TCC Concept Ltd.
TCC Concept Ltd. (TCC.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TCC.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Distribution Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCC.BO | ₹454.00 | +0.00% | 15.5B | 38.02 | ₹11.40 | N/A |
| AEGISLOG.BO | ₹681.35 | +0.00% | 243.4B | 31.61 | ₹21.94 | +1.15% |
| LLOYDSENT.BO | ₹55.14 | +0.00% | 70.1B | 24.16 | ₹2.28 | +0.36% |
| SGMART.NS | ₹444.00 | -0.44% | 55.6B | 52.31 | ₹8.43 | N/A |
| EFCIL.BO | ₹263.05 | +0.00% | 26.2B | 16.49 | ₹15.97 | N/A |
| VINCOFE.BO | ₹143.95 | +0.00% | 20.8B | 30.56 | ₹4.71 | +0.07% |
| KHAZANCHI.BO | ₹772.35 | +0.00% | 19.1B | 30.51 | ₹25.33 | +0.06% |
| CROPSTER.BO | ₹14.39 | +0.00% | 11.6B | 4.35 | ₹3.16 | N/A |
| YSL.BO | ₹28,100.00 | +0.00% | 8.6B | 7.89 | ₹3,563.08 | +1.78% |
| MERCURYEV.BO | ₹37.31 | +0.00% | 6.7B | 82.05 | ₹0.43 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TCC.BO vs AEGISLOG.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, AEGISLOG.BO has a market cap of 243.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while AEGISLOG.BO trades at ₹681.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas AEGISLOG.BO's P/E ratio is 31.61. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AEGISLOG.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to AEGISLOG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check AEGISLOG.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs LLOYDSENT.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, LLOYDSENT.BO has a market cap of 70.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while LLOYDSENT.BO trades at ₹55.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas LLOYDSENT.BO's P/E ratio is 24.16. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LLOYDSENT.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to LLOYDSENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check LLOYDSENT.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs SGMART.NS Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, SGMART.NS has a market cap of 55.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while SGMART.NS trades at ₹444.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas SGMART.NS's P/E ratio is 52.31. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SGMART.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to SGMART.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check SGMART.NS's competition here
TCC.BO vs EFCIL.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, EFCIL.BO has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while EFCIL.BO trades at ₹263.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas EFCIL.BO's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EFCIL.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to EFCIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check EFCIL.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs VINCOFE.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, VINCOFE.BO has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while VINCOFE.BO trades at ₹143.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas VINCOFE.BO's P/E ratio is 30.56. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VINCOFE.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to VINCOFE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check VINCOFE.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs KHAZANCHI.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, KHAZANCHI.BO has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while KHAZANCHI.BO trades at ₹772.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas KHAZANCHI.BO's P/E ratio is 30.51. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KHAZANCHI.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to KHAZANCHI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check KHAZANCHI.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs CROPSTER.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, CROPSTER.BO has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while CROPSTER.BO trades at ₹14.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas CROPSTER.BO's P/E ratio is 4.35. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CROPSTER.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to CROPSTER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check CROPSTER.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs YSL.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, YSL.BO has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while YSL.BO trades at ₹28,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas YSL.BO's P/E ratio is 7.89. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YSL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to YSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check YSL.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs MERCURYEV.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, MERCURYEV.BO has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while MERCURYEV.BO trades at ₹37.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas MERCURYEV.BO's P/E ratio is 82.05. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MERCURYEV.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to MERCURYEV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check MERCURYEV.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs VERITAS.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, VERITAS.BO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while VERITAS.BO trades at ₹172.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas VERITAS.BO's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VERITAS.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to VERITAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check VERITAS.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs BLACKROSE.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, BLACKROSE.BO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while BLACKROSE.BO trades at ₹85.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas BLACKROSE.BO's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BLACKROSE.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to BLACKROSE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check BLACKROSE.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs EUROASIA.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, EUROASIA.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while EUROASIA.BO trades at ₹306.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas EUROASIA.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EUROASIA.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to EUROASIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check EUROASIA.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs SWISSMLTRY.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, SWISSMLTRY.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while SWISSMLTRY.BO trades at ₹16.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas SWISSMLTRY.BO's P/E ratio is 47.00. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SWISSMLTRY.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to SWISSMLTRY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check SWISSMLTRY.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs AERPACE.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, AERPACE.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while AERPACE.BO trades at ₹25.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas AERPACE.BO's P/E ratio is -38.39. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AERPACE.BO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to AERPACE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check AERPACE.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs SRD.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, SRD.BO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while SRD.BO trades at ₹54.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas SRD.BO's P/E ratio is -8.78. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SRD.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to SRD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check SRD.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs MARBLE.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, MARBLE.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while MARBLE.BO trades at ₹109.