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas RSG.AX's P/E ratio is -34.50. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RSG.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to RSG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check RSG.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs OBM.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, OBM.AX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while OBM.AX trades at A$0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas OBM.AX's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to OBM.AX's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to OBM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check OBM.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs BGL.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, BGL.AX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while BGL.AX trades at A$0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas BGL.AX's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BGL.AX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to BGL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check BGL.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs PDI.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, PDI.AX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while PDI.AX trades at A$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas PDI.AX's P/E ratio is -47.50. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PDI.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to PDI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check PDI.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs ALK.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, ALK.AX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while ALK.AX trades at A$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas ALK.AX's P/E ratio is 27.33. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ALK.AX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to ALK.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check ALK.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs TIE.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, TIE.AX has a market cap of 776.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while TIE.AX trades at A$0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas TIE.AX's P/E ratio is -9.67. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TIE.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to TIE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check TIE.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs SXG.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, SXG.AX has a market cap of 764.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while SXG.AX trades at A$3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas SXG.AX's P/E ratio is -86.25. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SXG.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to SXG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check SXG.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs KCN.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, KCN.AX has a market cap of 726.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while KCN.AX trades at A$2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas KCN.AX's P/E ratio is 3.36. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to KCN.AX's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to KCN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check KCN.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs BC8.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, BC8.AX has a market cap of 622.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while BC8.AX trades at A$0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas BC8.AX's P/E ratio is -29.33. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BC8.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to BC8.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check BC8.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs DTR.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, DTR.AX has a market cap of 527.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while DTR.AX trades at A$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas DTR.AX's P/E ratio is -16.50. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DTR.AX's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to DTR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check DTR.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs WIA.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, WIA.AX has a market cap of 460.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while WIA.AX trades at A$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas WIA.AX's P/E ratio is -111.67. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WIA.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to WIA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check WIA.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs MEK.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, MEK.AX has a market cap of 437.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while MEK.AX trades at A$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas MEK.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MEK.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to MEK.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check MEK.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs SBM.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, SBM.AX has a market cap of 389.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while SBM.AX trades at A$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas SBM.AX's P/E ratio is -5.14. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SBM.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to SBM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check SBM.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs DCN.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, DCN.AX has a market cap of 346.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while DCN.AX trades at A$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas DCN.AX's P/E ratio is -5.70. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DCN.AX's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to DCN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check DCN.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs ORR.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, ORR.AX has a market cap of 267.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while ORR.AX trades at A$0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas ORR.AX's P/E ratio is -5.65. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ORR.AX's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to ORR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check ORR.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs AUC.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, AUC.AX has a market cap of 260.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while AUC.AX trades at A$0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas AUC.AX's P/E ratio is -1.66. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AUC.AX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to AUC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check AUC.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs TBR.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, TBR.AX has a market cap of 257.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while TBR.AX trades at A$4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas TBR.AX's P/E ratio is 20.42. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TBR.AX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to TBR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check TBR.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs WC8.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, WC8.AX has a market cap of 254M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while WC8.AX trades at A$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas WC8.AX's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WC8.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to WC8.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check WC8.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs GCY.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, GCY.AX has a market cap of 245.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while GCY.AX trades at A$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas GCY.AX's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GCY.AX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to GCY.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check GCY.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs AAR.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, AAR.AX has a market cap of 242.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while AAR.AX trades at A$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas AAR.AX's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AAR.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to AAR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check AAR.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs BTR.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, BTR.AX has a market cap of 237.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while BTR.AX trades at A$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas BTR.AX's P/E ratio is -3.73. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BTR.AX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to BTR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check BTR.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs FFX.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, FFX.AX has a market cap of 236.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while FFX.AX trades at A$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas FFX.AX's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to FFX.AX's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to FFX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check FFX.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs RXL.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, RXL.AX has a market cap of 227.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while RXL.AX trades at A$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas RXL.AX's P/E ratio is -7.62. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RXL.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to RXL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check RXL.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs MGV.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, MGV.AX has a market cap of 227.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while MGV.AX trades at A$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas MGV.AX's P/E ratio is -38.50. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MGV.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to MGV.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check MGV.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs VTM.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, VTM.AX has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while VTM.AX trades at A$1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas VTM.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to VTM.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to VTM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check VTM.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs POL.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, POL.AX has a market cap of 208.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while POL.AX trades at A$0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas POL.AX's P/E ratio is -15.60. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to POL.AX's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to POL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check POL.