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas MARBLE.BO's P/E ratio is 27.20. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MARBLE.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to MARBLE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check MARBLE.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs WARDWIZFBL.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, WARDWIZFBL.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while WARDWIZFBL.BO trades at ₹8.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas WARDWIZFBL.BO's P/E ratio is -54.75. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WARDWIZFBL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to WARDWIZFBL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check WARDWIZFBL.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs SICAGEN.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, SICAGEN.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while SICAGEN.BO trades at ₹54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas SICAGEN.BO's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SICAGEN.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to SICAGEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check SICAGEN.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs ABANSENT.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, ABANSENT.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while ABANSENT.BO trades at ₹24.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas ABANSENT.BO's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABANSENT.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to ABANSENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check ABANSENT.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs PARSHVA.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, PARSHVA.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while PARSHVA.BO trades at ₹163.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas PARSHVA.BO's P/E ratio is 905.56. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PARSHVA.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to PARSHVA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check PARSHVA.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs SAMOR.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, SAMOR.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while SAMOR.BO trades at ₹73.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas SAMOR.BO's P/E ratio is -183.70. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SAMOR.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to SAMOR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check SAMOR.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs SEML.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, SEML.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while SEML.BO trades at ₹108.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas SEML.BO's P/E ratio is 18.01. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SEML.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to SEML.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check SEML.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs METROGLOBL.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, METROGLOBL.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while METROGLOBL.BO trades at ₹114.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas METROGLOBL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to METROGLOBL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to METROGLOBL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check METROGLOBL.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs DHOOTIN.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, DHOOTIN.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while DHOOTIN.BO trades at ₹206.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas DHOOTIN.BO's P/E ratio is -14.56. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DHOOTIN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to DHOOTIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check DHOOTIN.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs CHANDRIMA.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, CHANDRIMA.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while CHANDRIMA.BO trades at ₹6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas CHANDRIMA.BO's P/E ratio is -7.23. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHANDRIMA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to CHANDRIMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check CHANDRIMA.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs MAXIMUS.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, MAXIMUS.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while MAXIMUS.BO trades at ₹9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas MAXIMUS.BO's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MAXIMUS.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to MAXIMUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check MAXIMUS.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs ISHANCH.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, ISHANCH.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while ISHANCH.BO trades at ₹60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas ISHANCH.BO's P/E ratio is -30.64. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ISHANCH.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to ISHANCH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check ISHANCH.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs PURVFLEXI.NS Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, PURVFLEXI.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while PURVFLEXI.NS trades at ₹60.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas PURVFLEXI.NS's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PURVFLEXI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to PURVFLEXI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check PURVFLEXI.NS's competition here
TCC.BO vs BNL.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, BNL.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while BNL.BO trades at ₹118.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas BNL.BO's P/E ratio is 30.44. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BNL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to BNL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check BNL.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs SANINFRA.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, SANINFRA.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while SANINFRA.BO trades at ₹7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas SANINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 68.10. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SANINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to SANINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check SANINFRA.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs OPTIFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, OPTIFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while OPTIFIN.BO trades at ₹14.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas OPTIFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 17.54. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OPTIFIN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to OPTIFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check OPTIFIN.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs MENAMANI.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, MENAMANI.BO has a market cap of 943.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while MENAMANI.BO trades at ₹8.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas MENAMANI.BO's P/E ratio is -470.00. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MENAMANI.BO's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to MENAMANI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check MENAMANI.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs MRCAGRO.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, MRCAGRO.BO has a market cap of 899.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while MRCAGRO.BO trades at ₹42.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas MRCAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 93.45. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MRCAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to MRCAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check MRCAGRO.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs GEL.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, GEL.BO has a market cap of 887.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while GEL.BO trades at ₹284.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas GEL.BO's P/E ratio is 993.10. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GEL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to GEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check GEL.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs INDXTRA.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, INDXTRA.BO has a market cap of 886.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while INDXTRA.BO trades at ₹6.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas INDXTRA.BO's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INDXTRA.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to INDXTRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check INDXTRA.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs KTIL.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, KTIL.BO has a market cap of 783.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while KTIL.BO trades at ₹77.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas KTIL.BO's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KTIL.BO's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to KTIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check KTIL.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs RAFL.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, RAFL.BO has a market cap of 774.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while RAFL.BO trades at ₹65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas RAFL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RAFL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to RAFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check RAFL.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs HRYNSHP.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, HRYNSHP.BO has a market cap of 704.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while HRYNSHP.BO trades at ₹114.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas HRYNSHP.BO's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HRYNSHP.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to HRYNSHP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check HRYNSHP.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs MYSORPETRO.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, MYSORPETRO.BO has a market cap of 651.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while MYSORPETRO.BO trades at ₹98.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas MYSORPETRO.BO's P/E ratio is -18.60. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MYSORPETRO.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to MYSORPETRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check MYSORPETRO.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs CONSTRONIC.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, CONSTRONIC.BO has a market cap of 639.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while CONSTRONIC.BO trades at ₹51.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas CONSTRONIC.BO's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to CONSTRONIC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check CONSTRONIC.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs MISHKA.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, MISHKA.BO has a market cap of 589.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while MISHKA.BO trades at ₹40.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas MISHKA.BO's P/E ratio is 42.06. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MISHKA.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to MISHKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check MISHKA.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs IFL.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, IFL.BO has a market cap of 585.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while IFL.BO trades at ₹0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas IFL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.70. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IFL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to IFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check IFL.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs RONI.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, RONI.BO has a market cap of 563.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while RONI.BO trades at ₹47.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas RONI.BO's P/E ratio is 72.06. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RONI.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to RONI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check RONI.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs NVENTURES.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, NVENTURES.BO has a market cap of 518.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while NVENTURES.BO trades at ₹111.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas NVENTURES.BO's P/E ratio is 213.56. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NVENTURES.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to NVENTURES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check NVENTURES.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs PALCO.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, PALCO.BO has a market cap of 465.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while PALCO.BO trades at ₹119.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas PALCO.BO's P/E ratio is -28.94. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PALCO.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to PALCO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check PALCO.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs SSTL.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, SSTL.BO has a market cap of 450.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while SSTL.BO trades at ₹17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas SSTL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SSTL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to SSTL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check SSTL.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs TAVERNIER.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, TAVERNIER.BO has a market cap of 415.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while TAVERNIER.BO trades at ₹69.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas TAVERNIER.BO's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TAVERNIER.BO's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to TAVERNIER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check TAVERNIER.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs VEL.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, VEL.BO has a market cap of 358.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while VEL.BO trades at ₹43.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas VEL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.63. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VEL.BO's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to VEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check VEL.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs AAPLUSTRAD.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, AAPLUSTRAD.BO has a market cap of 347.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while AAPLUSTRAD.BO trades at ₹1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas AAPLUSTRAD.BO's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AAPLUSTRAD.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to AAPLUSTRAD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check AAPLUSTRAD.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs ACEMEN.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, ACEMEN.BO has a market cap of 325.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while ACEMEN.BO trades at ₹104.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas ACEMEN.BO's P/E ratio is 5125.00. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ACEMEN.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to ACEMEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check ACEMEN.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs CCAL.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, CCAL.BO has a market cap of 307.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while CCAL.BO trades at ₹18.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas CCAL.BO's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CCAL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to CCAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check CCAL.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs YASHINNO.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, YASHINNO.BO has a market cap of 277.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while YASHINNO.BO trades at ₹41.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas YASHINNO.BO's P/E ratio is 4120.00. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YASHINNO.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to YASHINNO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check YASHINNO.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs SANBLUE.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, SANBLUE.BO has a market cap of 221.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while SANBLUE.BO trades at ₹44.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas SANBLUE.BO's P/E ratio is 85.27. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SANBLUE.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to SANBLUE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check SANBLUE.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs OPCHAINS.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, OPCHAINS.BO has a market cap of 212.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while OPCHAINS.BO trades at ₹31.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas OPCHAINS.BO's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OPCHAINS.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to OPCHAINS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check OPCHAINS.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs TTIL.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, TTIL.BO has a market cap of 208M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while TTIL.BO trades at ₹8.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas TTIL.BO's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TTIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to TTIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check TTIL.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs SRUSTEELS.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, SRUSTEELS.BO has a market cap of 203.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while SRUSTEELS.BO trades at ₹3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas SRUSTEELS.BO's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SRUSTEELS.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to SRUSTEELS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check SRUSTEELS.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs PRADHIN.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, PRADHIN.BO has a market cap of 203M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while PRADHIN.BO trades at ₹0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas PRADHIN.BO's P/E ratio is 0.45. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PRADHIN.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to PRADHIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check PRADHIN.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs RAWEDGE.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, RAWEDGE.BO has a market cap of 191.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while RAWEDGE.BO trades at ₹20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas RAWEDGE.BO's P/E ratio is -13.07. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RAWEDGE.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to RAWEDGE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check RAWEDGE.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs NIVAKA.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, NIVAKA.BO has a market cap of 186.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while NIVAKA.BO trades at ₹1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas NIVAKA.BO's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NIVAKA.BO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to NIVAKA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check NIVAKA.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs NEERAJ.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, NEERAJ.BO has a market cap of 186.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while NEERAJ.BO trades at ₹16.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas NEERAJ.BO's P/E ratio is 154.18. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NEERAJ.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to NEERAJ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check NEERAJ.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs TAIIND.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, TAIIND.BO has a market cap of 184.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while TAIIND.BO trades at ₹29.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas TAIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 28.21. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TAIIND.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to TAIIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check TAIIND.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs PANTH.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, PANTH.BO has a market cap of 182.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while PANTH.BO trades at ₹7.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas PANTH.BO's P/E ratio is 1.61. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PANTH.BO's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to PANTH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check PANTH.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs RAMAPETRO.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, RAMAPETRO.BO has a market cap of 153.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while RAMAPETRO.BO trades at ₹14.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas RAMAPETRO.BO's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RAMAPETRO.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to RAMAPETRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check RAMAPETRO.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs FRONTCORP.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, FRONTCORP.BO has a market cap of 151.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while FRONTCORP.BO trades at ₹29.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas FRONTCORP.BO's P/E ratio is -18.51. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FRONTCORP.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to FRONTCORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check FRONTCORP.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs GANONPRO.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, GANONPRO.BO has a market cap of 139.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while GANONPRO.BO trades at ₹14.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas GANONPRO.BO's P/E ratio is 57.54. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GANONPRO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to GANONPRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check GANONPRO.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs REETECH.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, REETECH.BO has a market cap of 139.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while REETECH.BO trades at ₹33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas REETECH.BO's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to REETECH.BO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to REETECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check REETECH.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs ALCHCORP.