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs STN.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, STN.AX has a market cap of 207M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while STN.AX trades at A$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas STN.AX's P/E ratio is -45.00. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to STN.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to STN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check STN.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs BGD.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, BGD.AX has a market cap of 183.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while BGD.AX trades at A$0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas BGD.AX's P/E ratio is -16.30. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BGD.AX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to BGD.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check BGD.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs BCN.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, BCN.AX has a market cap of 180.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while BCN.AX trades at A$1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas BCN.AX's P/E ratio is -17.10. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BCN.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to BCN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check BCN.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs TGM.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, TGM.AX has a market cap of 163.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while TGM.AX trades at A$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas TGM.AX's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TGM.AX's ROE of -2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to TGM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check TGM.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs LLO.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, LLO.AX has a market cap of 162.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while LLO.AX trades at A$0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas LLO.AX's P/E ratio is -10.33. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to LLO.AX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to LLO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check LLO.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs BRB.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, BRB.AX has a market cap of 158.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while BRB.AX trades at A$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas BRB.AX's P/E ratio is 3.65. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BRB.AX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to BRB.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check BRB.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs TOR.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, TOR.AX has a market cap of 147.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while TOR.AX trades at A$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas TOR.AX's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TOR.AX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to TOR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check TOR.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs HRZ.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, HRZ.AX has a market cap of 138.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while HRZ.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas HRZ.AX's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to HRZ.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to HRZ.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check HRZ.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs MDX.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, MDX.AX has a market cap of 136.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while MDX.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas MDX.AX's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MDX.AX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to MDX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check MDX.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs X64.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, X64.AX has a market cap of 129.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while X64.AX trades at A$0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas X64.AX's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to X64.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to X64.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check X64.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs LRL.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, LRL.AX has a market cap of 125.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while LRL.AX trades at A$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas LRL.AX's P/E ratio is -11.25. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to LRL.AX's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to LRL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check LRL.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs GBZ.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, GBZ.AX has a market cap of 123.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while GBZ.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas GBZ.AX's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GBZ.AX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to GBZ.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check GBZ.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs DLI.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, DLI.AX has a market cap of 121.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while DLI.AX trades at A$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas DLI.AX's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DLI.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to DLI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check DLI.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs ERM.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, ERM.AX has a market cap of 118.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while ERM.AX trades at A$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas ERM.AX's P/E ratio is -18.70. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ERM.AX's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to ERM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check ERM.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs LSX.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, LSX.AX has a market cap of 117.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while LSX.AX trades at A$0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas LSX.AX's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to LSX.AX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to LSX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check LSX.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs TUL.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, TUL.AX has a market cap of 116.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while TUL.AX trades at A$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas TUL.AX's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TUL.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to TUL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check TUL.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs MMC.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, MMC.AX has a market cap of 115.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while MMC.AX trades at A$0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas MMC.AX's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MMC.AX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to MMC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check MMC.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs KSN.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, KSN.AX has a market cap of 113.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while KSN.AX trades at A$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas KSN.AX's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to KSN.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to KSN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check KSN.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs FAL.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, FAL.AX has a market cap of 111.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while FAL.AX trades at A$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas FAL.AX's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to FAL.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to FAL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check FAL.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs FML.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, FML.AX has a market cap of 106M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while FML.AX trades at A$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas FML.AX's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to FML.AX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to FML.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check FML.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs TTM.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, TTM.AX has a market cap of 105.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while TTM.AX trades at A$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas TTM.AX's P/E ratio is -8.10. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TTM.AX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to TTM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check TTM.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs KAU.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, KAU.AX has a market cap of 103.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while KAU.AX trades at A$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas KAU.AX's P/E ratio is -4.37. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to KAU.AX's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to KAU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check KAU.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs RND.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, RND.AX has a market cap of 97.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while RND.AX trades at A$1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas RND.AX's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RND.AX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to RND.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check RND.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs GPR.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, GPR.AX has a market cap of 95.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while GPR.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas GPR.AX's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GPR.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to GPR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check GPR.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs GHM.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, GHM.AX has a market cap of 93.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while GHM.AX trades at A$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas GHM.AX's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GHM.AX's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to GHM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check GHM.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs CAI.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, CAI.AX has a market cap of 93.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while CAI.AX trades at A$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas CAI.AX's P/E ratio is -3.83. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CAI.AX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to CAI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check CAI.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs CY5.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, CY5.AX has a market cap of 92.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while CY5.AX trades at A$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas CY5.AX's P/E ratio is -8.70. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CY5.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to CY5.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check CY5.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs IXR.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, IXR.AX has a market cap of 90.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while IXR.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas IXR.AX's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to IXR.AX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to IXR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check IXR.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs WWI.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, WWI.AX has a market cap of 89.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while WWI.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas WWI.AX's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WWI.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to WWI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check WWI.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs TRY.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, TRY.AX has a market cap of 78.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while TRY.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas TRY.AX's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TRY.AX's ROE of +4.97%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to TRY.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check TRY.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs FXG.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, FXG.AX has a market cap of 76.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while FXG.AX trades at A$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas FXG.AX's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to FXG.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to FXG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check FXG.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs HRN.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, HRN.AX has a market cap of 76M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while HRN.AX trades at A$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas HRN.AX's P/E ratio is -47.70. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to HRN.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to HRN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check HRN.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs WMC.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, WMC.AX has a market cap of 72.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while WMC.AX trades at A$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas WMC.AX's P/E ratio is -6.83. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WMC.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to WMC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check WMC.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs KAI.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, KAI.AX has a market cap of 69.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while KAI.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas KAI.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to KAI.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to KAI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check KAI.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs AME.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, AME.AX has a market cap of 69.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while AME.AX trades at A$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas AME.AX's P/E ratio is -9.40. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AME.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to AME.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check AME.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs TSO.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, TSO.AX has a market cap of 68.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while TSO.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas TSO.AX's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TSO.AX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to TSO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check TSO.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs KIN.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, KIN.AX has a market cap of 67.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while KIN.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas KIN.AX's P/E ratio is -5.70. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to KIN.AX's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to KIN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check KIN.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs CHZ.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, CHZ.AX has a market cap of 65.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while CHZ.AX trades at A$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas CHZ.AX's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CHZ.AX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to CHZ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check CHZ.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs TAM.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, TAM.AX has a market cap of 65.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while TAM.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas TAM.AX's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TAM.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to TAM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check TAM.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs HAV.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, HAV.AX has a market cap of 62.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while HAV.AX trades at A$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas HAV.AX's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to HAV.AX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to HAV.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check HAV.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs SKY.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, SKY.AX has a market cap of 60.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while SKY.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas SKY.AX's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SKY.AX's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to SKY.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check SKY.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs VAN.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, VAN.AX has a market cap of 59.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while VAN.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas VAN.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to VAN.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to VAN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check VAN.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs WCN.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, WCN.AX has a market cap of 58.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while WCN.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas WCN.AX's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WCN.AX's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to WCN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check WCN.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs MAT.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, MAT.AX has a market cap of 55.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while MAT.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas MAT.AX's P/E ratio is -7.40. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MAT.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to MAT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check MAT.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs VTX.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, VTX.AX has a market cap of 51M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while VTX.AX trades at A$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas VTX.AX's P/E ratio is -11.25. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to VTX.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to VTX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check VTX.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs YRL.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, YRL.AX has a market cap of 47.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while YRL.AX trades at A$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas YRL.AX's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to YRL.AX's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to YRL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check YRL.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs AUN.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, AUN.AX has a market cap of 46M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while AUN.AX trades at A$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas AUN.AX's P/E ratio is -9.20. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AUN.AX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to AUN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check AUN.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs AGC.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, AGC.AX has a market cap of 44.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while AGC.AX trades at A$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas AGC.AX's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AGC.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to AGC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check AGC.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs TRE.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, TRE.AX has a market cap of 44.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while TRE.AX trades at A$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas TRE.AX's P/E ratio is -6.70. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TRE.AX's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to TRE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check TRE.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs KNB.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, KNB.AX has a market cap of 42.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while KNB.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas KNB.AX's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to KNB.AX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is less volatile compared to KNB.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check KNB.AX's competition here
TCG.AX vs SIH.AX Comparison August 2025
TCG.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCG.AX stands at 551.5M. In comparison, SIH.AX has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCG.AX is priced at A$0.50, while SIH.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCG.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -26.25, whereas SIH.AX's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, TCG.AX's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SIH.AX's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TCG.AX is more volatile compared to SIH.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCG.AX.Check SIH.AX's competition here