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, ALCHCORP.BO has a market cap of 135.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while ALCHCORP.BO trades at ₹27.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas ALCHCORP.BO's P/E ratio is -12.61. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALCHCORP.BO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to ALCHCORP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check ALCHCORP.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs MULLER.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, MULLER.BO has a market cap of 135.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while MULLER.BO trades at ₹217.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas MULLER.BO's P/E ratio is 172.22. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MULLER.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to MULLER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check MULLER.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs SAENTER.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, SAENTER.BO has a market cap of 132.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while SAENTER.BO trades at ₹33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas SAENTER.BO's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SAENTER.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to SAENTER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check SAENTER.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs COMPUPN.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, COMPUPN.BO has a market cap of 128.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while COMPUPN.BO trades at ₹4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas COMPUPN.BO's P/E ratio is -71.17. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to COMPUPN.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to COMPUPN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check COMPUPN.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs SIBARAUT.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, SIBARAUT.BO has a market cap of 121.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while SIBARAUT.BO trades at ₹7.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas SIBARAUT.BO's P/E ratio is -23.03. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SIBARAUT.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to SIBARAUT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check SIBARAUT.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs PMTELELIN.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, PMTELELIN.BO has a market cap of 117.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while PMTELELIN.BO trades at ₹11.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas PMTELELIN.BO's P/E ratio is -193.67. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PMTELELIN.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to PMTELELIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check PMTELELIN.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs PANKAJPIYUS.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, PANKAJPIYUS.BO has a market cap of 113.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while PANKAJPIYUS.BO trades at ₹284.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas PANKAJPIYUS.BO's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PANKAJPIYUS.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to PANKAJPIYUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check PANKAJPIYUS.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs KONNDOR.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, KONNDOR.BO has a market cap of 104.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while KONNDOR.BO trades at ₹19.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas KONNDOR.BO's P/E ratio is -316.67. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KONNDOR.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to KONNDOR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check KONNDOR.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs 7NR.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, 7NR.BO has a market cap of 102.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while 7NR.BO trades at ₹3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas 7NR.BO's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7NR.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to 7NR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check 7NR.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs AIHL.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, AIHL.BO has a market cap of 100.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while AIHL.BO trades at ₹47.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas AIHL.BO's P/E ratio is 191.96. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AIHL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to AIHL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check AIHL.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs ELEFLOR.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, ELEFLOR.BO has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while ELEFLOR.BO trades at ₹4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas ELEFLOR.BO's P/E ratio is 3.21. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ELEFLOR.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to ELEFLOR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check ELEFLOR.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs DEVINE.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, DEVINE.BO has a market cap of 90.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while DEVINE.BO trades at ₹9.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas DEVINE.BO's P/E ratio is 315.67. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DEVINE.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to DEVINE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check DEVINE.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs FRASER.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, FRASER.BO has a market cap of 81M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while FRASER.BO trades at ₹9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas FRASER.BO's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FRASER.BO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to FRASER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check FRASER.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs PARKERAC.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, PARKERAC.BO has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while PARKERAC.BO trades at ₹16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas PARKERAC.BO's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PARKERAC.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to PARKERAC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check PARKERAC.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs AMANAYA.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, AMANAYA.BO has a market cap of 75.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while AMANAYA.BO trades at ₹20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas AMANAYA.BO's P/E ratio is 38.85. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMANAYA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to AMANAYA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check AMANAYA.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs ROJL.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, ROJL.BO has a market cap of 73.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while ROJL.BO trades at ₹1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas ROJL.BO's P/E ratio is -36.50. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ROJL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to ROJL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check ROJL.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs FLORACORP.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, FLORACORP.BO has a market cap of 71.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while FLORACORP.BO trades at ₹8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas FLORACORP.BO's P/E ratio is -45.56. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FLORACORP.BO's ROE of -5.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to FLORACORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check FLORACORP.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs ENTRINT.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, ENTRINT.BO has a market cap of 66M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while ENTRINT.BO trades at ₹22.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas ENTRINT.BO's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ENTRINT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to ENTRINT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check ENTRINT.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs AMITINT.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, AMITINT.BO has a market cap of 65.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while AMITINT.BO trades at ₹3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas AMITINT.BO's P/E ratio is 38.33. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMITINT.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to AMITINT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check AMITINT.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs TRIVENIENT.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, TRIVENIENT.BO has a market cap of 64.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while TRIVENIENT.BO trades at ₹1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas TRIVENIENT.BO's P/E ratio is 56.50. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TRIVENIENT.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to TRIVENIENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check TRIVENIENT.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs SAICOM.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, SAICOM.BO has a market cap of 63.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while SAICOM.BO trades at ₹0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas SAICOM.BO's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SAICOM.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to SAICOM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check SAICOM.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs NAKSH.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, NAKSH.BO has a market cap of 61M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while NAKSH.BO trades at ₹5.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas NAKSH.BO's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NAKSH.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to NAKSH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check NAKSH.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs WWALUM.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, WWALUM.BO has a market cap of 59.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while WWALUM.BO trades at ₹18.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas WWALUM.BO's P/E ratio is 95.05. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WWALUM.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to WWALUM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check WWALUM.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs PADMAIND.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, PADMAIND.BO has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while PADMAIND.BO trades at ₹9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas PADMAIND.BO's P/E ratio is 74.38. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PADMAIND.BO's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to PADMAIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check PADMAIND.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs UTLINDS.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, UTLINDS.BO has a market cap of 58.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while UTLINDS.BO trades at ₹1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas UTLINDS.BO's P/E ratio is 88.50. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UTLINDS.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to UTLINDS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check UTLINDS.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs PATRON.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, PATRON.BO has a market cap of 54.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while PATRON.BO trades at ₹2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas PATRON.BO's P/E ratio is 59.25. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PATRON.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to PATRON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check PATRON.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs ASHAI.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, ASHAI.BO has a market cap of 54.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while ASHAI.BO trades at ₹12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas ASHAI.BO's P/E ratio is 70.00. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASHAI.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to ASHAI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check ASHAI.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs DITCO.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, DITCO.BO has a market cap of 53.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while DITCO.BO trades at ₹15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas DITCO.BO's P/E ratio is 38.78. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DITCO.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to DITCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check DITCO.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs VOLLF.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, VOLLF.BO has a market cap of 47.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while VOLLF.BO trades at ₹11.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas VOLLF.BO's P/E ratio is -12.13. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VOLLF.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to VOLLF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check VOLLF.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs SIMPLXPAP.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, SIMPLXPAP.BO has a market cap of 44.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while SIMPLXPAP.BO trades at ₹1,495.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas SIMPLXPAP.BO's P/E ratio is -34.02. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SIMPLXPAP.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to SIMPLXPAP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check SIMPLXPAP.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs WOMENNET.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, WOMENNET.BO has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while WOMENNET.BO trades at ₹7.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas WOMENNET.BO's P/E ratio is 63.33. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WOMENNET.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to WOMENNET.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check WOMENNET.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs TSPIRITUAL.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, TSPIRITUAL.BO has a market cap of 32.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while TSPIRITUAL.BO trades at ₹1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas TSPIRITUAL.BO's P/E ratio is -18.11. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TSPIRITUAL.BO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is less volatile compared to TSPIRITUAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check TSPIRITUAL.BO's competition here
TCC.BO vs TINEAGRO.BO Comparison February 2026
TCC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCC.BO stands at 15.5B. In comparison, TINEAGRO.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TCC.BO is priced at ₹454.00, while TINEAGRO.BO trades at ₹32.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas TINEAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCC.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TINEAGRO.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCC.BO is more volatile compared to TINEAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCC.BO.Check TINEAGRO.BO's competition here